Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Shortcut
COM:VIC
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
16,106 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
13,790 (85.6%) 
Undecided
  
904 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
1,412 (8.8%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Oli de l'Empordà.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
QuimGil (talk) on 2015-05-19 06:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Oli de l'Empordà
Reason:
Proposing this image again, with a different scope, as per discussion. -- QuimGil (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm sorry, but it looks like any other olive oil in a square glass bottle...--Jebulon (talk) 14:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is "Oli de l'Empordà", and this is how it looks. If someone wants to illustrate this scope, this is the most representative picture we have. "Extra-virgin olive oil" does look the same regardless of its origin or brand, but when I proposed this image for that scope it was considered too broad...
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes I've read the previous reviews, but when I look at this (excellent) picture, I think it could be any yellow-green liquid... I don't know...--Jebulon (talk) 19:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Previous reviews

Open for review.
2015 Szczeliniec Wielki 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-21 09:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Szczeliniec Wielki, Stołowe Mountains, Sudetes, Poland, exposure from SE

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Captions are too succinct. You should put the name of the region and the country. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-21 09:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Golden Mountains (Sudetes), Poland, panorama from Borówkowa, exposure from WSW

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Captions are too succinct. You should put the name of the country. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2015 Kwiaty magnolii pośredniej.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-21 09:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Saucer magnolia, Magnolia × soulangeana, flowers

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2015 Park przy zamku Leśna w Szczytnej.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-21 09:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Leśna castle in Szczytna, park at the castle

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2015 Studzienka Matki Bożej w Wambierzycach.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-21 10:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Way of the Cross in Wambierzyce, well of Our Lady

Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope and usefull -- Christian Ferrer 10:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Echternach-torso2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-05-21 17:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of St. Willibrord Basilika (Echternach), Luxembourg: Torso of Christ
Used in:
de:Echternach (Luxemburg)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Antigua - side altar cl.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-21 18:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Antigua, Antigua, Fuerteventura, chancel, left side altar

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC>

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Clyte bélier - MHNT - Portrait.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-22 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Clytus arietis (Wasp beetle) portrait

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Louis Bertrand (saint) par Thibaud Maitrier - Saint Exupère à Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-22 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Saint-Exupère from Toulouse, St. Louis Bertrand, by Thibaud Maistrier

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Scola spagnola (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-22 05:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Sola spagnola in Venice - facade on Campo delle scole

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Szczyt Szczelińca Wielkiego.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-22 09:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Szczeliniec Wielki, Stołowe Mountains, Sudetes, Poland, sandstone formation on the hilltop
Open for review.
2015 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim (04).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-22 11:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Overpass in Lewin Kłodzki, exposure from W
Open for review.
2015 Ławeczka Szwejka w Szczytnej.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-22 11:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Szczytna, bench with the Josef Švejk
Open for review.
2015 Ławeczka Zagłoby w Szczytnej.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-22 11:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Szczytna, bench with the Jan Zagłoba
Open for review.
Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 2 (4).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-22 12:02 (UTC)
Scope:
2 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, house mark
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 4 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-22 12:27 (UTC)
Scope:
4 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, bay
Open for review.
Echternach-fountain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-05-22 15:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Willibrord-Well in the crypt of St.-Willibrord-Basilika (Echternach), Luxemburg.
Used in:
de:Echternach (Luxemburg)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Princess Elisabeth of Hesse - Painting.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ras67 (talk) on 2015-05-22 17:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Princess Elisabeth of Hesse, memorial drawing of her by Friedrich August von Kaulbach
Reason:
This drawing says all about her fate. -- Ras67 (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good but; It would add to the scope, the word "drawing" and the name of the author.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Melanoides admirabilis 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-22 18:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Melanoides admirabilis, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Papilio alexanor MHNT CUT 2013 3 10 Cucuron Male Dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-23 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio alexanor (Southern Swallowtail) mounted specimen, male, dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rue d'Alsace-Lorraine (Toulouse) Le Square de Gaulle.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-23 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue d'Alsace-Lorraine in Toulouse - View with Square de Gaulle

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Geremia (Venice) Santa Lucia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-23 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
San Geremia (Venice). Santa Lucia.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 5 11.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-23 11:09 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, windows and stuccos
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 5 08.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-23 11:16 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, side portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 5,5a (portal).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-23 11:29 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, main portal

Useful --Llez (talk) 09:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eurostar et Thalys, Albertville (2007).JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Floflo (talk) on 2015-05-23 11:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Gare d'Albertville, international station
Reason:
I propose this rather rare picture taken at Albertville railway station in the French Alps, with stopped both Eurostar and Thalys international high speed trains, during the winter season. Thanks, -- Floflo (talk)
Open for review.
Ponte San Lorenzo a Venezia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2015-05-23 11:28 (UTC)
Scope:
The San Lorenzo bridge in Venice, Southern aspect.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 14 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-23 11:51 (UTC)
Scope:
14 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, central stucco

There are many stuccos on this house, so the scope is not specific enough.--Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a special scope for only one stucco ? lol--Jebulon (talk) 20:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fontego del megio Venice.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2015-05-23 12:06 (UTC)
Scope:
The "Fontego del megio" in Venice, NW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Czeska 32 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-23 12:19 (UTC)
Scope:
32 Czeska Street in Kłodzko, portal
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 09.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-23 13:02 (UTC)
Scope:
20 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko, windows and stuccos
Open for review.
Tredegar House 1 (16984431737).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ham II (talk) on 2015-05-23 17:35 (UTC)
Scope:
NW façade of Tredegar House
Used in:
cy:Tŷ Tredegar, en:Tredegar House

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 23:14, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
View of antique city of Phaistos Crete Greece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-05-23 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Antique city of Phaistos, view from south-west
Reason:
The best of the two we have in the category. It is the antique minoan city ruled by king Rhadamanthus, son of Zeus and Europe, brother of king Minos. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Flangini e Scuola dei Morti a Venezia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2015-05-23 20:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Flangini in Venice, Canal Grande view.

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Palauenc05 (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Vexillum ebenus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-23 21:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Vexillum ebenus (Ebony Mitre), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di San Leonardo a Venezia facciata.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2015-05-23 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
The San Leonardo church in Venice, facade

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This facade is beautiful and photography very hard to do. But there is too much deformation. There should be two images with a 10mm. We can put it on our cameras, which automatically manages the reduction of fields. I did not take with me this year. It's a good challenge --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the review @Archaeodontosaurus, you are right I didn't have the right lens with me. I didn't understand what you mean with "our cameras, which automatically manages the reduction of fields". Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Large sensors can not fall below 24mm. If you place a 10mm lens, viewfinder you have the image framed by a red rectangle shows the area that you lose. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Helix Lussatite.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-24 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Ochthephila ramondi – pseudomorph in Lussatite

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Papilio alexanor MHNT CUT 2013 3 10 Cucuron Male Ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-24 05:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio alexanor (Southern Swallowtail) mounted specimen - Ventral side
Open for review.
Venise Aero Pont de la Liberté.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-24 05:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte della Liberta, in Venice - West exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Thunderbolt above Vyšné Hágy.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Midnight Runner on 2015-05-24 10:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Cloud-to-cloud lightning
Open for review.
Papaver setigerum, Sainte-Lucie Island, Aude 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer 10:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC) on 2015-05-24 10:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Papaver setigerum (Poppy of Troy). Plant with flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Paeonia rockii 2013 G1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2015-05-24 12:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Paeonia rockii (Rock's tree peony), unripe fruit
Used in:
en:Paeonia rockii, es:Paeonia rockii, la:Paeonia rockii, nl:Paeonia rockii and other
Reason:
good quality, used in many articles and geocoded -- George Chernilevsky talk

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Paeonia rockii bud 2015 G1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2015-05-24 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Paeonia rockii (Rock's tree peony), bud
Used in:
en:Paeonia rockii, ru:Пион Рока
Reason:
good quality, used in articles and geocoded -- George Chernilevsky talk

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
The "cup bearer" fresco Knossos Heraklion museum Crete Greece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-05-24 14:31 (UTC)
Scope:
The minoan "cup bearer fresco" from Knossos, Archaeological Museum of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Reason:
Alone in scope. This is the only life-size figure in a minoan fresco whose head and torso are preserved. Original object. Good quality, New in "Commons". Geocode in the institution template. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Antigua - side altar cr.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-24 18:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Antigua, Antigua, Fuerteventura, chancel, right side altar

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Słodowa 1 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-24 19:30 (UTC)
Scope:
1 Słodowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, facade
Open for review.
2015 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Słodowa 1 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-24 19:36 (UTC)
Scope:
1 Słodowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, portal
Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-24 19:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Jaszkowa Górna, exposure from SSE

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-24 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Jaszkowa Górna, gatehouse, exposure from SE
Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 08.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-24 19:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Jaszkowa Górna, gatehouse, exposure from N
Open for review.
2015 Kapliczka przydrożna w Droszkowie.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-05-24 20:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Droszków, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, roadside chapel
Open for review.
Eglise Saint-Martin de Finhan - Interieur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-25 06:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Finhan - St. Martin's church interior

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
La mairie annexe de Saint-Cyprien.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-25 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Place Jean Diebold in Toulouse - Town hall annex of Saint-Cyprien neighborhood

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ponte de Gheto Novissimo (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-05-25 06:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte de Gheto Novissimo in Venice - Southwest exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Carlo Palermo 2015.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-05-25 09:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Carlo Palermo
Used in:
en:Carlo Palermo, it:Carlo Palermo

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Vexillum tricolor 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-05-25 17:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Vexillum tricolor, Shell
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn, Poland[edit]

   
Studnia Trzech Braci 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2013-10-03 09:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn, Poland.
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Halavar (talk)

Previous reviews

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened for MVR, because 10 days ago image within the same scope was unfortunately promoted. --Halavar (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO this picture is better. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Cieszyn Studnia Trzech Braci 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2015-05-22 20:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn

Previous reviews

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened for MVR, because there is image within the same scope. --Halavar (talk) 14:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Close race, but the composition and framing is best on this one, although the light is better on the alternative. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.

Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side[edit]

   
Sarcophagus archmus Heraklion.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-05-22 17:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side
Reason:
Not from a book, a real picture, taken by me in the museum. All the face is visible, even the feet. Quality is far much better than our current VI, IMO. Geocode is in the "institution template". -- Jebulon (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Are you sure about the WB? It appears to be too cold. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
    • The museum is completely renovated, and the light is very different nowadays than before. I masked the explicit (but busy) background, but as far as I can say and as I remember, yes, the wb is good, now (it was far much colder before processing). Previous pictures are wrong (too hot) before, with yellow cast. But I could correct if necessary.--Jebulon (talk) 09:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
      • You know best what you sawSmile. I just noticed the shadow under it has a blue tint, which is often an indication of a too cold WB, which triggered my remark. -- Slaunger (talk) 08:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work. --Yann (talk) 21:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support other candidate has some flare and does not show whole item. Good composition, attractive photo. --Pitke (talk) 22:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Sarcophagus from Aghia Triada.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2015-05-22 20:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side

Previous reviews

Open for review.

Viborg Katedralskole[edit]

   
Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2015-05-22 19:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Viborg Katedralskole
Used in:
da:Viborg Katedralskole, en:Viborg Katedralskole, and secondary uses in three other articles
Reason:
There is an existing VI of this scope of the same view, which I took 7 years ago with a compact camera. This nomination from April 2015 is much more recent, and is a tone-mapped HDR stitch build from raws taken with a DSLR using Lightroom and PTGui. This has resulted in a much higher reolution image with better dynamic range, and quality. -- Slaunger (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better. --Yann (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sure! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version uploaded: perspective corrected, dust spot, sky reworked after feedback at COM:FPC. -- Slaunger (talk) 06:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 09:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2015-05-22 20:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Viborg Katedralskole
Used in:
da:Viborg Katedralskole, da:Hack Kampmann, en:Viborg Katedralskole, en:Viborg, Denmark
Reason:
This is the existing VI of this scope taken by me 7 years ago with a compact camera. Now superseeded by this photo of much better quality from April 2015. -- Slaunger (talk)

Previous reviews

Open for review.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]