User talk:Ziko/Archive 2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Ziko/Archive 2010!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Image Tagging Image:Antwerpen-lange-wapper-slot.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antwerpen-lange-wapper-slot.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 17:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:1975-revesp-julio-aug-mbow.jpg[edit]

Of course. This magazine cover is not old enough to be in the public domain. You said the author is Simo Milojevic and that we have permission from Osmo Buller, but I cannot see any OTRS ticket. So if we can check that we have proper permission from the copyright owner, we cannot accept the cover. Regards. --Dodo 20:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I am not quite familiar with the different labels, you see. What does OTRS ticket mean in this context? I have asked Osmo Buller by mail wether I have his consent; Simo Milojevic was then an employe of UEA. What do I have to do? By the way, I learned about the deletion only by chance and would otherwise not even noticed it.--Ziko-C 16:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Guernica-picasso.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Guernica-picasso.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:G.dallorto 19:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[Landesparlamente][edit]

Hallo, Deine Grafik sieht ja ganz gut aus, aber warum gibt es den Punkt für die zweitstärkste Fraktion nur für die ostdeutschen Länder und nicht für alle? Gruß, Korny78

Weil es im Westen immer klar ist, dass entweder CDU oder SPD die zweitstärkste Fraktion stellt. Man könnte darüber streiten, ob die zweitstärkste überhaupt angegeben sein muss, aber es erschien mir interessant. Das ostdeutsche Parteiensystem ist immer noch etwas anders als das westliche.--Ziko-C 16:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wpm02 13.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wpm02 13.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Українська | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. Kanonkas(talk) 00:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2005-02 Hoek van Holand strand.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2005-02 Hoek van Holand strand.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:2008-07-21 uk vp 02.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:2008-07-21 uk ueacentjara 06.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:2008-07-21 uk nl eduksistemo 03.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:2008-07-21 uk neof historio 02.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:2008-07-24 uk pilipovicx 02.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:2008-08-17 kolen gestookt fornuis.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Encyclopédie[edit]

Hello,

Can you tell me which images disappeared? There was a glitch on Commons servers yesterday, so maybe that was the cause. Otherwise some thumbnails do not show because there are over 12.5 million pixels, but that's a Mediawiki limitation. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, in that category (and others), if you scroll down, there are some examples. Does this mean that only the thumbnails don't work? I clicked on the signs but nothing happened. So I thought that those pics simly miss now.--Ziko-C (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:1965-jonas-lapenna.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1965-jonas-lapenna.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Trixt (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


File:1964-nro1-janfeb-ogr-heuss-ollenh.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning File:1964-nro1-janfeb-ogr-heuss-ollenh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig δ 22:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

kategorisieren[edit]

Hallo, danke für die Arbeit, die würde auch was bringen, wenn du nicht die 'Uncategorized...' Zeile drinlassen würdest. Bitte also entfernen! --Ayacop (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Tja, die lasse ich oft drin, wenn ich mir unsicher bin, ob nicht noch andere Kategorien denkbar sind. Beispiel Bundesgartenschau 1961: Da habe ich das Uncategorized normalerweise entfernt, jedoch gelassen, wenn eventuell auch Schlossplatz (Karlsruhe) eine sinnvolle Kategorie sein könnte. So guckt dann zumindest noch ein weiteres Augenpaar nach dem Bild. Übrigens, gibt es eine Diskussionsseite für allgemeine Fragen zur Kategorisierung der BA-Bilder?--Ziko (talk) 12:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Keine Ahnung. Momentan alles unter Commons Talk:Bundesarchiv/Todo, da ist nicht viel los, da kann man schon noch schreiben. --Ayacop (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Ich bin aber der Ansicht, dass du zu großzügig mit dem Drinlassen der Zeile bist. Andererseits wenn du meinst, irgendjemand kategorisiert noch die Gartenstühle in File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F011112-0009A, Bonn, Beethovenhalle, Frauenliga aus Irak.jpg, dann glaube ich, solltest du es selbst machen. --Ayacop (talk) 19:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Gut dass du's sagst, ich sehe gerade, es gibt eine Kategorie Beethovenhalle.--Ziko (talk) 19:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Politicians of Germany[edit]

Hi Ziko, magst du die Leute möglichst nicht da, sondern in eine tiefere Kategorie schieben? Ich versuch die verzweifelt leerzuräumen, weil es nichts bringt, preußische Könige und Grünen-Abgeordnete und ZK-Mitglieder in einer Hauptkategorie nebeneinander zu sammeln... aber es kommt immer wieder von oben nach... Wenigstens in eine Abgeordnetenkategorie (z.B. Member of the German Bundestag) oder eine regionale (z.B. Politicians of Bremen). Ginge das? Danke + Gruß, --Elya (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Ja, das ginge natürlich. Ich bin mir aber meist nicht sicher, wie die Unterkategorien lauten könnten. Abgegordnete ist mir noch zu wenig, ich überlege Parteikategorien, die müssten aber dann besser eine Kategorie innerhalb der Partei sein... Ich stelle absichtlich in die Hauptkategorie, um mehr Übersicht für das spätere Einräumen zu haben. Wenn eine Person erst einmal in eine Unterkategorie verschoben ist, findet man sie schwerer für weitere Einordnungen. Es ist beim Erstentdecken auch einfacher, nicht sofort an eine Unterkategorie zu denken, die es oft (z.B. für StS) noch gar nicht gibt. Ich beteilige mich auch gerne am späteren Einräumen.--Ziko (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Peto de Federico Faccio Peláez forigi liajn publikajn fotojn[edit]

Saluton, Ziko! Federico Faccio Peláez petis min sur mia persona pagxo forigi artikolon pri el E-vikipedio kaj la publikan foton de li. Mi nun vidas, ke la foto en la artikolo estis alsxutita de vi kaj petas vin forigi gxin el la komunejo. Kun koraj salutoj, Alaŭdo (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Saluton, dankon pro la atentigo. Mi nun forigis almenaux la foton el "lia" artikolo, kaj estonte petu forigon (aux cxu prefere vi faras?). Pri la ekzisto de la artikolo mem... tikla debato nun ankaux en Foundation-l, pri biografioj de vivantaj personoj, cxu ne?--Ziko (talk) 12:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Nice pictures of Wikimedia 2009[edit]

Hi Ziko, thanks for the nice pictures of Wikimedia 2009, I am now using the one of me on my Wikipedia page. May I also use it on my facebook page, even though the stupid idiots at Facebook don't have a place to put the license? --WiseWoman (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC) P.S. you left a yellow Stickit with bullet points on it, it is important? If so, I can email it to you.

Category:Europawahl 2009 in Köln[edit]

Hi Ziko,
category names on Commons have to be in english as per policy. Also, if you don't upload more images about this topic, it's not a good idea to create a category for 1 image. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 12:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. / Other images coming. Ziko (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Da du wohl deutsch sprichst, wie ich gesehen habe: wähle immer nur die spezifischsten Kategorien. Also z.B. bei File:2009-05 EW Köln BNG ÖDP.JPG nicht "Category:European Parliament Election 2009" und "Category:European Parliament Election 2009 in Cologne", sondern nur letztere, weil erstere ohnehin Oberkat. zu letzterer ist. Nun genügend verwirrt? --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Nein, du hast völlig recht, und ich reparier das gleich.:-) Ziko (talk) 12:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Ach, du bist mir zuvorgekommen. Vielen Dank! Ziko (talk) 12:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Diese Category:Election posters in Germany mit partei-spez. subcats gibt es auch noch. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


Deine Wahlkampffotos[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Einige deiner Bilder have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Isderion (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

reusage[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:2007-06_ktag_westerwelle.jpg --Martina Nolte (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Oha! Danke für den Hinweis! Ziko (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Hab dir den Blog, in dem sie das Bild schließlich verwendet, auch auf der File.disk. verlinkt. --Martina Nolte (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe mal die Betreiber selbst kontaktiert, da ich mich für einen Kommentar nicht extra anmelden will. Mal sehen... Scheint eher Naivität als bewusste Frechheit zu sein. Ziko (talk) 19:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Ich weiß nicht, wer sonst noch in Kontakt gegangen ist. Bisher auf de-WP: de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen/Archiv/2009/05#Nutzung_von_Wikipedia-Bildern_im_Blog_von_Beate_Wedekind und de:Wikipedia:WN/M#beatewedekind50plus.blog.de. Grüße --Martina Nolte (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Die Betreiber haben mir jetzt geschrieben, sie würden mit der Userin Kontakt aufnehmen, und ich habe bei ihr einen netten Kommentar hinterlassen (ging auch ohne Anmeldung). Ziko (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


File:2009-11-29_rdam_piet_01.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2009-11-29_rdam_piet_01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

File:2009-11 Terlouw Leisink.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Wpm 10.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wpm 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

·81.190.255.81 20:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Українська | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Wpm 10.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--81.190.255.81 20:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

if you nothily, your account is blocked. 81.190.255.81 20:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Ziko!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


File:2009-03 JMB faces.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2009-03 JMB faces.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Berlin musee juif feuilles.JPG. --Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Skillshare[edit]

Moin Ziko,
ich versuche, die einzelnen Gebäude etc. herauszufischen und in die jeweiligen Gebäudekategorien bei Commons mit einzusortieren.
Hmm, eine Unterteilung der Skillshare-Kategorie ist natürlich prima, es können ja leicht einige hundert Bilder werden insgesamt. Andererseits überblickt man/frau evtl. im Moment aber auch noch nicht ganz, wieviele Unterteilungen da sinnvoll werden? Ich könnte mir denken, dass erstmal alles in Skillshare gesammelt wird, und dann was Schlaues gebastelt wird? Z. B. "Category:Skillshare 2010/WRS" für Fotos vom Tagungsort Wilhelm-Raabe-Schule etc.? Was meinst Du?
Grüße, --Jocian (talk) 16:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Das ist grundsätzlich nicht verkehrt. Ich hoffe, es werden noch wesentlich mehr als einige hundert. Ich lade gerade mit Commonist hoch, und da erschien es mir praktisch, schon die Kategorien anzugeben. - Sollten wir auf der Skillshare-Kategorie-Seite besprechen, und nicht auf unseren beiden Benutzerdisk.s. :-) --Ziko (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Ich bin jetzt erstmal im RL unterwegs, schaue da aber später gerne hin. Schnell noch eine generelle Überlegung: Sollten nicht alle Bilder besser ab sofort auf "Category:Skillshare 2010" hochgeladen werden? Würde später einiges an Arbeit ersparen...
--Jocian (talk) 16:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Ja.--Ziko (talk) 17:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Ich hab dann mal die Hauptkategorie durchforstet, aber bei dem Kopf hier bin ich ratlos: File:2010-06-05_Skillshare_Lüneburg_08.jpg. Also Kalandhaus isses nicht, IHK auch nicht - wo hängen noch welche? ;) --TheK (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Das ist bei "Pehmöller Bestattungen", wenn man von Am Sand zur Schule geht. Ich will den Rest meiner Bilder hochladen, wenn da ein wenig mehr Struktur besteht... Danke für's Mitaufräumen! --Ziko (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Also Rote Straße - die aber keine Kat hat. Ergo was neues ausdenken... --TheK (talk) 20:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


File:2010-05-08_bocholt_plakate_spd_linke.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2010-05-08_bocholt_plakate_spd_linke.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 14:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Still-Leben in Bochum-Wattenscheid[edit]

Hallo Ziko, bitte nicht ärgern: Deine bisherigen Bilder vom Still-Leben in Bochum-Wattenscheid habe ich nach Category:Still-Leben in Bochum umkategorisiert. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Danke dir! --Ziko (talk) 20:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Wypm03-22.JPG[edit]

Da das Bild einen Verstoß gegen das Recht am eigenen Bild der abgebildeten Personen darstellt - es liegt keinerlei Genehmigung vor -, habe ich die Löschung beantragt. Grüße Weissbier (talk) 10:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Checken[edit]

Hoi Ziko, wil je de check categorie pas weghalen als de tijdelijke categorieën eraf zijn gehaald of vervangen? Dus liever niet zoals hier. Multichill (talk) 10:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, graag, Ik had iemand om advies gevraagd, en die had het niet over de tijdelijke categorieen.--Ziko (talk) 11:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

IRC[edit]

Hi Ziko, Could you come online in #wikimedia-nl ? –Krinkletalk 19:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

„(923909) Knizia-Strelow“[edit]

Was zum Teufel ist „(923909) Knizia-Strelow“? Ein Himmelskörper im Sonnensystem, der in einigen Jahren entdeckt wird? --84.61.131.141 12:52, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Was meinst du?--Ziko (talk) 15:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Ist damit der Personenaufzug im Gladbecker Kaufhaus gemeint? --84.61.131.141 09:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Verstößt der Asteroidenname „(923909) Knizia-Strelow“ gegen die Richtlinien der IAU? --84.61.183.12 09:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Ist „Knizia-Strelow“ ein deutsches mittelständisches Aufzugsunternehmen? --84.61.183.12 14:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Ich kann dir nicht helfen, wenn du nicht sagst, worauf du dich beziehst. --Ziko (talk) 15:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Ich meinte das deutsche mittelständische Aufzugsunternehmen. --84.61.183.12 16:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Der „Dawnay Day“ ist eine Domino-Kettenreaktion mit insgesamt 923.909 Dominosteinen, bei der die letzten 89.535 Dominosteine sich in einer „Challenge“ befinden und das Logo des deutschen mittelständischen Aufzugsunternehmens „Knizia-Strelow“ bilden. --84.61.183.12 17:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Ist es erlaubt, Asteroiden im Sonnensystem nach mittelständischen Aufzugsunternehmen zu benennen? --84.61.183.12 20:49, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

de:Benutzer:Entlinkt/Troll Gruß --Hozro (talk) 12:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Gab es mal auf en:WP:RD/M eine Diskussion, bei der es um das deutsche mittelständische Aufzugsunternehmen „Knizia-Strelow“ ging? --84.61.155.241 12:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Ist das deutsche mittelständische Aufzugsunternehmen „Knizia-Strelow“ nur in Nordrhein-Westfalen tätig? --84.61.155.241 21:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Man könnte das deutsche mittelständische Aufzugsunternehmen „Knizia und Strelow“ auch in „Knizia und Wertlos“ umbenennen. Begründung: Im alten Karstadt-Kaufhaus am Limbecker Platz in Essen gab es Aufzüge dieses Unternehmens. Aber im heutigen Einkaufszentrum “Limbecker Platz” gibt es keine Aufzüge dieses Unternehmens mehr. Und “Wertlos” ist ein abwertend konnotiertes Anagramm von “Strelow”. --84.61.155.241 21:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Kann das Logo des deutschen mittelständischen Aufzugsunternehmens „Knizia und Strelow“ auf Commons oder auf de.wikipedia.org hochgeladen werden? --84.61.155.241 19:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Ich möchte, dass eine Seite wie Guide to lifts in the UK aufgebaut wird, aber mit Aufzugsunternehmen, die in Nordrhein-Westfalen tätig sind bzw. waren. --84.61.155.241 20:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Wie würde „Knizia und Strelow“ in kyrillischer Schrift geschrieben werden? --84.61.170.156 09:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Können Sie bitte den Aufzug „(923909) Knizia-Strelow“ im Gladbecker Komm-und-Kauf-Kaufhaus filmen? --84.61.139.62 19:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich fordere den Benutzer PostTower auf YouTube dazu auf, den Aufzug „(923909) Knizia-Strelow“ im Kaufhaus „K und K“ in Gladbeck zu filmen. --84.61.139.62 10:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Warum müssen viele kleinere Aufzugsunternehmen die gleichen Knöpfe benutzen? --84.61.181.19 15:53, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Leider ist das Kaufhaus „K und K“, in dem sich der Aufzug „(923909) Knizia-Strelow“ befindet, seit Anfang dieses Monats geschlossen. --84.61.167.13 19:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Leider wird das Gladbecker Hertie-Kaufhaus, in dem sich der Aufzug „(923909) Knizia-Strelow“ befindet, bald abgerissen. --84.61.128.254 22:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Im Düsseldorfer Karstadt-Kaufhaus gibt es 4 Aufzüge (Flohr-OTIS) und 28 Rolltreppen (O&K); weitere 3 Aufzüge (2 KONE + 1 Flohr-OTIS) befinden sich im zugehörigen Parkhaus. --84.61.167.13 17:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Hier wird bald die Seite über den Personenaufzug im Kaufhaus „K und K“ entstehen. --84.61.147.158 16:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

<offtopic>Wie muss man fahren, wenn man ohne Plakette aus Richtung Düsseldorf kommt, und zur Messe Essen will? Die A 52 ist ja in dieser Richtung ab 1. Juli 2013 gesperrt.</offtopic> --84.61.144.180 15:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Welche Aufzugshersteller haben die Aufzüge in den Düsseldorfer Hotels „Asahi“ und „Nikko“ hergestellt/modernisiert? --84.61.150.155 11:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

<offtopic>Wer hat eigentlich die Aufzüge in der neuen Deutschland-Zentrale von Mitsubishi Electric in Ratingen Ost hergestellt? Falls sie tatsächlich von Mitsubishi Electric bzw. deren niederländische Aufzugstochter Mitsubishi Elevator Europe stammen sollten, muss dies als Trivia im Wikipedia-Artikel Mitsubishi Electric erwähnt werden, denn der Markenname Mitsubishi kommt im deutschen Aufzugsbestand sonst anscheinend nicht vor.</offtopic> --84.61.128.254 22:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Und dann wäre auch der Merkspruch „Welches der fünf größten Aufzugsunternehmen der Welt gibt es in Deutschland bisher noch nicht?“ hinfällig. --84.61.128.254 22:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Stadtarchiv Lüneburg[edit]

City archive Lüneburg

Hi, I noticed you added to Commons:Partnerships info about Category:Skillshare 2010 Stadtarchiv.

I would like to set up a dedicated page just like the other partnerships, but I could not find much information about this project. Could you please either explain me briefly waht this was about exactly, or point me to the relevant resources which would explain it so I could write it (given that I do not speak a word of German ;-) ?

Thanks, Jean-Fred (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Salut Jean-Fred, good idea! Actually there isn't much to tell. On June 5th, 2010 a number of Wikipedians visited the urban archive (Stadtarchiv) of Lüneburg. The collaborators of the archive provided them with material from the collection. It was a part of the "Skillshare" meetup that took place June 4-6th in that city. I wrote some reports on the meetup (here). We were kinda lead by Dr. Olaf Simons, historian and Wikipedian.--Ziko (talk) 18:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia countries map[edit]

In File:WP countries and versions Europe.pdf which you uploaded the label and pie for Cyprus are located on Crete instead, Cyprus would be the island to the east of that. Can you fix it. Kmusser (talk) 20:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Grrr! How stupid of me! Thank you for the notice. --Ziko (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Wow! Thanks for changing it so quickly- very impressed94.172.109.114 21:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)