File talk:Polish Regents 1916.jpg

According to law members of the Regency Council were not a Regents. Aleksander Kakowski wasn't cardinal in 1916-1918 period, Mr Ostrowski never was a count, prince Lubormirski never signed decrees of the Regency Council with his aristocratic title.--90.156.17.111 15:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Nobody says that Ostrowski was a count, they are still called "Regents" ("Mr. M. a grandson of Regent Lubomirski, retrieved the family mansion at Malawies in 2008" . Further in Hutten-Czapski, 60 Jahre, vol. 2, p.421: "wenige Minuten später kamen, in zwei weiteren offenen Wagen, die drei Regenten im Schlosshof an". But as to Kakowski, they are right in principle, he was created Cardinal in 1919, in 1917 he was only Primate of Poland.--Alexvonf (talk) 10:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Nobody says that Ostrowski was a count - It was written there before my edits ([1]). Primate of the Kingdom of Poland position in 1916-1916 period is subject for another discussion (did archbishop Kakowski was entiteled to declare himself as Primate of the Kingdom of Poland and particulary - did he was entiteled to declare it just in 1917, while his last predecessor in that office died in 1829). We shouldn't also confuse office of Primate of Poland (archbishop of Gniezno) and office of Primate of the Kingdom of Poland. Dotz_Holiday--90.156.17.111 20:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Explanation of last edits - Mr. Kakowski never was a Primate of Poland (in 1925 - 1938 period he has Primate of Kingdom of Poland however). --217.173.188.223 11:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)