Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
12956 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
10795 (83.3%) 
Undecided
  
829 (6.4%) 
Declined
  
1332 (10.3%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Shaheed Minar.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Aftab (talk) on 2014-10-15 16:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Shaheed Minar, Dhaka
Used in:
en:Shaheed Minar, Dhaka, bn:কেন্দ্রীয় শহীদ মিনার, de:Shaheed Minar (Dhaka), de:Internationaler Tag der Muttersprache ta:வங்காளதேசம்
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope should be reduced to Shaheed Minar, Dhaka. Yann (talk) 21:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Done --Aftab (talk) 13:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
I chose this because this is the only image (on commons) which have front view of shaheed minar & this photo is taken in 21st february (celebration day of International Mother Language Day) from the main event.
(note: File:Shaheed Minar GMT.jpg (side view of Shaheed Minar), File:Central Shaheed Minar 004.JPG (not completed)) --Aftab (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Fritillary feeding on passion flower.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gwillhickers (talk) 04:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC) on October 17, 2014
Scope:
Agraulis vanillae (Gulf Fritillary) -- Fritillary feeding (on nectar from Passion Flower)
Used in:
Gulf fritillary
Reason:
Informative: Image shows Fritillary, what it lives on and how it feeds -- Gwillhickers (talk) 04:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Done. Also, are you saying the filename needs to be moved (renamed)? -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Not to illustrate this butterfly there cheapest quality images; especially file:Agraulis vanillae 1.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
The image you linked to has a different scope and theme. The picture I'm offering features a Fritillary feeding from a passion flower, which is the mainstay to the Fritillary. Anywhere you find passion flowers you'll almost always find the Fritillary butterfly, and this image exemplifies this advent. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 07:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Solidago rugosa 001.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-18 15:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Solidago rugosa Inflorescences

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 22:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hamsa jâtaka, Ajanta, India.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-18 20:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Hamsa jâtaka, Ajanta, cave 17, India
Reason:
Good quality and the sole image of this painting. UNESCO World Heritage Site. -- Yann (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 22:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Fuchsia 'Zulu King'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-19 04:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Zulu King' Flower.
Open for review.
Distorsio septemdentata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-19 06:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Distorsio septemdentata, Cook Mountain Formation
Open for review.
Distorsio septemdentata 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-19 06:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Distorsio septemdentata, Stone City Beds
Open for review.
Bistorta officinalis 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-10-19 07:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Bistorta officinalis (European bistort), florescence
Used in:
de:Schlangen-Knöterich
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Scope changed accordingly, thanks for your advice --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The scope is perfect. But the caption is poor. In addition to geocoding must put the locality. A good caption ensures better distribution of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Caption enhanced with locality information --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Centaurea jacea 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-10-19 07:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Centaurea jacea (Brown Knapweed), top view of florescence
Used in:
de:Wiesen-Flockenblume
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Scope changed accordingly, thanks for your advice --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The scope is perfect. But the caption is poor. In addition to geocoding must put the locality. A good caption ensures better distribution of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Caption enhanced with locality information --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Allancastria cerisyi MHNT CUT 2013 3 7 Male Ventre Turquie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-19 08:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Allancastria cerisyi (Eastern Festoon) mounted specimen, male, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. (missing space inserted in scope) --P e z i (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di San Martino - Organo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-19 08:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Martino (Venice) Organ by Gaetano Callido.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 11:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bodhisattva Padmapani, cave 1, Ajanta, India.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-19 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Bodhisattva Padmapani, cave 1, Ajanta, India
Reason:
Probably the most famous painting in Ajanta Caves. UNESCO World Heritage Site. -- Yann (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Some other images are bigger, but I think mine is better (sharper, truthful colors)
    • You're right (imho) : Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope.--JLPC (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lusignac 24 Vue W du village 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-19 13:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Village of Lusignac, Dordogne, France, West view
Open for review.
Rosa 'moonlight' Moschatahybride. Locatie De Kruidhof.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-19 18:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Rosa 'Moonlight' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier ane des pyrenees vda 2010.jpeg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-10-19 20:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Equus africanus asinus (Pyrenean donkey)
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Jiel (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Pyrenean donkey is not a specy, it is a breed of domestic donkey (like Baudet du Poitou for example). Does I have to write : Pyrenean donkey, Equus africanus asinus (donkey) ? Jiel (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment like this --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ok, I understand. Thank you ! Jiel (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
The Pharaon Tutankhamun destroying his enemis.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-19 20:42 (UTC)
Scope:
The Pharaon Tutankhamun destroying his enemis, painting on wood, ca. 1327 BCE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier baudets du poitou culotte st-martin-de-re 2013.jpeg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-10-19 21:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Ânes en culotte, donkeys wearing trousers, tradition of Île-de-Ré
Reason:
Best in scope -- Jiel (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good. Yann (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Blue Mirage'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-20 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Blue Mirage' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa dell'Inviolata - Riva del Garda - Main portal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-20 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa dell'Inviolata, Riva del Garda, main portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zerynthia polyxena MHNT CUT 2013 3 8 Male Dos Montferrier-sur-Lez.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-20 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Zerynthia polyxena (Southern Festoon) mounted specimen, male, dosale side

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. JLPC (talk) 14:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église Notre-Dame de la Dalbade (Interieur) PM31000825.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-20 05:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Notre-Dame de la Dalbade in Toulouse. "Jesus presented to the people", called Ecce Homo.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
ASSISI 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2014-10-20 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Assisi, Italy - E view from Mt.Subasio

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. (I linked your scope to the right category. Feel free to correct.) --JLPC (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Assisi from north 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2014-10-20 13:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Assisi, Italy - W view from valley ground

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Changed scope to valley ground. village ground was nonsense. --Ikar.us (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Montboyer 16 Église Intérieur2 2011.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-20 14:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Montboyer, Charente, France (Interior)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Hemerocallis 'Catherine Woodbury'. Locatie, Tuinen Mien Ruys.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-20 17:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Hemerocallis 'Catherine Woodbury' Flower

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rochusgasse 7 Wohnhaus Marianne Hainisch DSC 0218w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-20 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Former residence of Marianne Hainisch, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ship procession fresco, part 1, Akrotiri, Greece.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-20 20:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Ship procession fresco, Akrotiri, part 1
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No VIS any more, so I am proposing it here. Yann (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Productenboerse Wien DSC 0269w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-20 22:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Productenbörse, facade
Used in:
Börse für landwirtschaftliche Produkte

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Margovula marginata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-21 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Margovula marginata (Chinese egg snail), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Canny Boy'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-21 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Canny Boy' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zerynthia rumina MHNT CUT 2013 3 8 Male Dos Villegailhenc.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-21 05:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Zerynthia rumina (Spanish Festoon), mounted specimen, male, dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 11:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Martino (Burano) Campanile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-21 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Leaning campanile, of Chuch San Martino in Burano, southwest exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. ("View from SE" added, but I'm not sure. Feel free to correct). --JLPC (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Elbasan - Naziresha Mosque (by Pudelek).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pudelek (talk) on 2014-10-21 09:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Naziresha Mosque, Elbasan, S-SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. ("S-SW view" added to scope : feel free to correct]. --JLPC (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
RBI-RBZ-Wien-DSC 0607w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-21 10:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Headquarters of Raiffeisen International Bank Holding, facade
Used in:
Raiffeisen Bank International

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 11:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rue Gratien Carrière, Murviel-lès-Béziers.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 10:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC) on 2014-10-21 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue Gratien Carrière. Murviel-lès-Béziers, Hérault, France. From the Southwest.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:50, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rue Paul Cuny, Murviel-lès-Béziers.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 10:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC) on 2014-10-21 10:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue Paul Cuny. Murviel-lès-Béziers, Hérault, France. From the Southeasst.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Peyrestortes-01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2014-10-21 13:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Eglise St Jean l'évangéliste, Peyrestortes, Pyrénées-Orientales, Façade.
Open for review.
Assisi Ansicht.jpg
View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2014-10-21 14:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Assisi, Italy - S view from valley ground
Reason:
Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination in favour of Assisi-Ansicht.jpg -- Ikar.us (talk)
Can be closed as declined
Sarcophagus from Aghia Triada.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-21 15:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tanacetum vulgare 'crispum', boerenwormkruid. Locatie De Kruidhof.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-21 16:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Tanacetum vulgare 'crispum' Inflorescences
Open for review.
Salles-Lavalette 16 Mairie 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-21 16:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Salles-Lavalette, Charente, France, E-SE view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa dell'Inviolata - Riva del Garda - Crucifixion Chapel.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-22 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa dell'Inviolata, Riva del Garda, Crucifixion chapel
Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Ciske De Rat'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-22 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Ciske De Rat' Flowers.
Open for review.
Hedychrum nobile MHNT profil.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-22 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Hedychrum nobile, side view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Il canale dei Buranelli.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-22 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Canale dei Buranelli, Treviso. Northwest exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Peugeot 203 Cabrio 2013-07-21 13-48-59.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2014-10-22 07:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Peugeot 203 Cabriolet
Open for review.
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Deviat 16 Rue&façade église 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Village street and church facade, Deviat, Charente, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
AT-90864 - Maxlankapelle - Allersdorf 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Hubertl (talk) on 2014-10-22 11:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Maxlan Chapel (Styria). View from Southeast
Open for review.
Assisi-Ansicht.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2014-10-22 11:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Assisi, Italy - S view from valley ground
Open for review.
Malus domestica Allington Pippin 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-22 15:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Malus domestica Allington Pippin Fruits.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Храм римско-католический.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Brateevsky {talk} on 2014-10-22 16:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception at night
Reason:
I think it's maybe not QI, but the best photo of a scope. The image was uploaded recently as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 (Russia). -- Brateevsky {talk}
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, brama, 07.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-22 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Baroque Gate on Kościelny Square in Kłodzko, night view
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 05.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-22 16:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Baroque Gate on Kościelny Square in Kłodzko
Open for review.
Banquet, tombe d'Agios Athanasios.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-22 18:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Tomb of Agios Athanasios, the Banquet

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-22 19:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, front facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-22 19:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Yamaha XV 535 Virago.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-22 22:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Yamaha XV 535 Virago
Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]