Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
13097 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
10933 (83.5%) 
Undecided
  
832 (6.4%) 
Declined
  
1332 (10.2%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 15 13.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-24 11:05 (UTC)
Scope:
15 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portals, view from SW
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 15:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-25 19:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think this scope is too identical from the former one. Sorry. Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Then I Symbol support vote.svg Support this one over the other. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Then please create a MVR. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There is only one image in this scope. All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 22:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
    • @Ikar.us, Halavar: This makes a joke on the whole VI project. How many scopes a simple church like this can have? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
    • We were talking about this few times... Some kind of buildings (like churches) looks completly different depending on which side you take a picture. I think that all of the people in VIC accept this, except you... --Halavar (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
    • For me it is obvious that should be that much scopes, how much is pages of an object, from wchich you can take different photos. And if Yann thoughts differently, he should propose rules change and voting this on page of VI discussion. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
White Fourring (Ypthima ceylonica).JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
AntonTalk on 2014-10-27 01:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Ypthima ceylonica (White Fourring), ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
White-browed Bulbul ( Pycnonotus luteolus).JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
AntonTalk on 2014-10-27 01:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Pycnonotus luteolus (White-browed Bulbul) ventral view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Fuchsia 'Ajax'.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-27 05:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Ajax' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Northern Murviel-lès-Béziers 02.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 05:56, 27 October 2014 (UTC) on 2014-10-27 05:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Northern part of the village of Murviel-lès-Béziers, Hérault, France. Seen from Northwest.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Arcocinus longimanus MHNT CUT 2014 14 1 Guyanne.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-27 06:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Acrocinus longimanus (Harlekinbock) - prepared in the Beauchene technique.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 14:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Bologna Statue of Galvani.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-27 06:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Luigi Galvani in Piazza Galvani, Bologna. Southeast exposure.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (07).jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-10-27 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Ruins of the Small Basilica in Heraclea Lyncestis. Bitola, Macedonia.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 4.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-27 11:57 (UTC)
Scope:
4 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 6.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-27 12:01 (UTC)
Scope:
6 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
August-Bergmann-Hof Favoritenstrasse 8-DSC 5409w.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-27 12:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Gemeindebau in Wieden, August-Bergmann-Hof, NW view
Used in:
Liste der Wiener Gemeindebauten/Wieden

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope & useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 18.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-27 12:09 (UTC)
Scope:
18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 5 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-27 12:11 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 12:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Otto Haus-Rax-DSC 5053w.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-27 12:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Otto-Schutzhaus, NE view
Used in:
Otto-Schutzhaus

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope & useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Landstrasser Gymnasium DSC 6181w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-27 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Gymnasium Kundmanngasse, South view
Used in:

Gymnasium Kundmanngasse

Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Linazay 86 Monument aux morts 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-27 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial of Linazay, Vienne, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Dominikanerkloster St. Johannis Hamburg Hof 1.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Dirtsc (talk) on 2014-10-27 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Catholic monastery of St. Johannis in Hamburg-Barmbek
Used in:
de:Dominikanerkloster St. Johannis (Hamburg)
Reason:
Showing the central yard with its sculpture and the connection with the church St. Sophien in the background -- Dirtsc (talk)
Open for review.
Hittfeld St. Mauritius Taufe 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Dirtsc (talk) on 2014-10-27 15:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Baptismal font in St. Mauritiuskirche (Hittfeld)
Used in:
List of gothic baptismal fonts along the southern baltic coast
Reason:
One of only two images of this baptismal font -- Dirtsc (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please add geocoding. Perspective correction would also be appriciated --P e z i (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Geocoding added, sorry its quite a long time since my last nomination for VI. Could you please specify what kind of perspective correction you have in mind? The main object looks OK to me. --Dirtsc (talk) 06:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope Think it's OK now. My comment was about the right side which I'd tried to get vertical. Please have a look at your Discussion. --P e z i (talk) 21:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hemerocallis 'Pink Damask'. Locatie De Kruidhof 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-27 16:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Hemerocallis 'Pink Damask' Flower.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cultivars are not automatically notable. "There are over 60,000 registered cultivars" of Hemerocallis. About 50 of the 340 images in Category:Hemerocallis cultivars are used by articles and none are images of this cultivar.[1] I think this scope is too narrow. To be a VI, a cultivar must be notable in some way, e.g., win one or more awards from the American Horticultural Society, Royal Horticultural Society, or similar society; be discussed in the horticultural literature; etc. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Walter is wise. Cultivars are very difficult appreciation. As I am a very bad botanist I will refrain in the future on this topic. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Théza-01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2014-10-27 20:10 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Peter's Church, Théza, Pyrenees-Orientales, facade,SE exposure
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Parlament Wien-DSC 0238w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-27 20:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Austrian Parliament Building at night, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stadtparksteg-DSC1268w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-27 20:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Stadtparksteg, SW view
Used in:

Stadtparksteg

Wiener Stadtpark

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Cymon'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-28 05:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Cymon' Flower buds.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful (We want to see the flower now :))--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That will be the following year.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Crisilla semistriata 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-28 05:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Crisilla semistriata, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zerynthia polyxena MHNT CUT 2013 3 8 female Ventre Montferrier-sur-Lez.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-28 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Zerynthia polyxena (Southern Festoon), mounted specimen, female, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église Notre-Dame de la Dalbade (Interieur) - Rosace.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-28 06:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Notre-Dame de la Dalbade in Toulouse. Rose windows.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 07:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 9 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-28 13:03 (UTC)
Scope:
9 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. (Orientation changed to "portrait") --P e z i (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 8 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-28 13:07 (UTC)
Scope:
8 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. (Orientation changed to "portrait") --P e z i (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 7,7a.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-28 13:13 (UTC)
Scope:
7-7a Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. (Orientation changed to "portrait") --P e z i (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 6,6a.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-28 13:15 (UTC)
Scope:
6-6a Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 19:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fresque des mytères, Pompéi.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-28 16:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Silenus holding a lyre (left); demi-god Pan and a nymph sitting on a rock, nursing a goat (centre); woman with coat (right). Fresco of the mystery ritual

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think scope:Fresco of the mystery ritual is too broad and general. --Halavar (talk) 19:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is no real name for each part of the fresco, and the interpretation is controversial. I completed the description. OK now? Yann (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Too complicated now... I think scope should be: "Fresco of the mystery ritual, Villa of the Mysteries, Pompeii, Italy." --Halavar (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is only a part of the fresco, which covers several walls. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Chiesa dell'Inviolata - Riva del Garda - Confessional box.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-28 17:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa dell'Inviolata, Riva del Garda, confessional box

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good. --JLPC (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Toulouges-02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wayne77 (talk) on 2014-10-28 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of the Assumption of the Virgin, Toulouges, Pyrenees-Orientales, Main west façade.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Haus der Industrie-DSC 0203w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-28 19:44 (UTC)
Scope:
House of Industry, Vienna, night view
Used in:
Haus der Industrie
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment According to our tradition here in VIC, scope should be in English. --Halavar (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks for review. Scope adjusted. --P e z i (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Langen Foundation.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Anıl Ö. (talk) on 2014-10-28 20:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Langen Foundation, Neuss, Germany, East view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Useful picture but geolocation is needed, and, on this page, we usually add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope. Can you complete ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi JLPC, i added the geolocation afterwards (thought it would be incured from the GPS dates). Do you need some more information? Regards --Anıl Ö. (talk) 22:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support now. (I slightly modified the scope, feel free to correct any error.)--JLPC (talk) 14:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction/addition of the view, now I know, what you meant with this. East view is right. Regards, --Anıl Ö. (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Aubeville 16 Monument morts 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-28 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial of Aubeville, Charente, France
Reason:
No other one in scope. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hauptplatz 13 Aspang Markt-DSC 5968w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-29 00:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Cultural heritage monuments in Aspang-Markt, Hauptplatz 13. Façade.
Used in:
Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Aspang-Markt

Symbol support vote.svg Support ok with façade added to the scope. -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 05:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aspang-Markt Kirchenplatz 3-DSC 5965w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-29 00:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Cultural heritage monuments in Aspang-Markt, Kirchenplatz 3
Used in:
Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Aspang-Markt
Open for review.
Uebergang Pestingbach-DSC 3980w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-29 00:41 (UTC)
Scope:
ÖBB 5022 on duty of Wechselbahn
Used in:

ÖBB 5022
Wechselbahn

Liste österreichischer Triebfahrzeuge mit Sonderlackierung
Open for review.
Universite de Paris Faculte de droit DSC 1945w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-29 00:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Faculté de droit de Paris, SSE view
Used in:

Université Panthéon-Sorbonne
Universiteit Parijs 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Университет Париж 1 Пантеон-Сорбонна
Open for review.
금동약사불입상.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
— revimsg on 2014-10-29 03:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Buddha statues in Unified Silla era
Used in:
GlobalUsage
Reason:
This is statue of Buddha, made in 8th century. the round thing in the hand is called yak-hap, the medicine jar. This is one of the well-preserved Bhaisajyaguru in Korea. -- — revimsg

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This work of art is only the scope should be too. The image should appear in the category indicates that is not the case. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. Fixed scope. Though I have to add more images to the cat. — revimsg 08:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Buddha statues in Korea to Buddha statues in Unified Silla era — revimsg 08:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Madhyamaheshwar Temple, Uttarakhand.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2014-10-29 04:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Madhyamaheshwar Temple, Uttarakhand, India. Southern view
Used in:
Madhyamaheshwar,
Template:Panch Kedar,
টেমপ্লেট:পঞ্চ কেদার

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is good. Perspective correction would be appreciated --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

-Archaeodontosaurus, Perspective correction ✓ Done, Please state if it is Ok now. Thanks. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. I improved the geocoding. Nice picture. I will add this on my list of visits in the area. ;oD Yann (talk) 17:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Perspective corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fuchsia 'sophie michels'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-29 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Sophie Michels' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Oedemera flavipes MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-29 06:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Oedemera flavipes dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Campo Santo Stefano, Statua di Niccolò Tommaseo, Venezia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-29 06:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Niccolò Tommaseo, on Campo Santo Stefano in Venice.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Homosexuality in Khajuraho sculpture.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Dey.sandip (talk) on 2014-10-29 08:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Erotic sculptures in the Khajuraho group of monuments, India. Homosexuality
Reason:
Among many erotic sculptures found in the Khajuraho temples, this is the only reference to homosexuality. -- Dey.sandip (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : interesting. Maybe you could add the name of the coutry to the scope ? ... But I'm not sure. --JLPC (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. The geolocation could be improved. Yann (talk) 16:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-29 13:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-29 13:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 09.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-29 13:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, statue of the Virgin Mary, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 10.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-29 13:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, statue of the Virgin Mary, view from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Combiers 16 Église de Rauzet Vue SE 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-29 14:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Priory of Rauzet, Combiers, Charente, France, SE view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 16:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Still life with eggs, birds and bronze dishes, Pompeii.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-29 16:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Still life with eggs, birds and bronze dishes, House of Julia Felix, Pompeii.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kleingasse 2 DSC 5704w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-29 23:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Gemeindebau in Landstraße, Kleingasse 2, SE view
Used in:
Liste der Wiener Gemeindebauten/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Erdbergstrasse 12-14-DSC 5638w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-29 23:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Gemeindebau in Landstraße, Erdbergstrasse 12-14, North view
Used in:
Liste der Wiener Gemeindebauten/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kościół pw. Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Rybniku 3.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-10-30 00:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows church in Rybnik, Silesia, Poland. Facade.
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Crisilla innominata 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-30 05:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Crisilla innominata, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Iphiclides podalirius MHNT CUT 2013 3 9 Male Dos Cahors.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-30 08:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Iphiclides podalirius (Scarce Swallowtail), mounted specimen, male, dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Support (Very) useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
DisthèneNépal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-30 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Kyanite, cut.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Mosaïque nilotique, Praeneste, Italie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-30 10:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Nile Mosaic from Palestrina
Reason:
Famous ancient Roman mosaic, which has its own article in 10 languages: w:Nile mosaic of Palestrina. -- Yann (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Libourne 33 Confluent Isle Dordogne 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-30 13:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Confluence of river Isle and river Dordogne, Libourne, Gironde, France
Reason:
Best in small scope imo -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kłodzko, pl. Bolesława Chrobrego 19 (3).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-30 13:38 (UTC)
Scope:
19 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from N
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 19, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-30 13:47 (UTC)
Scope:
19 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from E

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pręgierz w Kłodzku 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-30 13:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Pillory in Kłodzko

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 6 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-30 14:03 (UTC)
Scope:
6 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Crocus nudiflorus 1 MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-10-30 15:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Crocus nudiflorus, flower

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Salamandra atra accouplement MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2014-10-30 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Salamandra atra (alpine salamander), mating

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stadtplatz 20-22 Steyr DSC 2781w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-30 16:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Steyr Stadtplatz 20, 22, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stella-Klein-Loew-Hof DSC 0300w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-30 22:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Stella-Klein-Loew-Hof, NE view
Used in:
Liste der Wiener Gemeindebauten/Leopoldstadt

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gedenktafel Franz von Toula Hof TU Wien-DSC 6755w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-30 23:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Main building of the Vienna University of Technology, Plaque to Franz von Toula

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gedenktafel Opfer des Faschismus TU Wien DSC 9015w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-30 23:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Main building of the Vienna University of Technology, Plaque commemorating the victims of racism und fascism
Used in:
K.k. Polytechnisches Institut

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Josef Stiny Hof TU-Wien-DSC 3573w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-30 23:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Main building of the Vienna University of Technology, Commemorative plaque Josef Stiny
Used in:
Josef Stini

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kieslinger TU-Wien Hof-DSC 3582w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-30 23:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Main building of the Vienna University of Technology, Commemorative plaque Alois Kieslinger
Used in:
Alois Kieslinger

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ludwig von Tetmajer Bueste Hof TU Wien-DSC 6752w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-30 23:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Main building of the Vienna University of Technology, Bust in honor of Ludwig von Tetmajer
Used in:

Ludwig von Tetmajer

Ludwig von Tetmajer

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Menna'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-10-31 05:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Menna' Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met --JLPC (talk) 11:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Malcesine - Castle - Goethe's direction of view.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-10-31 05:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Castello di Malcesine, view as drawn by Goethe

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why Goethe’s drawing was torn and never finished and why he was almost arrested as an Austrian spy... please read the whole story in the image caption --Llez (talk) 05:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Archon apollinus MHNT CUT 2013 3 7 female dos Turquie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-31 09:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Archon apollinus (False Apollo), mounted specimen, female, dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
La fontaine Garonne de la rue Boulbonne.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-10-31 09:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Fountain of the Garonne in Boulbonne street, Toulouse.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
서봉총 금관 금제드리개.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
— revimsg on 2014-10-31 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Royal crowns of Korea (ca 5th century), in Gyeongju National Museum
Used in:
ko:서봉총 금관 (Or GlobalUsage)
Reason:
This is a golden crown used during the Silla era. -- — revimsg

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think a datation and the name of the place (museum, palace ?) would make the scope better. --JLPC (talk) 11:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Fixed scope. — revimsg 11:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Royal crowns of Korea to Royal crowns of Korea, in Gyeongju National Museum — revimsg 11:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Symbol support vote.svg Support : Good and useful.--JLPC (talk)
Open for review.
SonakshiSinha10.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-31 11:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Sonakshi Sinha
Reason:
One of the leading actresses of Bollywood (Indian movies) -- Yann (talk)
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Miła 3, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-31 14:29 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Miła Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Miła 3, 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-31 14:32 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Miła Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from S
Open for review.
Rétaud 17 Mairie 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-10-31 14:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Rétaud, Charente-Maritime, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-31 15:16 (UTC)
Scope:
10 Spacerowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 08.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-10-31 15:19 (UTC)
Scope:
10 Spacerowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, covered bridge
Open for review.
Shraddha Kapoor at IBJA awards and fashion showcase.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-31 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Shraddha Kapoor
Reason:
Indian actress. She received 5 awards, including Filmfare Award for Best Actress, for her role in Aashiqui 2 (2013). It was also a huge success. -- Yann (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Difficult choice. Other contenders might be: 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Yann (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]