User talk:Caspian blue

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Applebee)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

FP Promotion[edit]

Mexican Wolf 2 yfb-edit 1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Mexican Wolf 2 yfb-edit 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mexican Wolf 2 yfb-edit 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer (talk) 09:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Korean buckwheat jelly-Memilmuk muchim-01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

RE:User:Steve46814/Korea Gallery creation[edit]

Thank you for your consideration.

As you may have detected, no one has stepped up to offer me any assistance in learning to navigate the intricacies of the Wikimedia Commons. I may have found a book that will help me learn how to contribute to the Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons without making a mess of things. I don't have that book yet but I have hopes it will help me a lot.

This "Korea Gallery" looks like it should be so much easier to use. Would you consider explaining how to created gallery pages like this so I may add additional gallery pages for use with non-Korean content as well?

Thank you again for your assistance, patience and time.

(p.s. I would also appreciate knowing if this is the appropriate way to correspond with you)

Steve46814 (talk) 05:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Korean seafood-Yangnyeom gejang-01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Followup to meessage "User:Steve46814/Korea Gallery" 23 August 2008[edit]

Your guidance in creating gallery pages was great. I have accomplished that task and populated the new gallery with some photos. I have also figured out how to create sub categories with a little trial and error (OK, mistakes). Hopefully I have not created a mess that you or someone else will need to clean up as with my passed endeavors.

Thank you again for your help, patience and interest in assisting me.

Steve46814 (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Pansori images[edit]

Thank you for your kind remarks about the Pansori images. These pictures were taken inside an auditorium with theatrical lighting, which helped. As you know, with the exception of the snap of the fan, there is little rapid movement in a Pansori performance. I was able to hold the camera steady enough, with the help of the "steady shot" feature of the camera, to get a couple of good shots. You'll notice the fan is closed in both pictures. The composition of the pictures would have been better with the fan open, but the pictures I took when the fan was open turned out to be too blurry to be any good.

The Korean culture is so rich, diverse and fascinating that we try to experience as much of the traditional and contemporary cultures as we can while traveling in Korea. So little of the Korean culture is well known or understood outside Korea, especially in the West - and particularly in the US, that I think it is important to promote understanding of these two (traditional and contemporary) great cultures. This seems like a good venue to do accomplish some of this.

I have added another picture but am not able to categorize it. Would you please have a look, at your leisure, and add a category for me? Image:Korea-Black mussels 6680-07.JPG

Thank you, I appreciate all your patient help and assistance.

Steve46814 (talk) 05:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Problem with a photo[edit]

Dear Caspian Blue,

I have a problem. I have asked the person in charge with the copyrights of multiple Carlos Kleiber's picture to allow me the permission to add a CD cover from Deutsche Gramophon label. After reading the FGDL, she simply refuses (when she is nobody, compared to the daughter of german conductor Hermann Scherchen who gave me full permission). She wants the photo (i.e: a CD cover !!!) under a license that prevent it from being copied or whatever... As for me, I give my biography to anybody who would find some information in it. I don't think that I am God. Apparently she thinks that her father WAS God. Do you have any solution for me ??? Thanks! User Talk: MenerbesMenerbes (talk) 18:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)20:08

Carlos Kleiber again[edit]

Hey Caspian Blue: you wrote:

  • Hi, Menerbes. Good to see you again. I'm afraid I don' know hot to solve the problem because I've never done to ask a permission from famous people's family. He WAS god to me....too, so I understand his daughter's opinion. Is the photo that you want to get a permission from her for a purpose to use in Wikipedia or others? If your request is lied in the first case, we can use it as a fair use image since he was deceased. But as for the latter case, well, I don't know what solution might be. Sorry that I can't give you a helpful opinion. Best. --Caspian blue (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Récupérée de « http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Menerbes » Catégorie cachée : PD-user

  • Well, you misunderstood me. I am not talking about Kleiber's daughter, but about Siegried Lauterwasser's daughter. Lauterwasser was an official photographer for DG, and passed away in 2000. Alexandra is now in charge of the copyrights... And before readings the terms and conditions of the FGDL license, she only agreed for a CD cover where DG could be perhaps better seen than Kleiber himself. This is mean.... You know, Kleiber was also God for me, and I would respect his children viewpoints; but that is not the case. About celebrity families who don't want to give a photo, well, I had a very nice time with Hermann Scherchen's dautghter Myriam, who allowed me almost everything, because she was happy to see her father recognized.. I will find a way, you will see!!!

Thanks a lot. Good WE. User Talk: MenerbesMenerbes (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)20:55

FP Promotion[edit]

Chateau de Chenonceau 2008.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Chateau de Chenonceau 2008.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Chateau de Chenonceau 2008.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Edited version --Mr. Mario (talk) 14:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

RFA[edit]

float
Thank you

Thank you for voting on my request for adminship. The result was unanimously in support, which really surprised and overwhelmed me. I'll do everything I can to make sure that it was justified.

-Adam Cuerden          

Ping[edit]

Nice seeing you here, Caspian. Thanks for the work you do here. Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 00:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for stopping by. :) --Caspian blue 00:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Hogeon[edit]

Hi ! I saw you undo my edit on Category:Hogeon. Can you explain why Hogeon represents tigers ? I don't understand I saw only nice costumes. --Abujoy (talk) 12:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

See en:Hogeon and the name itself means "tiger hat" by the way.--Caspian blue 16:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Korean song[edit]

자유 저작권으로 공개된 노래 File:Kim Hae-Song, Cheong-chun-gye-geup.ogg, File:Bak Hyang Rim Kim Hae Song jeonhwa ilgi.ogg를 올렸으니 관심있으시면 들어보시기 바랍니다. :) --FriedC (talk) 14:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

간송미술관에서 가져온 GIF 포맷은 화질이 많이 떨어져서 대체하려고 한 것이었습니다. 지적하신 점을 보완해서 JPG 형식의 다른 버전을 새로 올렸으니 참고하세요. :) --FriedC (talk) 08:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul-Bongeunsa-Inside-01.jpg may be deleted[edit]

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/−


The File:Korea-Seoul-Bongeunsa-Inside-01.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot(talk) 20:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Flickr review request[edit]

Hello Caspian blue, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see Commons:Flickr images if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); (which you can add to your monobook.js), and you can add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! :) PeterSymonds (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Good luck. If you need any help, you know where to find me. Kanonkas // talk // CCD // 14:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice and confidence in me. If I have any question on the new tool, I will ask you for help. Thanks, again.--Caspian blue 15:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Rename request[edit]

You can't do a rename request if you are not an Admin or trusted user? You should contact an Admin like Kanonkas to do a null edit on the image files you want to rename. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I recently became a commons reviewer, and am also listed to Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage#Approved users. Thanks you for caring.--Caspian blue 14:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There are so many categories on WikiCommons, that I lose track. Anyway, keep up the good work on renaming the images. Yes, I was the person who persuaded the flickr owner to license some of his images as 'cc by sa' as this shows. I did not know he would license his whole set of Gyeongju photos free...but he obviously didn't mind doing this. (I just mentioned only 3 photos...which I had not had deleted which is why I later had to file an undeletion request here) Personally, I think his images are unbelievable...taken at maximum resolution. Its a pity most people's images are of inferior quality. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. As the guess, you contacted the photographer. I've been searching good images regarding Korea on Flickr, and many of his images are marked as "my favorites" because of the good quality. However, I delayed to contact him directly, but you did. I really appreciate your effort for Commons, so we have the quality images from the photographer. Thank you for the message, and kind words. Best regards--Caspian blue 17:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

The mask of Amenemope is my only valued quality image from a good friend at flickr. Most times the people I ask are willing to change the license...provided they are named in the image title itself. Regards from Metro Vancouver Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Interesting list, though I more like your porcelain image collection, which are taken in high quality. I'm interested in Persian and East Asian porcelain wares. Certainly contacting people with email is not an easy job, so I appreciate your work via OTRS.--Caspian blue 19:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:Pictures and Galleries[edit]

Thank you for you generous comments on my pictures and the time you spent on creating galleries. I have many pictures taken on our trips to Korea but find the picture uploading procedure slow and cumbersome so it takes me a long time to accomplish anything. Still working on adding more for Guinsa. If you know of a way to more easily upload pictures, other than using the "Upload file" link provided on the left side of the Commons screen, please advise. Thanks again for your help and interest.Steve46814 (talk) 23:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the Barnstar. That was an unexpected and pleasant surprise. Your recommending the "Commonist" bulk photo uploader is also greatly appreciated. This should be a great tool with a few more refinements but it works fairly well now the way it is, and does save time once one figures out all the quirks. Thanks again for for your consideration.Steve46814 (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

Hi,

I noticed your quistion by Kanonkas, could you confirm for me that you checked all the files that could be deleted and non of them are in use? :)

best regards, Huib talk 19:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Never mind, its done. :)
Thanks for your work on that list :D
Huib talk 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the visit. I've just finished to check out that all images are not in use. You can confirm it by glancing this and this and that. --Caspian blue 19:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Great job, keep up the good work Caspian blue. Huib talk 19:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Note[edit]

You missed these 2 images here: [1] and [2] Rinux still lives in some image titles...for the time being. These are 2 older images I had OTRS'ed. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind notification. The user who originally uploaded the images has a tendency to name as such....so well, there are way more than Rinux-typed names to be renanmed later. Thank you.--Caspian blue 02:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Sure no problem at all. I was just pointing them out to you since I am not an expert in Korean history (Egyptology is my main interest) and don't know an appropriate title for them unlike you. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Have a good weekend. :-) Caspian blue 04:34, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

"[year] in [country]" categories[edit]

In principle, I agree with you 100%. It should be (for example) Category:Germany in 1964, rather than Category:1964 in Germany. Besides sounding more natural, the former is consistent with the "[country] in the [decade]" category tree. I also note that the "[country] in [year]" form is more inclusive (for example, something like this, which is so extremely relevant and iconic to the American experience in 1945, could be included in Category:United States in 1945 or a subcategory thereof, but arguably would be excluded from Category:1945 in the United States because it didn't occur in the U.S.).

However, the problem is that the current standard is "[year] in [country]" - the vast majority of the year/country categories (it appears only the South Korean categories are the exception) follow that format. I don't agree with it, but that's the standard. It needs to be changed across the board, so that all "[year] in [country]" categories are switched to "[country] in [year]", rather than having the occasional "[country] in [year]" cat. I personally do not have the energy at this time to make a recommendation at COM:CFD that we make this switch (my previous suggestion at COM:CFD seems to be ignored), but I would wholeheartedly support any proposal that you or someone else would make to do the switchover. I know that User:Foroa is also troubled by the "[year] in [country]" form, and would presumably support a proposal to change them all to "[country] in [year]".

In the meantime and until there is consensus at COM:CFD to do otherwise, however, the South Korean year cats need to be consistent with the rest of the "[year] in [country]" category tree, and that means (for example) Category:1964 in South Korea. If someone is prepared to raise the issue at CFD, I will hold off making the switchover of any South Korean year cats, but otherwise we need to be consistent within this one category tree. --skeezix1000 (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

The U.S. decade categories are in the "[country] in the [decade]" form (as is the case for all countries, as far as I know), but all of the U.S. year categories are in the "[year] in [country]" form. I don't know why the decade category tree follows a different form that the year category tree, but that's (sadly) the way it is. Consistency-wise, it makes more sense that the South Korean year categories follow the format of the year category tree, rather than looking to the decade category tree, and the year category tree is overwhelmingly in the "[year] in [country]" format. I think the only solution is to propose a widespread change through COM:CFD. --skeezix1000 (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
That's a good idea. If you make a proposal, let me know, and I will support it. If there is consensus for the change, someone will arrange for a bot to make the change. --skeezix1000 (talk) 17:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Userboxes[edit]

Hi Caspian blue; I wonder if you'd mind adding language userboxes (COM:BABEL) to your userpage, please? It may be helpful to other editors to know what languages you understand. Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 12:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Caspian blue!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Category moves[edit]

Hi, I see that you are doing major clean ups. It might be quicker and more efficient for all of us to enter non disputed category move requests in User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands. Enjoy the work. --Foroa (talk) 06:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind and practical direction. I will visit the place.--Caspian blue 13:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Korea-Yeongju County-Rice field near Hwagiri-01.jpg[edit]

Hello, you requested this image to be renamed, but it seems to me that the target name is identical to the current name. Regards, --NEUROtiker  20:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Korea-Gyeongju-Tomb of General Kim Yusin-01A.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Problems on Meta[edit]

I've not seen that behaviour before but it's likely a configuration or setting at your end. Try it with a different browser, perhaps. This happens on Meta but not anywhere else? The index.php is how everything gets done for example the link I'm using right now to edit this section is:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caspian_blue&action=edit&section=new

... ++Lar: t/c 20:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Yep, it only happens on Meta. I've sometimes run into that problems over the years since I registered my account on WikiProjects. That is why I stopped to care about editing on Meta because there are many Wikiproject I can contribute to, but well, that problem would not be ceased unless I would voice out. The link on "Commons" is working, but I'm not sure I can edit on Meta with the same method.--Caspian blue 22:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I just tested the method, which worked, but I could not still edit or click the top tab, and can not bring the diff here because of the annoying pop-up.--Caspian blue 22:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I changed the title to link the page on Meta.--Caspian blue 22:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
The same problem is happening with Safari. I don't use IE because it is too slow.--~~

User_talk:Abigor#Deletion_request[edit]

Hi,

I was away so I couldn't handle your request but my friend MarkW handled it perfectly for you.

There was something I would like to say, please feel free to keep placing those kind of list on my talk page, you do very very good work and our duplicate category is very very backlogged so when you make a list like that you make it nice and easy for us administrators to handle it.

Really, I hope you make a lot of those list in the future and I will be happy to handle it for you, but did you ever think about running for administrator here on Commons?

Best regards, Huib talk 09:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words and visit here. I'm glad you agree with my assessment on such lists. I'm planning to make a list of images for renaming soon. I'm more interested in uploading lots of images, so well adminship is not my interest since Commons has a lot of good admins like you. :-) Keep the good work! --Caspian blue 00:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Modernpioneerink00grif.djvu[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Hwangungu Hall of the Wongudan Altar.jpg[edit]

This image was restored after it was found to be licensed freely in the past. Don't know if you plan to use it but it looks useful. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. Yes, the building is regarded as an important cultural properties. I appreciate your effort.--Caspian blue 21:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

File:An interesting perspective of the gate.jpg[edit]

The target name to rename the file already exists, please give another target name. --Martin H. (talk) 21:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Done. When I uploaded a bunch of images named "Jinseonmun", I forgot this request.--Caspian blue 22:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, but by the way: renaming all files you want to "Korea-..." will not work. Thanks for paying attention to this important field of quality, but please dont ask for renames not covered by Commons:File renaming. --Martin H. (talk) 23:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, I respectfully disagree. The questioned file clearly falls under the guideline because "interesting perspective" is a subjective expression and has no information about what gate would be, so I thought renaming with an accurate title like "Korea-Seoul-Changdeokgung-Jinnamun" (location info) is better for searching. I also expected "Betacommandbox" would rename it, so your visit for the matter puzzled me a bit.--Caspian blue 23:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Moreover, I mostly request for renaming "incorrectly Romanizied titles", not just for adding the Korea- prefix".--Caspian blue 23:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Your help is highly appreciated and your edits improve the quality in a significant way, see the renaming of "An interesting perspective...". But e.g. with File:Choksuk Pavillion-JinjuCastle.jpg I not see the reason for rename. After the file move function is activated the moves will be done manually (for the moment), that saves the reuplod by Betacommand, it will keep the uploads by the uploader and it will save administrators time to delete the files. --Martin H. (talk) 00:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
The second name is not only misspelled (not Pavillion) but also "incorrectly Romanizied" (there are a couple of Romanizations of Korean, but it should be at any of 진주-진주성-촉석루-01.jpg (in Korean), "Chinju Castle-Cho'ngsok Pavilion", "Jinju-Choksengnu", "Jinju-Chokseok Castle" ect). So there is no way to find the file with the current false name if somebody would search for images related to the subject. I appreciate your hard working, but my rename requests are solid and based on the valid ground (descriptive names, and fix incorrect Romanization), so if you do not like my renaming, please defer it to other admins. Thanks.--00:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. Please feel free to put the rename back on that image (and others from the category), but please fill in a short explanation with {{rename|newname.ext|reason}} --Martin H. (talk) 01:19, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks.--Caspian blue 01:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Korean Flickr images[edit]

Hey there. I was working on the massive OTRS ticket you sent in regarding Korean images. It all seems to be good, but there are a few problems. The following images do not exist, and I am unable to find them. Any help you can give would be much appreciated.

Thanks, NW (Talk) 17:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the confirmation job! The list miss a "blank" between Gyeongju and Seokbinggo, so the correct links are like below.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Korea-Gyeongju_Seokbinggo-Monument-01.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Korea-Gyeongju_Seokbinggo-Inside-02.jpg
Cheers.--Caspian blue 20:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Charlotte Gainsbourg at 2008 Venice Film Festival-01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Images from Mireille Ampilhac's Flickr account[edit]

Okay, I'm right curious here. You uploaded File:Harrison Ford and Calista Flockhart at the 2009 Deauville American Film Festival-01.jpg and tagged it as CC-SA-A. When I pull up the source image, I see it also has the NC tag present, which should disqualify it from Commons upload. Same thing goes for File:Director and actors of I'm not there at the 64th Venice Film Festival-01.jpg and others. So what gives here? Tabercil (talk) 16:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I uploaded them via Flickrhelper, not by hand, so you can check the fact in looking into the Flickr bot's contribution history. I think the photographer changed the copyright setting "right after" I sent her an email for showing my gratitude to her releasing images under CC-BY-SA today. :-(. I think the photographer tries to revoke the images, but at that time I was uploading her images of actors, those were under CC-BY-SA. I have not received any reply from her yet, but I can send a copy of my email message with the time log to COM:OTRS. Moreover, according to Commons policy and Creative Commons policies, the images are not revoked, so I don't think those should be deleted.--Caspian blue 16:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I know what you're talking about. I got one Flickr account who wanted to change the license back after I uploaded File:Keisha Castle-Hughes at TIFF 2009.jpg. They haven't yet gotten around to reverting back, but I reckon it's only a matter of time. Kicking the email along to OTRS might not be a bad idea, just to forestall the next user who asks the same question. Tabercil (talk) 16:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Well, placing {{Flickr-change-of-license}} to the images would be good for other curious viewers? I can forward my email message to her to OTRS, but if she does not reply to me, I don't think those images could have the securing "orange OTRS permission" templates.--Caspian blue 17:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Template ought to be good enough I think. Tabercil (talk) 17:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
I sent another email to explain about non-revocable CC-BY-SA and tagged all images with the template. I hope she replies to me..--Caspian blue 17:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:National Museum Incense Burner Photo[edit]

Nominating image File:Korea - Seoul - National Museum - Incense Burner 0252-06a.jpg to WP:FPC had crossed my mind but felt that it was 1) not of enough general interest to generate the support needed for Feature Picture promotion, and 2) not of a high enough resolution to garner needed support. However since you have proposed nominating this picture I think I will give it a try. What is the worst that can happen - it gets rejected?;) Thank you for your support, I sincerely appreciate it. Steve46814 (talk) 23:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

HELP! Attempted to submit this nomination following the less than clear instruction and have generally screwed it up. Rather than trying to fix things and make it worse I'm asking for you to please bail me out and fix (or delete) this if you would. Here is what I did Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/ and I know it is not right. Thank you for anything you can do. So Sorry, I should have known better than to attempt this. Steve46814 (talk) 01:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, all you gotta do right now is just to add {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Korea - Seoul - National Museum - Incense Burner 0252-06a.jpg}} at the top of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates&action=edit&section=1 Cheers.--Caspian blue 01:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again. I wish I understood this barnstar stuff and how to do it because I certainly would like to issue one to you for putting up with me and my screw ups, fixing things, and then being so pleasant about it all. Sorry to be such a PIA. Think I'll ever be able to get on board with all this stuff and make myself usefull?? Thank you very much with apologies for creating extra things for you to do. Steve46814 (talk) 05:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for my inappropriate changing of the Incense Burner image version. My thoughts were as the edit/version submitted by another editor contributing in the Feature Picture promotion discussion did seem to improve on my original photo, I thought it desirable to substitute this improved version. I was unaware that would be in conflict with the Quality Image promotion criteria/guidelines etc. Perhaps you could suggest to someone in the inner circle that a check be performed and block such inappropriate updates when a user attempts to update a Quality Image, or the like, when this activity is invalid. Thank you again for all your help and support in this endevor, you are the greatest. Steve46814 (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

2008 Yongsan Fall Festival-01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2008 Yongsan Fall Festival-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2008 Yongsan Fall Festival-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 23:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Message for you...[edit]

...at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anapji Pond-Gyeongju-Korea-2006-07.jpg. Thanks. Wknight94 talk 12:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Tip[edit]

This flickr owner here licenses his images freely and takes high resolution photos but since he gives minimal or no image descriptions, only 7 of his photos are on Commons. I think the pictures he's taking recently is in Korea (though he has been in Europe before) since he says in his profile that he's in Inchon right now. If there is any important image you recognise, feel free to upload it here. Its worth it considering the superhigh image resolution. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Leoboudv. The flick site page indeed has useful Korean images, so I will upload some of them. Thank you for the tip.--Caspian blue 15:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 09:04, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Just a general question in order to comprehend your logic[edit]

Hello Caspian Blue, just a general question, which could be answered by "yes" or "no":

If it is your opinion, that Liancourt Rocks should be in general included on all Maps showing (South-)Korea (see [3]), than you would also support an general include of Liancourt Rocks in all Maps showing Japan, right? Greetings --Valentim (talk) 15:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The islet is "governed by South Korean government" and the law states the fact, so I don't see why you're excluding the official designation by you. Please stop the disruption.--Caspian blue 18:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

As you know, only South Korean law says, that Liancourt Rocks are South Korean Islands (same for Japan), and you also know that in the last century this islets were governed by both countries alternately. And you know very well, de-jure-status is under dispute and it looks a little bit better for Japan (sorry, don't want to hurt your feelings, that's just what is printed in newspapers). If you have difficulties to face this (and it seems like this, otherwise I cannot explain your permanent usage of emotional terms like "POV", "disruptive edit",...) I advice you for your own good sake to read en:Wikipedia:Conflict of interest very carefully...

After clearing this, could you now please answer to my question: If it is your opinion, that Liancourt Rocks should be in general included on all Maps showing (South-)Korea (see [4]), than you would also support an general include of Liancourt Rocks in all Maps showing Japan, right?

An answer in "yes" or "no" would be enough. --Valentim (talk) 02:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't know when Japan is governing the islands. Please show me the evidence that why Japanese police can not be in the alleged territory? That is quite different from the case of other Japanese territories. The English Wikipedia does not show any such thing as you insist. That goes same as the Pinnacle Island de facto governed by Japanese not "co-governed by China and Japan. I'm sorry to see that your obsession with the Dokdo seems to be your long-run mission or agenda given your Wikistalking of people for one year, but please don't misuse Wikipedia for your such purpose. I think you're the one facing the difficulty to accept the reality. Please don't misuse English term like "permanent since we just "officially" met just few cases. Even if we might have met before on English Wikipedia (not your visit to my talk page on the English Wikipedia), that does not account for any "permanent" period of my feeling over your inappropriate conduct not only here but also on the German Wikkpedia. Perhaps, your Wikistalking of people for that long may be closer to your "permanent" mission. :-)
I will of course answer to your nonsensical questions, but that is not my "primary goal" to use Commons or Wikipedia project. My goal is to provide quality contents unlike your obsessive mission. That is about Japanese map, so I don't understand your deliberate exclusion of the Islets.
You're not my boss or you don't have no right to force me to follow your rude attitude. If you can not parse my reply to yours, then, that is your responsibility and ability. Also I can't wait to see your answer to my question to you on your talk page. During my absence, you archived "remarkable things" like "endless edit warring", and "harassing another editor". Sorry to see that you did such thing again. --Caspian blue 03:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
  • "I don't know when Japan is governing the islands.": Sorry, maybee your grammar here not correct and due to that the sentence is ambivalent. Or I just misunderstand what is written there. Is it possible that you ment "was governing the islands"? If you ment that, than you also have to deny full annexion of Korea in 1910 by Japan... Otherwise you can show me evidences, that this two tiny islets never have been part of the Imperial Japan de-jure and de-facto until 1945. But why are you beginning to raise such topics? This is not Wikipedia, and I refuse to continue such topic discussions on total other projects like commons.
  • "My goal is to provide quality contents [...]": Fine, me too. But please, don't make POV and half truth-edits anymore (e. g. [5], [6], [7], [8], ...).
  • ""harassing another editor"": Be careful, I'm not going to tolerate slandering (see also [9]).
  • Do I interpret your answer "That is about Japanese map, so I don't understand your deliberate exclusion of the Islets" correctly when saying that you agree to include this island also to Japan related maps? --Valentim (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
    • Ah, this message of yours goes into a realm of en:WP:TLDR. :-) You amaze me a lot with your assumption; "Sorry, maybee [sig] your grammar here not correct [sig]" This is grammatically incorrect. :-) I will reply to your nonsensical comment later when I can have time for your whole disruptive campaign.--Caspian blue 00:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 21:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I archived the ones that I could do. However, I am unable to find an OTRS ticket for the other ones. Do you think you could give me a number? Thanks, NW (Talk) 00:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
The rest done. NW (Talk) 04:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the caring, NW. --Caspian blue 20:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

OTRS invitation[edit]

OTRS Wikimedia.svg
Wiki-otrs.png
The OTRS system is looking for trusted volunteers to help staff our permissions and photosubmissions queues. I would like to invite you to look over what OTRS involves and consider seeking approval at the volunteering page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 04:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)}}

Another OTRS en-masse ticket ;)[edit]

Hello Caspian, I have looked at your OTRS ticket related to File:North Korea-Kaesong Folk Hotel-Inside-01.jpg and others and have noticed you haven't uploaded all the photos to the Commons yet. May you please leave me a note when you finish doing so? I will handle the ticket immediately after that. Thanks in advance, odder (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Liancourt rocks map[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Simane-map.jpg... AnonMoos (talk) 04:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Keith's works[edit]

I think that your uploaded files of Keith's works, do not meet the Commons licensing policy. So, I've requested Speedy deletion by {{copyvio}}. --Minor edit (talk) 07:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

The accusation is incorrect and false. The images are clearly in South Korean PD. I suggest you to read Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Old Korea-Keith-BRIDE.JPG or take them to Commons:Deletion requests.--Caspian blue 03:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Tapsa[edit]

Hi, Added a selection of photos of Tapsa a little over a week ago with the bulk uploader but failed to prefix the file name properly. After discovering my error I added the rename template requesting to properly name the files. So far the files have not been renamed. I seem to have read somewhere the the rename template is generally ignored so files seldom actually get renamed. Why is there a template that is not used? I'm ready to re-upload my files and flag the original files for deletion. How much longer do you think I should wait for these files to be renamed before I give up and replace them. I would appreciate your opinion regarding this activity. As always, thank you for advice. Steve46814 (talk) 01:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Please add permission info …[edit]

[10] --:bdk: 14:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: I removed the OTRS stuff now and fixed the licensing due to the recent change on flickr (> CC-by-2.0 > flickrreview). --:bdk: 14:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 00:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

All dealt with. NW (Talk) 02:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Underwater_beer_shot.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Underwater_beer_shot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Japan_North_Korea_South_Korea_Locator.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Japan_North_Korea_South_Korea_Locator.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Tryphon 21:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Korea-Gyeongju_City_Hall-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-Gyeongju_City_Hall-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 04:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Korea-Hi.Seoul.Festival-Hanbok-Parade-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-Hi.Seoul.Festival-Hanbok-Parade-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.148.133 19:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul-Han_River_and_63_Building-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-Seoul-Han_River_and_63_Building-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.173.207 13:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Seoul-Gyeongbokgung-Heungnyemun-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Seoul-Gyeongbokgung-Heungnyemun-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 04:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Korean.beverages-02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korean.beverages-02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


File:Korea-Jeju-Haenyeo-01.jpg[edit]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Korea-Jeju-Haenyeo-01.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Statue of Kim Gu-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-Statue of Kim Gu-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul-N Seoul Tower-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-Seoul-N Seoul Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Moonian (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Seoul-Namsan-N.Seoul.Tower-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Seoul-Namsan-N.Seoul.Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Moonian (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-N Seoul Tower-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-N Seoul Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Moonian (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul Tower-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-Seoul Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Moonian (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Seoul-Namsan.tower-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Seoul-Namsan.tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Moonian (talk) 17:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Seoul.Tower.01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Seoul.Tower.01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Moonian (talk) 17:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul-Dosan Park-03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korea-Seoul-Dosan Park-03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Kingweapons.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kingweapons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChongDae (talk) 07:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 11:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


Category:Monuments in Jeollabuk-do[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Monuments in Jeollabuk-do has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

--Leedkmn (talk) 09:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 08:59, 21 December 2013 (UTC)