Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:International Space Station star trails - JSC2012E039800.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:International Space Station star trails - JSC2012E039800.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 19:59:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by astronaut Don Pettit - uploaded by O'Dea - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support I don't think we've had any star trail photos taken from space here at FPC. The brilliant photos by Don Pettit are a little old by our standards but they still hold up. I think this is one of his best, since it captures the star trails in a way that can't be done while here on the planet, plus the city trails and thunderstorms. Bonus is the "Star Wars opening shot"-use of ISS at the top of the photo. -- Cart (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Extraordinary, striking, perfect! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Unique. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support an out-loud "wow" from me. Almost looks like some sort of planet-printing going on :) — Rhododendrites talk | 23:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support The ISS looks surprisingly similar to the Tantive IV. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support If only the pictures of Earth taken by astronauts on the ISS have the same quality as the ones taken by the Earth observation satellite like the Landsat 8... --StellarHalo (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Indeed extraordinary. Thank you, Cart, for pointing out this photo! --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Amazing! Definitely should be part of our featured image collection. --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 07:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Finally an FPC that gives me that unique wow feeling. Simply stunning! --Granada (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Trougnouf (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Very special --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Cbrescia (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Special.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Does anyone know the name of this loading ramp where the picture was taken from? There is a flag of Japan on display at the top of the photo, so I thought it is part of en:Kibō (ISS module) but not too sure. --Gnosis (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Gnosis, in relation to one of the other photos in this series which was a POTD on the NASA website, I actually asked on Twitter where these photos were taken, and I got a reply from Commander Chris Hadfield (yes, I became suitably starstruck and swooned!):
- — Me: "Interesting and beautiful. I wonder where the camera is fixed for this shot. I always thought there would be a lot of vibrations on the station from different vents, pumps etc and steady long exposure shots would not be doable."
- — Cmdr: "It's mounted on a bracket in the Cupola. Station is big enough to dampen most of the vibrations you mention."
- In some of the shots you can see the interior of the Cupola. --Cart (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cart Thank You, I really enjoyed this. --Gnosis (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support RolfHill (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Andrei (talk) 08:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support A scene any Hollywood SFX house would be proud to have made ... thanks Cart for finding this! Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky
- As the uploader of the nominated image, I support the nomination mildly, but suggest two superior pictures from the same set of 36 pictures.
- The first alternative has the virtue of showing a view readily recognisable by those who appreciate star trail pictures: the scene shows circular star trails centred on Polaris. Many terrestrial star trail images show this Polaris-centred view and it is apt to nominate this space-based version of the conventional scene.
- But I am more excited to propose the more thrilling alternative image which contains two spacecraft dangling from the space station; which contains light trails on the planet as well as out in the cosmos; and which portrays an exciting kinetic pictorial dynamism, angled composition, and a more dazzling abstract lightshow composed of light streaks on the earth. Of the 36 pictures I uploaded, this one strikes me as being easily the most impressive aesthetic offering. I nominate this superior image as my favoured alternative.
- May I note, in conclusion, that a statement included, above, as part of the original nomination, states: "Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 19:59:20 (UTC)." Ikan Kekek rather jumped the gun by closing the nomination three days early, which leaves my alternative proposal annoyingly moot. O'Dea (talk) 10:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- No it doesn't, O'Dea. Please feel free to nominate those photos! And to explain why the voting period ended early: When there are at least 10 votes to support a nomination for Featured Picture and no opposing votes, the time for consideration is cut short by the bot. This is a feature, not a bug. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- This so-called "feature" contradicts the statement at the head of the nomination that the "Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021." That is a bug-of-factual-contradiction (or error), not a feature. O'Dea (talk) 10:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Eh. It's true that line could use a qualifier like "see COM:FPC for exceptions," but the point is that even if we reopen it, there's no chance of this not being featured, or of it being replaced with something different. Best route is, as Ikan says, just nominate any others you think are better. They're sufficiently different that if people agree they're better, they will likely be supported. Personally, I prefer this one to either of those (which isn't to say I'd oppose). — Rhododendrites talk | 16:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- This so-called "feature" contradicts the statement at the head of the nomination that the "Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021." That is a bug-of-factual-contradiction (or error), not a feature. O'Dea (talk) 10:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)