Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
12641 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
10500 (83.1%) 
Undecided
  
814 (6.4%) 
Declined
  
1327 (10.5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Autobahnkirche-BB Totem.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2014-09-25 23:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Road church Baden-Baden, Germany (extern objects, view from the church)
Reason:
VIS being defunct, nominating a set of VICs. -- Ikar.us (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. "WNW view" added to the scope, as we usually do here. Correct me if I'm wrong. --JLPC (talk) 09:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • You're right, but I still dislike the compass scopes. Suggest a more meaningful direction indication "view from church". --Ikar.us (talk) 11:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from (extern objects), WNW view to (extern objects, view from the church) --Ikar.us (talk) 13:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Merpins 16 Abbaye de la Frenade Salle capitulaire 2014.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-26 13:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapter hall of abbey of la Frenade, Merpins, Charente, France, interior (NNW view)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Stodoła w Lutyni Dolnej 03.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-26 15:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Barn in Dolní Lutyně, Czech Republic. View from East.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic. -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Radix relicta 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-27 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Radix relicta, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Musical fountain at Mohor Kunja 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2014-09-27 05:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Musical fountain, Mohor Kunja, Kolkata (night view)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met (I've just added "night view" to the scope.). --JLPC (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Parnassius phoebus MHNT CUT 2013 3 6 Arvieux female dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-27 06:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Parnassius phoebus ( Phoebus Apollo), mounted specimen, female, dorsal side.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:32, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pipe organ of Notre-Dame de la Dalbade.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-27 06:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Gallery organ, Notre-Dame de la Dalbade in Toulouse.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pont sur le Rhône - Saint-Maurice.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ludo (talk) on 2014-09-27 08:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge over the Rhone, Saint-Maurice in Switzerland (view from SE).
Reason:
This bridge is one of the monuments of the list of cultural property of national significance in Switzerland. -- Ludo (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : OK, but can you add "NW (or SE) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page in similar cases ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I remember the place I were when I took this picture. So, I added the template Template:Location. And inside the description, I added View from the south-east to the north-west.. Ludo (talk) 11:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support : OK now (I just added "view from SE" to the scope, feel free to correct if I'm wrong). --JLPC (talk) 08:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Ok. No problem. Ludo (talk) 09:13, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Kaplica Anioła Stróża na byłym cmentarzu cholerycznym w Starym Boguminie 05.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-27 10:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of the Guardian Angel in Starý Bohumín, Czech Republic. Exterior.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:34, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
St-Amant L'école.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-27 15:43 (UTC)
Scope:
School of St-Amant-de-Montmoreau, Charente, France, West view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół ewangelicki Apostołów Piotra i Pawła we Frydku-Mistku 04.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-27 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Evangelical Church of the Apostles Peter and Paul in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. Facade.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Pink Marshmellow'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-09-28 04:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Pink Marshmellow' Flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Barleeia unifasciata 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-28 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Barleeia unifasciata, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
NOULET Jean-Baptiste.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-28 06:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Photographic portrait of French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Noulet

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and best in scope -- Jiel (talk) 10:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bourg-Saint-Bernard - ÉgliseSaint-Bernard - Autel.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-28 07:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Bourg-Saint-Bernard, St Bernard Chruch, Altar.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Fontanna św. Floriana na rynku we Frydku 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-28 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Fountain of St. Florian in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Water buffalo calf suckling, near Mehsana, Gujarat, India, 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-09-28 13:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo suckling calves)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Small oversight: Bubalus bubalis(Water buffalo) would be a better scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lalji Desai.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-09-28 14:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Lalji Desai
Reason:
Political leader of Gujarat, India. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Víctor García de la Concha Editatón BNE - 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kadellar (talk) on 2014-09-28 14:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Víctor García de la Concha
Used in:
Víctor García de la Concha (several languages), Instituto Cervantes, Real Academia Española.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Water buffalo calf, near Mehsana, Gujarat, India.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-09-28 15:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo calves)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Small oversight: Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo) would be a better scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
    • OK, done. Yann (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Usefull --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Statue blessed bishop Diego Ventaja Milan, Almeria, Spain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-09-28 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Diego Ventaja Milán, statue. Almeria, Spain
Reason:
New category in "Commons". This man, roman catholic bishop of Almeria, Spain, in 1936, watch shot by Republicans during the Spanish Civil War, together with the bishop of Guadix, for no reason except their faith. Both were elevated as "blessed" by pope John-Paul II in 1993. Best in scope IMO; Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP we Frydku-Mistku 08.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-28 16:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. View from S-W.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

The building seems too narrow compared to oginal. It would have to expand in width. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done You're right. Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new, fixed version. --Halavar (talk) 00:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Aleppo Pines grove, Pinet, Hérault 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC) on 2014-09-28 17:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Pinus halepensis (Aleppo Pines). Grove of trees in natural habitat.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Merpins 16 Abbaye de la Frenade-Clé de voûte Saint-Gelais 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-28 18:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Keystone in abbey of la Frenade, Merpins, Charente, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Santa Maria Assunta - Riva - Organ loft.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-29 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa Parrocchiale di Santa Maria Assunta, Riva del Garda, organ loft

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Venerque - Tombe Noulet.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-29 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Venerque, Tomb of Jean-Baptiste Noulet. South East exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ponte Ruga Vechia (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-29 05:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte Ruga Vechia Venice, North exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:51, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Svaneke water tower 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
aconcagua (talk) on 2014-09-29 10:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Svaneke Vandtårn
Used in:
da:Svaneke Vandtårn, en:Svaneke water tower, no:Svaneke vanntårn, pl:Wieża ciśnień w Svaneke, de:Svaneke, en:Svaneke
Open for review.
Aussenbild 10.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2014-09-29 12:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Road church Baden-Baden, Germany (exterior, night view)
Reason:
Well exposed: the concrete relief, the window structure and the door painting are all visible. --Ikar.us (talk) 12:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC) -- Ikar.us (talk)
Open for review.
Linnaea borealis 8803.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Walter Siegmund (talk) on 2014-09-29 15:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Linnaea borealis (Twin Flower), inflorescence
Reason:
This image, used in nine projects, depicts the flowers, borne in pairs on long slender flower stalks, nodding, pink, conical with five flaring lobes, that are notable and distinguishing features of this monotypic genus. -- Walter Siegmund (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good choice. --JLPC (talk) 19:53, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Koreahaus Donaupark-DSC 4321w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-09-29 18:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Korea Kulturhaus Österreich, view from Donauturm
Used in:

de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Donaustadt

de:Donaupark

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Jistebník, Stacja kolejowa 04.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-29 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Railway station in Jistebník, Czech Republic. View from North.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bors Monument.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-29 20:06 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial, Bors-de-Montmoreau, Charente, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting question.svg Question Why is Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list in the category? --P e z i (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Santa Maria Assunta - Riva - Side chapel.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-30 04:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa Parrocchiale di Santa Maria Assunta, Riva del Garda, side chapel

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Belle de Spa'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-09-30 04:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Belle de Spa' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chrysanthia viridissima MHNT Léguevin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-30 05:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Chrysanthia viridissima Dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bourg-Saint-Bernard - ÉgliseSaint-Bernard -Exterieur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-30 05:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Bourg-Saint-Bernard, St Bernard Church. West exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Jodoka we Frydku-Mistku 08.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-30 08:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Judoc in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. View from East.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in the Czech Republic -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Marienkapelle, Würzburg, Nave 20140929 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DXR (talk) on 2014-09-30 10:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Marienkapelle Würzburg, Nave
Reason:
Good quality -- DXR (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kollegiatstift Neumünster, Würzburg, Nave 20140929 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DXR (talk) on 2014-09-30 10:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of Neumünster Würzburg, Nave
Reason:
Good quality -- DXR (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chimay triple.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ludo (talk) on 2014-09-30 10:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Chimay beer: Tripel

Symbol support vote.svg Support I've narrowed down the scope to "Chimay beers: Tripel" --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
aconcagua (talk) on 2014-09-30 13:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS
Used in:
de:Canon Powershot SX-Reihe, en:Canon PowerShot S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Water buffalo bull, near Mehsana, Gujarat, India, 4.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-09-30 14:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo), male
Open for review.
Hénanbihen 22 Église 2007.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-30 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Hénanbihen, Côtes-d'Armor, France, W-NW view
Open for review.
Onymacris rugatipennis albotessellata 1 MHNT.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-09-30 15:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Onymacris rugatipennis albotessellata ()
Open for review.
Camponotus detritus 1 MHNT.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-09-30 16:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Camponotus detritus ()
Open for review.
Shanti Stupa, Dhauli 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-30 17:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Shanti Stupa (Dhauli), Odisha, India West view
Open for review.
Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2014-09-30 18:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Sacred Heart Church in Munich: exterior
Used in:
Herz-Jesu-Kirche München
Open for review.
Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2014-09-30 18:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Sacred Heart Church in Munich: nave
Used in:
Herz-Jesu-Kirche München
Open for review.
George IV Statue (Edinburgh) - 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Kadellar (talk) on 2014-09-30 18:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of George IV, George Street, Edinburgh, front view
Open for review.
Kalvarienberg Frauenkirchen DSC 4847w.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-09-30 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Kalvarienberg, Frauenkirchen, West view
Used in:
de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Frauenkirchen
Open for review.
Chimay bleu.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ludo (talk) on 2014-09-30 19:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Chimay beer: Blue
Open for review.
Annasaeule Frauenkirchen DSC 4891w.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-09-30 20:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Annasäule, Frauenkirchen, NW view
Open for review.
Mariensaele Frauenkirchen DSC 4881w.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-09-30 22:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Mariensäule, Frauenkirchen, SSE view
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier metro st-sebastien-froissart paris 2009.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Sébastien - Froissart (Paris Metro), inside, N view
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Jiel (talk)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier metro st-sebastien-froissart 1 paris 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Sébastien - Froissart (Paris Metro), Saint-Sébastien exit, N view
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier metro st-sebastien-froissart 2 paris 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Sébastien - Froissart (Paris Metro), Saint-Sébastien exit, S view
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Florent Amodio Bompard 2013.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Florent Amodio in 2013
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Mae-Berenice Meite Bompard 2013.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Maé-Bérénice Méité in 2013
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Marie-Pierre Leray Bompard 2013.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Marie-Pierre Leray in 2013
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Samantha Cesario Bompard 2013.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Samantha Cesario in 2013
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Pechalat Bourzat Bompard 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-30 23:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Nathalie Péchalat & Fabian Bourzat at 2010 Trophée Eric Bompard
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Ilinykh Katsalapov Bompard 2013.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-10-01 00:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Elena Ilinykh and Nikita Katsalapov in 2013
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Zhiganshina Gazsi Bompard 2013.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-10-01 00:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Nelli Zhiganshina and Alexander Gazsi in 2013
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Virtue Moir Kostner Chan Szolkowy Savchenko WFSC Nice 2012.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-10-01 00:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Gold medalists at 2012 World Figure Skating Championships
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier Joubert Pechalat Bourzat Amodio WFSC Nice 2012.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-10-01 00:32 (UTC)
Scope:
French team leaders at 2012 World Figure Skating Championships
Open for review.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]