Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hoverfly.jpg

Image:Hoverfly.jpg featured

•  Nominate

— Fabien1309 11:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

•  Support — Fabien1309 11:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support--Shizhao 12:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --che 19:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Wikimol 20:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- cut -- YolanC 08:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support main subject is the fly, and it is not cut.--Dschwen 11:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • allright, but why don't we cut the right and the top ? it is the main subject ? YolanC 15:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
    • No, but IMO here the cropping serves a pourpouse and this way it is more aesthetically pleasing. Now the main subject is in the golden section and the flower is supressed by compostion to the role of "environment". IMO its in 99% better to have one clear subject than two or more, and this compostion is more interesting than the "default macro" centered compostion. --Wikimol 17:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - MPF 16:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Malene Thyssen 18:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support great framing. pfctdayelise 01:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- missing the identification of the syrphid -- Lycaon 22:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support ----Dakota ~ 09:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Calderwood 13:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Jon Harald Søby 15:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Hein 08:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Roger McLassus 07:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured Calderwood 09:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)