Commons:Valued image candidates/Brouilla portal kapitell(li).jpg

Brouilla portal kapitell(li).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-08-31 20:25 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Portal of Église Sainte-Marie de Brouilla: left capital
Used in	Global usage de:Sainte-Marie (Brouilla)
Review (criteria)	Oppose Should we have the right capital (of the entrance) as another candidate soon ? Yes, this one is the best of the two we have, but I don't think this object is worth a scope.--Jebulon (talk) 21:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC) Other opinions please. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)  Support The porch is part of the description of the classification of historic monuments. The two capitals are not identical. The one and the other merit a label. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment I disagree. The project loses his credibility.--Jebulon (talk) 11:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment Formerly we hat sets for such pictures, but this isn't possible any more (which I regret). So we must relinquish coherent images or use subscopes as here (which is also a kind of set: The main scope is the church, the subscope the left capital, the right capital an so on as part of the set). I see it as a replacement of the VIS. The same we have with plants: formerly we had sets with habitus, leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, now each picture must be nominated separately as VI, what a pity, as a single picture does not show all aspects of the plant. --Llez (talk) 19:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment I disagree with the comparison. Comparison is not reason.--Jebulon (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment Whether an object deserves a scope or not should also depend on the object’s value itself. These capitals represent an important kind of medieval craftsmanship. They are almost always unique specimens of high quality. I could have chosen the category Romanesque capitals in Pyrénées-Orientales for the scope but decided to use Église Sainte-Marie de Brouilla as the picture contributes to a nice series. As Llez correctly complains, it’s a pity that the former VI set nominations don’t work anymore. --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for comment. I still disagree. I'm from a country (region) where one can find tons of such romanesque capitals, and I have a lot of such pictures to be uploaded soon (WLM?). I don't think every of them deserves a "scope" (which notion has nothing to do with categories nor galleries). A picture of the whole portal could be acceptable though, and you should nominate it (if not, the current candidacy is definitely a nonsense IMO). And yes, a set with the two capitals and the portal would be nice...--Jebulon (talk) 05:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)