File talk:ESO-VLT-Laser-phot-33a-07.jpg
跳转到导航
跳转到搜索
Why isn't the beam itself blurred? I mean, the near end of it (the far "end" was moving with the stars). --91.196.238.116 06:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- It is blurred by it is insignificant as the laser beam diameter is much less than the aperture of the telescope. Ruslik (talk) 08:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- I meant "why doesn't it look blurred 'on this photo?". All the buildings on the ground have very noticeable motion blur. --94.158.203.101 09:35, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- This is displayed in the image description. Ruslik (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I meant "why doesn't it look blurred 'on this photo?". All the buildings on the ground have very noticeable motion blur. --94.158.203.101 09:35, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
