User talk:Yuraily Lic

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Yuraily Lic!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Why delete a usefull image in a language you do not speak?[edit]

Hi, I saw you requested deletion of my photograph of Slagroomversteviger. It is used for Dutch wikipedia, in a new article (in Dutch). You did not provide any information why it should be deleted. Thus, I have no idea why you made the request. This is rather rude and (even worse~!) unhelpful. Ietskleiner (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ietskleiner. Are you talking about Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slagroomversteviger.jpg? If so, as I wrote in the deletion request. Please see COM:PACKAGING. Please do not upload images that Wikimedia Commons cannot accept to decorate Wikipedia articles. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

watermarked images[edit]

I uploaded images on wikipedia commons ( - and got a message from you. I would tell you, that i have the strictly permission by the copyright holder, roland lorenz, to put them under creative commons and upload to wikipedia. Greetings from snowy Austria! austria69 —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 09:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, austria69. Are you talking about Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Austria69 ?If so, please write in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Austria69. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Posted by User:国際国際[edit]

reqtest for deletion of File:単眼猫.jpg--国際国際 (talk) 09:39, 11 january 2021 (UTC) 国際国際 (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 国際国際. What is your point? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  svenska  Tagalog  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
I don't know when or who wrote it. As I recall, it was a long time ago. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Unicorn Gundam Statue RX-0 IMG 0564.jpg[edit]

Hi, Yuraily Lic. Sorry to upload an image that violates copyright issues. I understand the result and you may proceed to delete it.

Thank you for understanding. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Please no more "No FOP in Sweden"[edit]

@Esquilo: said that there has FOP in Sweden for buildings in Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Sweden. -- 08:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Are you talking about Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ahlgrens bilar in a flurry (2724657673).jpg ? If that's the thing, it has already been processed. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi Yuraily Lic, just note that LPfi and I, maybe other peoples, either from Sweden or not, are discussing your matters on this topic at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Sweden. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of File:کاتی_زێرین.jpg[edit]

Hello Dear , about today's speedy deletion i want to cancel it , because i need time to fix it, and i think i had warning previously that i have seven days,

and it's not free use , it's Fair Use unfortunately i'm still new here so i couldn't change it to [Fair Use] Content i provided a Source and Author and Artist to the Content In other words i think i have right to use it fairly in other wikis as it used previously as Fair Use in English Wikpedia.Sakura emad (talk) 14:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Sakura emad. Unfortunately, fair use files are not allowed on Wikikedia Commons. Please see Com:Fair use. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Texte Star Wars.jpg[edit]

Clodion (talk) 20:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@Clodion: I am not the uploader of that file, and I have nothing to do with it. Why did you post it on my talk page? It is annoying. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
I know, I just want your opinion on the matter. Thank you.--Clodion (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


初めまして。先従隗始と申します。日本語を理解なさっているようにお見受けしましたので、日本語にて書かせていただきます。 私のアップロードした画像について十数枚ほど削除依頼に挙げられています。以前ほかの方に、説明のアップロードはページに用いられなければよいと聞いたのですが、実際どうなのでしょうか。 もし認識が間違っていたら教えていただきたく思います。説明板は非常に微妙な立ち位置の画像と考えておりますので、個人的に説明のアップロードをYuraily Licさんが「よくない」とお考えなのでしたら、その場合にも消していただいて構いません。--先従隗始 (talk) 06:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 先従隗始. Please read User_talk:Yuraily_Lic#説明文の写った写真の削除依頼について. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

You cannot delete his 2 photos.[edit]

Hello, you deleted two photos for no real reason, here are the 2 phtos: File: Nelson Mandela Trophy.jpg and File: Mother Teresa Trophy.jpg. I take the example of "File: Mother Teresa Trophy.jpg" the photo comes from the facebook page "VIVA WORLD CUP LTD" (created in 2019) except that this account has absolutely nothing official and the picture does not belong to that person. For "File: Nelson Mandela Trophy.jpg" if I remember correctly, it's a fan's blog, ditto the photo does not belong to him. The real VIVA World Cup account was deleted a long time ago, there is just an NF-Noard page on facebook and twitter, there again they are abandoned. The NF-Board no longer exists since 2013. The 2 trophies were created by a French artist. Second important point: Regarding copyright, each contributor is subject to the law of his country. So from my country's point of view, there is no problem. Fair use is a case law used in the United States (but absent in most other countries, particularly French-speaking) which tolerates the reproduction of works normally protected by copyright. Each Wikipedia is free to define its own policy, I cannot be subject to English-speaking or other decisions, rules or laws. Photos can be stored and shared on the French-speaking wikipedia without worrying about being deleted. I therefore ask you to put back his 2 photos, please. You are wrong, the 2 photos can be posted on the article VIVA World Cup the French version wikipedia, while respecting the English version which will not have its 2 photos on the article VIVA World Cup. Hope the second point will help you understand better. Cordially. Durante Inferno (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Durante Inferno. "Fair use" media files are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Please read Commons:Fair use for more information. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Yuraily Lic. As I could say it before, the photos which I besides modify, do not belong to the person of the blog [[1]] (he himself must have resume it on a site that no exists) nor to the person on the facebook page [[2]], they have nothing official and does not belong to them. The photos I edit are mine. These are photos that have always been free, they have been shared everywhere and there has never been a request for protection regardless of the sites, newspapers or even the creator or the NF-Board. There has never been a ban on sharing his photos, they have always been free, plus they are useful for one of Wikipedia's projects. French laws go against wikimedia commons rules, its images are made for French wikipedia. If wikimedia commons which is basic English-speaking poses a problem then as much to create a "wikimedia commons 100% Francophone" which could be a real solution for those who wish to improve various articles in French, even wikimedia commons in other languages ​​for their projects, which will be aligned with the laws of their country and not that of another. I will not bother you with that anymore, I will make a request (for a Francophone wikimedia) to avoid this kind of absurdity. Cordially. --Durante Inferno (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Durante Inferno. For requests to restore files, please write on Commons:Undeletion requests. If you have more questions about Wikimedia Commons copyright rules, please write on Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)


著作権侵害との通知を頂きました。== File:Screenshot 20210111 mariocart.jpg == 平家パイナップル (talk)

It's not the file I uploaded. The file you uploaded. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


著作権侵害との通知を頂きました。削除お願いします。{{subst:copyvionote|1=File:Yamaman-車両基地.jpg|reason=from Google Maps.,140.1544528 平家パイナップル (talk) 11:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

It's not the file I uploaded. The file you uploaded. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Call of duty mobile[edit]

Esse texto está escrito em português por que eu não sei inglês A imagem do call of duty podera ser removida por direitos autorais,mas as imagens do jogo call of duty mobile está para domínio publico,basta jogar o call of duty mobile para saber que qualquer pessoa pode usar essas imagens — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan Trassante (talk • contribs) 23:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Direitos autorais da imagem Ryan Trassante (talk) 23:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ryan Trassante. If you have any objections to the deletion of files, please write to Commons:Undeletion requests (Commons:Pedidos de restauração). --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


えむえすいーです。平家パイナップル様のGoogle Mapとマリオカートツアーの削除依頼の件ですが、削除が行われていませんでした。どうすれば削除できますか? えむえすいー (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, えむえすいー. File:Screenshot 20210111 mariocart.jpg has already been deleted by the administrator. I think the other file will be deleted soon by the administrator. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


削除依頼の件ですが、どうしても削除していただきたい問題のため、1月中の削除お願いします。私はウィキ初心者なので、削除ができません。お願いします。削除してください。 えむえすいー (talk) 11:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright Dragon Quest III[edit]

Hello! This picture I took from an emulator. I believe that is from my own work. Sorry for anyhting! Please talk to me if I violate any copyrights — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryugold (talk • contribs) 07:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ryugold. Screenshot of video game without free license is obvious copyright violation. Please do not upload it. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright violations notices in error, please amend and take notice Anne Jones is the copyright holder of images of theatre productions in question[edit]

Dear Yuraily Lic, you have flagged copyright violations for various works owned by ToadShow Pty Ltd ABN 63 073 488 114 a company which is co-owned by Anne Jones who is the chair of ToadShow and the senior executive authority and therefore responsible for the company and its works, and in so being, is authorised to upload ToadShow works to Wikimedia Commons and assign Creative Commons status. Your flagging of several uploads by Anne Jones referred to here is in error. Please take steps to countermand these judgements (presumably made by you without full knowledge of their status and the status of Anne Jones as copyright holder).Annepatriciajones (talk) 01:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Annepatriciajones. Please write that explanation in Commons:Undeletion requests. If the administrators understand that your explanation is true, the deleted files will be restored. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


Are all screenshot taken from you tube copyright infringement I ask this out of curiosity for I have seen long standing image taken from youtube on wikipedia without anyone marking copyright violation so I really thought its ok if I gave the credit to the owner and the source urlLuwanglinux (talk) 17:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Luwanglinux. Please see Commons:YouTube files. The same is true for screenshots from YouTube files.
For example, File:"El amor de Eloy" - Entrevista Patricia Pérez - Teatro Bellas Artes 01.jpg, this is a screenshot from a YouTube file. And, its source, , has a CC license. Files in such cases are OK. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you,Yuraily Lic.This is very helpful Luwanglinux (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Is this file
This file
Ok about copyright will it strike me with copyright violation too...,help me don't block me I am afraid of copyright legal jeopardy too.Luwanglinux (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
That YouTube file has CC license. But, it seems to be a collection of several videos. The licenses of the original videos in the YouTube file are unknown. So, I can't decide if it's OK or not. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
If you have more questions, I think it's better to ask at Com:Village pump/Copyright. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Something to consider[edit]

Hi. I think you should consider becoming an Admin. From what I can see you know your stuff and you are polite to all users - which is a very good trait to have. Give it some thought, we could use the help Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Gbawden. But, becoming an admin is a heavy burden for me. I would like to contribute to Wikimedia Commons as a user.
I am always grateful for the activities of all the admins. Thanks, all the admins and good users! --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


  • 關於部分圖像的來源我已經補上,所以你可以把缺少來源排的模板刪除嗎?

[3] 林未釋 (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 林未釋. About File:李宗仁與張發奎.jpg, I removed the no-source tag because the source was added. And, I changed the license according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Taiwan. Thank you for adding the source. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • 我一些照片都是來自同一本書,還有大部分照片關於部分圖像的來源我已經補上。 林未釋 (talk) 07:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I will write the continuation on your talk page. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • 關於下面這二張照片的年份我已經補上。



林未釋 (talk) 09:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • 還有這張照片的來源我也補上了。


林未釋 (talk) 10:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I removed the no-source tags and changed the licenses according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Taiwan.
* File:張發奎在抗戰初期攝.jpg
* File:左起黃琪翔、陳銘樞、郭沫若、張發奎、葉挺.jpg
This photo was taken in 1984. Unfortunately, Wikimedia Commons can not accept it without the permission of the copyright holder.
* File:1984年蔡文治在黃埔軍校建校六十週年紀念會上.jpg

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

  • 這是要根據中華人民共和國的著作權法來看。 林未釋 (talk) 10:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • 中華人民共和國的著作權法是2010年發佈的。 林未釋 (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
The People's Republic of China, not the Republic of China? Was the photo File:1984年蔡文治在黃埔軍校建校六十週年紀念會上.jpg taken in the People's Republic of China? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
To upload a photo taken in 1984, the permission from the copyright holder is required. Please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/China. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • 我的來源已補上

File:臺灣民報總批發處.jpg 林未釋 (talk) 06:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

  • 下面幾張照片的來源我也補上了



File:蔣渭水先生的臨床講義.jpg 林未釋 (talk) 06:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. These are the files you uploaded, so I will write the continuation on your talk page. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Is it right? It seems that textbooks of Taiwan history are copyrighted [4], but is that textbook not copyrighted? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
That site does not appear to be official. I can't determine if that textbook is copyrighted or not. It is your responsibility to change the copyright tag of this file. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright in the People's Republic of China is difficult. I can't determine the copyright status of this photo. It is your responsibility to change the copyright tag of this file. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

If you have more questions, I think it's better to ask at Com:Village pump/Copyright or Commons:Village pump/zh. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

我沒有叫你看中華人民共和國的著作權法,我只是要跟你說著作權法是有「2010s」發布的,而照片是在「1984s」拍攝的,所以當時根本沒有著作權,所以此照片不受著作權保護。 林未釋 (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
I can't determine the copyright status of them. Please ask for help at Commons:Village pump/zh or Com:Village pump/Copyright. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
I can't determine the copyright status of it. Please ask for help at Commons:Village pump/zh or Com:Village pump/Copyright. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I removed the no-permission tag because the year of the shooting was added. And, I changed the license according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Taiwan. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
I removed the no-permission tag, and changed the license based on your information. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Is the author 國父紀念館 or 蔣渭水? If the author is 蔣渭水, please change it. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thanks 林未釋 (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
我有一些問題.(1)我有之前那些圖片不是已經加入了沒有版權的模板嗎?那為什麼「TechyanTalk)」這一個管理員又要刪除我的照片。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 林未釋 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

About the some files nominated in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 林未釋, I'll write my opinion.

This looks like a screenshot from a video game. If the video game is copyrighted, then the copyright belongs to game's creator, even if you took the screenshot.
It looks like a photo of a rabbit taken by you. I see no reason to delete it.
It looks like a photo of a diagram from a book. The copyright may belong to the author of the book.
Old photo taken in 1940. According to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Taiwan#Old_photographs, as you put it, {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} is OK, I think.

Please talk to the administrator Techyan directly. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

  • However, some photos already have non-copyright templates, why should they be deleted? 林未釋 (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Hmm, I don't know. I think some images (some old photos and rabbit photos) will remain. I think it's better to claim your opinion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 林未釋. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Will you keep the photos you checked before?

The year the photo was taken must be indicated, and the license must be changed to an appropriate one.
The year the photo was taken must be indicated.
The others will be OK, I think. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I may not be able to provide the correct year, but the "Li Jishen" man has been dead for 62 years. 林未釋 (talk) 09:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

For example, you can write "The year the photo was taken is before xxxx (because the year of his death is xxxx)." The point is to provide evidence that the photo is old, the copyright is not valid and it is in the public domain, and the license is appropriate. There are also templates. Template:Other date --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
I reasonably used this photo from the internet 林未釋 (talk) 10:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
I have no idea about this. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
This photo was taken before 1959, because the year of 李濟深's death was 1959. I understood this way. If my understanding of it is correct, I think that the license is OK. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Can you delete the template? 林未釋 (talk) 09:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Is a template for mentioning and deleting 林未釋 (talk) 09:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
No, I can't. Because I'm neither the submitter of that deletion requests nor the administrators. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • I told Techyan, but he didn’t reply to me 林未釋 (talk) 10:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

On the page Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 林未釋, for each file, write a reason why this file is appropriate to keep. I think it's good to do so. For example,

This photo was taken in Republic of China before 1959, because the year of 李濟深's death was 1959. So, according to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Taiwan#Old_photographs, the license PD-ROC-oldphoto is appropriate.
This photo was taken in Taiwan in 1940. So, according to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Taiwan#Old_photographs, the license PD-Japan-oldphoto is appropriate.

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hope you can add the objection template under Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lin. 林未釋 (talk) 14:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
You can do it! --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
You misunderstood.I hope you can add the "Objection" template below. 林未釋 (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletation of satellite view[edit]

Indian cities like New Delhi, Bhopal, Surat etc's satellite views must not be deleted. No impurities are there. Jejsiguoa (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Jejsiguoa. Are you talking about Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jejsiguoa? You have written source=own, author=Jejsiguoa in the informations of those satellite view files. Do you have your own satellite? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Those satellite views are good photos. But, it's not good to plagiarize. Please indicate the correct source of the photos. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh. I didn't know it. I will try. Jejsiguoa (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding. And, the next time you write your comment about the deletion request, please write to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jejsiguoa. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Yuraily Lic, I have uploaded a new version of File:Imphal city satellite view.jpg, with source URL. It was a screenshot from Google Earth. Please verify it, then inform whether it is OK

Jejsiguoa (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Images from Google Earth are copyrighted. Unfortunately, Wikimedia Commons does not accept them. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

But why??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejsiguoa (talk • contribs) 13:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC) It is user friendly

There are some conditions for using Google Earth (and Google Maps, Street View) images.
These do not match the conditions of the acceptable files on Wikimedia Commons. (Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses) --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Stop Spamming files that are within the copyrights I have attributed them to[edit]

You clearly just spam report without looking into the source files. You have reported numerous files that belong to Tasnim and Mehr news agencies. They both STATE 4.0 Creative Commons in the bottom of their web page. As for the other images, the bottom of the page I have used indicated that the use of their images and content is free as long as you mention the source however this is written in Farsi so you obviously can’t read Farsi, but that doesn’t excuse the fact that Tasnim and Mehr have written the Creative Commons 4.0 in English. Ali313korosh (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ali313korosh. Thanks for your comment. Ah, I missed. Some of the files you uploaded were cases that should have used {{LicenseReview}}. From now on, when you upload photos from Tasnimnews or Mehrnews, please add {{subst:Tasnim/subst}} or {{subst:Mehr/subst}}. (Please see also Category:Tasnimnews review needed and Category:Mehrnews review needed. ) From now, I will modify some of your files. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the no-permission tags from some of your uploaded files, and added {{subst:Tasnim/subst}}, {{subst:Mehr/subst}}, or {{LicenseReview}}. Please check them if my modifications are correct. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Pictures I uploaded are public domain.[edit]

There are many other public domain works that are already uploaded on Wiki commons. It is not fair you delete them.

1. Murals : they do not have copyright. There are no authors. It's drawn 1500years ago inside a tomb. There are lots of other pictures already on Wiki commons. 2. images inside a book : The author of these books do NOT have copyright of original drawings. They used it because it's public domain. They are not the copyright holder. 3.One that provide source : In Korea, we already mark if it's allowed to share postings and pictures in it when you post it. If you can right click and save it, it means you can share. if you can't right click, it means the writer locked it.

Most of pictures are cultural heritage, It's for everyone. There are many relics already in Wiki Commons. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, There's no indication of who you are and which files you are talking about. So I don't know what you are talking about. If you have any objections to the deletion of the files, please contact Commons:Undeletion requests. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Commons[edit]


Hope you are well. I have seen that you have recently active in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This page is currently the only page where user problems (conduct issues, and other unacceptable behavior, etc.) get reported.

I am working on facilitating the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement discussion on Commons which focuses users’ conduct. That is why I am inviting to participate in the discussion to give your valuable opinion.

You can do so by participating in the public on-wiki discussion on Commons: Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. There are a few questions regarding enforcement you can answer. Please feel free to include anything you find relevant.

I also encourage you to participate in the survey:

The survey has a different set of questions, and you can response to them anonymously. It is not a long survey and should take around 10 minutes to complete.

I want you to know that your input is very valuable and it will help to us better shape the UCoC enforcement pathways for our beloved Commons community. I hope you participate. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 08:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Alleged violation of copyright photos[edit]

Hello, this message is regarding the alleged violation made by Yuraily Lic, of posting photos on wikimedia commons by me.

Trabantfully is my ligin in a sandbox on Wikipedia, I used it to create an article about my own artistic work about Tomasz Matuszak. In other words, Trabantfully is Tomasz Matuszak. The article by Tomasz Matuszak exists on Wikipedia since yesterday, I'm new to Wikipedia and I don't know how to remove an article from sendbox yet, but I'll try to do it to. All photos posted on Wikimedia Commons belong to me. Domain is my official website. The domain describes my work with my consent, there are also only my photos there, the same is with the domain All these domains hold only photos that belong to me and I have the copyright to them.

I have posted similar message in:

I am not suer if I did in the right place so I am sending this message here as well

Sincerely Yours, Tomasz Matuszak - Trabantfully Trabantfully (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Please reply to this message, as I am a little worried about possible blocking of my own content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trabantfully (talk • contribs) 10:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I just noticed that my photos has been deleted from the Wikipedia site about me:

As I stated earlier all the photos that i have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons are my property. There has not been a violations of any kind. The website: is my official website done by me and holding images that belong only to me.

Other one: is a website catalogue of artis from Lodz Poland where I live and it holds article about me and also my photos.Same thing with the website:

I dont know what I have to do to prove that I am not ab elephant but I am me - Tomasz Matuszak, blocking photos that I only have copyright to, is really outrageous!!!!

I dont know who you people are but I suggest you better start thinking associate facts, in other case you will turn nazi,

Sincerely Yours, Tomasz Matuszak - Trabantfully —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, User:Trabantfully. Thank you for the message. I've read your messages here and there.
Are you Tomasz Matuszak? You didn't write it anywhere, did you? If it's not written, everyone will assume that those files were uploaded without author's permission. Neither I nor the administrators are responsible.
If you will upload them again, I think it would be good to write "These images are available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license." near the photos on your site.
(I like your photos. Unfortunately, they were deleted.)
By the way, let me confirm to make sure.
You are an artist.
Photos uploaded to Wikimedia Commons can be used by anyone for free. Commercial use is also possible. It means that your photographic works could be printed and sold by someone else.
Do you accept that your works may be used for free? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
You wrote to me "you will turn nazi". I think it's better not to write such offensive words. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Yuraily Lic // How the hell does "you will turn nazi" become offensive? --Iol Iizzy (talk) 18:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Iol Iizzy. Did you get a new account just to write it? Special:Contributions/Iol_Iizzy --Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
What- I came from wikipedia? •_•" But I still don't know how it's offensive. --Iol Iizzy (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  svenska  Tagalog  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#About the message I have received from Yuraily Lic. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, Jeff G.. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
You're welcome. Your actions are also under discussion at COM:AN#I'm having a last warning without prior warnings.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, Jeff G.. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
You're welcome again.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Andy Sophie[edit]

Bonjour, je suis scandalisé par le blocage de mon compte. Cette photo m'apartiens car je l'ai fait moi même et elle proviens de Foot de l'île 974 dont je suis le Community Manager --Dadam97490 (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Dadam97490. For request to restore of deleted file, please write on Commons:Undeletion requests and explain to the administrators. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the photos I uploaded about the Subaru BRZ[edit]

Hello! There is an Israeli site called cartube that have good pictures so I asked them where their pictures came from and they gave me a link to the site from which I uploaded the pictures and they told me that this site has no copyright Is it enough? Heziyehonatan (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Heziyehonatan. Thanks for your comment.
Are those images not really copyrighted? For example, File:Subaru-BRZ-2021.jpg, it looks the same as this image ( on the Subaru official website. I think Subaru Corporation has the copyright of it. You need to show that those photos are truly free-use. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I am in smog[edit]

I have uploaded multiple files to Wikimedia commons. But there are mistakes in licensing. I am in smog how to use the license. Which license will I use if I :

1. Publish my own work, 2. From other sources.

Also I don't know anything about metadata and resolutions. Tell me what are those. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejsiguoa (talk • contribs) 16:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejsiguoa (talk • contribs) 16:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Jejsiguoa. First, about metadata.

Metadata is the data that is recorded in the image file when a photo is taken. In the metadata, information such as the date of shooting and the camera used to take the photo are recorded.
For example, File:Statue of Liberty 7.jpg, you can see "Metadata" at the bottom of the page. There you can see the metadata information "Camera manufacturer: SONY, Camera model: DSC-N1, Date and time of data generation: 15:45, 8 August 2010".
For more information on metadata, please read Metadata#Photographs.

Sorry, I'll continue later. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

A little more about metadata.

When a photo is posted on the Internet, for example on Instagram or Facebook and so on, the metadata can disappear or change. So, if other users see a photo uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with missing or changed metadata, they may suspect that the photo is not the uploader's work.

Next, about resolutions.

Simply put, it's the number of dots that make up digital photos. On the files page of Wikimedia Commons, it is below the picture.
For example, File:Statue of Liberty 7.jpg, the resolution is 1,464 × 2,022 pixels (= dots).
Photos taken with recent cameras and smartphones have high resolution (in other words, many dots). So for low resolution (= fewer dots) photo, other users may suspect that it will be a photo stolen from other site. (The size of the photos may be reduced when posted on the website.)

Sorry, I'll continue later again. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

And about when you upload photos.

1. Publish your own work
It is better to upload photos with high resolution and metadata left. You upload the photo you took as it is, and the photo will have high resolution and metadata. In this case, the license can be any of CC0, CC-BY, or CC-BY-SA as allowed by the Wikimedia Commons. (Please see Com:Licensing)

To be continued. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I have understood the metadata and resolution clearly. Now, tell me while uploading a file at Wikimedia commons, where will I add the metadata? --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa 03:43 26 February 2021 (UTC)

There is no need to add metadata at all. Are you thinking of tampering someone else's photo and uploading it to Wikimedia Commons? If so, it shouldn't. If not, please forgive my bad premonition. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

No, I am not uploading someone else's photo.

All of these files are my works. But due to low resolution and metadata (only Orientation:0) these have been nominated for deletion. I wanna add metadata. Otherwise, these files may be deleted.

Response soon. The files shouldn't be deleted. --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa) 03:43 26 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't think those are your works. I can't help you on this matter. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok. It's confirmed. Most of the photo was from my YouTube channel. I will try to reload it with the URLs. I thought that these are from my channel, so I am the author. But now I realized YouTube sources are needed also. Let them be deleted. I'll try later after deleting. What about this decision? --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa) 10:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

I can't help you. Many people will think they are not your works. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
You asked me questions. Today, I realized its purpose. Don't upload other people's work as your own. Fake files uploaded by you will waste other users' and administrators' time. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok. I have realized my mistakes. The two files: File:Kanchenjunga from Jalpaiguri 2.jpg and File:Krishnanagar Collegiate School 2nd Runners Up at 8th All Bengal Inter Government Schools Sports Meet 2016-1017.jpg are really my works. You may check. Can you help me about these two files? No website will show these photos. --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa) 8:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello??? --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa) 15:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello. If the two files were really taken by you, just upload the files as you took them. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes I have uploaded a new version of that file (File:Krishnanagar Collegiate School 2nd Runners Up at 8th All Bengal Inter Government Schools Sports Meet 2016-1017.jpg). Please see it is ok or not. --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa) 7:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The size is smaller than previous versions. That's not good. And, overwriting, it's hard to judge. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploading incorrectly licensed files or plagiarized images will bring discredit to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. Please do not upload such files. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Exclam icon.svg Keep tidy ask.svg This media file has been nominated for deletion since 24 February 2021 This is still now. This should be reverted. --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa) 12:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

I have uploaded a new version of File:Kanchenjunga from Jalpaiguri 2.jpg. It may be some smaller in size than the previous. And as I realized my mistakes, I would like to advise you in this matter:

---These three files are not my works. You may request speedy deletions. But File:Kanchenjunga from Jalpaiguri 2.jpg and File:Krishnanagar Collegiate School 2nd Runners Up at 8th All Bengal Inter Government Schools Sports Meet 2016-1017.jpg--- these are 100% own work. You may check. These two files shouldn't be deleted. --Jejsiguoa (User talk:Jejsiguoa) 14:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Please write your claim on the page Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jejsiguoa. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Peter John Watson[edit]

Hi, I'm OTRS agent. In these cases the source says clearly "CCBYSA 4.0"; no OTRS permission is needed. Remember always verified the source license. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ganímedes. Thank you for your advice.
After I saw them, the uploader added the link to the page that describes the license. [8] [9] No wonder I don't notice, because there were no link when I saw them.
By the way, do those two files need {{LicenseReview}}? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
The permission says "This image is available under a CC BY 4.0 license", but two files have cc-by-sa-2.5 license. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Working on it. Thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
You're welcome. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Ganímedes, Another file File:Peter John Watson.jpg, uploaded by the same user. (This file has been deleted once as copyvio.) This file also says CC BY 4.0 in the source, but the file has CC BY-SA 4.0. I'll leave it to you to decide what to do about this as well. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

I konw. All 3 are in the ticket, but you just tagged 2. That's why I didn't name the other. I've already received confirmation of the license. Fixing... --Ganímedes (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Ganímedes. That's our OTRS team member! When I saw them, File:Peter John Watson.jpg was obviously copyvio. (This file has been deleted once. Special:Log/Scratchvideo shows that it was re-uploaded with the same file name.) So, I tagged only 2 files. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, i don't want to get blocked[edit]

Hey, I am so sorry for the copyrighted photos. But there are almost no photos of Emma Chamberlain and they are not really good. The ones that already exist are also copyrighted so I thought it was ok. Also, the last photo is a photo of my grandfather with former French President François Mitterand. I believe he has the right to choose the photo of him that he wants on his Wikipedia page. Thanks, Germinal31 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Germinal 31 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Germinal 31. Those already in Category:Emma Chamberlain are files that have a license acceptable to Wikimedia Commons. Your grandfather is a fine man. But even if your grandfather is in the photo, it does not mean that he is the copyright holder or the author. Please understand. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Misunderstanding about copyright violation[edit]

Hello I am sorry for the copyright issue, I was so much hesitating before uploading this picture and I had a very good chat with an editor yesterday (see below) suggesting to try with a different licence. i don't want to get blocked and most important I don't want to violate any copyright. here are the messages :

Hello Mosbatho you sent me a warning for a possible copyright violation about this file : Coda Magazine cover.jpg I would like your help about this because I am working on a Draft on Wikipedia about a band who is on the cover of this French Magazine called "Coda Digital". I uploaded it and added it to my draft but withdrawed it immediately from my contribution wondering about possible copyright issues. This magazine stopped all his activities in 2009 and I tried to contact the journalists and the director but they are impossible to reach as the media doesn't exist anymore. What do you think? Can I upload it again as nobody will claim the copyright for it now?
Thank you very much for your help !
Naufalle Al Wahab 21:17, 1 March 2021 (CET)

Hello, good to hear from you! I believe you that this image is a valuable contribution to your article work, however, there are copyright issues. Well, the magazine cover is certainly still copyrighted, even though the magazine has not been published since 2009. So this cover can be published under a free "Creative Commons". --Mosbatho (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your quick reply this good advice. I didn't think of the free Creative Commons for this file. I will do so. thanks again for your help.

Naufalle Al Wahab 22:03, 1 March 2021 (CET)

Please keep in mind that such Creative Commons licenses do not automatically. I hope you can complete your article anyway. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Is there anyway to fix this? Naufalle Al Wahab 10:39, 2 March 2021 (CET)

Hello, Naufalle Al Wahab. Thank you for your comment. I understood the situation. You might want to ask the question at the Commons:Help desk. Good luck! --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help Yuraily Lic I will try the help desk then ! --Naufalle Al Wahab (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2021 (CET)
You're welcome. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Minna Hof & vicinity.jpg[edit]

Hi, please have a look at Category:Details of topographic maps of Iceland. All of the files in here were uploaded by the same user. Maybe all of them should be tagged "Source missing"? I can help with that, just wanted to make sure. Oh, and the user keeps uploading more (and always adds them to Category:Iceland). --Till (talk) 09:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Till. I think that files that aren't clearly the uploader's own works and aren't given the source, should be tagged "Source missing". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for tagging. --Till (talk) 20:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
You're welcome. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Upload question[edit]

Hi, is this allowed? Here. Why my image was removed then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptdm (talk • contribs) 10:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ptdm. For screenshots of YouTube, please read here that I answered questions from other users before.
For example, File:Amílcar de Castro Almeida, Presidente da Câmara de Valpaços.png, in the files you gave. The source of this screenshot is . This YouTube video is OK because it has CC-BY 3.0 license. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked soon[edit]

Hello Yuraily Lic.

Firstly Sorry for the copyright issues i have made. I uploaded images i found on Internet which are in public domain.

So please tell me what images from Internet can be uploaded in WIKIMEDIA COMMONS and importantly which copyright should i use. 

I don't want to get blocked! Kindly reply me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddartha897 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Siddartha897. The page Commons:Licensing, and especially the diagram "What can I upload to Wikimedia Commons?" on that page, may help you understand what you can upload to Wikimedia Commons. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Jiya Shankar.jpg[edit]

Respected Sir/Madam,

As you have asked for submitting the copyrights permission certificate for

I tried mylevel to reach the copyrights through e-mail and phone contact in these 7 days but failed miserably,

So, I kindly request to grant me more time to acquire the required and submit the required copyrights.

Thanking you, Aleyamma --Aleyamma38 (talk) 16:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Aleyamma38. I logged in today after about two weeks. The file had already been deleted. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Premià de mar Barris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation.[edit]

Hello, For months I am trying to create pages. Especially the pages regarding to my village, history, famous places, etc... I still lack necessary skills to create pages though. The file that is listed as copyrighted logo is owned by me/the company I own. See you, take care! From Barcelona — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinividivincci (talk • contribs) 19:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Vinividivincci. If you have any objections to the deletion of the files, please contact Commons:Undeletion requests. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Hong Kong Panorama 1909.jpg[edit]

Hello Yuraily Lic,

i uploaded this file, and you marked it as possible copy right violation. I don't agree, and i don't recognize that there is an existing copy right for this image. The original image is a photograph taken by my grandfather Karl Lembke (1886 - 1917) which i have in a family album. He was a german navy officer in China and Japan 1908 - 1910. Also, since my grandfather as the original author of the photo is longer than 100 years dead, i don't see any copy right violation.

If i did anything wrong, e.g. by chosing a wrong licence, tell me please. Otherwise i recommend that you take back the deletion mark.--WikiTL65 (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, WikiTL65. I have written my opinion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hong Kong Panorama 1909.jpg. Please read there. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

File:S.S. Patricia (1899).jpg[edit]

Hello Yuraily Lic,

i uploaded this file, and you marked it as possible copy right violation. I don't agree, and i don't recognize that there is an existing copy right for this image. The original image is a photograph taken by my grandfather Karl Lembke (1886 - 1917) which i have in a family album. He was a german navy officer in China and Japan 1908 - 1910. Also, since my grandfather as the original author of the photo is longer than 100 years dead, i don't see any copy right violation.

If i did anything wrong, e.g. by chosing a wrong licence, tell me please. Otherwise i recommend that you take back the deletion mark.--WikiTL65 (talk) 10:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, WikiTL65. I have written my opinion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:S.S. Patricia (1899).jpg. Please read there. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Sam Curry.jpg[edit]

Hey! I am actually the owner of the photo. Could you please remove your deletion request? I can prove it, please send me a message on Twitter @samwcyo. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magistr8 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Magistr8. If you are the owner of the photo, please contact Commons:OTRS. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)


Hi, The asked sources are added to the photo, Thanks,Rezaalavi023 (talk) 09:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Rezaalavi023. Thanks for adding the sources. There are five photos, but only three of the source. Why is that? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Dear Yuraily Lic, I lost the related links and it was difficult to find them but I found them. Sorry for that . I added those two remained sources to the photo. Thanks again.Rezaalavi023 (talk) 12:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Dear Rezaalavi023, Thank you for adding the sources, again. I can confirm that Farsnews and Tasnim News allow to use them under the CC license. Do the two Instagram authors and Honarnews allow to use the photos? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I removed the dw no source tag. However, if permissions to use all photos cannot be confirmed, I will have to submit a delete request about this file. Please kindly understand about that. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Ok no problem but I just like to know what is the difference between this photo and this photos? one and Two . both of these photos do not have any source and permission but they have been confirmed again! Rezaalavi023 (talk) 05:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
It seems that no one was aware of them. I've added the dw no source tags to them. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

file:Isabelle Pilloud.jpg[edit]

Das Foto File:Isabelle Pilloud.jpg ist auf Commons verschwunden/gesperrt. Wie kann man diesen Vorgang rückgängig machen? Das Foto wurde vom Urheber selbst hochgeladen. Wurde beim Hochladevorgang die Auswahl der Lizenz vergessen? Danke für eine Rückmeldung [[User talk:Matutinho|Matutinho 14:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)]]

Hello, Matutinho. If you have any objections to the deletion of the files, please contact Commons:Undeletion requests. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hallo @Yuraily Lic, Thanks. It seems that the problem is solved. --@Matutinho Matutinho 05:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
That's good. Thank you for your reply, Matutinho. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please don't block me I didn't understand the wikipedia rules.[edit]

To the user Yuraily Lic

As you know I am a contributor to wikipedia, I was just trying to help build up wikipedia articles. Can you please forgive me? I'll try harder to be more respectful and I'll try to watch what I do in the future.

I don't have any schooling or training on wikipedia and I'm really scared. Please don't get angry at me. I'm autistic. I'm not a prankster. I don't fully understand wikipedias ways. I would appreciate it if people would help me out instead of scaring me. I need more training on how to properly contribute on wikipedia. CrosswalkX (talk) 14:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, CrosswalkX. As long as you understand copyright and do not infringe copyright again, you will not be blocked. Don't worry. I hope you will be a good contributor. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)