Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 17.jpg

File:Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 17.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2014 at 20:29:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 17.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 17.jpg

•  Info Khmer-style Prang (spire) of the Wat Arun Temple, Bangkok, Thailand. The temple itself exists since the 17th century, but the prangs, decorated with rows of demons and monkeys, were built during the reign of King Rama II (1809-1824). All by me, Poco² 20:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 20:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Yeah, thats the place where I took this this, just the other direction. ;-) I like the view and the given quality, even the distortion with this large FOV is managed very well. I would really like to support this one, but I don´t like the two long tail boats driving exactly "into" the prang. Diego, don`t you have a version captured just a few seconds earlier or later? That would be great! --mathias K 05:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

  Hi Mathias, I got your point and uploaded a new version without those 2 boats. Please, let me know what do you think Poco² 19:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

• Good work! Now,  Support. --mathias K 05:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, but it's not a good work. There are signs of cloning (this is obviously not an easy task) and among the boats you have cloned out one element of the temple. Overall quality is ok, but not outstanding (bottom part of the temple is not sharp) and the light is not amiable. --Ivar (talk) 06:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Ok,  New version uploaded, I gave it a new try, better work now? Poco² 21:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment better cloning quality, but you still cloned out one golden element of the temple. --Ivar (talk) 08:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
      • Ok, Ivar, now I saw what you were talking about, the golden element is back there Poco² 09:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ivar -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting subject, and good ev for the subject, but seems more composed to get everything in for an encyclopaedic image than to achieve something artistic. Quite distracting backgrounds. -- Colin (talk) 11:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Ok, that's it folks, Poco² 16:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)