File:Comparison of young foliage of Latua pubiflora ( left ) with that of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides ( right ), showing ease of confusion.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(2,447 × 2,263 pixels, file size: 1.35 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Young shoots of, on the left, Latua pubiflora ( Solanaceae ) and, on the right, Dasyphyllum diacanthoides ( Asteraceae ), showing ease of confusion when plants not in flower.

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Comparison of young, leafy, non-flowering shoots of, on the left, Latua pubiflora (Griseb.) Baillon ( family Solanaceae ) and, on the right, Dasyphyllum diacanthoides (D.Don) Cabrera ( family Asteraceae ), juxtaposed to reveal the ease of a potentially dangerous confusion of these two native Chilean medicinal plants, which has frequently resulted in accidental poisonings by Latua of blunt trauma victims who mistook it for Dasyphyllum diacanthoides (which they were seeking as a remedy for their condition).
Date
Source Own work
Author Flobbadob
Camera location50° 31′ 14.19″ N, 4° 14′ 05.88″ W  Heading=162.04419889503° Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMapinfo

The Latua specimen on the left ( a small, container-grown plant purchased from a specialist nursery in the county of Herefordshire, U.K. ) was brought to a wholesale specialist nursery in the county of Cornwall, U.K. ( at the time, possibly the only location in the U.K. where a specimen of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides was readily viewable ) with the express purpose of illustrating a dangerous confusion which has occurred quite frequently in Chilean folk medicine. N.B. even when the plants are not in flower they may still be told apart by means of the following features 1.) Latua spines are borne singly, while those of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides are borne in pairs ( as described in the specific name ). 2.) The leaves of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides tend, even when young, to bear a spine at the leaf-tip, while those of Latua do not. 3.) The leaves of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides become much more leathery than those of Latua as they mature, a textural feature absent in only the youngest of foliage. 4.) The leaf veins of Latua ( viewed from below ) tend to be more prominent than those of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides. 5.) The young bark of Latua is striated, while that of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides is finely warty.

Licensing[edit]

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current10:28, 14 August 2019Thumbnail for version as of 10:28, 14 August 20192,447 × 2,263 (1.35 MB)Flobbadob (talk | contribs)User created page with UploadWizard

There are no pages that use this file.

File usage on other wikis

The following other wikis use this file:

Metadata