Comment Perspective correction necessary, incorrect scope, for there exist more windows in this church, too poor decription --Llez (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review comment. Fixed. Corrected the perspective and updated the scope as well as description to precise the comparison with other photographs of stained glasses in the church. John Samuel (talk) 11:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a work with several hands which is nice. On the central stained glass there is the name of the author the place and the date; this information must be given in the caption and also in the scope. A work from 1947 may still be copyrighted... The perspective correction is a bit laborious but the latest version is hardly acceptable because it is a composite with frank errors. It would be better to go back on this point. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All this is not very orthodox but there is a common work which is interesting. The basic version serves as a reference, you then have to program your work according to the round drawings! There are some here at the top and bottom of the 3 stained glass windows. We straighten the perspective and they must be perfectly round at the end. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
