File talk:Old Wikisource logo used until 2006.jpg

来自Wikimedia Commons
跳转到导航 跳转到搜索

Unprotect[编辑]

This image is not the official logo, I think it should be unprotected and its description should explain it. – rotemlissTalk 13:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[回复]

Obsolete![编辑]

This logo is out of date! Seahen 23:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[回复]

This image originated from en.wikipedia.org. List of contributors:

  • [2004-05-12T12:02:04Z] Dmn (Symbol for wikisource)
  • [2004-06-05T03:32:20Z] 80.5.160.4
  • [2004-06-05T03:32:46Z] Dysprosia (Reverted edits by 80.5.160.4 to last version by Dmn)
  • [2004-06-05T16:15:16Z] Marknew (Added link to Wikisource)
  • [2004-06-06T01:47:52Z] 172.133.39.66
  • [2004-06-08T04:40:55Z] Alikhtarov
  • [2004-06-10T23:05:52Z] Dysprosia (temporary referral-type hack in case someone clicks on the image)
  • [2004-06-19T13:29:54Z] Jay (more details at Image:Iceberg.jpg)
  • [2004-06-26T15:53:14Z] 207.153.206.103
  • [2004-06-26T15:53:54Z] 207.153.206.103
  • [2004-07-24T10:40:45Z] Angela (Wikisource redirects now work. Redirecting to make consistent with the rest of the main page images)
  • [2005-06-20T02:11:23Z] Dbenbenn ({{NowCommons|Image:Wikisource-logo.jpg}})
  • [2005-09-17T21:41:51Z] Angela ({{GFDL}})


Original title:

  • Sourceberg.jpg


Upload log:

  • (del) (cur) 12:02, 12 May 2004 . . Dmn (Talk | contribs) . . 135×143 (5,508 bytes) (Symbol for wikisource)


Text:

Perhaps you want to go to [[Wikisource:Main Page]]. {{NowCommons|Image:Wikisource-logo.jpg}} {{GFDL}}

Poccil 06:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[回复]

File information[编辑]

This file was marked as equivalent to w:Image:Wikisource-logo-35px.jpg from en.wikipedia.org according to the NowCommons tag.

This is the edit history for that file's page:

  • [2004-12-06T01:56:51Z] Tom- (#REDIRECT [[Wikisource:Main Page]])
  • [2005-07-02T17:30:47Z] Dbenbenn ({{NowCommons|Image:Wikisource-logo.jpg}})


Original title:

  • Wikisource-logo-35px.jpg


Upload log:

  • (del) (cur) 04:48, 15 February 2005 . . Dbenbenn (Talk | contribs) . . 35×37 (681 bytes) (copied from :Commons:Image:Wikisource-logo-35px.jpg, for protection)


Text:


Poccil 02:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[回复]

File information[编辑]

This file was marked as equivalent to w:Image:Sourceberg-MainPage.jpg from en.wikipedia.org according to the NowCommons tag.

This is the edit history for that file's page:

  • [2004-11-25T20:12:56Z] Tom- (re-compressed logo for the Main Page)
  • [2004-11-25T20:19:10Z] Tom- (info from original page)
  • [2004-11-25T20:43:25Z] Tom- (fixed redirect)
  • [2005-07-04T06:34:30Z] Dbenbenn ({{NowCommons|Image:Wikisource-logo.jpg}})


Original title:

  • Sourceberg-MainPage.jpg


Upload log:

  • (del) (cur) 20:12, 25 November 2004 . . Tom- (Talk | contribs) . . 80×110 (1,988 bytes) (re-compressed logo for the Main Page)


Text:


Poccil 11:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[回复]

Wrong licence[编辑]

Hello,

This file can't be "© & ™ All rights reserved, Wikimedia Foundation, Inc." because the original file (Image:Iceberg.jpg) is GFDL. See also the source here: [1] [2], where it is something like CC-BY-NC (commercial users need written permission). Yann 22:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[回复]

Thanks for pointing it out! It seems like this edit accidentally or maliciously replaced the right license with the wrong one. Any work based on another GFDL work must be released as GFDL. --spider 10:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[回复]
Correction: the license change status was completely legal, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Wikimedia logos#Wikisource. The original copyright holder re-released the image and delegated all rights to Wikimedia Foundation. --spider 10:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[回复]
Well the original image is free for non commercial use. So I don't think it can be at the same time, "© Wikimedia", GFDL and "free for non commercial use". So something is wrong somewhere. And the link above goes to en empty page. Regards, Yann 12:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[回复]
It's a weird situation indeed, can't argue with that. I fixed the link (forgot the second Wikipedia:, silly of me) so you can read the details of the whole story now. --spider 15:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[回复]
Hm. Great. This should go through the foundation being a trademark issue. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[回复]