User talk:Yann/archives 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Kingdom of Humanity.svg[edit]

Regarding Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Kingdom of Humanity.svg, are there guidelines available on when {{PD-shape}} should be used? Personally, this seems like a pretty liberal interpretation. Not only is there the moderately complex swirl, but the colour choices and styalised text also add to the design. I've always used PD-shape very conservatively- personally, if I'd designed this flag from scratch, I wouldn't want others thinking that no work had gone in at all... I'm certainly not going to revert you, but I would appreciate an explanation. J Milburn (talk) 21:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

No, I've no personal vendetta at all (I can't even remember where it was the flag for) I just retagged it for deletion when the tag was incorrectly removed, and the other editor became a little hostile. Where do we draw the line regarding a "simple design"? Is there some kind of precedent? J Milburn (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:StarckJuicer.jpg[edit]

Your input on the above would be appreciated. --Simonxag (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Colour enhancement of your image - File:Crowds of French patriots line the Champs Elysees.jpg[edit]

Just found your message Yann, sorry it took so long, still finding my way around here

I have downloaded the image, and will work on it tomorrow for you. Try to get it uploaded by tomorrow evening. It's almost bedtime here :)

I did some edits over on that image improvement page you sent, but then I lost the page :) Oops

Could you give me the link to it again please, so I can keep an eye out for requests.

Thanks again for all your help

Julie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julielangford (talk • contribs)

Ok, I changed my mind about going to bed right then :)

Here is a colour enhanced version for you. I didn't know anything about the painting so I copied all of your description and licensing info across ok. Hope that's ok. If not, please feel free to edit the info as you need.



What does AGF mean? See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-10537-0001, Plakat der Friedensfahrt 1951.jpg

Regards --ALE! ¿…? 09:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, AGF means Assume good faith. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
In this particular case I do not think that this enough to close the deletion request. Also the Bundesarchiv can make mistakes. --ALE! ¿…? 11:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


Hi, you deleted this file because of personality rights issues, but this person is a public figure, and obviously knew that he was being photographed, so I think it is well within our policy. Besides, we also host a black and white version of this file, so how is the color version more of a problem? has been trying to get this image deleted for a long time, on the grounds of copyright issues; that's why I'm surprised by your deletion summary. He has never complained about a violation of his personality rights, and if he wanted to do so, he should make a formal request to OTRS (I don't think an anonymous DR is enough, especially without any explanation). Besides, discussion was still underway at COM:ON#File:Sander-jan-klerk.jpg, and I was hoping we could sort things out before taking any action. –Tryphon 19:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I think that the copyright issue is just an excuse. It is clear that this person wants his picture to be deleted. Please read again Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Removal at the_request of the_subject, photographer or uploader. I think we should be "sympathetic to removal requests" as mentioned in the policy when personality rights is involved. The last thing we want is fighting against people who ask their picture to be removed. And because we have a (B&W) copy, we can allow the deletion of this one. Yann (talk) 19:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I've read it, but 1) we don't know if it is the subject, photographer or uploader who made the request (actually, we know it is not the uploader, because he stated the file was uploaded without his knowledge), 2) good reasons have not been given and 3) images are not removed simply because the subject does not like them. If chose to go with the copyright violation angle, we should consider the request on this basis alone, and not act out of courtesy for something he didn't even ask for. The fact that we still have the B&W version proves that it is not a personality rights issue, but merely a matter of "I don't like this picture"; which is a very poor reason to delete it. –Tryphon 20:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Don't know if you're watching [1]. –Tryphon 13:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I just opened an undeletion request after it was confirmed that there is no copyright violation. Your comments would be appreciated there. Thanks. –Tryphon 12:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of pictures from flickr[edit]

Hi. You deleted two pictures (File:Old book - Basking Ridge Historical Society.jpg and File:Old book - Basking Ridge Historical Society (1).jpg) that I had imported from flickr by User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske). This process automatically checks the license before uploading (hence why both pictures have the code {{flickrreview|File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)|December 15, 2008}}). It is likely that the flickr user changed the license afterwards, but that doesn't give you the right to delete properly {{flickrreview}}'d files as copyright violations. guillom 07:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh OK, sorry for deleting them. Yann (talk) 10:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Review valued image nomination - Scope:Dust storm[edit]

Dear Yann, I have changed the scope of my valued image nomination as you suggested. Please reconsider your vote. Thanks Originalwana (talk) 12:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


Hi Yann, I have uploaded a further edit of the file above. Took the pointers advised by JovanCormac on your comment on his talk page, and did the restoration work suggested. Julielangford (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

What was wrong??[edit]

hello Yann: like 5 minutes ago i upload a picture but you erase it can you tell me what was wrong, because i dont understand very much wikipedia. Can you teach me what pictures can i upload?? Beacause i dont want to make the same mistake. P.D. Can you replay this message NOW please. --Sammybonilla (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Sammygirl 2 August 3:10 pm

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anna Paquin 1 (2009).jpg[edit]

Hello, sorry to disturb you, but could you please explain to me the copyright status of live feeding ? Do you have a link to any website or something were i could learn more on this, and that would support your claim ? Thank you ! Face-smile.svg --Lilyu (talk) 07:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but personal deduction backed up by no law-cases is not enough. You can't close a DR deciding on your own that live feeding has no copyright : if it's just an impression, i would have prefer that you gave your opinion and let the discussion continue a little bite. Or maybe you know of a trial about video monitoring saying it cant be copyrighted ? A bunch of real tv do provide live feeding from automatic camera, and they do claim copyright over it. Where the "no copyright" might start and end ? Is TV news not copyrighted because the camera just don't move when filming the journalist and it's live, so not copyrighted ? European satellites taking pictures of stars or the ground... i cant think of something more automated, but they are copyrighted. The only kind of person able to decide whether something can get granted copyright protection or not, is judges. Copyright protection is automatically granted, thus the burden of proof is on the claim that it's not copyrighted, and not just saying "it's obvious" : unless there is a case law stating that live feeding is not copyrighted...
I mean, let's just say they record what there cameras are recording, and sell a DVD of that event... Would you claim they can't claim copyright over it ?
All i'm saying is that the case is not as obvious as you may think, and that i would like the discussion to continue. There is a lot of live feeding nowadays, don't tell me that if it's not copyrighted, there has never been a single situation ending in newspapers or court trial ?
I'm not that much familiar with all Commons' processes, could i re-open the Deletion review or would it be treated as a disrupting contribution ? --Lilyu (talk) 04:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
My messages were calm and friendly, and just questions on someone's talkpage. Please, don't threaten me.
original : yes this image is original, it doesn't depend if the way an image was taken do represent artistic gift from it's author. It depends of the nature of the image ; this image is deferent from all other images, that's why it's original. Else, the person who took the photo couldn't claim copyright over his work and license it under free licence (it would be public domain).
fixation : there is a fixation : this photo. The copyright of the person or collective organization who set up those cameras and displayed it on that screen do apply to this image. They are co-authors of this photo.
author see previous point.--Lilyu (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Change of scope on Cannery Row at Night VI nomination[edit]

I have changed the scope to narrow it down to "Cannery Row": Commons:Valued image candidates/Cannery Row at night.jpg. If you have a moment would be willing to weigh in on this change and whether this meets criteria? Thanks--Amadscientist (talk) 19:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

FP closure[edit]

Great I saw that you could help with this as well. I just closed 14 delisting candidates, and now there seem to be around 20 FPC to close. Do you want to split it somehow ? (For example one takes the candidates ending on even numbered dates and the other do the odd dates). /Daniel78 (talk) 19:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok, we can try it and change if not needed later. I can do the odd ones. /Daniel78 (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


Hi Yann. Please would you help!

It was only a matter of time I suppose, but I have made my first mistake. I tried to edit the Gorilla gorilla diehli sub category of the above page, to make the species show up as a category, but it didn't work. It not working doesn't worry me, but originally, before my edit, the small text underneath the main heading pointed to the Cross River Gorilla on wikipedia, but now it's gone. I have no idea how to put it back, and seeing that is is such a rare species of primate, its very important.

The Wikipedia page is here en:Cross_River_Gorilla.

Any help, greatly appreciated. Julielangford (talk) 02:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

FP nomination[edit]

Lightning 14.07.2009 20-42-33.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lightning 14.07.2009 20-42-33.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lightning 14.07.2009 20-42-33.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


File:PPcornerTop2nl.gif & File:PPcornerBottomnl2.gif[edit]

Bonsoir Yann, by deleting these files you inadvertently (only slightly) messed up the lay-out of the main page of nl.wikipedia (it took us about a week to find out, so not that big a deal ;-)). I've restored them and put a comment on the description pages. If you still feel they are so out of scope that they should be deleted, please list them regularly, so we can at least take preventative action to restore the local copies. Cheers, NielsF ? (en, nl, fr, it) 21:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Images of user User:MaxtorNP[edit]

Hi, I saw you deleted some images of User:MaxtorNP, I tagged these images as no permission on July 31 after I read this page (;art186,1203) but there was another page which I didn't see that day (, Also it seems the user has sent the permission to OTRS, I put a note on the user's talk page but she/he didn't respond yet, also Túrelio is translating the second link declaration into {{Attribution}} "Airport Nürnberg". Is there any other copyright problem with the images? is the second link enough?   ■ MMXXtalk  03:15, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


You deleted yesterday the file File:Eva-Vermandel-Milow.jpg, because of copyvio (which is correct). The uploader reloaded this file again. I just nominated this an later found out you already were busy with this one. Miho (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Deleted, and user warned. Thanks for your help. Yann (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Featured picture closures[edit]

I'm not sure if your aware, but the FP canadidates that you have closed over the past couple of days have not been moved to the log or tagged as FPs and are still appearing on the candidate list. Just thought I'd give you a heads up. Pax et bonum... TonyBallioni (talk) 21:25, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I know. Help is needed to move the closed nomination until the vote is working. Yann (talk) 21:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Ah ok, I'll be glad to help, I just thought I'd let you know to be sure. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Image:Rolla, North Dakota Tornado.jpg[edit]

Can you please restore this image? Discussion here has determined that images stored on National Weather Service servers are in public domain unless copyright is specifically noted, including "Courtesy of" images such as Image:Rolla, North Dakota Tornado.jpg. See Template:PD-NWS. Thank you. -Runningonbrains (talk) 04:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 15:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


Hey I have two pictures. The first I sent email to Wikimedia to prove that I actually had permission. Please remove the thingee. The second needs to be verified. Mhera (talk) 20:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Pont de Saint-Nazaire depuis St-Brévin 4.jpg[edit]

Salut Yann,

suite à une discussion qui tourne un peu au ridicule sur le bistrot de FR, est-ce que tu pourrais précisé si tu as retouché ou fait retoucher cette image ? Merci d'avance. Stéphane (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Salut aussi,

J'abonde et sollicite de même ton intervention pour éclairer ce point. O.M.HH.M.O 08:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour, Je n'ai pas retouché ma photo. J'ai seulement, comme on le voit dans l'historique, redressé l'horizon et coupé une partie du premier plan. Yann (talk) 09:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

File:HugoPratt CortoMaltese.jpg[edit]

Are you sure this image was a Copyright violation? --Manu Lop (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Permission Request[edit]

Hi Yann,

I work for Dissent Magazine ( and we are considering using your wonderful picture of the juggler on the Berlin Wall ( for our upcoming cover. I had a couple questions about permissions, and if you could contact me at: assistant (at) dissentmagazine (dot) org, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks so much!


QI subcategories[edit]

Hey Yann, I hope you really know what you are doing. Changes in QIhelper.js must be met by creation of the proper subpages which you have not done. This can f*ck up the bot majorly! --Dschwen (talk) 12:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Reverted the change for now. Will have time later to talk this through with you. Basic idea is good. Sorry, see you later. --Dschwen (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
There is nothing to gain from splitting up the Man made structures page. Most of it is exterior shots. It would be great if you would add links whenever you remove the inclusion of a subpage though, as in [2]. --Dschwen (talk) 14:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I beg to differ. It is actually blown up out of proposition, to the point that it is not useful any more. I have asked weeks ago input about that several times and on several places, and I received none, so I conclude that nobody really cares. Yann (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
How do you beg to differ? You haven't adressed my points at all. --Dschwen (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, I made some propositions two months ago: Commons talk:Quality images#Subdivision of Man made structures. Did you look at them? Your complain is a bit out of place. Yann (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Dude, there is no need to get all emotional here. I told you that you have to be careful when changing the categorization scheme for QI, as there is potential to break things. I also told you that I didn't see the point in breaking up the Man made structures page. Well, one thing would be useful, which would be having the Exterior shots gallery in a separate page. In any case the whole page too big issue is overrated in my opinion (I'm probably not alone with that, which would explain the lack of responses). --Dschwen (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

FOP en France[edit]


Au sujet de ma photo (File:Tour de télévision sur le Salève.jpg), il est nécessaire d'avoir un minimum d'originalité pour avoir un droit d'auteur, et ce n'est pas le cas ici. Cette tour n'a absolument rien d'original. Elle est absolument identique à n'importe quelle autre tour de télévision. En plus, elle est uniquement « utilitaire », ce qui, du point du droit d'auteur, la rend comparable à n'importe quel autre objet utilitaire (voiture, outil, etc.). Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Je doute fortement de ce que tu dis sur l'aspect utilitaire, mais si tu es sûr de ton coup, c'est bon pour moi. --Coyau (talk) 11:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Seattle Center as night falls.jpg[edit]

Dear Yann, Jeffery Hayes has given permission to upload this image under CC-SA. If you need any more info please let me know Originalwana (talk)

Dear Yann, I have sent the permission information to OTRS. If you have access to OTRS could you review it? If not I hope you will consider evaluating the image for FP status? Thanks Originalwana (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 11:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution2.jpg[edit]

I have changed the scope per your recommendation. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 19:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


Hi, Yann!

Thank You for support!

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 12:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)



Qu'est-ce qui ne va pas ? Yann (talk) 09:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Mon commentaire de diff indiquait le problème : il n'y avait pas de permission valide sur OTRS (un "tenez, voilà une photo" n'est pas une permission valide contrairement à un courriel du type fr:Aide:Republication/Courriel Image). Même si c'est clairement en bonne voie, ce n'est d'ailleurs toujours pas le cas : la validation par PeterSymonds est une erreur. D'ailleurs, ce n'est pas vraiment judicieux de solliciter sur IRC un agent volontaire non-francophone pour traiter un ticket en français...
Au plaisir de pouvoir valider cette image quand l'équipe de YAB aura envoyé le courriel approprié !--Bapti 04:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Je pense que tu cherches des problèmes là où il n'y en a pas. J'ai échangé plusieurs mails avec l'assistante de YAB, dont un où il est clairement indiqué les conditions nécessaires pour publier une image ici, et auquel elle a répondu positivement. Je lui ai aussi expliqué au téléphone le fonctionnement du projet. Il ne faudrait pas que le mauvais esprit dont tu fais preuve sur fp.wp vienne gâter la situation ici. Yann (talk) 09:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Le mail auquel tu as répondu n'est effectivement pas le bon. Ça ne peut que les embrouiller. Yann (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Passons sur l'attaque personnelle, même s'il est dommage que tu n'ais toujours pas compris pourquoi tu as été désysopé sur Wikipédia : il n'y a actuellement rien dans le système OTRS confirmant que File:Souzy-la-Briche.jpg est bien placé sous licences GFDL et Cc-by-sa-3.0 (ou sous tout autre licence libre d'ailleurs). Je doute que mon message embrouille YAB, mais mon courriel n'aura pas été nécessaire si une permission claire avait été directement envoyée. En tout cas, je validerai avec plaisir cette (belle) image quand YAB aura explicitement choisi une licence et qu'une autorisation claire aura été reçue sur OTRS ;) En attendant, merci de ne pas remettre le bandeau de confirmation OTRS, surtout que tu n'as plus accès au système.--Bapti 02:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
J'avais considéré un problème avec le compte User:Arthus-Bertrand qui impliquait aussi un problème avec la photo File:Souzy-la-Briche.jpg J'ai regardé la base de photo "Altitude" en particulier les photos de YAB ex: (je n'est pas retrouvé la photo de Souzy). Pour moi, les conditions d'usage ne sont pas compatibles avec Commons. Par ailleurs, des échanges que j'ai pu voir, l'uploader est une dénommée "Eva FERRERO" qui semble être plus liée à l'agence Altitude qui distribue de nombreux photographes qu'à YAB lui-même. Je ne crois pas que dans ces conditions, le compte utilisateur puisse être "Arthus-Bertrand", cela ne me semble pas correct et l'éventuel ticket OTRS devrait venir directement de YAB et non d'une assistante. Mais bon, je me trompe peut-être ou je suis peut être un peu compliqué. Oxam Hartog 21:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

FP nomination[edit]

Hi, Yann! Thank You for support! Because it was not good, these photographs which I nominated it for deleted it. 池田正樹 (User talk:池田正樹 22 August 2009 (UTC)

MVR section appears twice in VI[edit]

please view discussion page here:

Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


I would like to draw your attention to this. Thank you, Tiptoety talk 04:36, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

FI nominations[edit]

Hello, Yann!

I have made FI nominations of spiders. Please, look it at leisure.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Stolen Throne cover[edit]

Hey just wondering why this book jacket was a copyright violation and not others? I have seen the same picture used on the Dragon Age Wiki. Thanks for your help Loleil (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedy reply. I'll give it a go. Loleil (talk) 12:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

It went fine there :). With all the “Think about uploading your image to the Commons instead of here” messages on Wikipedia I hadn’t realised the two sites have different copyright rules regarding fair use. Thanks again for your advice. Loleil (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

duplicate files deletion[edit]

Can you check usage of file, before deletion? File:Uriah Heep drawing.jpeg was used on pl wiki and AFIK om few other project. Regards Margoz (talk) 10:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

About images uploaded by User:سبأ.[edit]

Hello, Images uploaded by User:سبأ are mostly taken from other websites, They all have different qualities and some of them are very old, I am sure that User:سبأ is not the photographer, user claims he/she has taken all the images but I founded real source of some of them (1,2,3 are from this website and many others which I didn't listed here are from same website I couldn't find any copyright note at this website but it seems all the images in the website are uploaded by different photographers,
I wanted to open a deletion request for all the images by this user but I wasn't sure that I should add the "Delete" template to more than 400 images! or no?
Also I saw you wrote a comment in French, but this user speaks Arabic language and the caption of images are mostly in Persian. the user keep removing warnings and tags from talk and image pages, how should we deal with this user? for your information, I can write and understand Persian, I also understand a little Arabic but I can not write in Arabic, I translated your comment to Persian but maybe we should also translate it to Arabic, Best regards.   ■ MMXXtalk  20:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard   ■ MMXXtalk  03:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

File:NISSAN SKYLINE CROSSOVER interior.jpg[edit]

This message that follows was mistakenly writted on your userpage and not on your talkpage, and for that i am sorry:

Sorry to bother you but could you please see this file, and the acts of User:TTTNIS (in bad faith in mine opinion) and mine too, and mine too (i think that i did the correct, but maybe not). After you rejected its speedy deletion requested by this user, of this file, he overwritted and tried to get it deleted as a duplicate, i reverted and so one, until we opened a normal delete request with the justification of this fileno longer being needed, but this file is used on fr wikipedia (please see the deletion request). Sorry to bother you, as i am not trying to canvasing "votes" but this situation is starting to get out of control, and its a waste of time and recourses. Sincerely Tm (talk) 14:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

missing source[edit]

Hi Yann, you've tagged some of my uploads as no source, but as far as i could tell they all have source indicated as own work by uploader (which came from using the template). What else is needed? F1list (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Yann! please see my response in my talk page... F1list (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

B0rken image[edit]

Hi Yann, I reverted your modfied version of File:Kjøbenhavnsposten 28 nov 1838 side 1.jpg because it seems to be b0rken. --Avatar (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Kjøbenhavnsposten 28 nov 1838 side 1.jpg[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Yann. You have new messages at Docu's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

About Arabic/Persian user uploading book scans.[edit]

Dear Yann,
User:سبأ have posted a comment on my talk page, He/She says: "There is no violation, I took the pictures from my personal website." he/she also provided a link to source website about page, there is a line in about page which says (in Persian):
استفاده از مطالب و محتویات وب سایت کوخرد با ذکر منبع بلامانع می باشد
I would translate it: "Using of contents of kookherd website is permitted if the website is attributed"
Maybe {{Attribution}} license applies to the images which I tagged them as copyvio but it is still unclear that how many of User:سبأ images are from this website, besides all the images in mentioned website are posted by different people to the website, and we can not say those people are creators of this images or not. also it appears many of this user's images are scans from books or something else.
I have also posted this at Administrators' noticeboard, will you please comment and advise what should we do with the images uploaded by this user.   ■ MMXXtalk  17:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Yalta-Churchill Stalin's agreement.jpg[edit]

Hi Yann !

This picture is coming from the romanian Wikipedia: if it's good on this Wiki, I hope it's good on the french one also.

Wishes,--Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 02:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

PS: si j'ai fait une erreur dans l'enregistrement, dis-le moi STP, merci