Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crete senesi - Asciano (Siena).jpg

File:Crete senesi - Asciano (Siena).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2023 at 08:03:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Crete senesi - Asciano (Siena).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crete senesi - Asciano (Siena).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Tuscany
•  Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by PROPOLI87 -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Info The delightful panorama of the "crete senesi", hills in Asciano (Siena) Italy — Preceding unsigned comment added by PROPOLI87 (talk • contribs)
•  Oppose ⚠️ No embedded color profile. Oversaturated fluorescent grass. Please read Commons:Image guidelines#Color space and upload a new version. Same issue as this previous nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

  I uploaded the original version, I hadn't saturated the image but slightly increased the exposure. The grass is so green because it's "grain" (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87

• It's a smartphone picture. Sometimes automatic filters and post-treatments are integrated. Exposure doesn't appear in the new metadata. Tones seem unnatural to me, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

• I have absolutely not used filters, you may not even believe it and I assure you that in Asciano Siena the hills really have this colour. And it is precisely for this characteristic that I nominated in FP.151.40.164.243 10:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87151.40.164.243 10:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

• Maybe not you, but the telephone. This smartphone Galaxy A52 integrates pre-selected programs that transform the scene in function of the aspect you want to give to the picture (high dynamic range, ultra-bight colors, etc.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

This is the same company that automatically fakes moon photos (this Youtuber also does a few tests to confirm this), so like Basile Morin, the colours also look a bit unnatural. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Ha ha! Funny. Yes, I also have the impression that these tools are designed to save users from tedious post-treatment. So the inner processing may handle the work automatically, depending on the kind of scenes they analyse. The goal is probably to produce an instant result that one can share immediately on the social networks. Despite the risk that it looks a bit fictional -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose per my comment above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nominationok, I withdraw the application and I see to post a photo of the same places made with a canon. Thank you all.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)