File:Hail! Thou Production most uncommon... (BM 1871,0812.4488 1).jpg
Original file (2,150 × 2,500 pixels, file size: 952 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary[edit]
Hail! Thou Production most uncommon... ( ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title |
Hail! Thou Production most uncommon... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Description |
English: Two figures stand joined together back to back in profile, each with one leg and one arm; to left the Chevalier d'Eon is shown as a man, with a military uniform, hat, jack-boot and sabre; to right, he is shown as a woman, wearing a gown, feathered hat and holding a fan; frontispiece to "An Epistle from Mademoiselle D'Eon to the Right Honorable L[or]d M[ansfiel]d" [1778, London: M. Smith]. 1778
Etching |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Depicted people | Representation of: Charles de Beaumont, chevalier d'Éon | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Date |
1778 date QS:P571,+1778-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Medium | paper | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Collection |
institution QS:P195,Q6373 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Current location |
Prints and Drawings |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Accession number |
1871,0812.4488 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes |
This is the frontispiece of "An Epistle from Mademoiselle D'Eon to the Right Honorable L--d M-------d, L--d C----f J-----e of the C----t of K--g's B----h [Lord Mansfield, Lord Chief Justice of the Court of King's Bench] on his Determination in regard to her Sex", which was published in 1778, 'printed for M. Smith; and sold by the booksellers in the Strand and Paternoster Row'. For a full copy of the Epistle, see the British Library (General Reference Collection 1562/290). It relates to Lord Mansfield's judgement in July 1777 that the Chevalier d'Eon was a woman, a judgement rendered necessary by the many gambling policies that had been taken out on this issue since early 1771. The image uses a very similar concept to that published in the London Magazine in 1777 (see 1837,0513.57), in which the Chevalier d'Eon is shown as half female and half male. While the London Magazine illustration shows him split vertically in half, this frontispiece instead shows him as two figures standing back to back, who have between them two heads but only two arms and legs, the left side dressed in military costumes, the right in female dress. According to the introduction, the Epistle is a translation into English of a poem originally written in French by the Chevalier, who had left London for France in August 1777. It explains the purported circumstances of its publication as follows. It was on Lord Mansfield's account that the Chevalier 'was obliged to leave England and fly to France. From that country this letter was intended to have been sent, as a just tribute to his Lordship's wisdom and precision, and at the same time to conciliate his patronage on her intended return to England. After it had been shewn to many of her acquaintance and much admired at Paris, it fell into the hands of the Editor... In some places [the Editor] had indeed taken the liberty of deviating a little from the original, especially in some of the concluding stanzas, where Mademoiselle, in her address to his Lordship, and in the warmth of her imagination, had indulged a vein rather too luxuriant. In short, she seemed to have forgotten that she was now in petticoats'. The Epistle is a playfully flirtatious poem recounting the Chevalier's supposed girlhood - perhaps based upon the first memoir that he had issued on his return to France - and finally offering 'herself' up to Mansfield as a lover in place of his wife (to whom the Editor had mischievously dedicated the Epistle). Whether there is any truth in the Chevalier's purported authorship is unclear: the tone of the Epistle is entirely at odds with the quiet, virtuous persona he would adopt during his life as a woman and it is most likely that the Epistle was fabricated by the alleged 'editor' - an attempt to capitalise on the enduring interest that the Chevalier held for British audiences, even during his absence in France. SV |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Source/Photographer | https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1871-0812-4488 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
© The Trustees of the British Museum, released as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other versions |
|
Licensing[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag. Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 22:38, 15 May 2020 | 2,150 × 2,500 (952 KB) | Copyfraud (talk | contribs) | British Museum public domain uploads (Copyfraud/BM) Satirical prints in the British Museum 1778 image 2 of 2 #11,093/12,043 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Width | 4,920 px |
---|---|
Height | 5,721 px |
Bits per component |
|
Compression scheme | Uncompressed |
Pixel composition | RGB |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Image width | 4,920 px |
Image height | 5,721 px |
Color space | Uncalibrated |
Date and time of digitizing | 13:55, 10 December 2018 |
File change date and time | 14:07, 10 December 2018 |
Date metadata was last modified | 14:07, 10 December 2018 |
Unique ID of original document | xmp.did:0880117407206811ACF9BEEFA32B2251 |