File talk:BahnhofsuhrZuerich RZ.jpg

この削除論議は終了しました。 このアーカイブに編集を加えないで下さい。 あなたは、削除の方針を読むことができ、また井戸端にて質問することができます。 このファイルに関する状況が大きく変化した場合は、再度の削除依頼か削除撤回依頼をしてもかまいません。

File:BahnhofsuhrZuerich P1050253.jpg

• File:BahnhofsuhrZuerich RZ.jpg

Derivative work. The clock design is still under copyright in Switzerland: [1]. Jafeluv (talk) 00:53, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

•  質問 What kind of protection is it though? If it's a trademark or design patent, we don't need to worry about it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:38, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

  Good question. A representative of the SBB (Swiss Federal Railways) says here that the "SBB is the only holder of the station clock's copyright and trademark rights". The design does look very simple and I'm not sure if a court has ruled on its copyrightability, but the SBB at least seems to assert that it's copyrighted. Jafeluv (talk) 06:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

What about FOP? --84.61.129.247 10:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

•  存続 as FOP and ineligible for copyright. Trademark rights do not matter here. --Leyo 11:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
• Ah, you're completely right. COM:FOP#Switzerland indicates that there should be no problem with the photo even if the design is protected by copyright. I guess I hadn't considered that possibility... Jafeluv (talk) 10:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

•  質問 Exactly why did Apple have to pay for a licence for this design? It should be ineligible for copyright or covered by FOP in most countries. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

  FOP would cover photographs taken on public places but not using the design for your own products, I imagine. Not sure about the threshold of originality in Swiss law, though. It's possible that Apple simply decided to play it safe and pay for the license instead of going to court to get a ruling on the design's copyrightability. Not that it really matters for us, of course :) Jafeluv (talk) 23:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Kept: per Leyo. -- Common Good (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)