File talk:First Republic of Armenia in 1918-1920.png

维基共享资源,媒体文件资料库
跳转到导航 跳转到搜索

I'm sorry, but I reverted map back, because on the original map is wrongfully shown northern line of the advance of the turkish troops in 1920. They occupied Alexandropol and Batumi. That wasn't shown on the map. Also, on the original map is missing explanation for numbers 10(eastern Nahichevan),19(Bagratuni dynasty domain in Upper Armenia),20-21(Somhetia). As well as still missing explanation for 22,23-Meshetia(Meskheti), 24,25-Ajara(Klarjeti) and 26-heartland of Ayrarat region.Culminatio (留言) 04:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[回复]

Numbers 3, 8 and 9 on the map.[编辑]

Good afternoon dear Accipite7! I want to give you very constructive notice on the map. The map inherited unfortunately, two common mistakes from the series of the maps of Tsutsiev , Andersen, Partskhaladze and Egge.

1. First is a serious mistake on numbers 8 and 9. According to the Treaty of Batum, Vardenis(Basargechar) district(number 8 on the map) and Yeghegnadzor(Vanadzor,Keshishkend) district was accepted by the Ottoman government as part of Armenian republic. Both districts 8 and 9 were contested by the Azerbaijani republic, but was accepted by the Ottoman empire as an Armenian territory. The same way as the Azerbaijani republic accepted in 1920 Kars province as part of Armenian republic, but Turkish government in Ankara didn't accept Kars province as the part of Armenian republic territory. So this two districts 8 and 9 have to be colored the same color as Erevan district number 26.

2. The second mistakes is a minor one. Armeno-Georgian condominium of Lori(number 3 bright orange on the map) was slightly bigger on the north toward modern Georgian territory.Culminatio (留言) 21:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[回复]