User talk:XRay

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:XRay.

This is the user talk page of XRay, where you can send messages and comments to XRay.

• Be polite.
• Be friendly.
• Assume good faith.
• No personal attacks.

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

Archives Archive Index

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

---

Dear XRay,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leura (AU), Chateau Napier -- 2019 -- 1864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Mountains National Park (AU), Three Sisters -- 2019 -- 1983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katoomba (AU), Scenic World, Scenic Cableway -- 2019 -- 1913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katoomba (AU), Scenic World, Scenic Skyway -- 2019 -- 1919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Mountains National Park (AU), Three Sisters -- 2019 -- 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, why the revert?

Hello, what is the reason for Revision #391238185. You have restored a manual category and then have set categorisation to none on template, this makes automatic categorisation much harder. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:45, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

@Gone Postal: I'm using the categories as [[Category:Dülmen photographs taken ...]] and this category is set. So CatALot, Batch tasks and other tools are still working. (My bot too.) Categories within templates are difficult to handle. You should have to edit the source always. A hard way. --XRay ^talk 05:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

What bot is it? If it has to do with categorisation by date, you may want to look at Commons:Village_pump#Date_categorising_photographs. I am trying to standardise the work across different countries a little bit. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

@Gone Postal: My own bot, registered as bot here at Commons. The bot is working for my own images and I'm trying to improve the source/description for all my images. It is a hard was to do such things manually. I'm respecting the "Taken on" categorization (Commons:Village_pump#Date_categorising_photographs), but with explicit categories. I'd too much trouble with categories inside templates. So I'm setting {{Taken on|2018-01-20 13:23|cat=no}} and [[Category:Dülmen photographs taken on 2018-01-20]] (you haven't seen the category?). So all my image descriptions fulfill this way of "standardization". BTW: Sometimes you'll find [[Category:... photographs taken on ...]] at a parent category. --XRay ^talk 06:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok. By the way, if you haven't pinged me in the original message, it makes no sense editing your message to add the ping, as the system only pings when it is a new post ending with the signature. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint with the ping. --XRay ^talk 08:20, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leura (AU), Leura Cascades -- 2019 -- 2032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katoomba (AU), Scenic World, Scenic Cableway -- 2019 -- 1933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Mountains National Park (AU), Three Sisters -- 2019 -- 1946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Mountains National Park (AU), Jamison Valley -- 2019 -- 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katoomba (AU), Scenic World, Scenic Walkway -- 2019 -- 1961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Awesome series of photos. Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 2064-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, Pyrmont Bridge -- 2019 -- 2088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Opera House -- 2019 -- 2152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, King Street Wharf -- 2019 -- 2084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Mountains National Park (AU), Three Sisters -- 2019 -- 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC) --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katoomba (AU), Echo Point Road, Letter Box -- 2019 -- 1981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3184-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, King Street Wharf -- 2019 -- 2086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-06

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 4 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 5 February. It will be on all wikis from 6 February (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sydney (AU), Coast, New Zealand sea lions -- 2019 -- 3489.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sydney (AU), Coast, New Zealand sea lions -- 2019 -- 3489.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3202-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, King Street Wharf -- 2019 -- 2076-83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Opera House -- 2019 -- 2280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3199-201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Australian National Maritime Museum -- 2019 -- 2089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, King Street Wharf -- 2019 -- 2091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, Pyrmont Bridge -- 2019 -- 2087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality with Canon EOS 5D. --Lexy iris 17:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Withdrawal of 3 Sisters photo

Hi. I think you withdrew your VIC nomination too quickly. Why not wait and see if someone else was able or willing to take the time to judge your photo? Your choice, of course, but you have my view. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

VIC is not easy for me. I hadn't enough hope. (I had long considered naming a candidate at all.) --XRay ^talk 17:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3193-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, King Street Wharf -- 2019 -- 2092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Barangaroo -- 2019 -- 2093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Still Life with Stone and Car -- 2019 -- 2110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour, King Street Wharf -- 2019 -- 3187-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), The Rocks -- 2019 -- 2133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Overseas Passenger Terminal, Ruby Princess -- 2019 -- 2134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Overseas Passenger Terminal, Ruby Princess -- 2019 -- 2136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3173-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Millers Point -- 2019 -- 2198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Farm Cove -- 2019 -- 2283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Skyline -- 2019 -- 2287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2019 -- 3022-6.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Watsons Bay -- 2019 -- 2294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2019 -- 3022-6.jpg

I do not understand with reflections of the stoup, a symbolic baptismal font in the English description nor its German counterpart. IMO it should be with reflections in the baptismal font. Looking at the size of the vessel and the place where it stands, it does not seem to be a stoup/Weihwasserbecken but baptismal font/Taufbecken. --jdx ^Re: 17:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, no. I know, it is not easy and a very special case. It is a stoup, not a baptismal font. It's large for a stoup and it looks like a baptismal font, a symbolic baptismal font. I'd asked for this special case and this was the answer. --XRay ^talk 17:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

May it is helpful, this is the baptisimal font: File:Heilig Kreuz Dülmen Taufstein.jpg. It is located in the back of the church near the crypt. --XRay ^talk 17:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

OK, so it is a stoup. But the description still is not clear IMO. In such case it should be with reflections in the stoup. In the reflection one can see the ceiling, the lamps and a part of the cross but not the stoup (nor baptismal font). --jdx ^Re: 18:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

I think your English is much better than my English. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 19:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Can't fix it today, the page is protected. --XRay ^talk 19:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

I just have updated the descriptions: Special:Diff/393220664. I hope that everything is fine. --jdx ^Re: 21:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Sydney Seaplanes -- 2019 -- 2291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Watsons Bay -- 2019 -- 2295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-07

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• There is a new version of the Wikimedia Commons app for Android. It should fix the failed uploads problem. [1]

Problems

• There was a problem with the new MediaWiki version last week. It deleted some messages by accident. The new version was late because it was stopped to fix things. [2]

Changes later this week

• The MediaWiki action API is used by various tools like bots and gadgets. Some error codes will change. Some parameter values that do not follow the standard will no longer work. [3]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 February. It will be on all wikis from 13 February (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Hornby Battery -- 2019 -- 2323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Camp Cove Jetty -- 2019 -- 2324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Bondi To Bronte Coastal Walk -- 2019 -- 2410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3165-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, sharp enough and not too noisy --Michielverbeek 07:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Hornby Cannon -- 2019 -- 2298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Hornby Keeper's Cottage -- 2019 -- 2303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Hornby Lighthouse -- 2019 -- 2312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 2975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coastal Cliff Walk -- 2019 -- 2326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), South Head Signal Station -- 2019 -- 2337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Bondi To Bronte Coastal Walk -- 2019 -- 2358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coastal Cliff Walk, Dunbar Anchor -- 2019 -- 2328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Macquarie Lighthouse -- 2019 -- 2344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Bondi To Bronte Coastal Walk -- 2019 -- 2387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coastal Cliff Walk -- 2019 -- 2334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Bondi Beach -- 2019 -- 2354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Bondi To Bronte Coastal Walk -- 2019 -- 2395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coastal Cliff Walk -- 2019 -- 2335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Overseas Passenger Terminal, Golden Princess -- 2019 -- 2976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Perhaps FPC? -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Bondi To Bronte Coastal Walk -- 2019 -- 2379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit daring. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coastal Cliff Walk -- 2019 -- 2333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 2073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2019 -- 3153-9.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Opera House -- 2019 -- 2983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Royal Botanic Gardens -- 2019 -- 3079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Opera House -- 2019 -- 3041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Opera House, Light Tower -- 2019 -- 3051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Opera House, Harbour Bridge -- 2019 -- 3070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Bondi Beach -- 2019 -- 2349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps horizon correction needed. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)  Comment Thank you. The horizon will be fixed as soon as possible. --XRay 06:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Fixed. This and some other issues. Thank you, thank you to remember. --XRay 16:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC) Okay. Thanks.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Petermann Ranges (AU), Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park, Uluru, Kuniya Walk -- 2019 -- 3636.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 12:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for nomination! :-) I'll have a look to all the votes. --XRay ^talk 12:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Royal Botanic Gardens -- 2019 -- 3081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Art Gallery of New South Wales -- 2019 -- 3103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), St Mary's Cathedral -- 2019 -- 3107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Archibald Fountain -- 2019 -- 3117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

A photo with a heritage designation?

Hi XRay, I'm a bit puzzled by this edit. Here you're saying that the photo has heritage designation (P1435) -> architectural heritage monument in North Rhine-Westphalia (Q15632117), isn't that a bit weird?

For the Dutch monuments I did it like this: File:Grote-Kerk-Haarlem.jpg depicts (P180) Grote Kerk (Q1545193). And the item Grote Kerk (Q1545193) has heritage designation (P1435) -> Rijksmonument (Q916333) & Rijksmonument ID (P359) -> 19264 . Wouldn't something like that be better in this case too? Multichill (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

May be your right. Sometimes the Wikidata item is enough, sometimes the cultural heritage monument information in Wikidata is missing or there is no item. I'll think about your idea. Sometimes it is not easy to find the best way. It's like other cases, someone has startet adding heritage designation (P1435) and I'll continue these edits. --XRay ^talk 16:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

I understand your need to record it here if you can't find the matched item on Wikidata. Not sure what the best way is. Maybe some qualifiers to easily flag it so it can be later migrated to Wikidata? I don't think we currently have a property on Wikidata for NRW to easily match things. I do recall some activity around https://denkmal.nrw/ , but I might be mixing it up with another state. Multichill (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

The list in https://denkmal.nrw/ is very incomplete. In North Rhine-Westphalia every muncipality is responsible for the cultural heritage monuments. In my place of residence there is no published list. From time to time I'm asking at our administration for new cultural heritage monuments. If I have these information, I'm updating the list at Wikipedia and I'm adding these data to the configuration file of my bot. (And sometimes I'm adding the data at Wikidata too, but only sometimes.) So the description of the affected images will be updated within a couple of weeks. The second part of the bot transfers all the description data to the structured data - if possible. Some properties are still waiting, for example the date and (!) time of creation. It would be a very hard way to do this manually, so it's better to use a bot. My bot will continue working, but if there are new knowledge, I'll update the bot. --XRay ^talk 06:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

A second answer to the way working with a bot. A bot is a good way to modify all (own) images in the same way. If someone added a useful information, I'm updating my bot and all my photographs will have a benefit. If there is a useless edit, I some revert an edit or I'm modifying for checking for these edits or modifying these edits. I'm working with other tools too, like Cat-A-Lot, but working without tools is not easy. Editing at commons is not easy. Please expect a more commons answer to Wikidata and structured data at the other topic (location). --XRay ^talk 06:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Location statements

Related to the previous topic, but let's keep it separated. I think it would be better if you use location of creation (P1071) instead location (P276) to indicate where you took a photo. It's much less ambiguous and in line with how we model art on Wikidata. The related conversation is on Commons_talk:Structured_data/Modeling/Location#Types_of_locations. By the way, for the date you took the photo, you can use inception (P571) (example edit). I'm quite happy to see you using the structured data. Best way to figure out what works best. Multichill (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

First of all: Your suggestion of using location of creation (P1071) instead of location (P276) for the location is a good idea. I'm looking at Commons:Structured_data/Properties_table for all the properties, but the information is changing. There are still some things not finished. So the proposed property for this case is coordinates of the point of view (P1259). So it's not easy to find a really good property. This is one main problem of using Wikidata: too much similar properties. So what is the best way: location of creation (P1071) or coordinates of the point of view (P1259)? The discussion you'd linked has one more property: location of the point of view (P7108). IMO location of creation (P1071) is the best way. I think I'll modify my bot. (But I can't follow any discussion.) --XRay ^talk 07:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry: The best way is location of creation (P1071) for the item and coordinates of the point of view (P1259) for the coordinates. Not just one. --XRay ^talk 09:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

I'll reply here first. Commons:Structured data/Properties table is very outdated. Should probably update it.

Currently we store where a photo was take with a template like {{Location}} and with a category (for example Category:Haarlem).

With structured data we use coordinates of the point of view (P1259) for {{Location}}. The location category is split up in depicts (P180) for what we see and location of creation (P1071) for where we took it. Multichill (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

And now a longer answer, sorry for so much text. I have to say that I am just a simple user in Wikidata. OK, with a background of years in using Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. And I'm working as Database administrator and Software develeoper in real life.

(1) It is not easy to find the right item in Wikidata. Very often there are a lot of similar items for the same thing. Sometimes I found the difference in the german description, sometimes in the english description, sometimes not. So it can happen I'd chosen the wrong item or the wrong property.

(2) It's pain some users are using structured data and description pages of Commons. May be others are thinking the same of my way of editing. At Commons structure is missing, at structured data possibilities are missing. For me it's very important to describe all my photographs in the same way with nearly the same informations.

(3) Categories of Commons ... Please have a look to an example: Category:Heritage sites in North Rhine-Westphalia (Q8991918) is an instance of Wikimedia category (Q4167836). OK. But not linked with a Commons category. The category Category:Cultural_heritage_monuments_in_North_Rhine-Westphalia is linked to architectural heritage monument in North Rhine-Westphalia (Q15632117). Why? In architectural heritage monument in North Rhine-Westphalia (Q15632117) you'll find a property Commons category (P373) to the category, but no link. I don't know which item has an link to the category, but I think, it exists. In the best case there is only one item - with link and P373 to the category (why two entries?), very often there are at least two items for Commons categories, one item with P373, one with the link. It should be easy to write a bot checking these cases.

(4) The rules at structured data are not finished, the work at structured data too. That's a usual way of software development. Meanwhile people are working with structured data in very different ways. For example the most common property "depicts" depicts (P180). Most of the people are ignoring structured data. They do not see not sense in it and it's not easy enough to understand and to handle. An example with the Oude Kerk in Amsterdam Oude Kerk (Q623558). It should be useful not to add the information included in the item as structured data (including heritage designation). And it should be useful not to add items of upper levels like church building (Q16970) (church building), religious building (Q24398318) (religious building) or building (Q41176) (building). Some people add all these items to the structured data of an photograph. (OK, I'm adding some of these informations too - like heritage designation -, but I'm avoiding most of the data. The configuration file of my bot is very huge, especially the part for avoiding some items.) And do you think you'll find the Oude Kerk searching for "haswbstatement:P180=Q16970". No, you can't. You cannot find any church having their own item in Wikidata. (May be it's fixed today, but I think, it isn't.)

(5) So much discussions ... There are really a lot of discussions in the Wikimedia universe. Discussions are good way, but they are everywhere, on talk pages, village pump, and so on. But the people with in a weird kind of way don't discuss. I've seen a lot of very different ways working with all the date categories, especially all the "photographs taken on" within the category. A lot of discussions, but very often no consense. And if there is consense, most of the people don't know something of the result.

So, I think it's enough for this response. There are still a lot of issues, but not today. Thank you for reading my answer. --XRay ^talk 07:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes, it is very much work in progress the chaotic wiki way of doing things. Regarding your points:

1) A lot of concepts are still missing on Wikidata because we haven't needed them before. Now that we start using it here, we need concepts that haven't been created before. When in doubt, just create a new one and describe it well. Merging is easy.

2) The data model is far from complete. We're still doing trail and error.

category connections

3) Categories are the old way of doing it. Quite a bit of connecting can be done between concepts and categories. See the picture on the right. I'm not going to go into this any further, too much time is already spend on these discussions, I'm moving on (look at where the image is used if you want to know more).

4) Search engine is still very rudimentary. What you're describing is one of the basic user stories for search: A photo has depicts (P180) -> Oude Kerk (Q623558). As a user I want to search for "church" (or maybe in your case "Kirche") and this photo should show up in the search results. Adding all sorts of derived statements to a file because otherwise it won't show up is not a long term solution.

5) Try not to read them all. Know what people to go in conversation and what people to ignore. Multichill (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, forgotten. It's good to show the kind of way using location. - Your sample edit shows the item inception (P571). At this time it is not supported (I'm waiting for support) and it's not complete. The time is missing and IMO it is not easy to handle the time zone. At least the time should be possible (as local time). And (sorry again), the categorization is improvable and depicts are missing. (I'm creating the depicts statements from categories, description, template, title, upper level categories and so on. But caution: not every category is useful as depicts statements. The development of an algorithm filling the depicts statements from the description file wasn't really easy. Today it's working, but it is not perfect. And it is only working for the kind of describing my own photographs.) --XRay ^talk 07:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

You can use inception (P571) with the API from your robot. It's days only, not hours or minutes let alone timezones. I don't expect that part to be implemented anytime soon. The basic part will probably be live soonish

Categories have multiple meanings so quite often not the best source for depicts (P180). The monuments templates like {{Rijksmonument}} on the other hand, are an excellent source of depicts statements. I created User:ErfgoedBot/Depicts monuments.js some time ago for that. Multichill (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Ups. Searching for data ... I'm sure you know an answer. (Setting the items was your bot.) So please let me ask. I've found these difference: [4] . The photographer has an item in Wikidata. So this/his item should be added. And I've found source of file (P7482), but how to add another file in Commons? You need this for example for extracted images. (Currently I'm using extracted from (P7009).) Thank you. --XRay ^talk 08:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

I don't want to encourage vanity items. Structured data on items can always be updated. Multichill (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

---

Let's try a new way: a short answer. ;-) Thank you for your very helpful explanations. I've a lot of modifications and improvements to do at my bot for the structured data, for example inception (P571) (together with refine date (P4241) and sourcing circumstances (P1480)), location of creation (P1071) instead of location (P276) and a good solutions for cultural heritage monuments. Hopefully it will be done within only a few weeks.
Categories are a good way to find depicts, but only if you know, what you do. The configuration file of my bot is full of manually written and selected regular expressions.
Meanwhile my bot is running to improve the structured data (and to fix some - IMO silly - modifications done by third party and to find a good way for all the different opinions).
There are very committed people to modify categories for the "photographs taken on" categories, but all in different directions. Hopefully I found a way to reduce all these third party edits. My goal is still to take photographs. And the photographs needs a good description including good categories and good structured data. --XRay ^talk 10:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

In the end that's why we're implementing structured data: To better curate files and to make it easier to find the right files. Multichill (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Opera House -- 2019 -- 3073-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 14 February 2020 (UTC) XRay, there are two dust spots above the middle of the bridge. I haven't thoroughly checked the rest of the photo for dust spots, but you should. -- Ikan Kekek 04:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks to Ikan. I've removed all dust spots found. --XRay 11:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-08

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Pages on Wikidata and Commons now load faster. You can read more about page load performance. [5][6]

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 February. It will be on all wikis from 20 February (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), St Mary's Cathedral -- 2019 -- 3111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), St Mary's Cathedral -- 2019 -- 3112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Yurong -- 2019 -- 3096-101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Archibald Fountain -- 2019 -- 3118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, St James Church -- 2019 -- 3120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Archibald Fountain -- 2019 -- 3124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Macquarie Lighthouse -- 2019 -- 3437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coast, New Zealand sea lions -- 2019 -- 3450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Archibald Fountain -- 2019 -- 3119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Australian Museum -- 2019 -- 3123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Eastern Channel Pile Light -- 2019 -- 3210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Watsons Bay -- 2019 -- 3213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coast -- 2019 -- 3247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Pool of Reflection and Anzac Memorial -- 2019 -- 3125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), The Rocks, George Street -- 2019 -- 3566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coast, New Zealand sea lions -- 2019 -- 3484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Coast, New Zealand sea lions -- 2019 -- 3489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), The Rocks, Nurses Walk -- 2019 -- 3556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), George Street, The Fullerton Hotel Sydney -- 2019 -- 3574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Queen Victoria Building -- 2019 -- 3127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), The Rocks, George Street -- 2019 -- 3567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Macquarie Lighthouse -- 2019 -- 3443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), The Rocks, Observer Hotel -- 2019 -- 3568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), The Rocks, Museums & Galleries of NSW -- 2019 -- 3561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Oktoberfest at The Domain -- 2019 -- 3134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), The Rocks, Federal Electrical -- 2019 -- 3562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), George Street -- 2019 -- 3573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), George Street, The Fullerton Hotel Sydney -- 2019 -- 3576.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), George Street, The Strand -- 2019 -- 3577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Art Gallery of New South Wales -- 2019 -- 3139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), Queen Victoria Building -- 2019 -- 3580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Magnetic Termite Mounds -- 2019 -- 3721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Florence Falls -- 2019 -- 3735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Wangi Falls -- 2019 -- 3749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-09

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 February. It will be on all wikis from 27 February (calendar).

Future changes

• There will be a reply button after each post on a talk page if you want one. This will soon be a beta feature on the Arabic, French, Dutch and Hungarian Wikipedias. You will have to turn it on if you want to use it. It will come to more wikis later. You can test the reply button. It was briefly shown earlier than planned by mistake on the four first wikis last week.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Münster, Aasee, Restaurants -- 2019 -- 3464-8.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Castlereagh St -- 2019 -- 3140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special!--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Magnetic Termite Mounds -- 2019 -- 3725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Yellow Water -- 2019 -- 3802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Florence Falls -- 2019 -- 3738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Wangi Falls -- 2019 -- 3758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, St Mary's Cathedral -- 2019 -- 3141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Question: beautiful building. But shouldn't it be vertical?--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)  Comment I've fixed the verticals in this special case. From the point of view (the Sydney Tower) it is not easy with verticals. Most of the views haven't good verticals. And yes, it is a beautiful building. It very interesting inside too. --XRay 06:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Thank you for explaining. Nice photo of a beautiful building. In my opinion, the correction was successful.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Magnetic Termite Mounds -- 2019 -- 3727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Shady Creek Walk -- 2019 -- 3737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Wangi Falls -- 2019 -- 3754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Yellow Water -- 2019 -- 3815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Finger Wharf -- 2019 -- 3146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Magnetic Termite Mounds -- 2019 -- 3729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Florence Falls -- 2019 -- 3741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Wangi Falls -- 2019 -- 121650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Yellow Water -- 2019 -- 3840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Hyde Park Barracks -- 2019 -- 3145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Magnetic Termite Mounds -- 2019 -- 3728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Florence Falls -- 2019 -- 3736.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Wangi Falls -- 2019 -- 3751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Yellow Water -- 2019 -- 3832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney (AU), View from Sydney Tower, Queen Victoria Building -- 2019 -- 3153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Magnetic Termite Mounds -- 2019 -- 3730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Florence Creek -- 2019 -- 3743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu National Park (AU), Marrakai Road -- 2019 -- 3765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Yellow Water -- 2019 -- 3871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Magnetic Termite Mounds -- 2019 -- 3731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litchfield National Park (AU), Florence Creek -- 2019 -- 3745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu National Park (AU), Marrakai Road -- 2019 -- 3766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Yellow Water -- 2019 -- 3884.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Kirchspiel, Rödder, Mäusescheune -- 2014 -- 2930-4.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 08:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

"Naturschutzgebiet" kann kein Motiv sein

Du hast bei vielen deiner Bilder die Aussage: depicts (P180) -> nature reserve (Q179049) erstellt. Diese Aussage macht keinen Sinn, denn ein nature reserve (Q179049) ist ein juristisches oder allgemein organisatorisches Konzept, das auf einem Bild nicht zu sehen sein kann. Stattdessen kannst du mit located in protected area (P3018) das Schutzgebiet angeben, in dem das Foto aufgenommen wurde. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich schaue mal, wie ich es verarbeite. --XRay ^talk 10:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)