User talk:Wouterhagens/Archives/2009/

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Welcome to the Commons, Wouterhagens/Archives/2009/!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Contents

Bedankt

Hoi Wouter. Ik zie net op je gebruikerspagina dat je al 500 afbeeldingen hebt toegevoegd en slechts 1 bewerking is gemaakt op je overlegpagina: een welkom. Je verdient een groot compliment.

Ik hoop dat je het hier een beetje naar je zin hebt en dat we nog veel geogecodeerde afbeeldingen van je mogen hosten. Dank en groet, Siebrand 11:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hydrangea sargentiana A.jpg

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Image:Hydrangea sargentiana B.jpg Image:Hydrangea sargentiana C.jpg

Hi, these images have wrong ID. This is Viburnum plicatum. H. sargentiana (now H. aspera subsp. sargentiana) is very different. Please change their names. epibase 16:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. The plant has been sold to us 14 years ago as Hydrangea sargentiana. Indeed it may be not that, but I think it is a hydrangea and certainly not Viburnum plicatum. See for example the images in the catalog on http://www.esveld.nl/htmldia/v/viplic.htm
The image I found for Hydrangea aspera sargentiana shows pink coloured flowers, see http://www.esveld.nl/htmldia/h/hysarg.htm The flowers of the plant in our garden are pure white. The plant remains quite low, less than 150 cm
Do you have other possibilities? Wouter 21:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I investigated further. Indeed you are right; it is the viburnum plicatum 'Mariesii'. Thanks! -Wouter 14:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Spiraea thunbergii

I found your comment at my talk page today, I'm sorry for no answer so long. The picture was taken at a river side park. The plant is often planted in parks in Japan, and looks similer to the picture. There are several varieties(subspecies) of Spiraea thunbergii, so some varieties may look different.

I'm not an expert about plants, and not sure the accurate variety of the plant I took, but it seems Spiraea thunbergii ( Spiraea thunbergii Siebold ex Blume ?).

Thank you.--Moja 11:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

my talk page and suggestion

Yes you are right I know the fellow who added 1000's of species categories matching the gallery species and yes it was annoying, It is fruitless to change all that one page at a time so I will limit my edites to smaller things, I hadn't thought about woriking on the latin names but thanks for the suggestion and it looks like I forgot to sign in User WayneRay

WayneRay 12:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)WayneRay


Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_A.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wouter 09:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_B.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wouter 09:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_C.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wouter 09:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_D.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Sorbaria_kirilowii_D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wouter 09:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Druk aan het experimenteren? :) Gebruik alsjeblieft {{duplicate|Nieuwenaam.ext}}. Groet, Siebrand 09:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Niet direct aan het experimenteren. Is {{duplicate|Nieuwenaam.ext}} inderdaad het eenvoudigste? Het ging er om de omschrijving van Sorbaria kirilowii te veranderen in Sorbaria sorbifolia en tevens de filenaam overeenkomstig te veranderen. Ik gebruikte de volgende twee stappen: 1. de file opnieuw uploaden met de juiste filenaam en tevens de juiste beschrijving geven. 2. de oude files (na het verwijderen van de links in galleries) voor verwijdering opgeven.

Het gaat dus m.i. niet om het verwijderen van een duplicaat. Groeten, --Wouter 11:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Het beestje moet een naam hebben. {{Bad name|Nieuwenaam.ext}} kan ook. Groet, Siebrand 12:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Geranium_phaeum_Samobor_B.jpg

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 12:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Sorry, I forgot to click the license selection. Is done now. --Wouter 21:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


Image:Geopage_does_not_work.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Geopage_does_not_work.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wouter 06:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Image:Geopage_does_not_work.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Geopage_does_not_work.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wouter 06:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Mooi werk

Dag Wouter, ik zie hier een grote stroom van mooi werk toekomen. Ik heb een aantal van de dubbele categoriën terug gezet omdat het weinig zin heeft in één enkele categorie dimensie (geografisch in dit geval) het zelfde beeld op verschillende niveaus aan te houden. De bedoeling van diepere categorien is om de bovenliggende cleaner en overzichterlijke te hebben. Als je op tocht ben, weet dat er op de nl wiki heel wat mensen blij zullen zijn met foto's van stations. Vriendelijke groet. --Foroa 06:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

En voor ik het vergeet; vermits je regelmatig serietjes upload zou je flink wat tijd kunnen winnen met het commonist programma. Voor mij is het in elk geval een goede tijdswinst. --Foroa 07:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Bedankt voor de reactie. Met de dubbele categoriën heb je gelijk alhoewel ik soms toch een dubbele gebruik opdat een zoeker het makkelijker kan terugvinden. Bijvoorbeeld bij http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Kasteel_van_Horst_A.jpg heb ik zowel Holsbeek als Sint-Pieters-Rode gebruikt. De toeristische dienst, het adres op de kaarten, etc. gebruiken allemaal de plaats Holsbeek, alhoewel het in theorie Sint-Pieters-Rode zou moeten zijn. Het programma commonist zal ik eens bekijken. Bedankt voor de tip. Wouter 11:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Met categoriën moeten wij vooral niet te dogmatisch zijn. Er zijn ook veel domeinen/parochies/kastelen die op het ene grondgebied liggen en op een ander beheerd worden. In dat geval beter een cat te veel dan te weinig. Als ik een serietje kerkfoto's upload en die in een aparte cat zet, dan zet ik toch nog het leukste prentje in churches in Belgium en eentje onder de gemeente. Alhoewel dat dikwijls teruggedraaid wordt vind ik het wel belangrijk voor iemand die visueel zoekt een maximum aan zinnige aanknopingspunten te vinden. --Foroa 13:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


Category:No category required

Image deletion warning Category:No category required has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Multichill (talk) 10:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Baksteenhulo.jpg

I appologise for the wrong change in categorisation, but would it be possible to include a bit more information in the description of the picture? I tried to form your reasoning in a description and hope that I didn't make another mistake... --Anna reg (talk) 07:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Removing Categories

That's a good idea, so if a picture is characteristic/symbolic, i will categorize it in the genus category and the species category. I think that a characteristic picture is either an overview photo, either a flower photo, either an illustration. Best regards. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 10:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I saw how you categorized Image:Genista acanthoclada B.jpg, i fully agree, i will do the same. Thanks a lot for your good advise. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 10:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Late reply at Commons talk:Licensing#Panoramic view on Brussels from the Atomium in Brussels

That was about Image:Brussels view A.jpg. Lupo 13:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Information about where the photo was taken

Couldnt you try to put that information into the {{information}}-template, please? abf /talk to me/ 19:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. In my opinion is the information template not the right place. In the past I sometimes included it in the description.
When uploading an image the template gives the field "additional information". The explanation mentions that there geocoding and where the photo has been taken can be given. That is the place where I do it now. The present template has the advantage that the License info has been moved downwards so that the info of for example "This photo has been taken in Belgium" is more visible.
It also depends on the subject. Compare for example Image:Harderwijk_grote_kerk_B.jpg and Image:Nandina_domestica_A.jpg. In the last case there is still the "thick" Permission field so that the info about where the photo was taken is somewhat lost. Putting it in the description is not very useful. A optional separate box below description and before source would be better. May be you can rise the point in the Village pump. --Wouter (talk) 20:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Aantal afbeeldingen van postzegels, auteur 70 jaar dood?

Beste Wouter,

Bij uw afbeelding : Image:Postzegel NL 1937 nr296-299.jpg staat: Copyright verlopen, auteur meer dan 70 jaar dood. Echter ik zie in de catalogus dat de nrs. 296 en 299 door S.L (Sem) Hartz zijn gemaakt, en deze is in 1995 overleden (volgens nl wikipedia). nb:Sem Hartz is ook de ontwerper van Image:Postzegel 1936 zomer.jpg Basvb (talk) 15:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Dag Basvb, Destijds heb ik uitgebreid naar gezocht hoe de situatie is. Een uitleg staat op http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Beleid_voor_gebruik_van_media/Postzegels Het komt er op neer dat TNT Post (vroeger PTT) beschikt over de exclusieve exploitatierechten met betrekking tot postzegels. Als -zoals bij de postzegels van TNT Post het geval is- een rechtspersoon als maker aangemerkt wordt, wordt de beschermingstermijn van 70 jaar berekend aan de hand van de eerst rechtmatige openbaarmaking van de postzegel. Na 1 januari 1989 is de situatie wat anders geworden. Naar mijn idee geldt in ieder geval voor oude postzegels dat het copyright is verlopen 70 jaar nadat de postzegel is uitgegeven. --Wouter (talk) 21:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Bedankt voor deze verduidelijking. Basvb (talk) 12:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Stamps

Can you possibly add some information in English based on the link you gave in this edit, so that those of us who cannot read Dutch can know what that status of Netherlands PD stamps is? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 04:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion. I have done it and asked the main author of the Dutch text to look at it and correct/add/change if needed. --Wouter (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

OK

OK, I will be gradually add categories to my photos. I don't know categories on commons but I wiill be looking for it. Best wishes --Piotr967 (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Tips for categorization you find at Commons:Categories. Wouter (talk) 08:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

My Images

I own the copyright to the images, took the photographs myself, and license them freely for reuse under the GNU Free Documentation License (as shown in the infobox/licensing section). Why are you tagging all my images for deletion? - Mailer Diablo 23:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Your deletion requests.

Even under the GFDL, all images unless they are in the public domain, are copyrighted, and he has his right to assert, REGARDLESS of the license. ViperSnake151 (talk) 13:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Pocahontas, and Other Poems

I was surprised to see, as you notified my on my Wikipedia User Page that File:Pocahontas, and Other Poems.djvu did not have any categorization or other info. I have to wonder if perhaps it was uploaded automatically from Wikisource to Commons. Probably not because it says it was edited by me, but I don't make a habit of uploading without info. Perhaps an upload problem or something.  ;) Oh, well. I added some information and categorization. Thank you for letting me know. --Mkoyle (talk) 02:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. There has been a discussion about that see Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2008Dec#What_about_linking_to_a_category_in_Commons_for_djvu_files.3F. Apparently a bot puts these files in Commons without any further information. May be they changed it now. I was looking at Category:Media_needing_categories to add categories to files that consider as important or ask the owner to do that. That was how I found your file. Best regards, Wouter (talk) 13:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Expo58_building_UK.jpg

File deletion warning File:Expo58_building_UK.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 22:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Expo58_building_Philips.jpg

File deletion warning File:Expo58_building_Philips.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 22:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Expo58_ontvangsthal.jpg

File deletion warning File:Expo58_ontvangsthal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 22:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Expo58_building_URSS_night.jpg

File deletion warning File:Expo58_building_URSS_night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 22:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Expo58_building_USA_inside.jpg

File deletion warning File:Expo58_building_USA_inside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 22:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Your images

Unfortunately under local copyright law, the rights of photographs of buildings and artwork are reserved by the copyright holders, which means that we cannot host them on Commons. ViperSnake151 (talk) 12:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

In my opinion is what you mentioned "the rights of photographs of buildings" not right. Under local copyright law is mentioned: "The modern pieces of art cannot be the central motive of a commercially available photographs without permission of the artwork copyright holder." In the The Belgian copyright act in French is mentioned " Section 3. - (Dispositions particulières aux oeuvres d'art graphique ou plastique.)" and the article 11: "On entend par " oeuvre d'art originale ", les oeuvres d'art graphique ou plastique telles que les tableaux, les collages, les peintures, les dessins, les gravures, les estampes, les lithographies, les sculptures, les tapisseries, les céramiques, les verreries et les photographies, pour autant qu'il s'agisse de créations exécutées par l'artiste lui-même ou d'exemplaires considérés comme oeuvres d'art originales."
The Dutch version gives exactly the same info " Afdeling 3. - (Bijzondere bepalingen betreffende de werken van grafische of beeldende kunst.)" and "Onder " oorspronkelijk kunstwerk " wordt verstaan, een werk van grafische of beeldende kunst, zoals afbeeldingen, collages, schilderingen, tekeningen, gravures, prenten, lithografieën, beeldhouwwerk, tapisserieën, keramische werken, glaswerk en foto's, voorzover dit werk een schepping is van de kunstenaar zelf, of het gaat om een exemplaar dat als oorspronkelijk kunstwerk wordt aangemerkt.".
Could you please tell me where "the rights of photographs of buildings" is mentioned? With a search in the (older) English version I could not find it. Wouter (talk) 15:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Wouter, omdat ik zag dat je de eerste bezoeker was van de pagina: Sculpture images without artist name keek ik even op je overlegpagina en zie bovenstaande discussie. Als dit gaat over gebouwen/beeldhouwwerken etc. in de openbare ruimte dan kun je verwijzen naar de in Ned. geldende Freedom of Panorama. De tekst is na te lezen op Commons:Freedom of Panorama: Ned. is een z.g. FOP country, vandaar dat er zo verschrikkelijk veel afbeeldingen van beeldhouwwerken zijn opgeslagen onder Sculptures in the Netherlands. Groetend--Gerardus (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC) PS Als de discussie gaat over België dan is de positie duidelijk: België is absoluut No FOP country!--Gerardus (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Hallo Gerardus. Bedankt voor je info. Met je opmerking over België ben ik het niet eens. Ik zou zelfs zeggen dat België wel een FOP land is met uitzondering van beeldende kunst. De COM:FOP#Belgium zegt "The modern pieces of art cannot be the central motive of a commercially available photographs without permission of the artwork copyright holder." Naar aanleiding van de delete nominaties heb ik de wet zelf eens goed nagelezen. De [Belgische wet] spreekt over “werken van grafische of beeldende kunst”. Gebouwen worden nergens vermeld. Groeten, Wouter (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token a04cf7601be64e650994dae6fe4a3d84

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Derby War Memorial

I will put an image of the war memorial into the article to add to the collage.

{Weglinde (talk) 10:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)}

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Znak ostrzeżenia
Ten plik może zostać usunięty.
Witaj, Wouterhagens/Archives/2009/! Dziękuję, że wysłałeś(-aś) plik Image:Lwow-Jan z Dukli-do1939.jpg. Zauważyłem jednak, że strona opisu tego pliku nie zawiera informacji o tym, kto ten plik stworzył, więc jego status prawny nie jest znany. Jeżeli nie stworzyłeś(-aś) tego pliku sam, to musisz udowodnić, że mamy prawo do użycia go na Wikimedia Commons (zobacz oznaczanie licencji grafik poniżej). Jeśli nie stworzyłeś(-aś) tego pliku sam to musisz także podać źródło, skąd ten plik masz (zwykle wystarczy podać link do strony, z której masz ten plik oraz link do strony opisującej możliwości używania zawartości strony).

Jeśli plik nie zawiera oznaczenia licencji odpowiednim szablonem, to je także musisz dodać. Jeżeli stworzyłeś(-aś)/zrobiłeś(-aś) ten obrazek, plik dźwiękowy lub wideo, to możesz użyć szablonu {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}, aby udostępnić ten plik na licencji Creative Commons lub {{PD-self}}, aby oznaczy go jako własność publiczną. Zobacz Commons:Oznaczenia licencji, aby uzyskać pełniejsze informacje i szerszą listę szablonów używanych przy oznaczaniu grafik (czy ogólniej plików).

Zauważ, że pliki nieoznaczone szablonami, jak również bez podanych źródeł zostaną usunięte po tygodniu od ich przesłania, tak jak opisano to na stronie: kryteria usuwania. Jeżeli wysłałeś(-aś) również inne pliki, sprawdź ich pochodzenie i dodaj odpowiednie licencje. Wszystkie wysłane przez siebie pliki znajdziesz na stronie narzędzia Galerii. Dziękuję.

Masur (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 8c34081e0603fe97f58113a4bdd7c9ca

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Wouterhagens/Archives/2009!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Aversa_duomo_rilievo.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aversa_duomo_rilievo.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Multichill (talk) 15:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

My bot

There's already what you need in the description page:

date/time username resolution size edit summary
00:00, 10 mar 2008 Dr.Conati 3.264×2.448 3,73 MB Autore foto: Roberto De Martino

Isn't this enough? Btw I won't upload other images here on commons with my bot. Simply Dr.Conati has asked me a favor because he had "wrongly" uploaded them on it.wikipedia instead of commons ;-) --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 14:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

DSC_0072.JPG

I did it. KoS (talk) 11:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

The boat in San Giovanni

You've just made me laugh!! Really! Of course it is, and for the priest is even easier to do the processions: he's just to raise the sail, and the boat moves by itself!! I thank you for your attention, and wish you Happy Easter. Marcus90

Municipalities of Slovenia

I left you a reply on my talk page. Cheers, --Yerpo (talk) 06:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Datzeroth_1982_0001.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Datzeroth_1982_0001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Datzeroth_1982_0001.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Suhadi Sadono (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Opmerking beantwoord

Ach ja, de titel zegt het al... Luctor 22:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Header of the Category:Villena

I just copied the headings from the the Villena page, but I did not realise that the link to other languages was already there. So, I undid the changes and now is again in English and Spanish with no superfluous links. Thanks for the notice. Qoan (talk) 15:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Image question

Hi. Do you know anything about File:600px-Acacia mellifera 3D-Modell.jpg? Why does it list you as the author? Did you upload it somewhere else? The uploader here hasn't been active since 2007 so I didn't bother leaving him a note. Thanks. Wknight94 talk 03:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I have no idea why I am mentioned as author. The history shows that Dcarlson has uploaded the image but why he/she mentioned me as author I don't know. Regards, Wouter (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Photo of Dorothy Day

[1] Hi Wouterhagens, I got the file that you mention from English Wikipedia, but I don't know why it is not exist anymore in the English site. I also took the license from English Wikipedia. So if the license is permissable to be used in Commons, you may get the photo directly from Indonesia Wikipedia, right? Roscoe x (talk) 01:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Chapter Wikimedia Belgium

Hallo, U heeft te kennen gegeven dat u geïnteresseerd bent om mee te doen met Wikimedia België. Wilt u zich aanmelden voor de mailing list, https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabe-l om in contact te blijven ? --M0tty (talk) 20:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


File:Chania_monument_shipwreck_A.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chania_monument_shipwreck_A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Iconoclast (talk) 09:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


File:Chania_monument_shipwreck_B.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chania_monument_shipwreck_B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Iconoclast (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


File:Chania_monument_shipwreck_C.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chania_monument_shipwreck_C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Iconoclast (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Bot

Hi! In most cases it's just mistake. If you can, send me examples, I will try to fix it. Yarl 19:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

There is no big reason, it's just one of many rules in my bot. If you think it's pointless I can disable it. Yarl 20:22, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Change in explaning text in Category:Neuquén River

Hi Wounter: Thanks for the advise and sorry for the delay of my answer. I've been putting descriptions in categories for a while for the same reason as you and trying to normalize the descriptions of categories. I used This category is for multimedia files related to to show that you only must put multimedia files, and what is the country that belong. About to the use of template ARG, maybe i can use the subst command. I think, Patagonia is so generic than Argentina; Patagonia is a region in Argentina and Chile. What do you think if we put: ''This category is for multimedia files related to name of the river, in name of the province, name of the country?. Regards, --Arcibel (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Pd: I apologize for my English.

Hi Arcibel. I think that is fine ! Regards, Wouter (talk) 20:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, i made some changes, tell me what do you think. --Arcibel (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Very good Arcibel! Regards Wouter (talk) 07:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Geneva Mosque

Hallo Wouterhagens, nach dem gestrigen Volksentscheid wird heftig über das Thema Religionsfreiheit und die vier Minarette in der Schweiz diskutiert, aber ich finde nur von zweien ein Foto. Hast du zufällig eins von der Genfer Moschee? (Die Category:Minarets in Switzerland ist neu und eventuell nicht vollständig.) Gruß --Kolja21 (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have a photo. Searching with Google images and the search term "Mosquée de Genève" gives many images, but the most interesting ones are copyright. Regards, Wouter (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Schade, aber Danke! --Kolja21 (talk) 22:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)