Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
12515 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
10384 (83%) 
Undecided
  
804 (6.4%) 
Declined
  
1327 (10.6%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Verteuil1.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-15 13:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Entombment attributed to Germain Pilon, detail. Church of Verteuil-sur-Charente, France.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Schlosspark Laxenburg grosse Felsenkaskade DSC 4627w.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-09-15 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Große Felsenkaskade (Laxenburg, Lower Austria)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Nassarius kochianus 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-16 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Nassarius kochianus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Pont-Saint-Pierre - Toulouse.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-16 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Pierre bridge in Toulouse. Northeast exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Clermont-le-Fort Vue des Pyrénées.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-16 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Clermont-le-Fort, Haute-Garonne France. View of the Pyrenees and Ariege river. Southern exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Matera san giovanni.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Velvet (talk) on 2014-09-16 06:25 (UTC)
Scope:
San Giovanni Battista church in Matera, Italy (facade)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : nice and useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Saint-Florent-le-Vieil du vélo.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2014-09-16 06:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Abbatiale de Saint-Florent-le-Vieil, view from the Loire (East)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
ÖBB 4024 Übergangskupplung.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Linie29 (talk) on 2014-09-16 08:03 (UTC)
Scope:
ÖBB 4024, Coupling adapter

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Aubeterre Minimes4.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-16 14:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Cloister, convent of the Minimes, Aubeterre, Charente, France, interior, view from west

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Limone - Chiesa San Rocco - Interior.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-16 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa San Rocco, Limone sul Garda, Interior

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good and useful work. --JLPC (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier chateau claeys ascq 2014.jpeg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 17:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Château Claeys, S-E view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added, although this is not a requirement (cf our discussion) Jiel (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC).
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier bouquet dor ascq 2014.jpeg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 17:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Bouquet d'Or factory, France, E view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier heron parc 1 vda 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 18:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Heron Parc shopping mall, S view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Église Sainte-Famille, Boucherville.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-16 19:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Église de Sainte-Famille, Boucherville, Canada (facade) West view

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Couvent Congrégation de Notre-Dame, Boucherville.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-16 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancien couvent de la congrégation de Notre-Dame, Boucherville, Canada (exterior) NW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful & best in scope Jiel (talk) 20:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier la croisee des chemins vda 2007.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 19:18 (UTC)
Scope:
La Croisée des Chemins church, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, N-E view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Copyright problem, the architect died in 2008. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier chateau du sart sud 1 vda 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 20:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Château du Sart, S view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier golf du sart vda 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Sart's golf course, S view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier larosedesvents 2007.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Théâtre La Rose des Vents, E view

Copyright problem, and no caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier eglise du sacre-coeur du sart 1 vda 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 20:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Sacred Heart Church of Sart, Villeneuve d'Ascq, W view

<Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier chateau du sart est 1 vda 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 20:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Château du Sart, N-E view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment no caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Franzensburg Schlosspark Laxenburg Faehre DSC 4410w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-09-16 20:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Franzensburg, ferry across the castle pond

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 27, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-16 21:37 (UTC)
Scope:
27 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 28, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-16 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
28 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój

<Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 29, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-16 21:49 (UTC)
Scope:
29 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, dzwonnica 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-16 22:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Belfry in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Parnassius apollo MHNT CUT 2013 3 3female Aragnouet dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-17 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Parnassius apollo, mounted specimen, female, dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : (very) useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Canal latéral à la Garonne.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-17 05:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Root of Canal latéral à la Garonne in Toulouse.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-17 12:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, View from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including slightly different view direction) too narrow for a not too exceptional building. --Hagman (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-17 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, View from SW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including slightly different view direction) too narrow for a not too exceptional building. --Hagman (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 08.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-17 12:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of John of Nepomuk in Lądek-Zdrój

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Statue of John of Nepomuk in Lądek-Zdrój is a better category as a link to the scope. Image also should be moved there. --Halavar (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ronsenac Mairieb2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-17 13:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Ronsenac, Charente, France, facade, seen from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 13:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Oriental-Themed Cocktail Set.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
ПростоУчастник (talk) on 2014-09-17 20:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Cocktail shakers

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You must define a scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

OK, thank you! --ПростоУчастник (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image is not the best to illustrate the Cocktail shakers. But it would be meaningless if we add the name of the owner in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Romaine Solar heures.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vikoula5 (talk) on 2014-09-17 23:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Romaine sundials in Timgad
Used in:
fr:Timgad (in all languages ), fr:Art de la Rome antique
Reason:
Excellent quality and the only good picture of the solar heures in Timgad on commons, and it can be used in the article of the Ancient rome -- Vikoula5 (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image caption is insufficient and must in French and English.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done I correct the image caption in French and add an other in English.--Vikoula5 (talk) 09:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Nassarius multipunctatus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-18 04:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Nassarius multipunctatus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hister quadrimaculatus MHNT Fronton Profil.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-18 05:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Hister quadrimaculatus, Side view.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
L'église de Saint-Anatoly de Lanta.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-18 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anatoly de Lanta, Haute-Garonne France. Church Saint Anatoly. North exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 12:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul.Kościelna 5 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 11:52 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from NE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul.Kościelna 5 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 11:55 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from E
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul.Kościelna 5 04.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 11:58 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from N
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. -- Hagman (talk) 01:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Limonium vulgare narbonense, Vic-la-Gardiole.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer Talk 12:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC) on 2014-09-18 12:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Limonium vulgare subsp. narbonense (Statice of Narbonne). Plant with flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Champagné-St-Hilaire 86 Mairie Façade 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-18 15:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Champagné-Saint-Hilaire, Vienne, France, facade, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
St Giles Cathedral - 05.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kadellar (talk) on 2014-09-18 17:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Ceiling of the Thistle Chapel
Used in:
St Giles' Cathedral
Reason:
It meets the requirements imo. -- Kadellar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rail vehicle DGKu-3461 2014 G1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2014-09-18 17:20 (UTC)
Scope:
DGKu rail vehicle
Used in:
uk:ДГКу
Reason:
Good quality, geocoded and used in article. Rail crane service vehicles DGKu was produced since 1975 and over 4700 total. -- George Chernilevsky talk
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier marque vda 2007.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 19:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Marque river in Villeneuve-d'Ascq

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier moulin a farine vda 2008.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 19:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Flour mill, Villeneuve d'Ascq, W view.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier pavillon de chasse 2007.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 19:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Jagschloss, Parc du Héron, Villeneuve d'Ascq, S view
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier lac heron vda 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 20:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Heron Lake, Villeneuve d'Ascq, S-W view
Open for review.
Kankali Mata Temple.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2014-09-18 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Kankali Mata Temple, Garh Panchakot - Eastern view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pancharatna Temple, Garh Panchakot.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2014-09-18 20:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Pancharatna Temple, Garh Panchakot - Southern view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier hotel de brienne exterieur paris 2008.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de Brienne, S-W view
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perspective distortion at the limit of acceptability. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Limone - Chiesa San Rocco - Nave ceiling.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-18 20:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa San Rocco, Limone sul Garda, ceiling of the nave

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier hotel de brienne interieur paris 2008.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 20:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Principal Private Secretary office in Hôtel de Brienne

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier mairie 11e arr paris 2006.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Paris XIe arrondissement at night, S view
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info VI for buildings should be daylight. -- Hagman (talk) 02:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1, 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 21:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Conium maculatum MHNT.BOT.2005.0.956 graines.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-19 05:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Conium maculatum (Poison Hemlock), fruits.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Phébade de Venerque Monument aux Morts.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-19 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Phébade, Venereque. Monument to the dead of the first world war.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Stary Jerzy 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 09:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, Old Jerzy, view from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Stary Jerzy 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 09:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, Old Jerzy, view from S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 10:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, New Jerzy, view from NW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 10:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, New Jerzy, view from NE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Champagné-St-Hilaire 86 Église chevet&clocher 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-19 12:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Flat apse and clock tower, church of Champagné-St-Hilaire, Vienne, France, view from E-SE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 13:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Tour du Doubs 2014 - Pontarlier - Jérémy Leveau.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-09-19 15:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Jérémy Leveau in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Plutonia lamarckii 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-20 03:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Plutonia lamarckii, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 06:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 8 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 10:39 (UTC)
Scope:
8 Kłodzka Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 10:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 11:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 11:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Château-Garnier 86 Autel détail 2014.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-20 17:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Entombment on altar frontal, church of Château-Garnier, Vienne, France
Open for review.
Udayagiri Caves - Hathi Gumpha.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-20 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Hathi Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India SW view
Open for review.
Udayagiri Caves - Rani Gumpha 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-20 18:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Rani Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India SE view
Open for review.
Gasa Dzong.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Cfynn (talk) on 2014-09-20 20:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Gasa Dzong
Used in:
w:en:Gasa Dzong, w:es:Bután, w:ru:Гаса-дзонг, w:ruГаса
Open for review.
Kamsum Yul-le Namgyal Choten.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Cfynn (talk) on 2014-09-20 19:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Kamsum Yul-le Namgyal Choten, Punakha, Bhutan
Open for review.
Friedhof Dottendorf (11).JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Hagman (talk) on 2014-09-21 01:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Cemetry of Dottendorf (Bonn)
Used in:
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler im Bonner Ortsteil Dottendorf
Open for review.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]