User talk:Ytoyoda

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ytoyoda!


Help[edit]

Hello Ytoyoda. You left a message on my talk page regarding a photo I uploaded. Your message is at the bottom of my talk page. This file was uploaded by the owner to Flickr under public domain. I didn't really understand the message you sent above. Can you please help me figure out what is needed in this case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HRShami (talk • contribs) 00:45, April 27, 2020 (UTC)

Benjamin Mazatis[edit]

Hello Ytoyoda. You have submitted a request to delete the picture File:Benjamin Mazatis 2017.jpg. Bennjamin Mazatis owns all rights to his pictures. Das wollte ich eben noch mal im Freigabe-Assistent mitteilen. I just wanted to tell you about this in the release assistant. Unfortunately I always get the error 500. Thank you very much— Preceding unsigned comment added by MSA-Dim (talk • contribs) 10:24, December 08, 2020 (UTC)

@MSA-Dim: Since it's unusual for someone to own the rights to all rights to their photographs, I suggest submitting an OTRS request explaining the copyright status for those images. Right now, since it's unclear who the photographer is, there's a 3rd party mentioned in the metadata and there's no evidence that Benjamin Mazatis has released the rights to his photographs. All this information needs to be verifiable. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk)


File:Série Camisa Brasileira - foto Gilberto Perin.jpg[edit]

Olá Ytoyoda, o documento assinado pelo proprietário da foto, Gilberto Perin, autorizando a publicação da foto e renunciando a seus direitos conexos foi encaminhado para o e-mail permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org na data de hoje 13 de dezembro as 18:50. [Ticket#: 2020121310007846] english Hello Ytoyoda, the document signed by the owner of the photo, Gilberto Perin, authorizing the publication of the photo and waiving its related rights was forwarded to the email permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org on today, December 13 at 6:50pm. [Ticket#: 2020121310007846].--Lucashempa (discussão) 09h55min de 14 de dezembro de 2020 (UTC)

T-ARA Photo Nominated for Deletion[edit]

hi! today i uploaded a photo of T-ARA on their award page and it was nominated for deletion. i had gotten permission from the facebook user to post the photo. please respond soon, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack153901 (talk • contribs)

@Jack153901: Thanks for your response. If you have permission from the copyright owner, please have them email the license information following the steps described at COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Taxi cab meter Japan (2).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Taxi cab meter Japan (2).jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Taxi cab meter Japan (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

File:TikTok by Solen Feyissa.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:TikTok by Solen Feyissa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aasim 22:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Doll-waldorf-doll-cloth-doll-members-toys-thumbnail.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Doll-waldorf-doll-cloth-doll-members-toys-thumbnail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Gizon bat lan egiten.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gizon bat lan egiten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

I am aware[edit]

Hello i noted that my photo is not suitable for Commons since it got signed for deletion, so i was hoping to know how to delete it. Thanks ~ Er surgi —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.71.237.145 (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Er surgi: @93.71.237.145: If you want your own image deleted, you can add the speedy deletion tag like this: {{speedy|reason for deleting}}. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Darreon Mark (Southall FC).jpg and File:Max Howell (Southall FC).jpg[edit]

Hello, thank you for your notes about File:Darreon Mark (Southall FC).jpg and File:Max Howell (Southall FC).jpg

I thought I had added these images correctly but it seems not, but I am not sure how to add the images correctly, please can you advise what I need to do differently?

To confirm: Southall Football Club own both of the images and have sent both of the images to me by email and have given me permission to add them to the Southall F.C. Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall_F.C.).

Therefore there is no issue with permission, the only issue is correct procedure for adding the images, so can you please confirm what I need to do, as I seem to be running into issues with the way I am uploading images, when I have permission to use them. Thank you. Mark Roach Southall FC (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

N.B. There are some duplicates of images and the only versions of images required on the Southall F.C. Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall_F.C.) are the versions that have been published on that page, all other versions are not needed and can be deleted - are you able to delete them please? Thank you. Mark Roach Southall FC (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

@Mark Roach Southall FC: Hi, thanks for replying here. If you have permission from the club, you can have them verify the licensing information through the steps described at COM:OTRS. I realize this might seem like unnecessary red tape, but going through this process ensures that the source information is confirmed and the permission can't be revoked in the future. As far as duplicates, I can mark them up so there's only one copy of an image. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Mark Roach Southall FC (talk) 19:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

{{}}== Help ==

Ciao Ytoyoda. Mi hai lasciato un messaggio nella mia pagina di discussione, riguardo ad un immagine che ho aggiunto. Questa immagine viene utilizzata in siti di immagine non coperte da copyright, dopo un atttenta ricerca non ho trovato da chi è stata creata o dove è stata pubblicata per la prima volta. Questa immagine credo sia di pubblico dominio, vonee usata su siti come Flickr e Pinterest. Potresti aiutarmi a capire cosa ho sbagliato ad aggiungere questa immagine? Grazie — Preceding unsigned comment added by TommasoRmndn (talk • contribs) January 12, 2021‎ (UTC)

@TommasoRmndn: There's a LOT of copyrighted material on Flickr and Pinterest. And if you can't find the original photographer or publisher information, I don't think you have any evidence for why it's in the public domain. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Ytoyoda Ho detto che è di pubblico dominio perchè la fotografia del ritrovo della Gioconda, è stata pubblicata prima del 1978, precisamente nel 1914, quindi supera anche i 95 anni dopo la prima pubblicazione. Ho letto i termini e le condizioni e questo è quello che ho trovato, quindi credo, vista la ricerca che ho fatto anche sul web, che possa esser considerata di Pubblico dominio o comunque utilizzabile. Fammi sapere, grazie. January 12, 2021

@TommasoRmndn: Hi, I've updated the licensing information. Based on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France, the copyright would usually expire 70 years after the photographer's death. However, since we don't know the photographer (Roger-Violett is an agency), the copyright (probably( expired in 1984. The Freddy Mercury photo is likely copyrighted though, since it's only about 36 years old. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ytoyoda: Ciao, l'immagine di Freddie Mercury non è coperta da copyright poichè l'autore è sconosciuto e non si ha la certezza di dove sia stata pubblicata la prima volta. Ho aggiornato la sorgente da dove ho preso il file con una che si sembra maggiormente chiara e più sicura rispetto a Flickr.

Un'altra cosa: non capisco perchè mi hai segnalato la fotografia di Lenin. Quell'immagine è stata presa dall'archivio di fotografie storiche e culturali con sede a Firenze e Londra, dove viene esplicitamente detto che l'autore è sconosciuto e che si ha la possibilità di utilizzare l'immagine. Fammi sapere. --TommasoRmndn (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

@TommasoRmndn: This is incorrect. We know the photographer and there's nothing in the link that says the photograph is in public domain. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ytoyoda: non si ha la certezza di chi sia l'autore dell'immagine e non è chiaro dal 1926 anche perchè questa è la foto originale non la modifica per eliminare Kamenev e Trockij. Hai ragione sul fatto del pubblico dominio, dice solo che può venir utilizzata in vari paesi, quindi credo che il problema si risolverebbe togliendo il CC 0 e aggiungendo CC 4.0 dando i crediti all'archivio e rimando con l'autore anonimo.

Mi puoi dire anche con la fotografia di Freddie Mercury? ho cercato dall'ultima volta che abbiamo parlato e questo è quello che ho trovato, spero vada bene. --TommasoRmndn (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

@TommasoRmndn: The photographer is likely Denis O'Regan, a professional concert photographer. I'm pretty certain the photograph is copyrighted. The photo wasn't old enough to be in public domain anyway. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ytoyoda: Nel suo sito e nel suo archivio non è presente quell'immagine. Non credo che la fonte sia attendibile trattandosi di una pagina facebook. Ad ogni modo ho controllato e non è attribuiti con certezza a nessuno. Comunque ti ripeto, il problema con queste due immagini forse è dire che sono CC0, il problema non c'è se sono sotto voce CC4.0 visto che una è un immagine che viene davvero da un fonte sicura come l'archivio (Lenin) e l'atra un immagine che non ha certezza di autore e viene da un sito di concerti (Freddie Mercury). Grazie --TommasoRmndn (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@TommasoRmndn: You can't assign a CC license just because you're unable/unwilling to find the proper source information. It's the uploader's responsibility to provide the information. And as I mentioned in the deletion request page, even though the source information is from a Facebook post, it matches up with another photograph of the same concert by the same photographer from the same angle. If you disagree, you're welcome to find the actual photographer information. Otherwise, since it's a 1986 photograph, it's still copyrighted even if the photographer is unknown. Please stop assuming copyright doesn't exist when you don't know the photographer. And as for the Lenin photograph, there's nothing at the archive site that says the photograph is in public domain. Please stop assuming things. Anyway, there's no point in arguing but you're welcome to repeat your points at the deletion requests. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ytoyoda: credo invece che chi dia le cose per scontato sia tu, visto che continui a segnalare immagini che potrebbero stare su wikipedia senza nessun problema. Ho detto che secondo me era di dominio pubblico perchè è un immagine creata nel 1920! Sull'autore ancora non si ha la certezza, ma ad ogni modo questa dovrebbe esser l'immagine che si crede che sia di GP Goldstein, morto nel 1946. Per quando riguarda la fonte che mi hai fatto vedere per l'immagine di freddie mercury non è sicura, ogni persona su facebook può scrivere i crediti che vuole. Denis O'Regan era uno dei fotografi a quel concerto ma se questa immagine non è nel suo archivio o nel suo sito non credo sia possibile supporre che sia sua. Ho detto che poteva esser di dominio pubblico perchè nessuno forse aveva mai richiesto il copyright. Non credo sia corretto. Grazie però --TommasoRmndn (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@TommasoRmndn: The Lenin photo is fine - sorry, the photographer died in 1941 so it's been in the public domain for 10 years (the discussion is for the altered photo without Trotsky). As for the Freddy Mercury photo, sure, it might be someone other than Denis O'Regan. But every photograph is copyrighted unless:
  • The photographer gives up all rights
  • The source allows free use and modification of the photograph
  • The copyright has expired
Here's how it works: if you take a photograph right now, that photograph is automatically copyrighted unless you choose to release it to the public domain. Since we don't know who the copyright owner is, we assume that the photograph is copyrighted until we have more information. You can read more about this at COM:COPYRIGHT. And because we know that the photographer of the Freddy Mercury photograph has not been dead for 70 years, we know that the copyright has not expired. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ytoyoda: Ok, grazie mille per avermi spiegato tutto. Non volevo essere scortese, scusami se lo sono sembrato. Ti voglio chiedere un ultima cosa: nella pagina https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodstock ho voluto aggiungere l'immagine iconica creata da Burk Uzzle. Volevo utilizzare il "fair use" perchè penso che quell'immagine sia fondamentale ed esprima al meglio il festival spiegato nella pagina. Credo di aver fatto un errore nell'impostazione di quell'immagine, sai dirmi come fare? se posso utilizzarla e come? ho parlato via mail col fotografo (Uzzle) e mi ha detto che potevo utilizzarla ma solo sulla pagina di Woodstock, per quello avevo pensato al "fair use". Grazie mille --TommasoRmndn (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@TommasoRmndn: fair use images are not allowed on Commons. Some, but not all, Wiki projects allow fair use images in very limited circumstances. It gets complicated so I won't try to explain. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

File:PEI registration plate.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:PEI registration plate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

sorry[edit]

I was trying to get primission but did not get a response KoolKidSaysHello (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Northern_Cyprus_win_ELF_CUP_2006.jpg?uselang=fr[edit]

Hello, I could see that you put this "Dialog-warning.svg This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: From https://trofeusdofutebol.blogspot.com/2015/02/torneios-entre-selecoes-nao-fifa.html?m=1 "on an image I posted yesterday, except that the problem, the photo does not belong to this blog, in addition to your error this photo I took it again a few years ago from a site which was deleted in 2010. This blog does not has no rights on this photo. You know very well that a blog often recovers images or articles already existing or deleted for several years. This photo has always been free of rights. This blog to create his article in 2015 with photos recovered that does not belong to him, This photo must have been taken by a northern Cypriot 15 years ago. Durante Inferno (talk) 11:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)