Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
12198 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
10089 (82.7%) 
Undecided
  
790 (6.5%) 
Declined
  
1319 (10.8%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Équipe cycliste Wanty - Tour de l'Ain 2014 - J-1 - Marco Minnaard.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-11 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Marco Minnaard in 2014
  • The geocoding does not make much sense here but if you know it's always useful. Look modificaiton the syntax of scope.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Équipe cycliste Wanty - Tour de l'Ain 2014 - J-1 - Frederik Backaert.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-11 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Frederik Backaert in 2014
  • The geocoding does not make much sense here but if you know it's always useful. Look modificaiton the syntax of scope.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Exterior of église Saint-Florent de Thil (Ain) - 2014 - 2.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-15 16:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of église Saint-Florent de Thil (Ain) - south-west views

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment file:Exterior of église Saint-Florent de Thil (Ain) - 2014 - 1.JPG has better resolution. In all cases must correct perspective. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Genouillé 86 Abside et clocher 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-16 09:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Apse and bell tower of the church, Genouillé, Vienne, France, S-SE view
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 11:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Enisei angara.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kreuzschnabel (talk) on 2014-08-16 09:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Merger of Yenisei and Angara Rivers, wooden sculptures.
Reason:
Fine pic from QIC, not supported for technical drawbacks, but a very useful image IMHO. -- Kreuzschnabel (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Refugio Militar Capitan Cobo - Pico Veleta - Sierra Nevada - 2014-08-07.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2014-08-16 11:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Refugio militar Capitán Cobo
Used in:
es:Mando de Operaciones Especiales (España)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Holstentor-Lübeck-DSC 0429w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-08-16 11:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Holstentor, West view
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question You confirm that the building is very distorted in reality? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, I agree. The problem concerning perspective correction was discussed at QIC also. --P e z i (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I do not go very often in QI; your opinion is enough for me.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I doubt whether it’s the best in scope. File:Holstentor_April_2009.jpg may be a bit less detailed but shows the object in much better lighting. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 11:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Malus domestica Manks Codlin Locatie De Kruidhof.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-08-16 16:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Malus domestica Manks Codlin, fruit.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment it would be interesting to have geolocation--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done coordinates added. Sorry.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier chateau afgand brouckerque 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de l'Afgand, Nord, France, SE view
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Jiel (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Sint-Niklaaskerk1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Nicholas' Church, Ghent, W view.
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Jiel (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier eglise saint-nicolas wasquehal 2008.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 17:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Nicholas Church, Wasquehal, inside, N view.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Here matter is a bit uneasy. Can we take pictures during a church service? I have no idea about this. other opinions seems useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a public place (this is a french church built before 1905) and no one is recognizable on the picture. Church office is a common activity like many others. I think there is nothing illegal or problematic here. Let's wait for other opinions :) Jiel (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Taking photographs during service is very disturbing and in very much (perhaps most, in germany propably all) churches explictly forbidden. As friendly Wikipedians we should avoid such situations. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I tried to be discreet and respectful, and I took the photo far from the background. Nevertheless I will follow your advice from now on. Jiel (talk) 21:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier eglise saint-nicolas portail wasquehal 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 17:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Portal of Saint Nicholas Church, Wasquehal, N view.
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier distillerie duriez coppenaxfort 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 17:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Coppenaxfort's distillery, W view.
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier minoterie chevalier moteur coppenaxfort 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 18:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Early Duvant engine
Reason:
Best in scope -- Jiel (talk)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier salle polyvalente am chevalier brouckerque 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 18:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Brouckerque's community hall, S view.
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 4 051.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-16 20:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Cédric Pineau in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 4 079.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-16 20:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Julien Jurdie in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 4 036.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-16 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Jacques Berthou in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful Vote has to be signed. --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose IMHO focus length is too short for a portrait. --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier minoterie chevalier coppenaxfort 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 20:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Coppenaxfort's flour mill, NW view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : sky and perspective correction are needed imo. --JLPC (talk) 14:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : Why do you mean about sky correction ? Jiel (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : I mean it's not visible : no details, no colours in the sky. Can you "add" one (which is not always easy) or have you got another picture with a visible sky ? --JLPC (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier eglise brouckerque 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-16 20:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Omer's Church, Brouckerque, W view.
Reason:
Best in scope -- Jiel (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Romain Bardet.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-16 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Romain Bardet in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Potamides conicus conicus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-08-17 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Potamides conicus ssp. conicus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Parnassius mnemosyne MHNT CUT 2013 3 5 Le Mont Dore Male dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-17 06:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Parnassius mnemosyne ( Clouded Apollo), mounted specimen, male, dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eglise Saint-Caprais (Toulouse) Organ.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-17 06:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Caprais in Toulouse. Organ.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 4 - Sylvie Goy-Chavent.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-17 07:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Sylvie Goy-Chavent in 2014

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : One of the two other ones is better imo : no inscription in the background... But this is a personal opinion : some more advices are welcome. --JLPC (talk) 21:44, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Heppenheim BW 2014-05-13 15-13-41.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2014-08-17 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Townhall of Heppenheim, Germany, exterior

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier nouveau pont de coppenaxfort 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-17 13:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge of Coppenaxfort, E view.

Symbol support vote.svg Support: useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 4 - Jonathan Paredes.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-17 16:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Jonathan Paredes in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Malta Valletta BW 2011-10-07 12-32-05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2014-08-17 17:15 (UTC)
Scope:
St Paul's Pro-Cathedral (Valletta), facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cauterets 65 Refuge Wallon 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-17 21:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Refuge du Marcadau, Cauterets, Hautes-Pyrénées, France, SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lymantria dispar MHNT Fronton Male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-18 05:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Lymantria dispar (Gypsy Moth). Male, dorsal side.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and (very) useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eglise Saint-Caprais (Toulouse) Interior.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-18 05:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Caprais in Toulouse. Interior.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cauterets 65 Écoinçon façade Continental Résidence 2014.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-18 14:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Spandrel on Continental Résidence facade, Cauterets, Hautes-Pyrénées, France
Reason:
Best in (small) scope imo. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --AnatolyPm (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Avena sativa subsp. Nigra. (Zwarte haver) Locatie De Kruidhof 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-08-18 16:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Avena sativa subsp. Nigra. Fruits.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In botany scopes must be more precise. Here are the fruits. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done If I have understood correctly, this is the intention?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Cerithideopsilla djadjariensis 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-08-19 04:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Cerithideopsilla djadjariensis, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Titanacris.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-19 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Titanacris albipes male, disarticulated how to Beauchene.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
1 rue des Arts.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-19 05:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue des Arts, in Toulouse, maison à corondage, East exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Vientiane - Wat Xieng Ngeun - 0029.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DerFussi on 2014-08-19 07:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Buddhist paintings, Wat Xien Ngeun, Vientiane, Laos
Reason:
I am new here and don't know, whether this scope and nomination is appropriate. I've provided a set of Bhuddist paintings from Laos. They all are from a the Wat Xien Ngeun pagoda in Vientiane. You can see it if you turn around yourself in the entrance area. No QI due to a heavy perspective transformation. This is one of all together eight pictures of the series. -- DerFussi

Symbol support vote.svg Support : interesting and useful. I've change the scope a little (correct me if it's wrong) and promoted. It would be nice to have the painter's name and to know what is depicted... Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I will try to find out more about the paintings. -- DerFussi 10:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Auguste Perdonnet atelier Nadar BNF Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-08-19 15:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Auguste Perdonnet, photograph.
Used in:
Auguste Perdonnet
Reason:
New in "Commons", we had only a small engraving. A Nadar workshop photograph (BNF document) of this famous french engineer, who participated to the expansion of the railways in France. His name is engraved on the Eiffel tower. Alone in scope. No geocode, studio work. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good and useful (as usual). --JLPC (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
La Roche-Bernard 56 Maison du canon campanile 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-19 16:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Bell tower of the Maison du canon, La Roche-Bernard, Morbihan, France
Open for review.
Riva Ca' di Dio in Venice.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
AnatolyPm (talk) on 2014-08-19 16:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Riva Ca' di Dio (Venice), a view from riva towards Ponte Ca' di Dio.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The Riva degli Schiavoni is at the bottom; the half-filing represents the Riva del Ca di Dio. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

True. Riva degli Schiavoni is situated after the bridge Ponte Ca' di Dio. Corrected scope. --AnatolyPm (talk) 09:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
A sculptural ornament of Ca' d'Oro, Venice 1.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
AnatolyPm (talk) on 2014-08-19 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' d'oro (Venice) - Courtyard, a sculptural ornament on the facade of courtyard.
Reason:
Best in (small) scope -- AnatolyPm (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I see several problems. Link View Point, seems to me incorrectly stated, it must be a mistake. There is a lack of perspective. These two points are easy to correct. The issue of scope is more difficult. Ornaments of this type there are countless. It is necessary that this ornament is best described to distinguish it from others. In the Cortile Ca'd'Oro there are more than twenty. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Corrected a View Point. --AnatolyPm (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Madonna of the Quail.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
AnatolyPm (talk) on 2014-08-19 18:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna of the quail by Pisanello
Used in:
uk:Пізанелло, it:Madonna della Quaglia, en:Madonna of the Quail
Reason:
Best in scope -- AnatolyPm (talk)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Best candidate ;file:Pisanello - Madone à la caille.jpg. No abnormality perspective. Best color management. Full vision of the work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Parnassius phoebus MHNT CUT 2013 3 6 Cervières (Hautes-Alpes) male dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-20 07:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Parnassius phoebus (Phoebus Apollo) mounted specimen, male, dorsal side.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : (Very) useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bas-relief de François Lucas - Ponts Jumeaux - Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-20 07:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Bas-relief des Ponts Jumeaux in Toulouse.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 1 - Pieter Serry - 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-20 09:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Pieter Serry in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cauterets 65 Plaque Demontzey La Raillère 2014.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-20 14:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaque to Prosper Demontzey, La Raillère, Cauterets, Hautes-Pyrénées, France
Open for review.

Closed valued image candidates[edit]

Most valued reviews[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR has to be in the discussed state, while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.


Tomb of Fatima Sultana[edit]

   
Tomb of Fatima Sultana 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-08-04 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Tomb of Fatima Sultana, Hyderabad, India (exterior) NW view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think this one Tomb of Fatima Sultana 02.jpg is better --Halavar (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Tomb of Fatima Sultana 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-08-05 17:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Tomb of Fatima Sultana, Hyderabad, India (exterior) SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Halavar (talk) 00:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]