Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status, and image sets for valued image set (VIS) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

Contents

How to nominate an image or a set of images for VI status [edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image) [edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list, (under the heading "New valued image nominations") as the last parameter in the VICs template: Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Adding a new nomination (set) [edit]

Step 1: Choose a set name, and type that into this box after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname. Then click on the "Create new set nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VISC subpage.

Step 3: Open Commons:Valued image candidates/Set candidate list Click here, and add your set at at the bottom of the page using this format:

 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/A vulca......
 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname}}

and save the set candidate list.

Renomination [edit]

Declined VICs and VISCs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs and VISCs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs and VISCs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review [edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates [edit]

How to review an image or a set of images [edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates and the valued image set candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure [edit]

  • On the review page the image or image set is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria (and the set criteria if appropriate). The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image or set which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images/sets which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

For sets, see also the Set criteria.

Changes in scope during the review period [edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates [edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
8021 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
6169 (76.9%) 
Undecided
  
655 (8.2%) 
Declined
  
1197 (14.9%) 


New valued image nominations [edit]

   
Kamal Abbas (cropped).jpg
View
Nominated by:
The Egyptian Liberal (talk) on 2013-04-15 00:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Trade unionists from Egypt, Kamal Abbas.
Used in:
Kamal Abbas
Reason:
One of the highest definition picture in its scope. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support VI for me. -- Jeedm (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, the scope is not well formulated nor linked, the contrary would have been better. What is the subject ? "egyptian trade unionists", or "Kamal Abbas" ? What if I prefer the other person as "trade unionist from Egypt" ? Comparison is impossible. You may create a special category for this man, and link the scope to it. But it is not good for now. Please ask if you need help.--Jebulon (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Per Jebulon, please ask if you require help. Also, why is there a redirect in this nomination to the same nomination with an un-cropped version of the image? Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 05:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose =>
undecided. --Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Cicadella viridis en Oroso. Galiza-3.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Miguel Bugallo on 2013-04-24 19:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Cicadella viridis (Green Leafhoppers)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Iglesia de El Salvador - Santa Cruz de La Palma 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2013-05-19 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de El Salvador (Santa Cruz de La Palma), steeple

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Iglesia de El Salvador - Santa Cruz de La Palma 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2013-05-19 12:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de El Salvador (Santa Cruz de La Palma), portal

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2013-05-19 15:19 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Margareth church in Obervöls exterior

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Truelle pour maçonnerie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
D Y O L F 77Nuvola apps kmail.png[Talk] on 2013-05-19 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Rounded end trowels, Mason tools, a rounded end trowel on a white background.
Used in:
fr:Truelle
Reason:
One of the sharpest and best pictures with white background in its scope. -- — D Y O L F 77Nuvola apps kmail.png[Talk]

Please do not add nominations at the top, thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 21:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Very sorry about that! Regards --— D Y O L F 77Nuvola apps kmail.png[Talk] 22:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The idea is good but I see two problems. There are several types of trowel very different form. Especially it has a registered trademark, very visible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
    • Registred trademark removed and a new category created. --— D Y O L F 77Nuvola apps kmail.png[Talk] 08:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support agree.--Jebulon (talk) 22:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Cercis siliquastrum MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-20 06:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Cercis siliquastrum (Judas tree) flowers

Symbol support vote.svg Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:34, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ghetto (Venice) Panorama.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-20 06:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Campo de Ghetto Novo (Venice)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Most SNP, Bratislava (by Pudelek).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pudelek (talk) on 2013-05-20 10:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Most Slovenského národného povstania, Bratislava

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rathaus Grötzingen 2011-edit.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Felix König on 2013-05-20 15:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall Grötzingen (exterior)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ca'Pesaro di Baldassarre Longhena facciata sul Canal Grande.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2013-05-20 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' Pesaro Facade on the Grand Canal in Venice

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Corner della Regina sul Canal Grande.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2013-05-20 20:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' Corner della Regina palace in Venice, facade on Canal Grande

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pfarrkirche Völs am Schlern Südansicht.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2013-05-20 21:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Maria Himmelfahrt church in Völs am Schlern, exterior

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Strong distortion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Janthina janthina 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2013-05-21 04:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Janthina janthina (Common Purple Sea Snail), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Brandolin Rota (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-21 05:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Brandolin Rota (Venice) – Facade on Grand Canal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Civran Badoer Barozzi (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-21 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Civran Badoer Barozzi (Venice) – Facade on Grand Canal

Symbol support vote.svg Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ernest Pinard par Bayard et Bertall BNF Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2013-05-21 09:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Ernest Pinard, photograph
Used in:
fr:Ernest Pinard
Reason:
Alone in scope. This man is someway famous because he was the public prosecutor in some unforgettable press trials in France. He instituted proceedings for "obscenity" against Flaubert's Madame Bovary, Baudelaire's Les Fleurs du Mal, some Eugène Sue's novels, and others. So I think this photograph could be useful. Restored by me, no geocode is needed because it is a home work. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Very Good (la photo, pas le personnage qui est exécrable) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Trier BW 2013-04-14 15-59-54.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2013-05-21 11:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Trier cathedral (exterior)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Old Globe Theatre, San Diego.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-05-21 14:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Old Globe Theatre, San Diego (exterior)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Blanzac 16 Église extérieur 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2013-05-21 14:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Blanzac-Porcheresse (France), exterior

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope, Very good work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hypolimnas monteironis (Druce, 1874) (Centrafrique).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-21 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Hypolimnas monteironis (Black-Tipped Diadem) mounted specimen, female.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 07:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Trovaso (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-21 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
San Trovaso (Venice) – Facade on “rio San Trovaso”
Reason:
This interesting church has two facades. (The tower leaning towards the Rio.) -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 07:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Erftlandring Luftbild.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2013-05-21 21:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Erftlandring
Used in:
de:Erftlandring
Reason:
The Erftlandring is where several high-ranking german race-car drivers such as Michael Schumacher or Sebastian Vettel started their career. It will soon be completely vanished due to the spread of the Hambach surface mine. This is the only picture of it we have so far and I think it's a rather good one. -- El Grafo (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bonner Münster.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolf im Wald (de) on 2013-05-22 00:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of Bonner Münster

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ermita de San Sebastián - Santa Cruz de La Palma 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2013-05-22 04:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Ermita de San Sebastián (Santa Cruz de La Palma), Interior
Reason:
I found no picture of the interior of this church in the www. -- Llez (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Beethoven-Haus.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolf im Wald (de) on 2013-05-22 12:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Beethoven-Haus Exterior

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Balbi (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-22 14:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Balbi (Venice). Facade on Grand Canal.
Open for review.
Emberiza rutila MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.219 Mongolie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-22 15:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Emberiza rutila (Chestnut Bunting), eggs

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Romagne 86 Châtaignier mort 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2013-05-22 15:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Castanea sativa (Sweet chestnut), dead. Romagne (France)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC) Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Scope is bad, should be in form of Castanea sativa (dead). --Pitke (talk) 06:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done --JLPC (talk) 09:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Belloni Battagia facciata sul Canal Grande.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2013-05-22 17:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Belloni Battagia, facade on the Canal Grande in Venice

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Goyon, Charles Marie Augustin, général de, Pesme photo, BNF Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2013-05-22 17:22 (UTC)
Scope:
General de Goyon, photograph
Used in:
fr:Charles-Marie-Augustin de Goyon
Reason:
only photo we have of this general and senator, active during the Second French Empire. Restored by me. No geocode is needed, it is a homework. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Balboa Park Botanical Building 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-05-22 20:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Balboa Park Botanical Building (exterior)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Difficult choice because there are good candidates. VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Colubraria tortuosa 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2013-05-23 04:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Colubraria tortuosa (Twisted Dwarf Triton), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
False facade and stables - Villa Pisani (Stra).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-23 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
False facade and stables Villa Pisani (Stra)

Symbol support vote.svg Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Abbazia di Santa Giustina (St Luc).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-05-23 05:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Interior Reliquary of St. Luke the Evangelist

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Shreya ghoshal song saali khushi.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vensatry (Ping me) on 2013-05-23 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Shreya Ghoshal
Reason:
Best image of the subject in commons. -- Vensatry (Ping me)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good choice. I corrected the color curves. But I can not vote. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support: best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Sir Leopold Mc Clintock BNF Gallica reduc.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2013-05-23 10:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Sir Francis Leopold McClintock, photograph
Used in:
several wp biographies and others, please see file page.
Reason:
Very good quality, big size, and alone in scope for this 1875 photograph, restored by me, of this british/irish Navy Officer, explorer (and discoverer) of some islands in the northern Canada. New in "Commons". No geocode needed, because it is a homework. Original file available as usual. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. (et rafraîchissant) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bataille, Henri Jules, general, Disderi BNF Gallica.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2013-05-23 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
General Henri Jules Bataille, photograph
Used in:
fr:Henri Jules Bataille
Reason:
New category. The article was badly illustrated. The categorization shows how this soldier was active during the 2nd and 3rd thirds of the 19th-century. Restored by me, alone in scope. No geocode is needed, it is a home work. And what a nice surname for a general ! -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.


Closed valued image candidates [edit]

Most valued reviews [edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR has to be in the discussed state, while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Closed Most Valued Reviews [edit]

Closed MVRs

Pending valued image set candidates [edit]

New valued image set nominations [edit]

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2013-05-08 16:32 (UTC)
Description: The set shows the main aspects of Sonchus palmensis, an endemic species of La Palma, Canary Islands: Plant, leaves, inflorescence, infrutescence
VISC of:
Sonchus palmensis (La Palma Sow Thistle)
*Symbol support vote.svg Support. Criteria met -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 02:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-05-09 14:05 (UTC)
Description: Both sides of the Arch of Antoninus Pius (Sbeitla)
VISC of:
Arch of Antoninus Pius (Sbeitla)
Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and good for me.--Jebulon (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2013-05-12 10:42 (UTC)
Description: A description of the set (optional).
VISC of:
Sculptures of Giuseppe Torretti on San Stae church in Venice


Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 01:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-05-21 15:21 (UTC)
Description: Front and back facades of the Timken Museum of Art, San Diego
VISC of:
Timken Museum of Art, San Diego (exterior)


Open for review.

Closed valued image set candidates [edit]