Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Mini -- 2016 -- 5087-93.jpg

File:Dülmen, Mini -- 2016 -- 5087-93.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2018 at 13:23:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Mini -- 2016 -- 5087-93.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Mini -- 2016 -- 5087-93.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
•  Info created & uploaded by XRay - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
•  weak oppose - Not to take anything away from the photograph/photographer -- they're good quality -- but I'm uncomfortable with the fact that we already have 3 FPs of this car with a giant advertisement on it (1, 2, 3). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I'm inclined to agree with Rhododendrites. Aside from that, this road with the trees and misty light, might look better without the car or perhaps with someone on a bike or walking. --Cart (talk) 20:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks to Tomer T for nominating my photograph. It's good to see one of my photographs nominated. I'm happy if my pictures please others.
  I'm wondering about a reason for rejection that there are already two pictures of this car as excellent picture (the third one is another car). IMO if a photograph is good enough it should be possible to have more than one FP. (Yes, the photographs itself should be differently enough.) Could you imagine to have only one FP of the Golden Gate Bridge? I know, it isn't a good comparison. But it's FPC, not VIC. --XRay ^talk 05:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• FP is also about selecting and I think the three first photos are better and much more interesting than this. A fourth photo of this car has to be at least as interesting as they are. Here the trees are dominating so the photo becomes "half car, half trees". I'd rather see a nice shot of these trees. --Cart (talk) 08:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• Here are the trees only: File:Dülmen, Börnste, Waldweg -- 2015 -- 4649.jpg. It's already FP. ;-) --XRay ^talk 09:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• Q E D. :-) --Cart (talk) 10:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support The composition really stands out to me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Rhododendrites.--Ermell (talk) 07:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Rhododendrites and Cart; also the background could be sharper even though the car is the subject. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC)