File:Male-Female suicide ratios 2015 (age-standardized).png
原始檔案 (2,500 × 1,599 像素,檔案大小:678 KB,MIME 類型:image/png)
說明
摘要
[編輯]描述Male-Female suicide ratios 2015 (age-standardized).png |
English: Male–Female ratios of suicide rates in 2015. Data by World Health Organization (rev. April 2017): global average 1.7 : 1 is used as a reference (men were 70% more likely than women to die by suicide). Below, male (left) and female (right) age-standardizedα suicide mortality rates per 100,000 individuals used to derive the above ratios.
Global average was as higher as 1.9 in year 2012 according to the WHO, and 2.0 according to the IHME.[1] Mortality data is always estimated at a degree. Gender differences in suicide are described since the 1990s, by traditionally higher male suicide rates as contraposed to a typical disproportion of females in nonfatal suicide behavior; a relevant review of previous years' data later mentioned throughout the 2000s, noted this male/female disproportion in suicidality throughout Western countries: the proportion of male suicides was incongruous with that of female suicide attempts, as the male-female ratio of suicides was above 2.4 meaning males completed suicide at least 140% more than females, while the female-male ratio of suicide attempts was 1.5 meaning females attempted suicide 50% more than males.[2][3] Cited as 'gender paradox of suicidal behavior', it is essentially attributed to post-industrial sociocultural influences and gendered identities: females being more vulnerable to psychological problems and receptive to psychotherapeutic approaches (in western societies mental-health disorders are 20-40% higher in women than men, and female therapists outnumber male) particularly at a young age, report suicide ideation and attempt more frequently and are allowed to discuss their emotions, but males being required to express strength and stoicism assuming social status and working roles crucial for their identity are less likely to seek help for suicidal feelings. Since nonfatal suicidal behavior is typically higher in females while suicide rates are traditionally higher for males, then male vulnerability to suicidal behavior is often explained in terms of higher lethality of suicide methods used and hopelessness, being nevertheless that stigmatization of suicidal behaviors tends to frame surviving a suicidal act and seeking help for mental distress as something ‘inappropriate’ for men: research suggests that the gender gap is partially a result of the choice of more lethal methods and the experience of more aggression, which rather provide an indication of the higher intent to die in men.[4][5][6][7] This gender gap holds true in western cultures, while narrows elsewhere, unto where these patterns are contradicted entirely in various Asian societies (counting almost half of global population). Indeed gender differences in suicide vary significantly among countries: western societies (cultural heritage of european origin, such as european languages or religion) report a higher male mortality by suicide than any other, while South and East Asian a much lower, with China accounting for the greatest number of female suicides. Wealth is also a constant, being that the gender gap is generally limited or non-existent in low- and middle-income societies, whereas it is never absent in high-income countries (depicted in darker green aside): 200,000 deliberately take their own life in Europe and the Americas every year, about 40,000 females and 150,000 males.[8][9][10] The problem then is not the old-fashioned question — why do so many women commit suicide in China; the actual question is why do so many men commit suicide in high-income countries?[11] In the last 45 years suicide rates have increased by 60% worldwide. An estimated one million people per year die by suicide or a death every 40 seconds or about 3,000 every day (more people die from suicide than from murder and war). At the same time, nonfatal episodes are reported up to 20 times as much, with female adolescents and minority groups (migrants, transgenders, etc.) bearing most relevant socio-economic implications for suicide prevention.[12][13][14]
Late 1890s recorded first gender-related observation on suicide by Émile Durkheim: according to statistics of the time, more men died of suicide than women every year. Also, Durkheim mentioned relations between western industrialization, modern communities and vulnerability to self-destructive behavior, suggesting social norms and pressures have effects on suicide.[10][19] Reinforcement of male gender roles such as strength, independence, risk-taking behavior, often prevents males from seeking help for suicidal feelings and depression.[20][21] It is observed that shifting cultural attitudes about gender roles and social norms and especially ideas about masculinity, may also contribute to closing the gender gap.[5][7][22] Suicidal behavior is also subject of study for economists since about the 1970s: although national costs of suicide and suicide attempts (up to 20 for every one completed suicide) are very high, suicide prevention is hampered by scarce resources for lack of interest by mental health advocates and legislators; and moreover, personal interests even financial are studied with regards to suicide attempts for example, in which insights are given that often "individuals contemplating suicide do not just choose between life and death [..] the resulting formula contains a somewhat paradoxical conclusion: attempting suicide can be a rational choice, but only if there is a high likelihood it will cause the attempter's life to significantly improve."[23][24] In the United States alone, yearly costs of suicide and suicide attempts are comprised in 50-100 billion dollars.[25][26]
Social stigma is considered as well a "major barrier" to suicide prevention, and "the underlying motive for discrimination [..] caused by lack of knowledge - ignorance [..] One extreme example is the criminalization of suicidal behaviour, which still occurs in many countries."[28][29] Per recent releases, the World Health Organization warns about social stigma towards suicidal behavior and psychiatric patients, and the taboo to openly discuss suicide, representing to date challenges and obstacles for suicide prevention policies along with low availability and quality of data.[27]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
日期 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
來源 |
Based on
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
作者 | multiple | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
授權許可 (重用此檔案) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
其他版本 |
|
File:Male-Female suicide ratios and rates 2015 (age-standardized).svg是本檔案的向量版本。 如果品質不低,就應該優先使用該檔案,而非PNG檔案。
File:Male-Female suicide ratios 2015 (age-standardized).png → File:Male-Female suicide ratios and rates 2015 (age-standardized).svg
更多資訊請參閱Help:SVG/zh。
|
授權條款
[編輯]此檔案在創用CC CC0 1.0 通用公有領域貢獻宣告之下分發。 | |
在此宣告之下分發本作品者,已依據各國著作權法,在全世界放棄其對本作品所擁有的著作權及所有相關相似的法律權利,從而將本作品貢獻至公有領域。您可以複製、修改、分發和演示該作品,用於任何商業用途,所有這些都不需要請求授權。
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.enCC0Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedicationfalsefalse |
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
我,此作品的版權所有人,釋出此作品至公共領域。此授權條款在全世界均適用。 這可能在某些國家不合法,如果是的話: 我授予任何人有權利使用此作品於任何用途,除受法律約束外,不受任何限制。 |
檔案歷史
點選日期/時間以檢視該時間的檔案版本。
日期/時間 | 縮圖 | 尺寸 | 使用者 | 備註 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
目前 | 2021年3月7日 (日) 03:34 | 2,500 × 1,599(678 KB) | HomemMédio(留言 | 貢獻) | See post at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HomemM%C3%A9dio for a lengthier summary (because of the character limit here) - in simple words, last week SuperSucker recalled about map building, that maps look better and more reputable when free from graphic inclusions (such as legends and typings). | |
2020年12月31日 (四) 13:46 | 2,500 × 1,800(730 KB) | NoTengoFriends(留言 | 貢獻) | better legend - original author confided me he was never able to make the smaller legend more legible himself | ||
2020年12月21日 (一) 03:12 | 2,500 × 1,800(737 KB) | NoTengoFriends(留言 | 貢獻) | Reverted to version as of 02:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC) He also thinks green looks childish, simply childish, thus readers are both less likely to click on "More details" and to get the point from reading the description. I just heard him on the phone and he's freaking out and told me to just leave the .SVG version green and the .PNG version blue. It's the best compromise he can think of. If we can't handle the stalking tomorrow or in the future we'll just give them the stupid green color. | ||
2020年12月21日 (一) 02:57 | 2,500 × 1,800(783 KB) | NoTengoFriends(留言 | 貢獻) | Reverted to version as of 02:08, 21 December 2020 (UTC) However, SuperSucker and me agreed that if they want it green in order to stop stalking us (see his talk page for more on that, the part where I was reverted last) then let that be. It's impossible to take legal action against what they do anyway. They keep on bragging that climate change is becoming important and so that green is best, while they harass us. | ||
2020年12月21日 (一) 02:40 | 2,500 × 1,800(737 KB) | NoTengoFriends(留言 | 貢獻) | Reverted to version as of 01:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC) He also thinks green does likely misconceive readers who get to read the description. He thinks readers will read it with a feminist bias and thus won't get the point, which is that the male excess in suicide rates is a health issue, and not a fact of life based on whether born male or female. | ||
2020年12月21日 (一) 02:08 | 2,500 × 1,800(783 KB) | NoTengoFriends(留言 | 貢獻) | Reverted to version as of 01:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC) And by the way, anything written like SuperSucker does, that is, without a feminist bias, is reverted at wikipedia, which is why he wrote the long description under the maps instead. We think the EU feminists and parties stalking him (and now me as well) are concerned now because of the Brexit trade deal to be signed in these very days, and because of Biden's election (just as they were pumped for Trump's presidency before). Go figure out. | ||
2020年12月21日 (一) 01:54 | 2,500 × 1,800(737 KB) | NoTengoFriends(留言 | 貢獻) | Reverted to version as of 22:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC) SuperSucker's only concern with the map's main color being green is that readers are less likely to click on "More details" (from the wikipedia pages that link the maps) and thus land on the wikimedia page where the entire subject of male and female suicide is explained properly. He says he doesn't wanna think about it anymore anyway, and wonder why they don't revert the maps themselves. They're all very awkward. | ||
2020年12月21日 (一) 01:15 | 2,500 × 1,800(783 KB) | NoTengoFriends(留言 | 貢獻) | Reverted to version as of 06:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC) EU feminists came back at both of us again after I (MedicalWorker, banned a couple of days ago) uploaded a blue version of the triple maps to replace the two green ones (see also SuperSucker's talk page, last revert). Yesterday they convinced us to revert at least the .SVG version of the triple map. Today they forced us to have this one (.PNG version) reverted to green as well. They brag that the climate change topic is growing. | ||
2020年12月14日 (一) 22:31 | 2,500 × 1,800(737 KB) | MedicalWorker(留言 | 貢獻) | above 4.0 countries were blue a bit too deep | ||
2020年12月13日 (日) 22:52 | 2,500 × 1,800(738 KB) | MedicalWorker(留言 | 貢獻) | blue too deep |
無法覆蓋此檔案。
檔案用途
下列8個頁面有用到此檔案:
全域檔案使用狀況
以下其他 wiki 使用了這個檔案:
- en.wikipedia.org 的使用狀況
- es.wikipedia.org 的使用狀況
- fr.wikipedia.org 的使用狀況
- ko.wikipedia.org 的使用狀況
- ru.wikipedia.org 的使用狀況
- zh.wikipedia.org 的使用狀況
詮釋資料
此檔案中包含其他資訊,這些資訊可能是由數位相機或掃描器在建立或數位化過程中所新增的。若檔案自原始狀態已被修改,一些詳細資料可能無法完整反映出已修改的檔案。
水平解析度 | 142.87 dpc |
---|---|
垂直解析度 | 142.87 dpc |
使用軟體 |