Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Shortcut
COM:VIC
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
15,675 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
13,383 (85.4%) 
Undecided
  
896 (5.7%) 
Declined
  
1,396 (8.9%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 09.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-19 14:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Nowy Waliszów, main entrance
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's the only one and so it's the best in scope. (And it's good too.)--XRay talk 14:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Dicranocephalus albipes MHNT Side view.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-23 05:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Dicranocephalus albipes - Side view

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Tombe Jolivet.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-23 05:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Grave of André Jolivet, Montmartre Cimetery – Paris

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Ancien college de l'esquile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-23 05:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Collège de l'Esquile - facade on place Yitzhak Rabin in Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Napoli Cappella di Santa Restituta BW 2013-05-16 11-11-42.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2015-04-23 09:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedral (Naples) - Cappella di Santa Restituta, interior
Used in:
it:Basilica di Santa Restituta and some more

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 16.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-23 10:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, John of Nepomuk sculpture

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-23 11:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój, inclined fountain

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-23 11:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój, Dąbrówka spring

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 08.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-23 11:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój, larch alley

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, dzwonnica 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-23 12:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Belfry in Lądek-Zdrój, tented roof and clock

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-23 12:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Szczytna, fountain, nozzles

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Istmo de la Pared.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-04-23 15:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Istmo de la Pared, view from Mirador Astronómico de Sicasumbre

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Originally the northern part of Fuerteventura (Maxorata) and the southern part (Jandia) were two seperated Islands. By the uplift of the seafloor between the two islands, they are now conneced. This connection, covered with dunes of sand, originating from seashells, is now the Istmo de la Pared. Caused by the former isolation of Jandia, there exist a series of endemic species, with are restricted to this peninsula (especially in the region of the summit of the Pico de la Zarza) and are not found in the larger, northern part Maxorata.
The picture shows the view from Maxorata to Jandia with the connecting Istmo de la Pared, which is charcterized by the white sand dunes (also well visible in satellite images of this region, e.g. Google maps).

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work. Paragraph, very useful, you wrote could be put in the caption of the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done --Llez (talk) 11:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Purple-rumped Sunbird - male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
AntanO on 2015-04-23 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Leptocoma zeylonica, Purple-rumped Sunbird (male)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Oriental White-eye - Zosterops palpebrosus.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
AntanO on 2015-04-23 19:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Zosterops palpebrosus, Oriental White-eye

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No location in the caption text. No geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
House Crow (Corvus splendens)1.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
AntanO on 2015-04-23 19:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Corvus splendens, House crow

Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentNo location in the caption text. No geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Carl Jørgen Wesenberg-Lund. Photograph. Wellcome V0027734.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-23 20:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Carl Jørgen Wesenberg-Lund
Reason:
Biologist from Denmark. Studio shot, so no geocoding. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nicolaus Copernicus. Reproduction of line engraving.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-23 20:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Nicolaus Copernicus

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Auguste André Thomas Cahours.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-23 21:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Auguste André Thomas Cahours
Reason:
French chemist. Studio shot, so no geocoding. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support

Open for review.
Ince Minareli Medrese 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2015-04-23 21:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Ince Minareli Medrese (exterior), Konya, Turkey East view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Florence Nightingale. Coloured lithograph. Wellcome V0006579.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-23 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
The lady with the lamp (Miss Nightingale at Scutari), by Henrietta Rae
Reason:
This painting represents Florence Nightingale, a celebrated English social reformer and statistician, and is the best-known work of Henrietta Rae. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
David Livingstone -1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-23 22:38 (UTC)
Scope:
David Livingstone
Reason:
English explorer. Studio shot, so no geocoding. -- Yann (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I hesitated with this one, which is bigger, but the picture quality is not so good. Yann (talk) 22:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

* Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image is too dark, David Livingstone looks like nigger. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

    • I added some light. Better? Yann (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
      • It's better, but still too little. Skin color is still too dark. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I placed a new release. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Quincite.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-24 05:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Quincite Opal, Quincy-sur-Cher, France
Reason:
Type locality -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Dieupentale Maison de Laparre de Saint-Sernin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-24 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Dieupentale, France – Maison de Laparre de Saint Sernin, East exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
10 rue du Languedoc Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-24 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 10 rue du Languedoc (Toulouse) - facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Orla 7, dom zdrojowy 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-24 11:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Spa complex in Lądek-Zdrój, Spa House, northern part of the building

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Orla 7, dom zdrojowy 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-24 11:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Spa complex in Lądek-Zdrój, Spa House, southern part of the building

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 07.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-24 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, cartouche with the coat of arms of Lądek-Zdrój
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 08.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-24 11:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, sculpture over main entrance
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 11.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-24 11:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, keystone with the putto
Open for review.
20th March 2015 total solar eclipse cropped.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Anonimski (talk) on 2015-04-24 12:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Solar eclipse of 2015 March 20
Used in:
Solar eclipse of March 20, 2015
Reason:
Best picture of totality, which was visible only in a few places. -- Anonimski (talk)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Please add geocoding. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good. Yann (talk) 10:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Chilostoma illyricum 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-04-24 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Chilostoma illyricum (Illyrian Arianta), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Wendell Phillips by Brady.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-04-24 22:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Wendell Phillips
Reason:
American abolitionist, Native American advocate and orator. Studio shot, so no geocoding. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Maria Alexandrovna Duchess of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ras67 (talk) on 2015-04-25 00:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Maria Alexandrovna (Duchess of Edinburgh)
Reason:
IMHO this is the most representative portrait photo of Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia. -- Ras67 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eglise Sainte-Germaine (Toulouse) Autel.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-25 06:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Chuch Sainte-Germaine in Toulouse - Choir

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Dieupentale église Saint Pierre L'abside du XII.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-25 06:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Dieupentale, France – St. Peter's Church, North exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Pietro di Castello (Cloitre II).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-25 07:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Cloister of former Palazzo Patriarcale (San Pietro di Castello) Venice - Southern exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Europäische Investitionsbank.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-04-25 08:56 (UTC)
Scope:
European Investment Bank, Luxembourg (view from S)
Used in:
de:Europäische Investitionsbank, en:European Investment Bank, lb:Europäesch Investitiounsbank and many more.
Open for review.
2015 Nikon D7100 z lampą Aputure.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-25 12:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Nikon D7100, camera with with Aputure HN100 ring flash
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 23.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-25 13:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój - interior, stuccos
Open for review.
2014 Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech w Lądku Zdroju 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-25 13:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, dome
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 07.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-25 14:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, putti with the coat of arms of Lądek-Zdrój
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Kościelna 16, 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-25 14:59 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój, portal
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Kościelna 18, 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-25 15:12 (UTC)
Scope:
18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój, portal
Open for review.
Planorbis crassus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-04-25 21:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Planorbis crassus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:31, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
De hang, een vervallen zoutloods. Locatie, haven van Laaxum 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-04-26 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Laaxum The veil, a dilapidated salt shed. Location, Port Laaxum in the Netherlands.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Anthrenus pimpinellae MHNT Fronton.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-26 06:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Anthrenus pimpinellae dosal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Siderite late 1800s Redruth.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-26 06:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Siderite, Redruth - Cornwall, England

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Allée Jean Jaurès (Toulouse).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-26 06:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Allées Jean Jaurès in Toulouse - Northeast exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Barranco Valle de la Fuente - Fuerteventura.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-04-26 09:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Barranco Valle de la Fuente, Fuerteventura, view from east

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 06.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-26 10:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, Eye of Providence
Open for review.
Triepeolus monardae, F, Side, GA, Baker County 2015-02-03-12.05.11 ZS PMax (17209687452) (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Natuur12 (talk) on 2015-04-26 11:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Triepeolus monardae - Mounted specimen - Lateral view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 05.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-26 11:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, Virgin Mary with Children sculpture
Open for review.
Ashmeadiella xenomastax, ca, santa barbara, side 2015-04-20-12.02.39 ZS PMax (17213060282) (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Natuur12 (talk) on 2015-04-26 11:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Ashmeadiella xenomastax - Mounted specimen - Lateral view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 07.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-26 11:23 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, house mark from 1581 year
Open for review.
2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-26 11:31 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, house mark
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-26 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
6 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, entrance
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-26 11:50 (UTC)
Scope:
7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from WSW
Open for review.
Ceratina arizonensis, side2, ca, santa barbara 2015-04-20-12.16.53 ZS PMax (17029525739) (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Natuur12 (talk) on 2015-04-26 12:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Ceratina arizonensis - Mounted specimen - Lateral view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Osmia rufohirta, M, Side, Greece, Aegean Islands, Lesvos, Mytilene 2015-02-12-13.43.45 ZS PMax (17077265610) (2).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Natuur12 (talk) on 2015-04-26 13:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Osmia rufohirta - Mounted specimen - Lateral view
Open for review.
Megachile montenegrensis, M, Side, Greece, Aegean Islands, Lesvos, Mytilene 2015-02-12-14.37.26 ZS PMax (17070419409) (2).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Natuur12 (talk) on 2015-04-26 13:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Megachile montenegrensis - Mounted specimen - Lateral view
Open for review.
Webysther 20150321171849-2 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Webysther (talk) on 2015-04-26 21:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Candido Portinari
Used in:
Candido Portinari Wikipedia Portuguese and Candido Portinari Wikipedia English.
Reason:
Unique image in internet with this quality, one of best works of Portinari. This work show the history about Tiradentes, was a leading member of the Brazilian revolutionary movement known as the Inconfidência Mineira whose aim was full independence from the Portuguese colonial power and to create a Brazilian republic. He became a martir. -- Webysther (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope should contain the name of the author, and especially the title of the work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Charaxes jasius MHNT CUT 2013 3 12 male Roquebrun 34 Dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-27 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Charaxes jasius (Foxy Emperor) mounted specimen - male - Dorsal view

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Teruelite.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-27 05:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Teruelite, Teruel, Aragón, Spain - Deposite topotype

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Immeuble, 21 rue Pharaon (Toulouse).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-04-27 05:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 21 rue Pharaon in Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Joan Miro - Dona i ocell (1).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
QuimGil (talk) on 2015-04-27 06:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Dona i Ocell

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Lack english description. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 8 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-27 07:27 (UTC)
Scope:
8 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, house mark
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 20 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-27 07:45 (UTC)
Scope:
20 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, entrance
Open for review.
Agios Nikolaos in Agios Nikolaos 6073246.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
C messier (talk) on 2015-04-27 08:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Agios Nikolaos chapel at Agios Nikolaos.
Reason:
IMO, the most illustrative of the three of this small church, dating from the 7th-9th century, as is also clearly visible the water tank next to it and the partially side view can give a better idea of its architecture. The church gave its name to the modern city of Agios Nikolaos. -- C messier (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, pl. Staromłyński 5, 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-27 08:25 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Staromłyński Square in Lądek-Zdrój, stuccos on the avant-corps
Open for review.
Dactylorhiza fuchsii Mariazell 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2015-04-27 08:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Dactylorhiza fuchsii
Used in:
Dactylorhiza fuchsii
Open for review.
Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2015-04-27 08:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Frescos of dome and ceiling in Melk Abbey church

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, most na Białej Lądeckiej, 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-27 09:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Gothic Bridge in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from E
Open for review.
Trzebieszowice, plebiania, 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-27 09:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, entrance
Open for review.
Trzebieszowice, kościół św. Andrzeja, 20.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-04-27 09:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, main portal
Open for review.
Harmoniconus musicus 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-04-27 19:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Conus musicus (Music Cone), Shell
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

La Petite Parisienne (Knossos, main palace)[edit]

   
The Parisian, fresco, Knossos, Greece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-10-16 15:49 (UTC)
Scope:
La Petite Parisienne (Knossos, main palace)
Reason:
Famous fresco from ancient Greece. It even has its own article in 6 languages: en:La Parisienne (fresco). -- Yann (talk)

Image very useful, unique and highly representative of this famous fresco. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
La Parisienne Cnossos archmus Heraklion.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-04-05 10:35 (UTC)
Scope:
La Petite Parisienne (Knossos main palace)
Used in:
de:Knossos
Reason:
The best we have, IMO, of this extraordinary fragment of a minoan fresco, found in Knossos main palace by en:Arthur Evans. ca. 1500 BCE. now in Archaeological Museum of Heraklion, geocoded in the "institution" template. -- Jebulon (talk)

There is already a VI in scope (File:The Parisian, fresco, Knossos, Greece.jpg), but this is bigger. Symbol support vote.svg Support --C messier (talk) 11:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

  • And mine is for real, picture of the original taken by me, not a scanned copy from a book. Anyway, it is not the good procedural way to do, I have to go to MVR, but I don't remember how to do... Somebody could help, please ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus:, à l'aide, STP !--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportJebulon I overwrite my version of the picture, I think now the colors are more natural, if you do not like it restore your.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you very much Jacek for interest and support. I'm sorry, but I've reverted to my version. I find it better and more like what I've seen. This is a very old painting (more than 3000 years), and it is pale and not so much contrasted. Thanks again.--Jebulon (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes I agree the processing of the image is better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Sundial in First High School in Kłodzko[edit]

   
2014 Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-02-25 12:43 (UTC)
Scope:
First High School in Kłodzko, sundial

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
2015 Zegar słoneczny, Zespół Szkół Ogólnokształcących w Kłodzku.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-27 22:44 (UTC)
Scope:
First High School in Kłodzko, sundial
Reason:
This image is sharper, has better frame and is showing a sundial with a more natural perspective. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC) -- Jacek Halicki (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Doris Day[edit]

   
Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-26 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Doris Day

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC) --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Day-midnightlace.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-27 10:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Doris Day

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Studio shot, so no geocoding. Yann (talk) 10:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This picture is better. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't like her films, but the picture is okay. --Palauenc05 (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 20:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The better image Liam987 (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 06:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Collegiate Church in Tum[edit]

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927[edit]

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien Mitte[edit]

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Valle de los Caídos[edit]

   
Valle de los caidos by forcy-cruz y basilica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Under MVR.--Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would vote for this image if the perspective was corrected. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 10:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
SPA-2014-San Lorenzo de El Escorial-Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-12-10 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos (West)
Used in:
Valle de los Caídos

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : there's already a VI of this site with a similar orientation. Although this one is better imo, it seems that a MVR is needed.--JLPC (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East[edit]

   
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, here I don't see that this place isn't too adventurous. –10:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte ganz.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]