Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
12320 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
10200 (82.8%) 
Undecided
  
797 (6.5%) 
Declined
  
1323 (10.7%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Équipe cycliste Wanty - Tour de l'Ain 2014 - J-1 - Marco Minnaard.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-11 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Marco Minnaard in 2014
  • The geocoding does not make much sense here but if you know it's always useful. Look modificaiton the syntax of scope.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Équipe cycliste Wanty - Tour de l'Ain 2014 - J-1 - Frederik Backaert.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-08-11 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Frederik Backaert in 2014
  • The geocoding does not make much sense here but if you know it's always useful. Look modificaiton the syntax of scope.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Aster thomsonii. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.JPG
View
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-08-25 04:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Aster thomsonii Flower.
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier eglise saint-martin roubaix 2008.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-27 17:10 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Martin Church in Roubaix, in the evening, S view.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : a slight perspective correction is needed, especially on the left. --JLPC (talk) 08:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Too low photographic quality that does not allow a clear view of the monument. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Correction of perspective will be uneasy on this photograph, and right, I could probably do a new one with a better photographic quality. So, Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination for this image Jiel (talk) 10:07, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier ane corse calvi 2014.jpeg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-27 18:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Corsican donkey

Symbol support vote.svg Support: useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier interieur TGV TMST LGV Nord 2011 1.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC) on 2014-08-27 19:01 (UTC)
Scope:
TGV TMST train interiors
Reason:
Best in scope -- Jiel (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Kanał Młynówka i mury miejskie w Kłodzku.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-27 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Kanał Młynówka in Kłodzko, view from S

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Scope too broad. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment insufficient; I propose to add: "in Kłodzko". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
There is no Kanał Młynówka behind Kłodzko, it is only in Kłodzko, but ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Pole uprawne w Raszkowie.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-27 23:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Wheat fields in Raszków, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Scope too broad. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 08:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Parnassius mnemosyne MHNT CUT 2013 3 5 Le Mont Dore Femelle ventre.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-28 05:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Parnassius mnemosyne (Clouded Apollo) mounted specimen, female, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Notre-Dame de la Daurade - Orgues Choeur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-28 05:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Choir organ case. Basilica Notre-Dame de la Daurade, Toulouse, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Mitra cornicula 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-08-28 06:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Mitra cornicula (Little Trumpet Mitre), slender form, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Mitra cornicula 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-08-28 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mitra cornicula (Little Trumpet Mitre), bulbous form, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Preveli Beach Rock 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-08-28 08:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Mushroom-shaped rock next to Preveli Beach, Crete, north side viewed from the beach
Used in:
de:Palmenstrand von Preveli

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : It would be good to add "View from...(N, S, E or W)" to the scope as we usually do here in VIC. Thanks. --JLPC (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support now. Useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Schlammvulkan Berca.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
M. Krafft (talk) on 2014-08-28 15:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Berca mud volcanoes
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image needs geocoding and the scope needs a link to a relevant category. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Fixed it and added Geocoding. Thanks, --M. Krafft (talk) 06:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 06:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jarnac 16 Façade Temple 2014.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-28 16:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Facade of the protestant church, Jarnac, Charente, France, (SE view)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2012 Panorama Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-28 21:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Historic centre of Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from South

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is a wrong geocoding. Please add a proper geolocalization. --Halavar (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. Useful image. --Halavar (talk) 22:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier ESBVA Melissa Diawakana 1 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-28 21:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Melissa Diawakana in 2013
Reason:
Best in scope (she's a LFB basketball player) -- Jiel (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It lacks the caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Caption in English added. Jiel (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier ESBVA Emma Meesseman 2 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-28 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Emma Meesseman in 2013
Reason:
Best in scope (she's a LFB basketball player) -- Jiel (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It lacks the caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Caption in English added. Jiel (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier ESBVA Chloe Westelynck 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-28 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Chloé Westelynck in 2013
Reason:
Best in scope (she's a LFB basketball player) -- Jiel (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It lacks the caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Caption in English added. Jiel (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier ESBVA Djene Diawara 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-08-28 21:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Djéné Diawara in 2013
Reason:
Best in scope (she's a LFB basketball player) -- Jiel (talk)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral For me not the best in scope. There are better Pictures in the Category which are not VI. -- M. Krafft (talk) 16:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is in 2013 and the other images are from 2014 ! This is the only image of her in 2013. Jiel (talk) 10:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Now neutral. But i dont think, that this scope/reason is really good. If i make a picture from a sunset an make a scope like:"Sunset on 31th August 2014 in Lower Saxony" and it´s the only picture in that "Category", is that picture than valued? I think no... Greetings, --M. Krafft (talk) 18:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose M. Krafft absolutely right. One must keep discernment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2013 Paczków, ratusz, 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-28 22:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Paczków Town Hall, view from S
Used in:
pl:Ratusz w Paczkowie, pl:Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 22:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Trapezostigma loewii - Darwin.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Summerdrought (talk) on 2014-08-26 11:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Trapezostigma loewii (Common Glider), male
Used in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_glider
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Altered scope as recommended.Summerdrought (talk) 05:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Trapezostigma to Trapezostigma loewii (Common Glider) --Summerdrought (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Ectobius pallidus MHNT Juvnile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-29 05:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Ectobius pallidus juvenil form

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
La halle de Venerque.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-29 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Venerque, the village hall. Northwest exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in Scope. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Negresco in Nizza by night 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2014-08-29 13:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Negresco Hotel in Nizza at night, view from SE, main entrance

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi, Wolfgang ! Would you, please add "View from...(N, S, E or W)" or "main facade" to the scope as we usually do here in VIC ? Thanks. --JLPC (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:06, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 20:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Nikon D7000 z obiektywem MC 3M-5CA.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-29 14:12 (UTC)
Scope:
MC 3M-5CA, lens with thread M42

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : interesting, but I think the scope isn't precise enough. I would add "lens for Nikon D series" or something like that. --JLPC (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Scope is the model name of the lens. Precisely is impossible IMO. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:52, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 06:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Cauterets 65 Fronton pano 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-29 14:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Pelota courts in Hautes-Pyrénées, France
✓ Done : you're right, thanks. --JLPC (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope Perfect. --LivioAndronico talk 09:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Female and juvenile rhesus macaque at Galtaji, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-08-29 15:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Macaca mulatta (Rhesus macaque), female and juvenile

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 07:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Schlierenwagen Innenansicht Blau.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Linie29 (talk) on 2014-08-29 17:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Kurze Schlieren, Interior
Reason:
Only picture of the interior in this scope. -- Linie29 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kłodzko, most, 21.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-29 21:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, view from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-29 21:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Most św. Jana i kościół MBR.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-29 21:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, view from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Starówka w Kłodzku.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-29 21:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, view from SE

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject is the bridge. We do not clear. This one is better :file:Kłodzko, Most św. Jana (11).jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
La scolie hirsute (Scolia hirta) MHNT fronton.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-30 06:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Scolia hirta male, dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di Sant'Antonin Venezia - Campanile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-30 06:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa di Sant'Antonin in venice.Campanile seen from Ponte della Commenda.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Viviparus mamillatus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-08-30 06:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Viviparus mamillatus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kłodzko, Most św. Jana (11).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-30 08:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jarnac 16 Maison Mitterrand façade 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-30 13:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Facade of F. Mitterrand's birth house, Jarnac, France, S-SW view
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Yann (talk) 13:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Spike Jones'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-08-30 15:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Spike Jones' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Kościelna 10, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-30 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
10 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Kościelna 8, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-30 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
8 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Kłodzka 8, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-30 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
8 Kłodzka Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 17:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Kłodzka 3, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-08-30 17:28 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Kłodzka Street in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Mitra perdulca 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-08-31 06:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Mitra perdulca, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Anita'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-08-31 06:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Anita' Flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
DanburiteTaillée.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-31 07:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Danburite, cut.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Loredan in Campo Santo Stefano (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-08-31 07:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Loredan in Campo Santo Stefano. Venice, main facade, South East exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cassinomagus paysage 2012.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-08-31 17:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Typical landscape of N.-E. Charente, Cassinomagus, Charente, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --LivioAndronico talk 18:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Minox 35 ML 2014-08-31 11-01-57.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2014-08-31 17:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Minox 35 ML

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --LivioAndronico talk 18:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Mascaron 16 Place Vendôme Paris.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2014-08-31 21:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel Moufle Place Vendôme, Paris. Mascaron
Open for review.
Parnassius mnemosyne MHNT CUT 2013 3 5 Le Mont Dore Male ventre.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-01 05:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Parnassius mnemosyne mounted specimen, male, ventral side
Open for review.
Rue des Arts (Toulouse) 2.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-01 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue des Arts, in Toulouse. From Rue de Metz to Rue de la pomme
Open for review.
Stift Melk Marmorsaal Deckenfresko.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-09-01 07:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Ceiling fresco by Paul Troger in the Marble Hall of Melk Abbey
Used in:
de:Stift Melk
Open for review.

Closed valued image candidates[edit]

Most valued reviews[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR has to be in the discussed state, while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.


Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]