File talk:Acción de la Standard Oil.png

出典:ウィキメディア・コモンズ (Wikimedia Commons)
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動

No source

[編集]

Correct the source, not remove the tag. What does it worth to have an file with the false information "its entirely my own work" and some user nickname who has nothing to do with this "work"? That information is below any standards - and it is wrong, so {{Nsd}}. Correct it, I have no interest to do it myself today, maybe later. --Martin H. (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[返信]

See Special:Upload: If you do not provide suitable license and source information, your upload will be deleted without further notice. So Pieter, what are you talking about! Here we have wrong license, wrong source, wrong author... The uploader not even scanned this himself! what do you think nsd is about? Stop vandalizing this wiki and stop removing problem tags that indicate that something is realy wrong. Fix the problems if you want. --Martin H. (talk) 17:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[返信]
The rights of this work are owned by nobody else, and you know it. Don't bite newbies. There is no real problem. Imagibary problems you can fix yourself. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[返信]
A newby will be someone who joins this project and follows its instructions as best as he can. Someone who is selecting the "It is entirely my own work" option in Commons:Upload to upload something that he not created himself obviously not follows any instructions. Aditionally someone who not cares about the result of the uploade and ignores that the reuslt of his upload incorrectly says "source: 投稿者自身による著作物" is not a newby but someone who is not caring about this project. Any bot script can mirror google imagesearch in a better way, with at least an hint to the correct source. The warning on the user talkpage offers to ask for help at the help desk if there are questions on how to resolve the problem, im frequently visiting that page. --Martin H. (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[返信]
Fixed. I still think DR would have been more appropriate but Category:Media without a source is already a dump anyways. I don't know who the author is but it doesn't matter if it's old (the source wouldn't have mattered either, you could have just removed "own work"). I've suggested Rockefeller. ZooFari 18:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[返信]