Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Amundsen-Scott marsstation ray h.jpg

Info created by Chris Danals, National Science Foundation - uploaded by Jsymmetry - nominated by Freedom to share --Freedom to share 16:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is exactly what the concept of an FP should be about. Sure, it does have some noise, but the wow definitely mitigates those minor technical flaws. --Freedom to share 16:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not keen on the over-processed look, the tilting buildings or the grey snow. Sorry. --MichaelMaggs 17:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack Michael, plus the composition is just not good, everything is cropped, I'd have preferred a slightly wider angle. --Dschwen 17:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support unless there is undisclosed image processing. -Susanlesch 20:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, to me it looks heavily worked, and overall it looks to me to be fake-looking. Redrocketboy 08:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seen this before and I thought it was already a FP. Exposure for the aurora, background light looks perfect and I don't think it has been through much processing. --Lerdsuwa 10:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An edited version of this is a featured picture on the English Wikipedia. Sorry for the late comment. -- Avenue 11:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice picture. --Karelj 15:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure what this is supposed to be. (A green light comming out of an empty garage?) I think there are much better images. --TM 10:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition --Richard Bartz 19:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 13:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu