File:60019 Bittern as 4492 , South Wingfield.jpg
Original file (3,446 × 2,477 pixels, file size: 7.61 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary[edit]
Description60019 Bittern as 4492 , South Wingfield.jpg |
4492 " Dominion of New Zealand" aka , 60019 "Bittern" passes South Wingfield working 1Z79 Stratford on Avon - York return charter. Gresley,s finest on George Stephenson,s patch...I am sure he would have approved !! |
Date | |
Source | 4492 , South Wingfield |
Author | Phil Sangwell from United Kingdom |
Camera location | 53° 05′ 53.61″ N, 1° 25′ 34.03″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 53.098224; -1.426119 |
---|
Licensing[edit]
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on May 13, 2011 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 20:11, 13 May 2011 | 3,446 × 2,477 (7.61 MB) | File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description=4492 " Dominion of New Zealand" aka , 60019 "Bittern" passes South Wingfield working 1Z79 Stratford on Avon - York return charter. Gresley,s finest on George Stephenson,s patch...I am sure he would have approved !! |Source=[http |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon EOS 5D |
Author | Phil Sangwell |
Exposure time | 1/500 sec (0.002) |
F-number | f/4 |
Date and time of data generation | 20:07, 12 May 2011 |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 350 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 350 dpi |
Software used | Digital Photo Professional |
File change date and time | 20:07, 12 May 2011 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 20:07, 12 May 2011 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX shutter speed | 8.965784 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | −1 |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Serial number of camera | 730403197 |
Lens used | EF50mm f/1.4 USM |
Owner of camera | Phil Sangwell |
Date metadata was last modified | 22:14, 12 May 2011 |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |