File talk:Romanians before WW1.jpg

Biased

This is image as unneutral as it can be.
The black is artifically made darker so that it is more emphesized, while the other colors are fainted to make them less significant. Also, the choice of black as a color and its form, that resembles a spilled ink stain further emphizes the Romanian territories and appears as if the black is crawling to other parts of the map which gives a wrong impression to the observer...
This map is a propaganda work in the first place. Moreover the "user contribution" of Alex:D just cranks up these slanted and biased characteristics even more.--Bizso (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

The map was made to represent the Romanian-inhabited territories. That's why other peoples are represented in lighter colours. The important thing that the information by itself isn't wrong, the representation is made in accordance with the census results. See also this map. See for example an other map, the so-called red map (also a propagandistic work). Here, the Hungarians are represented in a strong red, while the Romanians in light violet. A map can't be criticized because of it's colours. --Olahus (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)