User talk:Ypsilon from Finland

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ypsilon from Finland!

File:Fest OfLights.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fest OfLights.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 02:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[]

Copyright status: File:Bannerhöfn.jpg[edit]

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bannerhöfn.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 21:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[]

File:Banneriecavasouthlatvia.jpg[edit]

Hi Ypsilon, I am renaming some banner files to make them more compliant with the recommendations for banners in Wikivoyage. It is not clear to me how this file should be renamed. Could you give suggestions? Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 08:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[]

File:Bannerbayernauinderhallertau.jpg[edit]

Same problem, same request. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 12:16, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Pildirüüstaja (talk) 08:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 17:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[]


File:Reykjavik Catholic church.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Reykjavik Catholic church.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poco2 10:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[]

File:Vaduz banner.jpg[edit]

Hi Ypsilon. In the Description of the Summary you have inserted an external link to a Commons image used to crop out this banner, but unfortunately this link is wrong. Could you fix it? I need it get a more significant description of what is shown in the banner itslef. Thanks, --Andyrom75 (talk) 07:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[]

✓ Done I inadvertently had capitalized the 'C'. The picture is Vaduz cathedral's clock tower and to the left the parliament (Regierung). Here you have the map. Photo is taken from the pedestrian street Städtle towards the south-southeast. That's probably all you need to know. :) ϒpsilon (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[]
Thanks! PS Personal suggestion: when you add the reference of the picture, use internal wikilink instead of external link, prevent such clerical mistakes. --Andyrom75 (talk) 19:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

A minor favour[edit]

Hi! If I am right you made the map of Milan with the districts coloured. Furthermore I saw that you could make a Hebrew version using someone's translation. Well I do not know how to make such images, and I would like to ask you if you could create a Hungarian version if I suggest the translation, please. The purpose of my request is that I am working on the Hungarian version of Wikivoyage which is still in the Incubator and I could not find any useful maps. If you do not have enough time for it I completely understand and wish you to keep up the good work with the tasks you are dealing with. Sincerely BanKris (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:WV banner Avoiding transit of the US.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  မြန်မာဘာသာ  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WV banner Avoiding transit of the US.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

廣九直通車 (talk) 04:25, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[]

There are even two links to the source file in the description, and I always copypaste the original author's name to make sure it is correct. But the source file has apparently been deleted two months ago. I don't know what I could do about it? --ϒpsilon (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[]

Category:Wikivoyage banners of British Virgin Islands[edit]

Category discussion warning

Wikivoyage banners of British Virgin Islands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Kai3952 (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[]

Correction of Kolkata District map[edit]

Hi Ypsilon, I have seen your Kolkata District map in Wikivoyage Kolkata page, and I think you have added too many places in Southern fringes (suburb). Please refer to the Kolkata page of wikipedia and publish a new map with the proper south kolkata areas included in the map. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[]

The district map is for the region as defined in Wikivoyage, regardless if that corresponds exactly to some official subdivision or not. This is one of the maps I made for articles that were divided into districts but lacked a map. When making the map I've looked at where the on the map the POIs of the district article are. As you can see they're spread out on a large area south of the city, this means the district article covers all those areas. --ϒpsilon (talk) 13:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[]