Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hoog water in de Friese boezem. 26-02-2020. (d.j.b) 01.jpg

File:Hoog water in de Friese boezem. 26-02-2020. (d.j.b) 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2020 at 16:00:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hoog water in de Friese boezem. 26-02-2020. (d.j.b) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hoog water in de Friese boezem. 26-02-2020. (d.j.b) 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Floods
•  Info High water in the Frisian bosom. Due to the heavy rain, the Jonkersloot has stepped out of its bank and the w:Aerial root (pneumatophore) of a bald cypress Taxodium distichum partially submerged.}}
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quite messy composition, harsh light, uninteresting POV, the subject itself isn't too pleasing. —kallerna (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kallerna. Daniel Case (talk) 00:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Harsh light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - I find the light fine. I think the composition would have been helped by having a bit more water at the bottom, to give the part of the root at the near right more space to breathe. Or maybe moving the camera to the left and shooting from that angle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Comment Different crop and longer exposure time.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I like the other one better. The blue water with white ripples is much nicer than the dreary water in this one. Sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)