User talk:Adeletron 3030

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Ytoyoda)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Adeletron 3030!


Palazzo Wanny licence images[edit]

Hello Ytoyoda, thank you to warning me about the Palazzo Wanny's images. I already asked the owner of the images to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the format found in the license guide.

Hope that it will be all right.

Best regards Rickmadferit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickmadferit (talk • contribs) 16:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HI you deleted my SISTER picture[edit]

I AM ADMIN OF SOCIAL MEDIA APP AND SITE OF MARIAM SHEIKHALIZADEH WHY YOU DELETED MY SISTER PICTURE WHEN I HAVE COPY RIGHT OF TIHS PICTURE 

RESPECT PLEASE [User:Ytoyoda|Ytoyoda]] ([[User talk:Ytoyoda#top — Preceding unsigned comment added by MOHA2000MOHA (talk • contribs) 06:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr[edit]

I see that you are a good uploaded of photos unlike me I am new to commons and do not have much experience. I am asking if you can Upload an image of the Lamborghini Squadra Corse logo image which would turn out to be a great help for me. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by ගොඩය (talk • contribs) 13:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC) Please fo not forget to reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ගොඩය (talk • contribs) 13:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сергеевская богадельня в Бежецке Тверская обл.jpg.[edit]

https://sobory.ru/profile/?author=7713_AndreyAgafonov — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemchinvk (talk • contribs) 18:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Croatian FCs logos[edit]

I have drawn all 3 digital image logos in this link below myself, from the original real life logo, as I am helping the Croatian FA fill the missing data of small provincial town clubs on Wikipedia: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TzPGZ Apart from the Quarnero one (which is a photo of a sport association physical badge that was created under communist rules of copyright 76 years ago and therefore not subjected to any copyright law, as none existed back then - although I agree with its deletion, because I plan to substitute it with a professional vector image as soon as I have some time), it is not correct to delete these logos without a discussion and giving the possibility to provide some evidence that the clubs to which they are associated are ok with its use (which I can easily get on a direct request basis by these small clubs themselves - being that they are extremely happy somebody is helping them improve their Wikipedia pages with quality data and up to date information that was lacking until now). This aside, the wikipedia usage (reproduction for wikipedia usage) of football clubs logos falls within the FAIR USAGE/DEALING of copyright law: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright#fair-dealing The real life logo of all these small clubs (from towns with 2-10k inhabitants) playing today in provincial leagues are absolutely not limited by any copyright provision that would prohibit its no-profit use on Wikipedia. Of course these clubs do not state this openly on their pages for me to provide you a link, because Football logos in the EU are not under copyright limitation for non-commercial and fair use. Otherwise all big clubs in Europe (which, contrary to these small clubs, do have the will and the money to sue people misusing their trademarks) would not have their logo featured on the respective Wikipedia pages. But as you see, all top 1000 football clubs in the EU have their logo and plenty of other trademarked imagery featured extensively here on Wikipedia, without any issue. It's the EU law that allows for this: https://www.sports.legal/2017/02/football-club-badges-the-legal-implications-of-misuse/ Moreover, also the law of the Republic of Croatia allows for such digital no-profit use of Sport club logos on the internet: https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/hr/web/observatory/faqs-on-copyright-hr (answer number 14) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TzPGZ (talk • contribs) 22:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You want to delete three pictures of mine[edit]

Hello, I don't know why you want to delete three pictures of mine, I've already sent the emails for declaring that there is no copyright violation and others members approved the pictures I've made with my phone. As I can see, you like to delete pictures even without getting more informations. I ask you to pay more attention. Thank you. --Fliv (talk) 16:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Fliv--Fliv (talk) 16:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you answer, while you continue to tag and delete my pictures? Please stop! Fliv (talk) 10:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fliv I’ve explained the reasons for tagging with each request. I’vs been responding to your messages in your talk page and in the deletion discussions because you’re more likely to see them there. My suggestion is to actually engage in the discussions instead of leaving messages in user talk pages. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I don't understand why there is a copyright violation on my work? Antonygrizmen1 (talk) 14:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Antonygrizmen1 The logo image appears to come from https://www.facebook.com/TheKashmirAvengersFC/. If it's the official logo of a team, the copyright belongs to the team. If you're representing the team and editing the Wikipedia page, you should make that clear. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
well thanks for your time I appriciate your work but I don't know where to do that i mean that's true I represent the team and i'm new here so please can you guide me how to do that, how to make thing clear and right
Thanks. Antonygrizmen1 (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Antonygrizmen1 You can follow the directions at COM:VRT/CONSENT to show that you own the rights to the logo. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks i've sent the email can you please remove the violation mark now ? Antonygrizmen1 (talk) 16:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the photo[edit]

Hi Ytoyoda,

Thank you for your kind reminder! I have undone the editing of adding the photo. I apologize that I did not find out the copyright details of the photo. Wish you have a great day!

Julie 27.33.90.186 00:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 11:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gobernador Jorge Arturo Dip Calderon.jpg[edit]

Hola! Vi que has marcado la imagen File:Gobernador Jorge Arturo Dip Calderon.jpg para ser borrada por no tener licencia libre. Sin embargo los lineamientos del Gobierno de Chile establecen que el contenido de sus plataformas "deberá ser publicado para licencia creative commons de atribución", conforme a la ordenanza 112/14 del ministerio de la secretaría general de gobierno de la república de Chile. Te dejo el link, está en la página 2, letra f. http://web.archive.org/web/20191102045715/http://2010-2014.gob.cl/media/2011/01/Instructivo_Lineamientos_Comunicacionales_Web.pdf

¿como puedo agregar esa licencia al archivo de imagen File:Gobernador Jorge Arturo Dip Calderon.jpg, para evitar que lo eliminen?

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Missvain (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:西武10000系電車 ニューレッドアロー スタジアムエクスプレス-2.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:西武10000系電車 ニューレッドアロー スタジアムエクスプレス-2.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:西武10000系電車 ニューレッドアロー スタジアムエクスプレス-2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All permissions are given[edit]

All the license which i gave on the photos and images are valid and has met one of these criteria or all if not most of the criteria making them public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onengsevia (talk • contribs) 20:48, January 31, 2022 (UTC)

@Onengsevia: In that case, please provide URLs where other users can verify the license information. If that’s not possible, please follow the directions at COM:VRT and submit evidence for the license provided. Thank you! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Could you please remove the false claims you input on the pages i uploaded? I gave a proper license info panel and i really don't want to waste time going back and forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onengsevia (talk • contribs) 20:51, January 31, 2022 (UTC)

@Onengsevia: I’m happy to remove the “no permission” template once you provide a link where the license information can be verified. You could also convert the “speedy delete” (it’s not that speedy, don’t worry) into a full discussion — you’ll see the button for doing that on the deletion tag. Or like I wrote above, you could go through COM:VRT. Feel free to do any of these three. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can use all these files[edit]

All the official insignia files of organizations are not protected by copyright in Ethiopia due to their legal nature of decree of official texts, and i can use the other photos for educational uses under Ethiopian law so please just remove this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onengsevia (talk • contribs) 20:48, January 31, 2022 (UTC)

@Onengsevia: Okay cool, but you can’t upload a file to Commons if it’s restricted to educational uses. It has to allow all uses (including commercial use) and modifications. Since there seems to be a misunderstanding on licensing, I’m restoring the tags to the images until more information is provided. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay delete all the educational use images, but all the insignias of government organizations are public domain in Ethiopia and the world because they are of legal nature: that i Ethiopian law and i would appreciate if you help me out and remove all the deleted requests from those pages Onengsevia (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Onengsevia I don't think there's a deletion tag on a government insignia at the moment. If your images are tagged, that means you're asked to provide more information. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding categories to my file[edit]

I don't know why you decide to add categories to files that aren't your own, but you're doing a good job, as you did with File:Unconsciousness Flower Memorial Library.jpg. You really did your research on the statue to the point where you put the maker of the statue without it even stating it on the file. Just letting you know that I noticed it and recognized it, and thanks. Edit: Turns out you did the same with File:Roswell P. Flower Statue.jpg and most of the rest of my files too. Are you like my mentor on commons if those exist on here? Either that or you have some connection to the library, or you're just bored out of your mind so you look at all the new files and try and find suitable categories for them. Whichever one it doesn't matter, thanks, --Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 14:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lallint I came across your images is, I do a regular search for Flickr images, since they're often incorrectly licensed and I like to do categorizing at the same time. Thanks for noticing! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baylor_Lady_Bears_basketball_players[edit]

Category discussion warning

Baylor Lady Bears basketball players has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


IagoQnsi (talk) 20:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving files from ja.wiki[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you move files from ja.wiki to Commons. That is awesome!!! I might be able to help add an information template with my bot if you tell me which files you would like to move. For example name of uploader or a category on ja.wiki. And if you do not mind to add the template yourself thats fine too. The files in Category:Unidentified subjects in Japan should be ready to move and if you see any files you like to move please feel free to do so. --MGA73 (talk) 07:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MGA73 Thanks, that’s good to know. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Odakyu 8000 2007-10-25.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Odakyu 8000 2007-10-25.JPG

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Odakyu 8000 2007-10-25.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Portaroumm[edit]

Greetings. The user Portaroumm, whom you warned in December of last year due to multiple copyright infringements, has re-uploaded several copyrighted photographs taken from various locations such as Facebook, Flickr and Google Streetview. Can you please check the situation, and if you consider that it is necessary, start a blocking process against the user? Thank you very much in advance, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the source from the last Portaroumm image that remained unidentified, it was taken from Flickr. Thank you very much and best regards, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 10:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mona supercup.jpg[edit]

Dear Adeletron 3030 I saw that you have submitted a request for removal of my photo I would like to explain to you that I think this is unjustified, because I know the photographer Hasan Mrad through an acquaintance and he has given me verbal permission to upload the photo as my own work. Bibnieuws 15:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bibnieuws If you have permission from the photographer, please follow the steps described at COM:VRT so that permission is documented and can be verified by other users. Thanks! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you put some files that I uploaded for deletion.

  • File:Salem Assli and his parents.jpg
  • File:Dan Inosanto and Salem Assli.jpg
  • File:Salem Assli at training.gif

These photos are taken from the official website of Salem Assli who distributes content under the license CC BY-SA 4.0, which is indicated in the footer of the website https://salemassli.com/.

@124Sanroque Thanks for letting me know. I've removed the "no permissions" tag. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No update on https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VScode_fanboy&oldid=prev&diff=644970719[edit]

Notice: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VScode_fanboy&oldid=prev&diff=644970719

Work that has been done: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Videonow_player_SpongeBob_Exclusive_Edition.webp&diff=645312073&oldid=645267405 — Preceding unsigned comment added by VScode fanboy (talk • contribs) 13:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VScode fanboy Thanks, though it doesn't look like the image is originally from Fandom. It's likely an old eBay sale item? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mentioned that the Exif data of the image did say it is from Ebay.
Processed By eBay with ImageMagick, z1.1.0. ||B2
On a google Lens search one Ebay's deep link was present. The link you posted doesn't work, please provide the URL of the search record that google ::provided - that attributed it to Ebay - not the Google search.
What do we do in this case, I'm all in for deleting it. VScode fanboy (talk) 02:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added Permissions[edit]

I included more permissions in two of my images that you nominated for deletion, including the URL that they came from, and the correct licensing for them. If there's anything else, just tell me. Tyman9348 (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've had trouble uploading images before in the past, And I'm still trying to basically learn how to do it right. Tyman9348 (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tyman9348 Hi, sorry I'm late responding. I appreciate you adding the source URL, though I don't think any of the images you uploaded are correctly licensed. The Flickr image is marked "All rights reserved", Instagram photos are copyrighted unless otherwise noted, and there's nothing on the Barr Visuals website that indicates a free license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was an image deleted?[edit]

I got a message saying an image had been deleted.

Editor's summary: Bot: Removing [[c:File:Money box from New Zealand.jpg]] , deleted by Túrelio (Copyright violation: Uploader cites a CC-BY-NC-ND license, and the site's terms of services says "all rights reserved": www.tepapa.govt.nz/about/collections/all-te-papa-websites/copyright-and-terms-use).

The specific image has the rights licence by-nc-nd/4.0 and a big button saying DOWNLOAD. https://collections.tepapa.govt.nz/object/60278

And this page: https://mediasales.tepapa.govt.nz/cart/object/60278 states: Te Papa has thousands of high-resolution images available for download, free of charge, with reuse subject to copyright status.

So my understanding is that the image is availble for non-commercial reuse. Please explain your view.Wainuiomartian (talk) 18:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wainuiomartian Commons does not accept works with licenses that do not allow commercial uses or derivative works. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information[edit]

Hi, I have a question. Maybe it is not a right place to ask, excuses in advance. I wonder is this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dalida_80%27s.png] photo legaly on wiki? It is copyrighted tho... ~~~~ Dalida Editor please ping or message me 20:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hyagnis fistularius[edit]

Buenas Adeletron 3030, La imagen [1] es de dominio público y no debería haber problema con ello. La imagen fue tomada en 1914, es decir, ¡ hace más de 100 años !. Elías (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esta también, no hay problemas debido a la licencia que es Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0). Elías (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I don't think there's a problem with it either. The Flickrreview bot will just review the Flickr license and tag the license as verified. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
oK. Elías (talk) 20:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SS Lep by VLT[edit]

I added the good license to file File:"Vampire star" (SS Lep or 17 Lep) captured by the VLT.webp, can you retire the "missing permission". Pelligton (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added the good license to file, can you retire the missing permission". Pelligton (talk) 17:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pelligton Where are you seeing that it has a Creative Commons license? I look at the site but couldn’t find it. Could you point me to the licensing information? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In the orther image of the VLT, source on the paper relied at the image https://www.eso.org/public/switzerland-fr/images/eso1148a/ Pelligton (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Adeletron 3030 Pelligton (talk) 18:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pelligton I see it now, thanks. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, QTHCCAN (talk) 19:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the Flickr account is likely to do some Flickrwashing. QTHCCAN (talk) 19:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Minneapolis Collage 2022.png[edit]

Hello. Can you please delete this file: Minneapolis Collage 2022.png. Because both you and another user (not including me) have noted blatant copyright violations. Thanks! -- Danyess (talk) 15:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone else has already tagged it for speedy deletion, so it'll happen shortly. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely sorry[edit]

I admit most of my photos are copyrighted, but only 2 or 3 are my own work. I was in a severe rush to finish my pages before my deadline, and didn’t have time to think about copyrighting. I’m very sorry for what I did.

My sincere condolences, MegaMack02 (talk) 19:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. Happy editing in the future! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Kit Connor with Maylis Briand.jpg[edit]

I left a message commenting on the deletion of the photo here. Could you read it, please? Theys York (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cassidy Hutchinson, is sworn in, 2022-06-28.webp[edit]

did not notice the "AP" .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 15:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it wasn't that noticeable since it's a video title card. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]