Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Margaret Pattens Interior 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg

File:St Margaret Pattens Interior 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2019 at 19:31:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:St Margaret Pattens Interior 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Margaret Pattens Interior 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg

759

1887

9926

6477

11529

8448

3:2 crop here is better imo. -- Colin (talk) 11:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info An extremely high-resolution image of the interior of St Margaret Pattens, a church located on Eastcheap in Central London. The current church was built by Sir Christopher Wren in 1687, and is notable for its 200-foot-high spire. I love how the resolution of this image is so high that the lettering of the Lord's Prayer and the Apostle's Creed next to the altar can be read in pin-sharp detail. Created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Although the light reflex on the painting is a pity. --Code (talk) 07:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I think however this is another example of Diliff including too much vertical. They eye is drawn up to the ceiling rose, which is oddly angled due to extreme perspective. The orange-brown of the ceiling is a bit distracting. If one takes a cut just below the ceiling line, you get a much more natural scene that I think is an improvement. -- Colin (talk) 11:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

• That is a sensible point. I personally don't find the distortion of the ceiling rose distracting but I can see where you are coming from. I find your suggested crop featurable too, but we'll see what others think. Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings