Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tapaculo (Bathysolea profundicola), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 64.jpg

File:Tapaculo (Bathysolea profundicola), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 64.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2022 at 19:21:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tapaculo (Bathysolea profundicola), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 64.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tapaculo (Bathysolea profundicola), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 64.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Pleuronectiformes_(Flatfish)
•  Info Deepwater sole (Bathysolea profundicola), Teno-Rasca marine strip, coast of Tenerife, Spain. No FPs of this family yet, indeed first images uploaded to Commons of this family. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Lupe (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good camouflage, but because of the beautiful patterns on the scales and the well-captured 3-dimensional shape of the fish, this photo really works. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment There is nothing wrong with this image but I found some other images more interesting in Category: Bathysolea profundicola. -- IamMM (talk) 05:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

• IamMM: if you mean the images with the sole swimming, I agree, those are also interesting but a pretty diffent shot than this one. I'd indeed like to try a nomination somewhen with this one, too. From all shots of the sole laying on the floor I believe that this one is overall the best one, specially in terms of quality. --Poco a poco (talk) 13:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

• Yes, quality is better than the others but on a subject like camouflage, I prefer this one which shows more details of how it works. The image you mentioned is also worth the nomination IMO, I find it interesting that camouflage is effective even when the fish is swimming. -- IamMM (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support per Ikan, good arguments for a good photo. --Aristeas (talk) 07:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Colour of the shadows is strange. --Ivar (talk) 17:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

• Agree, will fix it tonight Poco a poco (talk) 09:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

• Ivar  Done Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support --Ivar (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451559 10:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Dinkum (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Micha (talk) 22:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Another one of those rare pictures enhanced by the animal's camouflage. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 07:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Order_:_Pleuronectiformes_(Flatfish)