Category talk:Werkspoor Jumbo
Category:Werkspoor Jumbo of KLM[edit]
Over categorization. Three categories for a single aircraft? (Only one of this type was built) Andy Dingley (talk) 09:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Do we really need:
To present understandably consistent entries within the parents of each category, I think we do need both Werkspoor Jumbo and PH-AFI (aircraft). However we don't need Werkspoor Jumbo of KLM.
The only purpose of Werkspoor Jumbo of KLM is to include the Werkspoor Jumbo as a KLM aircraft in Aircraft of KLM. That's a necessary function, we should keep doing it. However we could do that by placing Werkspoor Jumbo in there just as easily. The other "Rutland Reindeer of KLM" categories are named as such because they were a more popular aircraft type and there are example which were not operated by KLM. In this case there's no need to distinguish. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
stale discussion. @Andy Dingley: specific topic. I guess you are free to implement your suggestions. Just in case notifying user:Huntster--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:08, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I tend to agree that Werkspoor Jumbo and PH-AFI (aircraft) are useful categories. But Estopedist1, may I ask why I was pinged here? I'm probably just being dense. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Huntster: I was pinged you, because I know you have special knowledge about aviation :)--Estopedist1 (talk) 19:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Estopedist1: Hah, thanks! I do appreciate it. I occasionally just get oblivious. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Huntster: I was pinged you, because I know you have special knowledge about aviation :)--Estopedist1 (talk) 19:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
@Andy Dingley, Estopedist1, and Huntster: Closed (consensus to at least eliminate Category:Werkspoor Jumbo of KLM level, can reopen if further changes needed) Josh (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)