Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jean-Luc Lemoine Saverne 2023 (2).jpg

File:Jean-Luc Lemoine Saverne 2023 (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2023 at 07:06:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jean-Luc Lemoine Saverne 2023 (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jean-Luc Lemoine Saverne 2023 (2).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
•  Info created by Le Commissaire - uploaded by Le Commissaire - nominated by Le Commissaire -- Le Commissaire (talk) 07:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose excessive vignetting. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, the photo is OK (maybe a little dark) but I would want more resolution for a portrait, especially an upper-body shot like this. Would make a good Valued Image though I think. BigDom (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose per BigDom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't mind a bit of a vignette in a portrait like this. It's bit on the dark side and it has a milkiness to it that doesn't seem intentional. Edit: actually not that bad, I think I let myself get fooled by the thumbnail. Compared to the first version, this one has had some heavy editing/retouching. Some might already call that "fake". I'd say, for a portrait, that can still be acceptable - but it should probably have a {{Retouched}}-template. Color correction maybe went a little bit too far towards the cool side. What really breaks it for me as a FP candidate is that bright spot right next to his neck. It's easy to miss that kind of thing while shooting when you're focused on your subject, but also easy to avoid if you're aware of your surroundings. --El Grafo (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Well, that bright spot could be retouched/cloned out, too. This would have to be mentioned using the {{Retouched}} template, of course. --Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

• That would be entirely appropriate for this kind of image. Forgot to mention that I think this is a very interesting shot. There's something intriguing about his expression that makes me wonder what kind of person he is - or pretends to be. There's a potential for a FP here, imho, it just needs a little bit more careful editing. --El Grafo (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others. I like this pose and the facial expression, but the background and vignetting just don't work. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)