Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
13484 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
11303 (83.8%) 
Undecided
  
840 (6.2%) 
Declined
  
1341 (9.9%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Caladium 'Fireworks' Leaf.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ram-Man on 2014-11-15 21:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Caladium 'Fireworks'
Reason:
Caladium cultivars are distinguished by their distinct leaf colors. This one is notable for its use in a garden plot at Longwood Gardens where it got the most votes. It was recently granted a patent. -- Ram-Man
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Only 860 plant patents were granted in 2012.[1] This new cultivar (2014) may be notable in a few years. The recent vote result by visitors to a premier regional botanical garden is encouraging. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and good quality --Hubertl (talk) 22:23, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 08:34, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Gogo Dancer Cherry Lei by Photocyclone.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Peter Chiapperino (talk) on 2014-11-16 00:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Go-Go dancing
Used in:
Go-go Dancing
Reason:
Image is of high quality and best depicts go-go dancing within its category. -- Peter Chiapperino (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Needs geocoding. Yann (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeTo the form: There is a desire to underlying trade promotion, as shown in the tag due to be removed by Lomita, the formulation of the photographer's name and the title of the photo that includes a trademark by the author. This image will be renamed.
On the subject: The scope is too broad. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Bengali Bride.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Aftab (talk) on 2014-11-17 15:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Bengali bride
Added --Aftab (talk) 15:44, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Where did you add geocoding? Yann (talk) 17:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
oh, sorry Yann. Now added :) -Aftab (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok now. Yann (talk) 10:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Old man smoking hookah, near Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-11-17 16:39 (UTC)
Scope:
People smoking the hookah, colour photograph

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : the scope is too broad imo : there are drawings in the category, and B&W photographs ; maybe you should add : "colour photograph". --JLPC (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

  • OK fine. Yann (talk) 12:08, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
San Geremia (Venice) view from Grand canal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-18 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
San Geremia (Venice) view from Grand canal

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry, but I think this one is better: File:Church of San Geremia 3 (7247892600).jpg. In yours image there is lots of brightness and too many lights. The other images looks more natural. --Halavar

Symbol support vote.svg Support : I don't agree : many flaws on the other one (Cas, barrel distorsion, perspective not corrected). I think this one is better. -- Other advices are needed. --JLPC (talk) 14:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)(talk) 11:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The colors are a matter of taste, but the description is a criterion of VI. Here there is a description of the two facades: one on the Grand Canal, and other on Canaregio canal . I'll add a little contrast to make it more atractive :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Witte esdoorn (Acer saccharinum). Locatie, Hortus (Haren, Groningen) 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-11-19 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Acer saccharinum (Silver Maple) in autumn colors

Symbol support vote.svg Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Iphiclides podalirius MHNT CUT 2013 3 9 Male Ventre Cahors.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-19 06:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Iphiclides podalirius (Scarce Swallowtail), mounted specimen, male, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Notre-Dame de la Daurade - Facade.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-19 06:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica Notre-Dame de de la Daurade in Toulouse, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Markgräfliches Opernhaus Sanierung Sandteinfassade.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2014-11-19 12:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Markgräfliches Opernhaus, restoration of the facade
Reason:
The Opera house of Bayreuth was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2012 and soon after that closed for extensive refurbishment. While most of the renovation works are focused on the interior, the sandstone facade recieved a major cleanup as well. The picture shows the old, grey-ish appearance of the stones in the upper left corner as well as the now again visible original yellow, along with the reference markers left by the restoration company. -- El Grafo (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : the scope is too broad imo ; I think "comparison sample" is needed to precise it. --JLPC (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 04.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-19 12:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Anne church in Zieleniec, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-19 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 18.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-19 12:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica, interior

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Plebania w Starej Łomnicy, 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-19 13:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory in Stara Łomnica, view from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good choice. --JLPC (talk) 14:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ernest Meissonier by RJ Bingham ca 1860-75b.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-19 14:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Ernest Meissonier, French painter, ca 1865-70, photograph

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Paris Rue royale depuis la Madeleine 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-19 14:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue Royale, as seen from la Madeleine, Paris (8th arr.), N-NE view
Reason:
Best in scope imo. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
'The River of burigonga'.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aftab (talk) on 2014-11-19 17:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Buriganga River in the Dhaka city, southwest exposure

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment should be added the name of the city and the exposure in the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Added --Aftab (talk) 14:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Leeds Castle from the west.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-11-19 17:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Aerial photographs of Leeds Castle
Used in:
en:Leeds Castle

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Parkhotel Schoenbrunn Ballsaal DSC 5115w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-19 23:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Parkhotel Schönbrunn, ballroom

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Crepidula fornicata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-11-20 05:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Crepidula fornicata (Common Slipper Snail), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Emberiza sahari MHNT 224 Marrakech HdB.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-20 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Emberiza sahari (House Bunting ), eggs
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Ca' Morosini Ferro Manolesso (Venise).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-20 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' Morosini Ferro Manolesso (Venice). Facade on Grand Canal
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Groene anijstrechterzwam (Clitocybe odora). Locatie, Hortus (Haren, Groningen) 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-11-20 06:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Clitocybe odora (aniseed toadstool) Hat

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful Look at the change in the syntax of scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, starówka 12.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-20 11:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Historic centre of Kłodzko, evening view from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-20 11:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of St. Roch in Stara Łomnica, view from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-20 11:35 (UTC)
Scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, view from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-20 11:42 (UTC)
Scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, view from SW
Used in:
pl:Dom Wagi Miejskiej w Nysie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope & useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 13.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-20 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Polychromy, City Scales House in Nysa, Poland

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
KF-16D High AOA (Angle of Attack), Low-altitude, Low-airspeed demo flight.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
— Revi on 2014-11-20 12:34 (UTC)
Scope:
F-16C/D Fighting Falcon (Republic of Korea Air Force) in flight

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 67 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-20 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
House number 67 in Stary Waliszów, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montmoreau 16 Sirène d'alarme 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-20 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Warning sirens in France
Reason:
Best in small scope, imo. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Криворізький ботанічний сад - Японский мотив.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) on 2014-11-20 18:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Botanical garden in Kryvyi Rih view from inside japanese garden
Used in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryvyi_Rih
  • useful and good quality --Hubertl (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Kryvyi Rih Metalurh Stadium 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) on 2014-11-20 18:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Metalurh Stadium, Kryvyi Rih, NW view
Used in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryvyi_Rih

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. (Scope slightly modified, according to the geotag. Feel free to correct). --JLPC (talk) 14:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Скалы МОПРа.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) on 2014-11-20 18:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Rocks of MODR, north view of rocks and partly Saksahan river
Used in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryvyi_Rih

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment look at changing the syntax of scope. We must add a geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
KRMetrotram.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) on 2014-11-20 18:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Kryvyi Rih Metro, Tatra train, view from inside Zarichna station
Used in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryvyi_Rih

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment look at changing the syntax of scope. We must add a geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa San Bernardino - Arco - Interior.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-11-20 18:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa San Bernardino, Arco, Interior

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bezirkshauptmannschaft Wr Neustadt DSC 6557w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-20 20:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Buildings in Wiener Neustadt, district commission, facade
Used in:

Bezirk Wiener Neustadt-Land
Wiener Neustadt-Land District

District de Wiener Neustadt-Land

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gentiana pyrenaica 1 MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-11-20 21:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Gentiana pyrenaica (Pyrenean Gentian) flower

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Mistek, kamienica, náměstí Svobody 7, 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-11-20 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
7 Náměstí Svobody in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bombus ternarius, F, Back, NY, Franklin County 2014-07-01-16.18.08 ZS PMax.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2014-11-21 00:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Bombus ternarius
Used in:
vi:Bombus ternarius

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The scope should montionner "Mounted specimen." But the head is not visible, the animal is not well described, it does not match the criteria VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Acaena novae-zelandiae (13854671884).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2014-11-21 00:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Acaena novae-zelandiae, mature fruit
Reason:
The only closeup with geolocation. -- Josve05a (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good but the binomial name should always be in italics. The scope must be precise : replace "close up" by "mature fruit". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Josve05a (talk) 07:40, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support : OK now. --JLPC (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jytte Guteland (2014).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2014-11-21 00:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Jytte Guteland
Used in:
sv:Jytte Guteland
Reason:
The only photo of Jytte Guteland with geolocation. -- Josve05a (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
X420 020 Karlberg (15299862672).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2014-11-21 01:04 (UTC)
Scope:
SL X420
Used in:
Open for review.
Adam Hayward 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2014-11-21 01:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Adam Hayward
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hastings line train interior.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2014-11-21 01:57 (UTC)
Scope:
British Rail Class 375s, interiors
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Geotagging is not needed since this is a moving object and impossible to add afterwards since we don't know where this was taken. Josve05a (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
1850LindseyHouseChelsea.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2014-11-21 02:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Lindsey House

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good but : We must add the term engraving in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Agapanthus praecox Snow White.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-11-21 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Agapanthus praecox 'Snow White' Inflorescences

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Morpho rhetenor rhetenor MHNT ventre.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-21 06:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Morpho rhetenor (Rhetenor Blue Morpho), mounted specimen, male, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ecole supérieure des beaux-arts de Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-21 06:35 (UTC)
Scope:
École supérieure des beaux-arts, Toulouse, facade, west exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
140823 Märchendom Saalfelder Feengrotten.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-11-21 06:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Märchendom, Saalfelder Feengrotten
Used in:
de:Feengrotten
de:Liste der Kulturdenkmale im Landkreis Saalfeld-Rudolstadt
Reason:
IMO best picture in scope. No geolocation because the picture was taken in a cave under the earth. The position could not be determined. -- Code (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment We must add the geocoding of the cave entrance --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done Thank you for the review, I added the geocode of the cave entrance. --Code (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 112 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-21 11:07 (UTC)
Scope:
House number 112 in Stary Waliszów, view from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kaplica przydrożna, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-21 11:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside chapel in Stary Waliszów, view from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-21 11:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint George church in Wilkanów, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 19.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-21 11:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint George church in Wilkanów, interior

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-21 11:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Dzikovia Castle in Tarnobrzeg, front view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Exeter (Devon, UK), Clock Tower -- 2013 -- 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-11-21 12:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Clock tower in Exeter, Devon, England, SE view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. (Scope slightly modified, according to the geotag. Feel free to correct). --JLPC (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Dülmen, Häuser (Hohe Straße) -- 2014 -- 3324.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-11-21 12:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Cultural monument No. 54, Dülmen, Germany, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Melierax canorus vol MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-11-21 12:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Melierax canorus (pale chanting goshawk)- flying

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cognac 16 Emblème cognac Hennesy 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-21 15:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Carved emblem of Hennessy cognac - Cognac, Charente, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Coral Probal.jpg
View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
Aftab (talk) on 2014-11-21 15:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Coral on the beach of Chera Dip, St. Martin's Island

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Must give the binomial name of the species to VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't know the binomial name of this species. so Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Aftab (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Can be closed as declined
Entrée d'une vieille mosquée by Nathaniel de Rothschild 1894.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-21 16:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Entrance of an old mosque, by Baron N. de Rothschild, 1894, photoengraving
Reason:
The only one in scope. For some details on the photographer, see : Nathaniel Meyer von Rothschild. Homework : no geocode. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Petro Poroshenko 2014-06-26.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) on 2014-11-21 19:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Petro Poroshenko, portrait
Reason:
best high res portrait of Ukrainian President -- Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree. Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bahnhof Wolfganggasse Fahrdienstleitung.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Linie29 (talk) on 2014-11-21 22:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Bahnhof Wien Wolfganggasse, Fahrdienstleitung
Open for review.
2014 Archiwum miasta Ostrawy 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-11-22 00:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Archive of Ostrava (23 Špálova street), Ostrava, Czech Republic. Facade.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dawny ratusz w Mistku 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-11-22 00:18 (UTC)
Scope:
The former town hall in Místek, Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. View from South.
Used in:
cs:Místek, pl:Mistek
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Indoplanorbis exustus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-11-22 06:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Indoplanorbis exustus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support supported --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zerynthia rumina MHNT CUT 2013 3 8 Female Ventre Villegailhenc.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-22 07:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Zerynthia rumina (Spanish Festoon) mounted specimen, female, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Epidote Oisans.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-11-22 07:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Epidote
Reason:
Deposit topotype - Piece of the early nineteenth century -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 , Centrum Dusznik-Zdroju, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-22 11:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Historic center of Duszniki-Zdrój, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2013 Duszniki Zdrój, dworek Chopina.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-22 12:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Frederic Chopin Theatre in Duszniki-Zdrój, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope & useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duszniki Zdrój, Rynek 1, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-22 12:34 (UTC)
Scope:
1 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 13:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-22 13:14 (UTC)
Scope:
6 Krakowska Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, view from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duszniki Zdrój, Rynek 3, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-11-22 13:59 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Thézac 17 Mairie-façade 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-22 15:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Thézac, Charente-Maritime, France, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (01).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-11-22 16:36 (UTC)
Scope:
The entrance gate to the Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia.
Used in:
en:Khamar Monastery, ru:Хамарын-хийд
Reason:
The only one in scope -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 17:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (02).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-11-22 16:40 (UTC)
Scope:
The main stupa in Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia.
Used in:
en:Khamar Monastery, ru:Хамарын-хийд
Reason:
The only one in scope -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (03).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-11-22 16:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Buddha in Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia.
Used in:
en:Khamar Monastery, ru:Хамарын-хийд
Reason:
The only one in scope -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (04).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-11-22 16:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia.
Used in:
en:Khamar Monastery, ru:Хамарын-хийд

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lasiommata megera, Sète 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 17:23, 22 November 2014 (UTC) on 2014-11-22 17:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Lasiommata megera (Wall Brown). Male, side view.
Open for review.
Zevenblad (Aegopodium podagraria) 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-11-23 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Aegopodium podagraria Plant with roots.
Open for review.
Haltern am See, Annaberg, Wegkreuz -- 2014 -- 6927.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-11-23 06:34 (UTC)
Scope:
(Wayside) cross at the Chapel of Saint Anne in Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 08:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Haltern am See, Annaberg, Mariengrotte -- 2014 -- 6963.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-11-23 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculpture of Marian at the Lourdes Grotto near Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Open for review.
Buccinum undatum - Hydractinia echinata 07.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-11-23 06:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Hydractinia echinata on Buccinum undatum shell (Snail Fur on a Common Whelk shell)

Symbol support vote.svg Support good and impressive details, a FP IMO -- ChristianFerrer 08:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Place royale du Peyrou, Northeast entrance.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
-- ChristianFerrer 07:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC) on 2014-11-23 07:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Place royale du Peyrou, Montpellier, Hérault, France. Northeastern entrance.
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Collegiate Church in Tum[edit]

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927[edit]

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien Mitte[edit]

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:34, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:34, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]