File talk:HMS Gävle.JPG

出自Wikimedia Commons
跳至導覽 跳至搜尋

There is something wrong with this picture...it seems to show a double of everything from the weatherdeck of the ship up as...I guess "doubled" is the only way to describe it. Two Bofors guns side-by-side on the front? Two upper decks and two stacks? What's going on here? For reference, compare to this picture of the HMS Sundsvall (it's from that craft's wiki page, but for some reason the link editor here insists that the page doesn't exist. Anyway, they're the only two remaining Göteborg-class corvettes, and it's very unlikely that they would be so drastically different. If anyone has a previous version without the error or a better picture, please submit it. Right now, this picture is used not only on the HMS Gävle's page, but on the Swedish Navy page as well. If I have time, I'm going to switch the picture at "Swedish Navy" with the picture linked above, as I believe it is a more effective representation of the Götenborg-class. If I am in error, please do not hesitate to correct me. Gh05t (對話) 04:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[回覆]

...and after publishing that, I decided to blow the image up until I could get a very close look at it, and saw that I'd been dazzled by the paint scheme (**** you, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_camouflage!)... This isn't a just a picture of the Gävle, it's a picture of both Göteborg-class corvettes tied up side-by-side. I think changing the description would suit to correct this minor issue, but if anyone has a good picture of the Gävle by itself that would be helpful as well! Gh05t (對話) 05:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[回覆]

Hi Gh05t. I am not sure what you are asking for? But if it's any help for you, is the other ship HMS Sundsvall (K24). Regarding renaming the article, I am not a fan ot that. This due to the fact that HMS Sundsvall is behind HMS Gävle, and the HMS Gävle is the most visible ship on the picture. Better to add some extra description in the media box below the picture. //Joshua (對話) 22:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[回覆]