File talk:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration Still Frame.jpg
跳转到导航
跳转到搜索
History of related deletion discussions
[编辑]August 2006
[编辑]这个file曾于2006年8月5日被提出存废讨论,讨论结果为保留。 如果您认为需要再度提出存废讨论,请先参阅该讨论页。 |
February 2007
[编辑]这个file曾于2007年2月15日被提出存废讨论,讨论结果为保留。 如果您认为需要再度提出存废讨论,请先参阅该讨论页。 |
June 2007
[编辑]这个file曾于2007年6月18日被提出存废讨论,讨论结果为保留。 如果您认为需要再度提出存废讨论,请先参阅该讨论页。 |
Is it really
[编辑]is it reallly educationnal?
No it is clearly pornographic as it depicts a sexual act which is performed in front of thousands of spectators (the person who took the picture and the Wikipedia users). I think the answer would be clear if a female ejaculation (yes female ejaculation exists!) was shown here. (SBJ)
wouldn't the process be more clear if the picture had a larger penis? it's hard to tell the penis is erect
- Let me get this straight: You object to this picture because:
- it is pornographic ('because it is "a sexual act"') ;
- because it's not a picture of a female subject ;
- because you have difficulty in assuring yourself that this picture of an ejaculating penis is a picture of an erect penis ;
- and because you would prefer a picture of a larger penis.
- is that correct? Maybe you should try a search engine if you are looking for non-pornographic images of Females/with large penises/who are ejaculating/erect/and not engaged in a sexual act. I wouldn't be surprised if you find just what it is you are looking for. Sorry wikimedia.org didn't work out for you. Pedant 01:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
1. the comments were made by at least two different persons. 2. if you want to be polemic, don't try to play godfather in telling what works out and what doesnt't ...the image is educational and pornographic at the same time