Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plain tiger (Danaus chrysippus chrysippus) on dwarf poinciana (Caesalpinia pulcherrima f. rosea).jpg

File:Plain tiger (Danaus chrysippus chrysippus) on dwarf poinciana (Caesalpinia pulcherrima f. rosea).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2022 at 10:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Plain tiger (Danaus chrysippus chrysippus) on dwarf poinciana (Caesalpinia pulcherrima f. rosea).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plain tiger (Danaus chrysippus chrysippus) on dwarf poinciana (Caesalpinia pulcherrima f. rosea).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fabaceae
•  Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent composition, reminds me much of the carefully arranged butterfly pictures by Maria Sibylla Merian and other early scientific illustrators. --Aristeas (talk) 10:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas--Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Yeah, some of your nominations have been sharper, but this is really beautiful, which is more important, and IMO certainly sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I do really like the composition and overall colours. It does look a bit like a "rescued overexposed photo" though. Maybe just let those whites shine? The background is quite posterised. Perhaps pushed a little too far in post? -- Colin (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

• I raised shadows and reduced highlights and reduced whites in RAW. I did the whites to eliminate some blown highlights on the butterfly. The image as a whole was not overexposed. Delighted to let anyone do a better job! Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Elegant composition with the flower. Homogeneous plain background -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 07:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose white areas on the right wing have been overxposed and have burned out. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support as per Aristeas and Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 04:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support stunning picture --Aliwal2012 (talk) 10:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 09:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fabaceae