Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:House sparrow chick.jpg

Image:House sparrow chick.jpg, Not Featured

•  Nominate

self-nomination, no vote. Rex 01:56, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

•  Support -- ADSR6581 07:28, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support Great stuff --wpopp 11:03, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support Jon Harald Søby\^{no na} 12:15, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Would support if it was in a natural situation (in a nest) - MPF 16:25, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Sadly, this one fell out of it. (It was still alive though.) Rex 18:11, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
    • I beleve in these situation the best way is put it back to his net not take Photo--Snowyowls 13:52, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
      • Of course I put it back in the nest. Rex 01:33, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
•  Support - Taka 18:56, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 20:55, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose not very illustrative and somewhat cruel. In a nest (its natural evironment) it would be ok. --PedroPVZ 23:26, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose --skINMATE 08:46, 28. August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support -- what a beauty nature is and cruel at the same time -- Janek 14:03, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support--Shizhao 03:51, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Strong support Amazing —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
•  Support --Cyr 17:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose--Snowyowls 13:52, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
•  OpposeI think it's dangerous to encourage people taking photos for baby bird and not put them back to nest, so it's not fit for Featured pictures.--Smartneddy 10:43, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Of course I put it back in the nest, and as said before, I found the chick outside the nest. Rex 01:33, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

8 support, 6 Oppose => Not Featured --Shizhao 13:05, 11 September 2005 (UTC)