Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ratargul 785.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ratargul 785.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2022 at 19:40:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created and uploaded by Abdulmominbd - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment I'd support if the strong CA is removed. Poco a poco (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Per Poco a poco: Good composition, good choice of subject and powerful image potential. It is a big pity that the grain and the strong chromatic aberrations decrease the technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I'd revise my vote if the strong CA is removed (BTW I wonder how it could be QI) -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)- Oppose Nice motif but yes, the strong chromatic aberration and the posterisation visible on the man's face do affect my vote. The noise doesn't bother me so much. Cmao20 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I am trying to reduce the strong CAs right now (but it’s a difficult case). Just mentioning this here to avoid that two of us do the same work … --Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Because the photo is a WLE winner and a QI (oops!), I have uploaded my derivative version under a new name: Ratargul 785 retouched.jpg. @Poco a poco, Radomianin, Basile Morin, and Cmao20: Please have a look. Is this variant better? Should we nominate it as an alternative version here? Do you have further suggestions? Best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the enhancement, which is a big difference from the original version. However, I still find the posterization on the man's skin areas quite disturbing, though I would rather support the retouched version than the current one. Many regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 12:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I agree that the face does not look great. There is also posterization in some other places, but the one on the face is the most irritating. Can anybody help to improve the face? I have to confess that I don’t know how to reduce the posterization there. Any help is greatly appreciated! ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Agree with Radomianin. Still I would move to neutral for this improved version. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I would support the alt. The man isn't so huge in the picture and doesn't look so bad to me in this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per the technical reasons cited by others. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
