Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tabanus atratus, U, Face, MD 2013-08-21-16.06.31 ZS PMax (9599360121).jpg

File:Tabanus atratus, U, Face, MD 2013-08-21-16.06.31 ZS PMax (9599360121).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2017 at 01:45:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tabanus atratus, U, Face, MD 2013-08-21-16.06.31 ZS PMax (9599360121).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tabanus atratus, U, Face, MD 2013-08-21-16.06.31 ZS PMax (9599360121).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera
•  Info Head of horsefly. Nominated by Drewmutt -- Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 01:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 01:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, but the form of the nomination IMO is not proper, because you haven't indicated who photographed it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose background, crop --Mile (talk) 08:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop, part of the thorax cut off --Llez (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Mild support It is a tight crop, yes, but it doesn't really bother me in this instance. Daniel Case (talk) 15:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose crop unfortunately. Charles (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support The tight crop helps the viewer focus on the essential information in the picture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @Frank Schulenburg: What do you think is the picture's essential information?
•  Support I don't like the crop but the image is otherwise so nice that I think it should be an FP -- Thennicke (talk) 10:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
• rather  Oppose than support, although it's a difficult desicion. The crop is one thing, in this case it really ruins the overall impression. But when zooming into the picture I have the impression that something is weird about it. Extreme manipulation perhaps? Also, per Ikan Kekek (nomination isn't proper). And additionally the meta data is missing important information about camera, lens, aperture, and focal dimensions. --Prozentzwanzig (talk) 12:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)