User talk:Wutsje

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Other talk pages:  fy:wiki · meta · nl:wiki Archive

Foto gebruikt door RTV Noord[edit]

Ter info, jouw foto File:20100523_Grote_Markt_en_Martinitoren_Groningen_NL.jpg is door RTV Noord gebruikt, maar zonder correcte naamsvermelding: https://www.rtvnoord.nl/nieuws/203196/Welke-gemeente-is-nou-de-vijfde-van-Nederland-Groningen-of-Eindhoven -- Spinal83 (talk) 15:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[]

Ik had het gezien, maar toch bedankt voor de notificatie. Inmiddels heb ik ze een mailtje gestuurd met het verzoek de bronvermeling te corrigeren. Groet, Wutsje 00:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[]
Update: dat blijkt ondertussen te zijn gebeurd. Wutsje 16:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[]

Hans Mooij[edit]

Overlijdensberichten J.J.A. Mooij stonden vandaag (03/12/19) in NRC etc., zie bijv. hier en hier. Groet, Eissink (talk) 01:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC).[]

Dag Jürgen, dank. Ik zal het aanpassen. Groet, Wutsje 01:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[]

De Hoop, Middelburg[edit]

Dag Wutsje, ik heb File:BUITENLANDSE STUDENTEN WERKEN IN NEDERLAND-PGM4011898.webm in Category:De Hoop, Middelburg gezet, vooral vanwege de gelijkenis met File:Geinundeerde gebied (Vlissingse singel) Op twee bomen zijn borden met maximum-, Bestanddeelnr 900-5285.jpg, waar zelfs de wieken nog gelijk lijken te staan — eens? Groet, Eissink (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC).[]

Ja. Wederom: knap gevonden, dankjewel. Groet, Wutsje 16:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[]
Geen probleem. Zou je mij een plezier willen doen? Ik heb Romaine hier gevraagd een foto te plaatsen op de Nederlandse Wikipedia. Ik had het anders niet gevraagd, maar iemand in Luxemburg is er speciaal voor op pad geweest, na eerdere vragen van mij in de zomer. Romaine is niet continu op Commons, dus ik weet niet hoelang het anders nog duurt. Ik hoor het wel. Eissink (talk) 17:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC).[]
Zie hier. Graag gedaan. Wutsje 17:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[]
Bedankt! Eissink (talk) 17:27, 11 December 2019 (UTC).[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20120715 Grondstation Nationale SIGINT Organisatie (NSO) Burum Fr NL.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20120715 Grondstation Nationale SIGINT Organisatie (NSO) Burum Fr NL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 04:54, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[]

File:Partey Atlético.jpg[edit]

Soccer.ru gave permission for publication. — Mr.Drax 03:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[]

Hi Mr.Drax, soccer.ru doesn't seem to have published this image under a really free license. The site says: "Футбол @ Soccer.ru © 2000-2019. При использовании материалов гиперссылка на www.soccer.ru обязательна". In my opinion and as far as my Russian goes that is an attribution requirement, as opposed to an attribution request. This may become problematical when this image is used to create a derivative work. See Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses and freedomdefined.org/Licenses#Attribution for more information. Regards, Wutsje 04:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[]

Category:Antoni Głowacki[edit]

See please here: [1] and learn please more over categoriasation. I transfered 2 categories from picture of Antoni Głowacki ... to Category:Antoni Głowacki. That wasn't a test, please don't break my work. As an example ... You don't categorize every single picture of Donald Trump as a category politician in the USA and presidents of the USA but only as Donald Trump. 77.6.173.31 13:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[]

Hi 77.6.173.31, you're right, my mistake. Sorry. Regards, Wutsje 13:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[]

A request[edit]

Please protect my userpage and talkpage from editing by unregistered users. Also, judging by the behaviour, user Misijabokserska is the same person.[2] Kubura (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[]

Hi Kubura, done. Regarding Misijabokserska: I've requested a global lock for them, see here. Regards, Wutsje 22:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[]
Hi, Wutsje. This user [3] is a vandal that usually vandalizes via IP edits. His edits are personal attacks pointed towards the targeted users and their family members. He hounds his targets across the pages across the wikis (articles, talkpages [4][5], file [6][7]). There he writes similar messages towards the original targets but also towards the user whome the original target talked to, as it happened here [8]. The attacks are sexist messages containing very detailed graphic descriptions of sexual intercourse. Often he writes targeted users' personal data. Often its messages escalate into something worse, threatning with beating, raping and murder by slaughter. The sicco snapped in last year's May and he appears on daily basis. He should be globally blocked. This is the extensive (not complete) list of the IP's from which he made edits: [9] Kubura (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[]
Hi Kubura, if they edited Commons only, they can only be blocked here (which I have done now). As far as they vandalise cross wiki, you really should take this matter to m:SRG. Regards, Wutsje 23:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[]
Hey Wutsje! He is back, but this time he is insulting you: [10]. Please intervene and block him! --Koreanovsky (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[]

Captain, the IP-vandal is back. He has personally attacked one user +20 times and caused damage on two files: Special:Contributions/93.143.124.96. Please intervene, is there anything else we can do to stop this? --Koreanovsky (talk) 07:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[]
Hi Koreanovsky, thanks for your attentiveness. I've blocked them for a week and filed a request to take cross wiki measures on Meta (link). Regards, Wutsje 16:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20140502 Vm Stadhuis IJlst Fr NL (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20140502 Vm Stadhuis IJlst Fr NL (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Cvmontuy 11:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20110805 Vm Station Leens Gn NL.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20110805 Vm Station Leens Gn NL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[]

Again, again...[edit]

...I guess you can imagine what is going on, since Koreanovsky is texting you again. This time the IP-offender was sexually harassing an female administrator from the Croatian Wikipedia on commons: [11] and was also insulting an administrator (also from the Croatian Wikipedia), that died years ago: [12].

I think this time he has crossed all lines. Globally blocking does not really seem working, since the IP is always a different one. Honestly I have no clue what we can do anymore. The last IP the user was editing from is (or was): 93.143.115.199.

Please intervene fast! Best regards, Koreanovsky (talk) 12:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[]

[13] Here he is. Also, he has a pick on that page [14], so I suggest protection. Kubura (talk) 23:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[]

[Sorry for the slow response, I've been afk for a while.]   Hi Koreanovsky and Kubura, I've semi-protected that page for a month now and I've blocked the 89.172.x.x ip-address you mentioned (the other one was already blocked by steward Martin Urbanec. In view of the fact that this seems to be a cross wiki affair though, I'd strongly suggest you keep taking this to m:SRG: I'm not a steward anymore and I can only offer some help on the Commons. More effective measures can only be taken by stewards. Regards, Wutsje 12:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[]

Halis Yen[edit]

Beste,

ik weet niet wat de probleem is en waarom mijn pagina niet op wikipedia mag.
volgens mij is alles volgens de richtlijnen die wikipedia toepast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halis Yen (talk • contribs) 2:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Beste Halis Yen, ik begrijp uw vragen, de nominator heeft het u ook niet uitgelegd, zie ik. De korte versie is dat hij het artikel NE vindt, oftewel de beschreven persoon is "niet encyclopedisch (niet belangrijk genoeg)". Verdere reacties kunt u het beste hier geven, want dat is de plaats waar de inhoudelijke discussie over dit artikel wordt gevoerd. Met vriendelijke groet, Wutsje 13:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[]
Ik dacht dat iedereen op Wikipedia belangrijk is. wat is niet belangrijk? dat ik minder bekend ben dan andere trainers? alvast bedankt om mijn artikel te laten staan omdat alles duidelijk is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halis Yen (talk • contribs) 14:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[]
Beste Halis Yen, nogmaals, opmerkingen over deze verwijderingsvoordracht kunt u het beste hier plaatsen. Eventueel kunt u ook bij de nominator om een nadere toelichting vragen. Met vriendelijke groet, Wutsje 22:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[]

Copyvios[edit]

Hello Wutsje, while patrolling I came across these user uploads which I tagged for csd. But I'm not sure about these two files. Please have a look here when you're free. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 00:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[]

Hi C1K98V, I've deleted both of them (Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1)): as all their other uploads were clearly copyright violations, I think it's safe to assume these were too. Thanks for your attentiveness and regards, Wutsje 01:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[]
Hello once again Wutsje, I want to thank you for your quick response as an admin. I was thinking of tagging, as F1, but google ris was not showing any results, so waiting to consult an admin. Thanks you, stay safe. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[]

Hello Wutsje! I thought that if I downloaded the images in wikimedia and added them to the files nothing would happen, but I see that there was no permission ...

Regarding the file "Draft: Jackie Hollywood" is a singer "rapper" model and interviewer of great personalities. I have spoken with her on instagram, and she is fine with creating a wikipedia for her, so there if I see that I have permission, I know that I still have to perfect her file, nothing more, greetings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Polimero (talk • contribs) 9:22, 22 September (UTC)

Hi Paul Polimero, her permission for "creating a wikipedia for her" is irrelevant on Wikimedia Commons. This is not Wikipedia, see Commons:Project scope. What is relevant on Wikimedia Commons though, is that it is generally not allowed to upload images made by someone else without explicit written permission of their creator. See Commons:Licensing, see also Commons:OTRS#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_OTRS?. Regards, Wutsje 16:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[]

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons![edit]

Dear Wutsje

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC[edit]

Hello Wutsje,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Report[edit]

Hello, please take a look at this report: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Files named with meaningless/disruptive names (motivated renaming was reverted without any valid reason) as these are serious everyday violations of the Commons rules and protection of meaningless names (in this case, Kalumny which translates as Columns). User Kazimier Lachnovič with filemover rights constantly performs violations of the Commons rules, creates instability issues and protects meaningless names, thus creates confusion. His Commons admin rights previously were lifted, but it is clear that it is not enough. -- Pofka (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[]