Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zaniskari Horse in Ladhak, Jammu and kashmir.jpg

File:Zaniskari Horse in Ladhak, Jammu and kashmir.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2019 at 11:43:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Zaniskari Horse in Ladhak, Jammu and kashmir.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zaniskari Horse in Ladhak, Jammu and kashmir.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
•  Info created by Eatcha - uploaded by Eatcha - nominated by Eatcha -- EATCHA (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- EATCHA (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition, high EV. --Yann (talk) 11:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support – Lucas 13:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but not outstanding. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I actually like this one, it's sharp and well-composed (although I think it would have been a little better still if there were a little bit more space around the horse on the left and at the bottom). Unlike the image below you've resisted the temptation to lean on the saturation slider and it's much better because of it. Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per Yann. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Cmao20, the crop is too tight and so the horse is the main motif. Looking at it at full resolution unfortunately I don't think that the sharpness is at FP level here, sorry, --Poco² 20:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support - I like the horse and the composition, though parts of the horse might be sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:07, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per the opposes above. --BoothSift 03:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose doesn't quite work for me.--Peulle (talk) 07:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Very good composition. Although it could be slightly sharper and below I'd like to see a bit more grass in the foreground. --Hockei (talk) 16:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 21:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The light is very nice but the post-treatment seems strong (like too much noise reduction, especially around the head). Also tight crop at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. The interface between the horse and the mountains behind it especially looks unnatural. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition should be better, for example more space at the bottom. It should be technically better too, for example there are JPEG artifacts at the horse. --XRay ^talk 06:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose soft Charles (talk) 09:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I kind of like the softness of this, it gives this harsh place a gentle look. --Cart (talk) 10:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:39, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Charles, Uoaei1, Daniel Case, Peulle, Poco a Poco and XRay I fixed this as per your comments do you still oppose it ? If yes, can you please mark those areas which can be fixed ? Thanks -- EATCHA (talk) 07:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Reverted it -- EATCHA (talk) 20:19, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

EATCHA, in the new version you have adjusted the curves, specially the background has now more constrast, which is not bad, but it has nothing to do with the issues I mentioned (crop and detail). Anyhow as of now it will become a FP, and therefore congrats! Poco² 09:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, for the reply -- EATCHA (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment You've reduced the sharpness. This was not a good idea. --Hockei (talk) 17:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Hockei, thanks for the suggestion, I reverted it. -- EATCHA (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:46, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:39, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)