Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
14,894 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
12,634 (84.8%) 
Undecided
  
883 (5.9%) 
Declined
  
1,377 (9.2%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Kleine maagdenpalm (Vinca minor) 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-02-26 05:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Vinca minor Flower a white selection.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Industrie lithique Bruniquel Victor Brun MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-02-28 07:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Archaeological Site of the four rock shelters, Bruniquel's castle - Lithic industry

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Église Notre-Dame de la Dalbade Notre Dame du Mont Carmel par Henri Maurette 1891.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-02-28 07:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Notre-Dame de la Dalbade Toulouse, Madonna and child, by Henri Maurette

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Floriana Szarego 4 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-02-28 12:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Former Bath in Kłodzko, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kłodzko, Floriana Szarego 4, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-02-28 12:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Former Bath in Kłodzko, exposure from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Floriana Szarego 4 11.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-02-28 12:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Former Bath in Kłodzko, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 16 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-02-28 12:56 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Wojska Polskiego Street in Kłodzko, exposure from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 16 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-02-28 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Wojska Polskiego Street in Kłodzko, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Erywań, Erebuni, Muzeum Erebuni, Posąg przy schodach (01).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2015-02-28 16:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of the Urartian Sphinx at the stairs in Erebuni Museum. Yerevan, Armenia.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Armenia -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Indothais malayensis 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-02-28 21:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Indothais malayensis, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bardentreffen 2013 3898.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
rs-foto (talk) on 2015-02-28 23:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Mick Flannery
Used in:
en:Mick Flannery; de:Mick Flannery
Reason:
imho best portrait in scope. -- rs-foto (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bardentreffen 2013 2757.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
rs-foto (talk) on 2015-03-01 00:02 (UTC)
Scope:
La Shica aka Elsa Rovayo
Used in:
es:La Shica
Reason:
imho best portait in sope -- rs-foto (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stachys macrantha 'Superba'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-03-01 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Stachys macrantha 'Superba' Flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Turdus philomelos MHNT ZOO 2010 11 187 Courtalain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-01 07:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Turdus philomelos (Song thrush) eggs

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chasse de Sainte-Germaine.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-01 07:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Pibrac, France – The reliquary of Sainte-Germaine

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:21, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Mocenigo Casa Nuova (Venice).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-01 08:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace Mocenigo Casa Nuova, facade on the Grand Canal, Venice

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bardentreffen 2014 Sa 2664.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
rs-foto (talk) on 2015-03-01 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Dota Kehr aka Kleingeldprinzessin
Used in:
en:Dota Kehr; de:Dota Kehr
Reason:
best portrait in scope, imho. -- rs-foto (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Erminia Mazzoni.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-03-01 11:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Erminia Mazzoni
Used in:
de:Erminia Mazzoni, fr:Erminia Mazzoni, it:Erminia Mazzoni, pl:Erminia Mazzoni

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jan Smits.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-03-01 11:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Jan Smits
Used in:
en:Jan Smits, nl:Jan Smits, zh:杨斯密

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ratusz 11.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-01 11:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall in Kłodzko, Kłodzko coat of arms with the clock

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 09.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-01 11:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, sculpture of St. Christopher

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 17.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-01 12:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, altar

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 14:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 34.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-01 12:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, pulpit

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 32.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-01 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, stainless glass window with the Holy Virgin

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 14:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support wow, good work! --rs-foto (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Photax BW 2015-03-01 16-45-43.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2015-03-01 15:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Photax III

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Samantha Stollenwerck Bardentreffen 2014 Sa 1885.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
rs-foto (talk) on 2015-03-01 22:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Samantha Stollenwerck
Used in:
en:Samantha Stollenwerck
Reason:
best portrait in scope, imho. Taken under live stage conditions at the Nuremberg Bardentreffen Festival. -- rs-foto (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Alas problem of the microphone. This is best file:Bardentreffen 2014 Sa 1934.JPG --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for your advice. I think the microphone in a portrait photo of a singer performing a live gig is not a severe problem, as it just shows the reality (and as long as you don't have another good portrait shot without disturbing microphone). The other pic you mentioned is technically / compositionally not very good and i wouldn't have the guts to nominate it as 'valued'. --rs-foto (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO nominated picture is the best in scope. The picture which suggested Archaeodontosaurus have blurred hands and all is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject is poorly described --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bardentreffen Fr 0202.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
rs-foto (talk) on 2015-03-01 23:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Achinoam Nini, aka Noa
Reason:
best portrait in scope, imho. Taken under live stage conditions at the Nuremberg Bardentreffen festival 2014. -- rs-foto (talk)
Open for review.
Vanuatu MHNT ETH AC NG 29 pirogue.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-02 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Pacific canoe prow - Vao Island in Vanuatu

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Fantin (Venice) miraculous icon of the Virgin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-02 06:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Fantin in Venice - miraculous icon of the Virgin

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Franco Panizza - Terre alte 2013.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-03-02 09:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Franco Panizza
Used in:
de:Franco Panizza, fr:Franco Panizza, it:Franco Panizza (politico)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Ratusz w Kłodzku, schody.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-02 11:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall in Kłodzko - Interior, spiral staircase

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Wieża widokowa w Suszynie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-02 12:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Suszyna (Dolny Śląsk), lookout tower

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Szalejów Dolny kaplica św. Anny 1.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-02 14:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 10.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-02 14:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-02 15:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene chapel in Szalejów Dolny, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
03 Stryi Air Base, Ukraine.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tupungato (talk) on 2015-03-02 22:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Stryi Air Base
Used in:
en:Stryi, pl:Siły Powietrzne Sił Zbrojnych Ukrainy
Reason:
The only image of Stryi Air Base in Commons -- Tupungato (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Récade MHNT ETH AC 450.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-03 06:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Récades - bird-headed

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Madona del orto Virgin of Mercy.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-03 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Madonna dell'Orto - Venice - Madonna della Misericordia

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 12.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-03 12:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, statue of Saint Sebastian
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, mury miejskie 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-03 13:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Defensive walls in Kłodzko, Zawiszy Czarnego Street
Open for review.
2013 Kłodzko, twierdza 50.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-03 13:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Kłodzko Fortress, lookout bastion, exposure from NE
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, bastion widokowy na twierdzy.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-03 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Kłodzko Fortress, lookout bastion, exposure from W
Open for review.
2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-03 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Piszkowice, evening exposure from SW

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a picture in this category. I don't think we need another category for evening exposure. --Bgag (talk) 20:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Look here: [1] [2] [3] [4]. Each photo was supported by different user. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I have just exposed my opinion. I have not declined your nomination. --Bgag (talk) 00:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Atatürk Dam.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2015-03-03 20:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Atatürk Dam, Turkey, South view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Picture is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I have made some improvement to the picture, but it is VI not QI. --Bgag (talk) 00:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Crane4 Foramen magnum.png
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-04 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Human skull - Foramen magnum

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pibrac Groupe Scolaire Maurice Fonvieille.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-04 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Pibrac, France - school group "Maurice Fonvieille"

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Collegiate Church in Tum[edit]

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927[edit]

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien Mitte[edit]

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Valle de los Caídos[edit]

   
Valle de los caidos by forcy-cruz y basilica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Under MVR.--Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
SPA-2014-San Lorenzo de El Escorial-Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-12-10 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos (West)
Used in:
Valle de los Caídos

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : there's already a VI of this site with a similar orientation. Although this one is better imo, it seems that a MVR is needed.--JLPC (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East[edit]

   
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, here I don't see that this place isn't too adventurous. –10:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte ganz.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]