File:A genetic atlas of human admixture history -full.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,734 × 992 pixels, file size: 201 KB, MIME type: image/png)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Some populations of the "Full analysis" on autosomal makeup in two donor groups by A Genetic atlas of human admixture history. Unlike the regional analyses, it was computed in relation to two random donor populations, inconsistent and incomparable to each of the recipient populations.
Notes: The Genetic atlas always estimated in two donor groups without shared proportions, so the alikeness to one donor group of a recipient population is not completely figured, for instance the observed two donor groups of South Italian are Tuscan-like and Cypriot-like, but the Tuscans resulted significantly Cypriot-like themselves. For the formulas used to estimate admixture times and admixing groups, see [1](page 23-36).
Date
Source

information sources: A genetic atlas of human admixture history Companion website for "A genetic atlas of human admixture history", Hellenthal et al, Science (2014).

(14 February 2014). "A genetic atlas of human admixture history (supplementary data)". Science (New York, N.Y.) 343 (6172): 747–751. DOI:10.1126/science.1243518. ISSN 0036-8075. "Overview of inferred admixture for 95 human populations (A) Coancestry curve for the Maya for Spanish donor group (inferred as closest to minor admixing source), with green fitted line showing inferred exponential decay curve and a corresponding recent admixture date (with 95% CI). (B, C) As A, but showing the Druze and Kalash respectively, with different indicated donors (donors indicated are proxies for minor admixing source, inferred as closest to Yoruba and Germany/Austria, respectively) and with successively older admixture. (D) On the map (locations approximate in densely sampled regions), shapes (see legend) indicate inference: no admixture, a single admixture event, or more complex admixture; colors indicate fineSTRUCTURE clustering into 18 clades (Table S11, Figs. S12-S13). Inferred date(s), 95% CIs are directly below the map, with two inferred admixing sources (dots and vertical bars) shown below each date (see example for simulation of Fig. 1 at left). For multiple admixture times, these two sources correspond to the more recent event; for multiple groups, they reflect the strongest admixture “direction”. Colored dots above each bar indicate clades best representing the major (top) and minor (bottom) sources. The bar is split at the inferred admixture fraction (horizontal line, fractions < 5% shown as 5%). Each bar section indicates inferred donor group haplotypic make-up, colored as the map, for one source. Shaded boxes on the inferred admixture times denote events referred to in the text, specifically 1. European colonization of the Americas (1492CE-present; hot pink), 2. Slavic (500-900CE; pink), Turkic (500-1100CE; maroon) migrations, 3. Arab slave trade (650-1900CE; cyan), 4. Mongol Empire (1206-1368CE; purple), and 5. Khmer Empire (802-1431CE; orange)."
Author Own work
Other versions
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current12:55, 5 September 2018Thumbnail for version as of 12:55, 5 September 20181,734 × 992 (201 KB)Bozdugan (talk | contribs){{Information |description={{en|Some populations of the "Full analysis" on autosomal makeup in two donor groups by A Genetic atlas of human admixture history. Unlike the regional analyses, it was computed in relation to two random donor populations, inconsistent and incomparable to each of the recipient populations.<br>Notes: The Genetic atlas always estimated in two donor groups without shared proportions, so the alikeness to one donor group of a recipient population is not completely figure...

Metadata