Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2015 at 16:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Not sure why you have left so much black round it. But this is just a decent photo of an unexceptional stained glass window. Just a QI. -- Colin (talk) 16:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I cutted this picture. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support I don't see anything that wrong with this ... how can you not leave some black around a semicircular stained-glass window? Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Daniel Case, "I don't see anything that wrong with this" is the definition of a QI, no more. FP needs wow! Either subject wow or photographic wow and preferably both. See Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Windows_.26_doors for examples of featured stained glass. The world is full of stained glass windows, and FP needs more than a competent rendering of an ordinary example. -- Colin (talk) 21:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Most of those other images are of entire stained glass windows, not portions as this one is. That's what I like about it. I don't see why we can't have a nice one at small scale. And yes, I'm wowed by it. I would not have indicated my support if I didn't feel that way—as I think one could deduce from my oppose votes explicitly saying an image has no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Jacek, it's not even symmetric, sorry. I agree with Colin, QI but not FP. --Kadellar (talk) 22:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Kadellar I improved symetry. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- This has been nominated and I like, what else? --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Σπάρτακος, the Featured Pictures are those judged against strict rules to be among the finest on Commons. "I like" really isn't a factor at all. It isn't even a factor for QI, which must meed certain quality standards. Keep "I like" for Flickr/Facebook or your own personal favourites collection. You ask "what else?". A lot else. Please, if you aren't prepared to research whether this image is among our finest, then don't vote. It just devalues FP to become images some people like. If you want to show some appreciation, then send a message to the photographer. -- Colin (talk) 14:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Colin"I Like" means many things. I like the colors, I like the composition, I like the light etc .... Who are you? The "God" of photography? everything is chosen by you? If so, buy commons and do as you think. Until then I will do the same,keep this opinions for you. Greetings.--Σπάρτακος (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Might I as who are you who is above criticism? This is a forum where we decide the best pictures on Commons. Nobody cares what images you Favourite or Like on Flickr of Facebook and your opinion there affects nothing. If you judge this image to be FP then there are perhaps 1000 other stained glass windows images that are equally as good and worth of FP. How about a grown-up discussion on what makes a FP stained glass window, rather than acting like a teenager who's been told by his dad that his taste in music is poor. -- Colin (talk) 15:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment Jacek Halicki, Daniel Case, Tremonist, Σπάρτακος, could you please examine Category:Stained glass windows. Click on the "Good pictures" button and look at the hundreds of QI images. Can you please explain how this small image of a small window is superior to those hundreds of other windows that are just QI. -- Colin (talk) 12:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)- Oppose I agree with the criticism: It's a good QI, but looking at other stained glass FPs, this is not among the finest. — Julian H.✈ 12:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
