Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
15,177 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
12,902 (85%) 
Undecided
  
889 (5.9%) 
Declined
  
1,386 (9.1%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
2015 Zaćmienie słońca 20.03.2015.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-20 11:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Solar eclipse of 2015 March 20 in Poland
Open for review.
Armand de Montlezun Baculum Castor fiber.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-22 06:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Castor fiber (Eurasian beaver) - Penis bone

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Maison en terre cuite de Virebent, Avenue de la Colonne.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-22 06:51 (UTC)
Scope:
House of terracotta Virebent in Toulouse - facade, on avenue de la colonne

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:05, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
San Geremia (Venice) Agostino Ugolini- Deposizione di Cristo dalla croce.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-22 06:54 (UTC)
Scope:
San Geremia (Venice) - Deposizione di Cristo dalla croce by Agostino Ugolini

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
2014 Radków, ul. Grunwaldzka 1 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-22 13:41 (UTC)
Scope:
1 Grunwaldzka Street in Radków, exposure from WSW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
2014 Radków, ul. Grunwaldzka 1 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-22 14:29 (UTC)
Scope:
1 Grunwaldzka Street in Radków, hallway

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
2014 Radków, ul. Kościelna 3 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-22 14:36 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Kościelna Street in Radków, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
2014 Radków, ul. Krótka 3 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-22 14:44 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Krótka Street in Radków, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 09.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-22 14:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków, wall and gatehouse with the bell tower

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 05.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-22 15:02 (UTC)
Scope:
St. James the Apostle Church in Ścinawka Dolna, exposure from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 15:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Stone bull's head rhyton archmus Heraklion.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-03-22 17:51 (UTC)
Scope:
the Stone Bull's Head rhyton, Archaeological Museum of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Reason:
A masterpiece of the Minoan art and culture. This black stone object, 1600 BCE, is really nice and interesting, even if restored. Best in scope IMO, sharp, good colors, big enough resolution. Geocode in the "institution" template, created by me on purpose. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think this angle works the best, but I'm IMHO WB is wrong, it is too blue/green. --C messier (talk) 07:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Jeongjo joseon.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-22 20:20 (UTC)
Scope:
King Jeongjo (1752-1800), the 22nd king of the Joseon Kingdom, Korea

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pycnonotus xanthopygos Saffagh Saïda Liban.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-23 05:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Pycnonotus xanthopygos ( White-spectacled Bulbul ) egg

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
OrthoclaseBresil.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-23 05:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Orthoclase, Minas Gerais, Southeast Region, Brazil

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Geremia (Venice) Sebastiano Santi - Cristo crocifisso tra i Ss. Agostino, Lorenzo Giustiniani, Antonio di Padova, e Gaetano da Thiene.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-23 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
San Geremia (Venice) - "Christ crucified between Ss. Augustine, Lorenzo Giustiniani, Anthony of Padua, and Saint Cajetan"

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-23 13:28 (UTC)
Scope:
St. James the Apostle Church in Ścinawka Dolna, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-23 13:33 (UTC)
Scope:
St. James the Apostle Church in Ścinawka Dolna, exposure from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 12.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-23 13:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Stanislaus Kostka church in Ścinawka Dolna, ceiling

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dwór w Ścinawce Dolnej 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-23 14:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Ścinawka Dolna, exposure from WNW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dwór w Ścinawce Dolnej 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-23 14:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Ścinawka Dolna, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Monodonta canalifera 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-03-23 20:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Monodonta canalifera (Canal Monodont), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Linum-pubescens-Zachi-Evenor-003.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MathKnight (Talk) on 2015-03-23 21:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Linum pubescens (Hairy Pink Flax) (flower)
Used in:
he:פשתה שעירה
Reason:
shows the flowers well, high resolution, geotagged -- MathKnight (Talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zaaddozen van Stachys macrantha 'Superba' Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-03-24 05:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Stachys macrantha 'Superba' Seed pods.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pierre taillée Melka Kunture Éthiopie fond.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-24 06:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Paleolithic chopper, Melka Kunture, Ethiopia

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hotel de Boysson Toulouse fenêtre à meneau de la seconde cour.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-24 06:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de Boysson Toulouse - second courtyard - mullioned window

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Geremia (Venice) Francesco Maggiotto Morte di San Giuseppe 1805.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-24 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
San Geremia (Venice) - "Death of Saint Joseph" by Francesco Maggiotto

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman c. 1900.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-24 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Charlotte Perkins Gilman

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Studio shot, so no geocoding.
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd like to thank Yann for this nomination. It was a lot of work, but she was a damn good writer and important early feminist, so it was worth it, I think. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ntozake Shange, Reid Lecture, Women Issues Luncheon, Women's Center, November 1978 Crisco edit.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-24 10:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Ntozake Shange

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support (though I may have a COI here) We don't have many images of her, and this is easily the best. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Lampa błyskowa pierścieniowa Aputure.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-24 15:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Aputure LED HALO HN100
Open for review.
2014 Kościoł śś. Piotra i Pawła w Tłumaczowie 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-24 15:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Tłumaczów, gatehouse
Reason:
best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC) -- Jacek Halicki (talk)
Open for review.
Stronie Śląskie, kościół ewangelicki, 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-24 17:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Christ's Resurrection Church in Stronie Śląskie, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stronie Śląskie, kaplica św. Onufrego, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-24 17:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Onuphrius chapel in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from W
Reason:
best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC) -- Jacek Halicki (talk)
Open for review.
Bardo, Główna 6, 09.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-24 17:30 (UTC)
Scope:
6 Główna Street in Bardo, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Acherontia lachesis MHNT Female Nîlgîri (Tamil Nadu) Dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-25 05:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Acherontia lachesis Mounted specimen - Female - Dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Leguevin La mairie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-25 05:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Léguevin, France - Facade of town hall

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Surian Bellotto (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-25 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Surian Bellotto Venice - facade view from Cannaregio Canal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
PentaxWideAngleLensA28.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2015-03-25 09:29 (UTC)
Scope:
SMC Pentax-A 28mm F2.8

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kaplica Ukoronowania NMP w Bardzie, 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-25 10:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, the crowning of the Blessed Virgin Mary Chapel
Open for review.
2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-25 11:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, Chapel of the Annunciation
Open for review.
Bardo, Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP, 38.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-25 12:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Bardo, main portal
Open for review.
Bardo, Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP, 57.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-25 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Bardo, portal in the monastery
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 11.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-25 13:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Anne in Przyłęk, exposure from NE
Open for review.
Amgueddfa Genedlaethol Caerdydd.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ham II (talk) on 2015-03-25 13:12 (UTC)
Scope:
National Museum Cardiff, W view of S façade
Used in:
cy:Amgueddfa Genedlaethol Caerdydd, en:National Museum Cardiff

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perspective correction needed. The image is a little too dark. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nizwa Fort and Minaret of Friday Mosque.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2015-03-25 14:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Nizwa Fort: View from the perimeter on Friday Mosque

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bahrain Fort March 2015.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2015-03-25 14:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Qal'at al-Bahrain: Panorama of the fort's outer walls - seen from the north

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gibbula albida 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-03-25 19:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Gibbula albida (Whitish Gibbula), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:36, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ella Fitzgerald (Gottlieb 02871).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-25 21:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Ella Fitzgerald

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Alain Reverdit - Industrie lithique - Le Moustier (Dordogne).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-26 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Le Moustier - Mousterian, flint side-scraper

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
DeinonychusGris.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-26 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Deinonychus antirrhopus Ostrom, 1969. Cast of Skull

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Place Rouaix.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-03-26 06:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Place Rouaix in Toulouse - Southern exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 08.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-26 10:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory in Przyłęk, exposure from WSW
Open for review.
2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 07.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-26 11:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory in Przyłęk, exposure from N
Open for review.
Braszowice, kościół św. Wawrzyńca, 10.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-26 11:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Braszowice, porch
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 11.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-26 11:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Tarnów, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ząbkowice, kościół św. Anny, 29.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-26 12:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anne church in Ząbkowice Śląskie, main portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ząbkowice, kościół św. Anny, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-26 12:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anne church in Ząbkowice Śląskie, side portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Episteme adulatrix.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Vengolis (talk) on 2015-03-26 17:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Episteme adulatrix [owlet moth]
Open for review.
Thomisus lobosus 08893.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Vengolis (talk) on 2015-03-26 17:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Thomisus lobosus [Crab spider]
Open for review.
Monkey Puzzle 08638.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Vengolis (talk) on 2015-03-26 16:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Rathinda amor [Monkey Puzzle]
Open for review.
Vestalis gracilis 06840.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Vengolis (talk) on 2015-03-26 17:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Vestalis gracilis [The clear-winged forest glory]
Open for review.
Asilus aurata 03327.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Vengolis (talk) on 2015-03-26 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Michotamia aurata [Robber Fly]
Open for review.
Mildred Bailey (Gottlieb 00401).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-26 17:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Mildred Bailey
Open for review.
Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-26 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Doris Day
Open for review.
Guardería de tortugas Sodade de Morro Jable 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-03-26 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Guardería de tortugas Sodade de Morro Jable, exterior, view from southeast.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is interesting that so far there were no images of this remarkable project [1] for the return of Careta careta to the Canary Islands on Wikimedia Commons.

Open for review.
Guardería de tortugas Sodade de Morro Jable 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-03-26 18:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Guardería de tortugas Sodade de Morro Jable, rearing pools.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is interesting that so far there were no images of this remarkable project [2] for the return of Careta careta to the Canary Islands on Wikimedia Commons.

Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Collegiate Church in Tum[edit]

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927[edit]

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien Mitte[edit]

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Valle de los Caídos[edit]

   
Valle de los caidos by forcy-cruz y basilica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Under MVR.--Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would vote for this image if the perspective was corrected. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 10:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
SPA-2014-San Lorenzo de El Escorial-Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-12-10 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos (West)
Used in:
Valle de los Caídos

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : there's already a VI of this site with a similar orientation. Although this one is better imo, it seems that a MVR is needed.--JLPC (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East[edit]

   
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, here I don't see that this place isn't too adventurous. –10:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte ganz.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]