File:When is art ?.jpg
Original file (1,865 × 1,433 pixels, file size: 1.41 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary[edit]
Author |
Erik Pevernagie
|
||
Object type |
painting object_type QS:P31,Q3305213 |
||
Description |
"When is Art?" , by Erik Pevernagie, oil on canvas, 80 x 100 cm xx
Art can blow us out of our pigeonholes. In deafness, it may shout or scream. In blindness, it may arrest our attention. In numbness, it may shake up our minds. If we don’t sense anything at all and take everything for granted, art can kick us in the ass, give us a conscience and make us aware. Art creates new dimensions, opens our scope, and transcends us from demeaning "pettiness" that haunts the minds of emotionally unprivileged people. Art must state a link to the challenges of previous eras and the twinkles and heartbeats of the present moment to ensure a ‘trans historic’ bond with our living world where past and present can converse. Beauty may no longer be what it was before. It has become suspect, and many have dethroned it from its art pedestal. A lot of questions are raised: "When" is art ?", "What" is art?", "Can this be art? " As some feel so powerless and speechless, they painfully resort to the uplifting and comforting counsel of their art shrink. When Elisabeth II was offered a painting during her visit to Germany, she was pretty unimpressed “ That’s a funny color for a horse ” and “ Is that supposed to be my father? ”Like so many people, she was disappointed by the kind of "grotesque kitsch." For Arthur Danto, there is another type of "art" today, where good taste is optional, the awful taste is artistically acceptable, and “kalliphobia”—an aversion to if not a loathing for beauty." Danto considers Kant’s book " Critique of Judgments” as maybe the most satisfactory basis for aesthetics we have had, up to Modernist art. He states that after modernism, a new aesthetic conception has come to life."The whole world consists of latent artworks waiting, like the bread and wine of reality, to be transfigured, through some dark mystery, into the indiscernible flesh and blood of the sacrament." He concludes that art is "the embodiment of an idea," defined not by how it looks but by what it has to say. " Much of contemporary art is hardly aesthetic at all, but it has in its stead the power of meaning and possibility of truth." Danto's model was Andy Warhol with his Brillo boxes. A century ago, Marcel Duchamp pioneered this vision with his "Fountain " ("urinoir") (1917). PS. Not only the public but the artists themselves raise the question. "When is Art ?". So does David Hockney express his personal view on art and artists in general. He notably criticizes and regards Gerhard Richter as an "overrated squeegee" painter ( Monopol) and " Jeff Koons as a terrible painter. Terrible painter." ( The Guardian). The New York Review of Books describes Koons’ work as “baloney” and the Spectator as imbued with a “deadly smugness,” full of “cheap, tone-deaf, misogynistic images” that look “dreadful.” The New Yorker described it as “angry.” Koons thinks his work is about polarities between the organic and the inorganic, about love or be loved, about the issues of the baroque, where everything is negotiated, about the different aspects of the eternal through biology. Koons says his art is “accessible,” and there are no right or wrong interpretations. Even singer Stromae has his say about art:: "Before music, there was just art, and art is just bullshit. It’s so useless. And next to a father, a baker, and necessary jobs, you see that art isn’t really a necessity." In the turbulent art arena, they all pitch in and do their dubious and mercantile part in the rocambolesque art saga. So many judge art with their ears and the sound of money. The question: "When is Art ?" remains a fascinating debate.
''Factual starting point: Man holding billboard upside down . French:citation. "La beauté est suspecte " déclarent certains amateurs d'art et en même temps détrônent la beauté de son piédestal. Des lors, un nombre de personnes sont dans le désarroi et font appel à un psychiatre ou un manuel spécialisé."'' |
||
Date | 2000 | ||
Source/Photographer | Erik Pevernagie |
Licensing[edit]
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:43, 2 December 2014 | 1,865 × 1,433 (1.41 MB) | Onlysilence (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file: