Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
13896 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
11696 (84.2%) 
Undecided
  
854 (6.1%) 
Declined
  
1346 (9.7%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Woman wearing traditional Ladakhi hat (2014).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Christopher Fynn (talk)) on 2014-12-13 21:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Woman wearing a traditional Ladakhi hat
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
    • And geocoding needed. Yann (talk) 09:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
      • Photo is good, worth to be croped from sides a bit, to put some tendancy to hat - vertical. --Mile (talk) 11:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Tashigang Dzong 111120.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Christopher Fynn (talk)) on 2014-12-13 21:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Trashigang Dzong, NW corner viewed
Used in:
w:en:Bhutan,w:en:Trashigang, w:et:Trashigang, w:fa:پادشاهی_بوتان, w:su:Butan
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Ołdrzychowice, zespół pałacowy, park, 01.jpg
View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-15 15:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Oppersdorfe's palace park in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Can be closed as declined
2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 02.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-16 14:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, view from W

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny, 03.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-16 14:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, interior

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Astley Castle Front Elevation.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-12-16 17:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Astley Castle south east façade

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Bożków, pałac 01.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-16 17:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Bożków Palace, view from WNW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Sant'Anastasia - Verona - Bevilacqua-Lazise Altar.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-16 18:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa di Sant'Anastasia, Verona, Bevilacqua-Lazise altar

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Lanius isabellinus MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.213.Turkménistan.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-17 06:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Lanius isabellinus (Isabelline Shrike), eggs

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
FluoriteBoltsburn.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-17 06:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Fluorite. Boltsburn Mine, Co. Durham, England
Reason:
Very famous deposit for this mineral species. -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-17 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene chapel in Szalejów Dolny, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-17 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene chapel in Szalejów Dolny, view from ESE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Szalejów Dolny, dwór.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-17 11:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Szalejów Dolny, view from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Szalejów Dolny, park przy dworze 05.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-17 11:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Park at the palace in Szalejów Dolny, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, 15.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-17 11:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint George church complex in Szalejów Górny, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Air France Airbus A380 landing at LAX.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gyrostat (talk) on 2014-12-17 14:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Airbus A380 of Air France landing

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment as Los Angeles International Airport is in the scope I would expect to see some more of the airport. The tower maybe, or a characteristic terminal building. This could basically be any airport with a runway 24 R… --El Grafo (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Fair point. I'll see if I can think of another scope, then. Gyrostat (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : I think it would be Ok with :"F-HPJB (aircraft)" as a category and "Airbus A380 of Air France landing" as a scope... --JLPC (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Airbus A380 of Air France at Los Angeles International Airport to Airbus A380 of Air France landing --Gyrostat (talk) 20:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm fine with the new scope, but wouldn't it be better to link it to Category:Airbus A380 (Air France)? There are surprisingly few rivaling images of Air France A380s landing. If I sort out those where the aircraft is somewhere at the end of the final approach rather than just before touchdown, I'm left with File:Air France Airbus A380 F-HPJB @YUL.jpg, File:Airbus A380-800 Air France (AFR) F-HPJB - MSN 040 (9233108784).jpg and File:AFR F-HPJI A380!115 KSFO 14-04-14.jpg. For the first two, I'm assuming it's a landing based on the position of the flaps and the angle of attack – but I might be wrong, and since their file descriptions don't say anything about whether it's a landing or a takeoff, it might be better not to consider them here as potential counter-candidates. The third one has serious quality problems, probably due to hot air, so I'd rule that out. So I guess that's a Symbol support vote.svg Support from me, on the condition that the category is adjusted to something more appropriate than this specific aircraft. Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 14:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done + added the cat to the file. Gyrostat (talk) 16:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Timema poppensis camouflaged on its host, Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), California.jpeg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2014-12-17 14:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Timema poppensis Dorsal view
Used in:
en:Timema
Reason:
Currently, this is the only picture in Category:Timema poppensis and it very nicely shows how the species' camouflage pattern is adapted to it's host plant. It was also the over all winner of the BMC Ecology image competition. -- El Grafo (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If the scope is considered too broad for this image, something like "(camouflage)" could be added, but I'll leave that up to the regulars here to decide what makes the most sense. Unfortunately no geocoding, but this may very well be a studio (or laboratory) shot where that wouldn't make much sense anyway. --El Grafo (talk) 15:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very useful. If you can it would be very useful to have a side view and a close-up view of the head from the front. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry, no can do: Not my image and not even uploaded by me, I just noticed it over at FPC. --El Grafo (talk) 21:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Marennes 17 Bidons eaux pluviales La Cayenne 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-17 16:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Water butts, Marennes, Charente-Maritime, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Juist, Otto-Mann-Haus -- 2014 -- 3537.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-12-17 17:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaque of the "Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Rettung Schiffbrüchiger" at the Otto-Mann-Haus in Juist, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd prefer to have the scope linked to this Category. --P e z i (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed Yes, it's better. I fixed the scope. --XRay talk 04:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Juist, Memmertfeuer -- 2014 -- 3529.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-12-17 17:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Memmertfeuer (Light house) in Juist, Lower Saxony, Germany

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Sant'Anastasia - Verona - Boldieri Altar.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-17 17:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa di Sant'Anastasia, Verona, Boldieri altar

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hôtel Weisshorn, (2337m). Zicht op Saint-Luc (1655m) in Val d'Anniviers 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-17 18:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Luc Val d'Anniviers Switzerland. view to the north.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rissoina ambigua 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-17 21:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Rissoina ambigua, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cheval de Fontalès Paul Davasse Magdalenien MHNT PRE 2011 0 555.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-18 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Horse engraved on a pebbleːPrehistoric site of Fontalès - France

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cathedrale St Etienne Toulouse - chapelle St François-Xavier.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-18 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Altarpiece of St. François-Xavier Chapelle in Toulouse Cathedral

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Magnac-Lavalette-Villars 16 Mairie façade 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-18 13:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Magnac-Lavalette-Villars, Charente, France, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, dzwonnica, 14.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 15:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Bell tower of Saint George church in Szalejów Górny, view from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 17:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, dzwonnica, 10.JPG
View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 15:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Bell tower of Saint George church in Szalejów Górny, view from SW

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Can be closed as declined
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, mur cmentarza, 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 15:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint George church graveyard wall in Szalejów Górny, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, budynek bramny, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Gatehouse of Saint George church complex in Szalejów Górny, view from NNE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Żelazno, dworzec kolejowy 3.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 16:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Żelazno train station, view from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Żelazno, zespół pałacowy, budynek bramny 1.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Żelazno palace, gatehouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lez River in Domaine de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- ChristianFerrer 17:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC) on 2014-12-18 17:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Lez River in Domaine de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez, Hérault, France.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nordbahnhof Carré.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-18 19:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Nordbahnhof Carré, View from East.
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cattedrale Santa Maria Assunta - Verona - Cappella Cartolari.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-18 20:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Cattedrale di Santa Maria Assunta, Verona, Cappella Cartolari

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Saruma henryi 13.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-19 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Saruma henryi Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Entelodon magnus 2 canines MHNT.PAL.2013.0.1016.1-2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-19 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Entelodon magnus - Canine - Saint-Antonin-Noble-Val, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
San Trovaso Campanile.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-19 06:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Church San Trovaso (Venice) - Mascaron - gate of the bell Tower
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Żelazno 109, pałac04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 11:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Żelazno, view from SSE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kudowa Zdrój, Zdrojowa 36, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 12:11 (UTC)
Scope:
36 Zdrojowa Street in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from WSW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, dzwonnica, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 12:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, tower bell, view from SSW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 24.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Wooden barn in Pstrążna, view from ENE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Sers Monument.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-19 17:23 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial of Sers, Charente, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Donaukraftwerk Freudenau DORIS DSC5907w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-12-19 19:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Kraftwerk Freudenau, information display for shipping
Used in:
Donau River Information Services

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 12.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Cottage from Kudowa-Zdrój in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna. view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Grave Pedro Ramiro de Alva Archbishop Granada Monastery San Hieronimo, Granada, Andalusia, Spain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-12-19 21:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Pedro Ramiro de Alva Grave.
Reason:
Alone in scope. Interesting relief of the 16th-century in the monastery of San Jeronimo in Granada, Andalusia, Spain. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cattedrale Santa Maria Assunta - Verona - Cappella Abbazia-Lazzari.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-19 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Cattedrale di Santa Maria Assunta, Verona, Cappella Abbazia-Lazzari

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Monacha cartusiana 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-19 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Monacha cartusiana (Carthusian snail), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) Hymenium.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-20 05:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Clitocybe nebularis Hymenium.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Merville église Saint-Saturnin La chaire.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-20 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Chuch Saint-Saturnin of Merville, Haute-Garonne France – Pulpit

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, zajazd.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 11:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Old inn from Szalejów Dolny in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna, view from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 25.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Cottage from Nowa Łomnica in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Belfry in Pstrążna, view from SSE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, wiev from S

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment need geolocation -- ChristianFerrer 19:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from W

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment need geolocation -- ChristianFerrer 19:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Angoulême 16 Deux apôtres Atelier cathédrale XIIe 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-20 14:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Two apostles, 12 th century, Museum of Angoulême, Charente, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nouvel Ambigu Bétail Humain 1920.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-20 15:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Victor Margueritte's plays : Bétail humain, at the Nouvel Ambigu, 1920
Reason:
No other poster of Victor Margueritte's plays on Commons. -- Homework : no geocode. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Château de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez 03.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
-- ChristianFerrer 17:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC) on 2014-12-20 17:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez, Hérault, France. Western facade.
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Collegiate Church in Tum[edit]

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927[edit]

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien Mitte[edit]

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Valle de los Caídos[edit]

   
Valle de los caidos by forcy-cruz y basilica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Under MVR.--Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
SPA-2014-San Lorenzo de El Escorial-Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-12-10 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos (West)
Used in:
Valle de los Caídos

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : there's already a VI of this site with a similar orientation. Although this one is better imo, it seems that a MVR is needed.--JLPC (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East[edit]

   
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte ganz.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]