Commons:Valued image candidates/Aracynthus sanguineus MHNT dos.jpg

Aracynthus sanguineus MHNT dos.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2020-01-07 06:03 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Aracynthus sanguineus mounted specimen, dorsal rest position
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment This image doesn't show the red hindwing colour (you have another better image). I don't know what this one is Charles (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Yes you yourself have very nicely modified the scope, for the flight position a little higher in the competition. The image you are referring to is oversaturated in red, if the front wings were red they would have trouble camouflaging it. On the other hand I modified the scope to remove the ambiguities. I think the scope is fair enough, but you and Ikan Kekek were not happy with this nomination: Commons:Valued image candidates/Pink-spotted hawk moth (Agrius cingulata) male.jpg Is there a big difference? Charles (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)  Comment - I'm not in any way an expert on this, so I'll just defer to you two to discuss things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Yes that's why I add in the scope "rest position". The rest position is physiological, but it does not characterize the species of certain families of butterflies such as Sphingidae; on the other hand, this problem does not arise for Nymphalidae. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)  Support OK, if you say so. (I assume you meant Fulgoridae). But I'm still not clear why it's valuable for a specimen - when the usual open wing position shows the same view of the upper side of the wings and some more Charles (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)