File talk:Punjabi example.svg
跳至導覽
跳至搜尋
- Users!Please Note-Image so shown represents digrphic nature of Punjabi Orthography, which has two recognized scripts Gurmukhi and Shahmukhi.Refer w:en:Punjabi Language#Writing systems and cited references there.Please do not make further reversions/changes by adding Devanagri in it, in this respect.--Guglani (talk) 08:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- @Filpro, Snow Rise, and Vigyani: Filpro please read Rfc mentioned in edit comments carefully and do not make disruptive edit }}--Guglani (對話) 00:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- What on earth are you talking about you talking about? I've never edited this file nor anything remotely likely it on commons. I haven't even been active here in years. I did mediate an RfC on the topic of en.wikipedia years ago, in which I took no content actions but rather helped the two sides reach a compromise solution. Are you conducing some sort of cross-project disruptive campaigning on that topic? From your comments I suspect you may not have complete competence with our tools, processes, or English, so you're going to have to be a lot more clear what you are talking about and why you are pinging us here, on entirely different project years after the discussion. Snow (對話) 08:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Snow please be informed disruptive edit comment was only addressed to Filpro in my comments ,ping to Snow Rise was only meant to invite attention to stop such disruption by other user. I didn't meant any negative comment for Snowrise or User:Vigyani, rather it was call for help at that time.I hope it clarifies though after long time.--Guglani (對話) 06:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- What on earth are you talking about you talking about? I've never edited this file nor anything remotely likely it on commons. I haven't even been active here in years. I did mediate an RfC on the topic of en.wikipedia years ago, in which I took no content actions but rather helped the two sides reach a compromise solution. Are you conducing some sort of cross-project disruptive campaigning on that topic? From your comments I suspect you may not have complete competence with our tools, processes, or English, so you're going to have to be a lot more clear what you are talking about and why you are pinging us here, on entirely different project years after the discussion. Snow (對話) 08:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
