Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vittoria Randonneur tire (trekking bicycle).jpg

File:Vittoria Randonneur tire (trekking bicycle).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2017 at 12:38:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vittoria Randonneur tire (trekking bicycle).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vittoria Randonneur tire (trekking bicycle).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info Something for bicyclers - Vittoria Randonneur tire (new tire for trekking bicycle; 700×35c). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Your shot, but it is my bicycle. --Claus 14:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 16:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose a wheel....and not entire...mah --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I find this picture oddly soothing. The background is so nice. -- Thennicke (talk) 01:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support It has that certain something that I can't put my finger on ... and I like the green/white background scheme.--Peulle (talk) 07:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing extraordinary Poco² 13:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I do believe that it has some extraordinary: besides the symmetry and the sharpness, I really like how the wheel divides the background which has nice colours, too. And I wish that the parts of my bike would be so clean. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Certainly a well-taken picture, but I really don't find the composition interesting enough to support a feature. I could see it as part of a show that could be interesting, though, depending on what other photos were in it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Nothing extraordinary except the photo itself... --Laitche (talk) 07:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 20:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Poco. --Karelj (talk) 22:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. --KSK (talk) 09:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 17:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 14:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)