Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Södra Åsum Old Church.jpg

Image:Södra Åsum Old Church.jpg not featured

• Self-nomination. A typical Danish medieval church in Skåne in Sweden. Fred Chess 09:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral Shadow on the left is too distracting, and it is also cut. -- Get_It (Talk) 18:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Churches are a dime a dozen, so a photo of one needs to be truly excellent to stand out. This one is a bit noisy, the shadows are annoying, and the church itself is just a little too plain and boring -- I see nothing that makes the photo especially visually appealing. Is that tall white box a back entrance? It looks like an outhouse.--Eloquence 11:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Is that a UFO in the photo? -- Lerdsuwa 18:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support. Please, this church from the 12th century is not boring. Instead, it has a number of interesting details as the sturdy tower in the West is followed by a comparatively short nave (with a strange sequence of windows), an even smaller choir, and finally a tiny apsis -- as if this has been unfolded by dragging the apsis out of the tower. The shadows are in my opinion also fine as they tell us how deep the sun stands at the late afternoon. I particularly like the precisely cut shadows of the grave slabs in the freshly mowed lawn. All together it gives an impression of simplicity, austerity, and tidiness. --AFBorchert 19:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not that interesting, not the best image quality, shadows (especially the big one in the foreground) and disturbing fore- and background. norro 23:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Urban 06:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- unusual, interesting church but foreshadow a problem, also that UFO. Rodge500 17:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose almost good enough, but the foreground shadow -- the extra leaf in the upper left and the ufo all disctract me from the subject. -Quasipalm 01:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral I found it a very nice foto and an excellent subject, but yes, the foreground shadow kills it. Francisco M. Marzoa 16:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I like the composition, if you wanted to you could apply a slight crop to remove the tree and its shadow from the left and bottom edges. Gnangarra 14:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support LoopZilla 21:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral --> not featured Roger McLassus 14:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)