Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Crescent Honeyeater Edit2.jpg

Image:Crescent Honeyeater Edit2.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2009 at 14:55:25

•  Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Kuvaly.--Kuvaly (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Info A female Crescent Honeyeater (Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus).
•  Support--Kuvaly (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, the image does not meet the minimal size requirement.Lycaon (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good quality, but small size --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Avala (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment--This is today's FP on Wikipedia!! Jnn13 (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Size is of course too small, Commons has different criteria from en.wikipedia. --Dori - Talk 22:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support While it will fail on the matter of resolution, being too small, this is a difficult subject (assuming photographed in the wild) and deserves to succeed on other criteria. My vote should be Neutral, but I have used Support to underline the point. The Cheetah, featured as Image Of The Day, did not meet minimum size requirement since it is only 1,9Mpx, while this subject, about cheetah's ear in size, is almost 1.2Mpx and generally in sharp focus (except the tail, which can be excused). -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • We've had this argument countless times before. This is not a rare shot, and I'm guessing it's downres-ed on purpose. When images are too small for FP they're too small for FP. --Dori - Talk 02:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Size. —kallerna™ 23:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Size and yellowish coloring Amada44 (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Of course its not going to pass on size grounds. This was the lucky shot (note 200mm) that ultimately got me into bird photography however. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Hi there! sorry for the rough and short comment. I haven't come round to doing wildlife photography much but I am sure, it is very rewarding! And the picture you did is not bad at all! really! Don't be upset if it wont get featured. Anyhow, I have just seen, that you do absolutely excellent pics which are also featured. So I am sure there will follow more *smile* BTW: Look what I did to the Image:Crescent_Honeyeater.jpg original image. I got rid of the yellowish color. Please revert if you dont like it! Amada44 (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
    • I did revert it, see the description as to why (yellow cast was realistic in low winter sun). I am not fussed at all that this won't pass (If I cared I'd just upload the original or a less downsampled version). I have already got a few featured pictures here but chose not to nominate any further. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to size. I generally am OK with 1.9MP (i.e. 1600x1200) if the image is otherwise great, but this is way too far (almost 50%) below the limit --Relic38 (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Mywood (talk) 11:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)