User talk:Zhuyifei1999

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

{{#useliquidthreads:1}}

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zhuyifei1999.

This is the user talk page of Zhuyifei1999, where you can send messages and comments to Zhuyifei1999.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

বাংলা | български | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | hrvatski | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | русский | sicilianu | 中文 | +/−

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.



A barnstar for you!

Administrator Barnstar Hires.png The Admin's Barnstar
感谢您的管理员工作。 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Signbot

Why didn't SignBot sign https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Steinsplitter&diff=297208266&oldid=297197804 ? User talk namespace, user has only 3 edits, didn't opt out. - Alexis Jazz 18:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

The toolforge NFS maintenance on Friday bugged out the bot. Restarted --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

FlickreviewR 2, custom rules possible?

File:Mallet Event Center and Rodeo Arena.jpg (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mallet_Event_Center_and_Rodeo_Arena.jpg&diff=297241674&oldid=297192956)

This is a somewhat complicated case. Barbara Brannon runs a book festival (or something) and has uploaded a bunch of images with good intentions and CC BY in October 2017 that are unacceptable for Commons. Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedinsource:barbarabrannon is the discussion about this. Photos showing book authors and book covers that were "made available for publicity use by permission of authors". Not even sure they actually agreed to CC BY and those writers often won't even have the rights.

So Barbara Brannon should be on User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors list to stop automatic uploading. However, she also has many photos (mostly from 2015-2016) taken with a Nikon D3000 and those are fine. Maybe I'm just looking for a way to enforce a human to review a Flickr image and leave them a note why a particular image is ok. Is that possible? And maybe FlickreviewR 2 should refer all requests for reviewing Barbara Brannon (and any similar users) to humans. - Alexis Jazz 20:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

custom rules possible <= generally no. Files uploaded by users on User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors, if they pass regular review goes to Template:FlickreviewR/bad-author and should, theoretically, get a human review. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
So when FlickreviewR 2 puts the warning box with "This means that the Flickr user is known to upload copyright violations to their Flickr account and as such this image should be removed from Commons." on it, this actually means a human reviewer will look at it? In that case perhaps the text on that template could be changed a bit. - Alexis Jazz 20:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Feel free to edit that template. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
I can't!
Suggestion:
"This means that the Flickr user is known to upload copyright violations to their Flickr account and as such this image should be removed from Commons."
change to
"This means that the Flickr user is known to upload images with possibly problematic license information. The image should be manually checked because some blacklisted Flickr users have also uploaded many pictures with a good license." - Alexis Jazz 20:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: I changed it to semi-protected --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 21:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Re: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#瑞丽江的河水

@Zhuyifei1999, 瑞丽江的河水:我看到你做出裁決結果,因為你說「關注別人的討論並做出回覆是很正常的事」,但我真正感到困擾的是:
User:瑞丽江的河水不是在回答到我問題,因為他承認他不是在對我提出在分類上問題有關User:林高志上傳照片去回答,而且我也知道他是因為看見3月26日至4月7日這一段時間裡,User:林高志沒有回答我問題,因此才告訴我不用等候他答覆。但是我認為User:林高志有權利不回答,因此他用這種令我感到困擾的方式( 糾纏的方式 ),迫使我配合他的要求,以達到我強迫User:林高志回答我問題,這顯然是在騷擾。如果真的像管理員這麼說「關注別人的討論並做出回覆是很正常的事」,那麼User:瑞丽江的河水為何這麼做呢?我想,這種不是在回答問題,用糾纏的方式在關注就已經不是很正常的事。--Kai3952 (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

  • @Kai3952:我知道你患有亚斯伯格症,我能理解你,但是也请你克制一点,这事过去就过去了,我也不想与人结怨。我没有迫使你配合我的要求,你乐意追问他当然是你的事,我只是好心告诉你不用苦等。我倒想知道我怎么个强迫你令林志高君回答问题了,我没有看懂你在说什么。还有请注意一下是谁在纠缠谁,我可以理解你不代表我可以无限容忍。--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 10:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
    • @瑞丽江的河水: 請不要人身攻擊,我沒有罹患亞斯伯格症。「好心告訴我」這話你已經說很多次了,這根本不是理由,因為你已經知道這是我與User:林高志之間的事,為何你現在卻繼續追著我問,非得什麼事都要使你知道?你這麼閒,不關你的事卻要問,你未免管太多了吧。誰糾纏並不重要,你無法容忍是你的事情,因為這是你自找的,沒有為我設想我也在容忍你。希望你能像你說的一樣,你克制一點,不要與人結怨。--Kai3952 (talk) 11:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
      • @Kai3952:亚斯伯格症并非我的个人揣测,有人告诉我阁下罹患此症,所以至今我仍能忍让你的行为。如果你并未罹患此症,首先我对未经查证就与他人一同认为你有困难表示最真挚的歉意,其二我将不再忍让你的无礼行为。我还想请你告诉我,我追问你什么了?是谁把我提进administrator notice,是谁在Commons林志高君以及zhuyifei1999君讨论页以及在下的中文维基讨论页内对鄙人和Outlookxp进行骚扰,暂且认为你对林志高君那么多的留言是出于善意的请求行为。话都说到这个份上了,请自重。--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 14:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
        • @瑞丽江的河水:
          1. 我沒有說你揣測,我是在說你在對我人身攻擊。我沒有罹患亞斯伯格症,所以你可以不用忍讓我無禮的行為,你也不用對我表示歉意,我唯一要求就是:請你停止追問與騷擾
          2. 如果你不希望我騷擾Outlookxp、zhuyifei1999,請你停止,因為這事因你而起的,我向他們說的事也是在談論你,如果你不滿意,僅管去提報吧。
          3. 你說「你对林志高君那么多的留言是出于善意的请求行为」這話,我感覺我跳入你的陷阱,因為我只問User:林高志這三個問題( [1][2][3]),剩下是我在對你回答,你看這筆編輯,是你主動找我說的,前面都是我在問他,後面的話都是你在問我,你是在逃避什麼?因為我看到你把事情全部推給我,好像對林高志我不是善意,實際上是我對你不是善意,因為你太煩人了,到現在你還在問我:「我追问你什么了?」你自己做的事,你能不能問你自己,我又不是你,何必問我。
        • 以上三個回答,我已經努力試著使你停止發問,但你一直不斷有問題找我,你希望我怎麼辦?我繼續騷擾別人,還是我不停向你回答?感覺你這個人對Outlookxp說的話會肯聽勸,而我對你勸說就「唱反調」,我無法理解我在問林高志為何招惹到你,感覺你像是沒有事情在找我麻煩。--Kai3952 (talk) 15:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@Zhuyifei1999: 中文維基那裡已經有管理員注意到,他請求我檢討這事,因此我在這裡提出討論。我到現在仍不知道為何這事的問題是出自於我,我看到是我在問User:林高志,變成因為是瑞丽江的河水回答,我反而成了我與別人發生衝突,或是在騷擾別人。問題是,我沒有問他,也沒有邀請他回答,你可以看見User talk:瑞丽江的河水沒有我留言,我不知道為什麼管理員認為這件事是我造成的。--Kai3952 (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

没说你造成什么,只是说,就User_talk:林高志#File:基隆市古砲台12.jpg而言,无论你是否有邀请一个人来回应,他都有可能回应,这是他的自由,并非“打断你们的讨论”。如果你只要相关人(林高志)的回复,你可以选择忽视他人(并最好写出这意图),但也许相关人永远不会回应。如果有人行为违反方针(如进行人身攻击),你需要管理员做什么,你可以在“管理员留言板”留言,并留下充分并明显的证据,但我们不是来裁决谁对谁错的。 --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
你是沒有,但是他有( 見[4] ),所以才需要我檢討這事。我沒有要干涉他回應的自由,但是他在知道與我問題無關的情況下,字面上是好心提醒別等候林高志的答覆,問題是他不斷地向我回應,那麼他的好心提醒的用意就不會是真的在好心提醒,因為他不斷向我提醒就是一種強迫,如此他的意思就會改變,形成「字面上是好心提醒,實際是要求我想個法子讓林高志回答」,原因是沒有人願意被不斷地提醒,那麼人性就會自然順從而達到停止被人強迫,否則正常人都會知道無關的話只說一次,讓對方知道即可,而不用一直提醒,憑這種「常理」就使我相信他是在強迫。在這種情況下,他避開了方針,使我控訴他騷擾是無法成立的,但是我無法聽從他,因為林高志不回答是他的自由,所以我才會與他發生衝突。中文維基那裡有關注這事,他叫我檢討的原因,應該是認為我對他的好心提醒「過度解讀」,這當中的問題在於:被人不斷回應他在好心提醒我,不斷之下而產生強迫感,使我對他意思的解讀改變,那麼你會這樣解讀嗎,還是說不理會?如果不理會,為何要寫出意圖,我覺得不理就是什麼都不做呀?--Kai3952 (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Tech News: 2018-16

15:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Photo of the year

Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2017/Help

Why am I bothering you? Because you made that page a redirect to Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2017 which as you can see from the contents is a bit of a problem. (so I removed the redirect) The whole contest seems broken. If it is not your thing I'll be happy to bring it to the VP though. (unless you can think of a better place to take it) - Alexis Jazz 12:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

I redirected it the opposite way. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

example

Give me an example of signing — Preceding unsigned comment added by وليد أنوس (talk • contribs) 10:15, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--~~~~ => --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Tech News: 2018-17

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Multilingual captions testing is available

Greetings,

The early prototype for multilingual caption support is available for testing. More information on how to sign up to test is on Commons. Thanks, happy editing to you. - Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)